Price 1 3 2 2
KPL 1/3 1
Comfort 4 1
Style 4 2 1
Synthesization:
Sum each column
Price KPL Comfort Style
Price 1 3 2 2
KPL 1/3 1
Comfort 4 1
Style 4 2 1
Sum 2.333 12.000 5.250 3.750
Divide each element by the column total:
CONSISTENCY Ratio
< 0.10
Consistency Ratio (CR)
Step 1. Multiply each value in the first column of the pairwise
comparison matrix by the priority of the first item.
Continue this process for all columns. Sum the values
across the rows to obtain a vector of values (weighted
sum).
Step2. Divide the elements of the weighted sum vector by the
corresponding priority for each criteria.
Step3. Compute the average of these values (max)
Step4. Compute the Consistency Index CI= (max-n)/(n-1)
Step5. Compute the consistency ratio CR= CI/RI.
N= 3 4 5 6 7 8
RI= 0.58 0.90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41
1.687
Price = 4.238
0.398
0.347
KPL = 4.082
0.085
0.907
Comfort = 4.161
0.218
1.274
Style = 4.261
0.299
AHP
max=4.185
CI= (max-n)/(n-1)= (4.185-4)/(4-1)=.0616
CR=CI/RI
CR=0.068
(RI = 0.90 for n= 4)
The degree of consistency in the pairwise
comparisons is acceptable.
PAIRWISE COMPARISON SCALE FOR THE PREFERENCE OF
DECISION ALTERNATIVES USING AHP
Price KPL
Wagon R Matiz Maruti Wagon R Matiz Maruti
Comfort Style
Wagon R Matiz Maruti Wagon R Matiz Maruti
Wagon R 1 2 8 Wagon R 1 1/3 4
Matiz 1 6 Matiz 3 1 7
Maruti DX 1/8 1/6 1 Maruti DX 1/7 1
PRIORITIES FOR EACH CAR USING EACH CRITERION
Car Priority
Matiz SD 0.421
Maruti DX 0.314
Wagon R (VX) 0.265