Advanced Technology............................................................................................... 4
E1 Antioxidant Infused Bearing Technology
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct
Signature Personalized Patient Care
Articulation Features................................................................................................. 7
Coronal Geometry
Sagittal Geometry
Curved Articulation
CR Bearing Options................................................................................................... 8
Bearing Technologies................................................................................................ 9
ArCom Polyethylene
E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology
Polyethylene Thickness
Component Fixation................................................................................................ 11
Interlok Finish
PPS Porous Plasma Spray Coating
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct
Patellar Articulation................................................................................................. 15
Series A Patella
Regenerex Patella
2|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Instrumentation Platforms...................................................................................... 17
Microplasty Total Knee Instrumentation
Premier Total Knee Instrumentation
Microplasty Elite Total Knee Instrumentation
Vanguard Tensor Instrumentation
Premier Anterior Referencing Instrumentation
Advanced Technology............................................................................................. 19
E1 Antioxidant Infused Bearing Technology
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct
Signature Personalized Patient Care
Articulation Features............................................................................................... 23
Coronal Geometry
Sagittal Geometry
Curved Articulation
PS Bearing Options.................................................................................................. 24
PS Bearing Design
PS Plus Bearing Design
3|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Bearing Technologies.............................................................................................. 25
ArCom Polyethylene
E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology
Polyethylene Thickness
Component Fixation................................................................................................ 27
Interlok Finish
PPS Porous Plasma Spray Coating
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct
Patellar Articulation................................................................................................. 30
Series A Patella
Regenerex Patella
Instrumentation Platforms...................................................................................... 32
Microplasty Total Knee Instrumentation
Premier Total Knee Instrumentation
Microplasty Elite Total Knee Instrumentation
Vanguard Tensor Instrumentation
Premier Anterior Referencing Instrumentation
References............................................................................................................... 34
4|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Figure 3
Signature Personalized Patient Care
Figure 1
E1 Antioxidant Infused Tibial Bearing
5|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Figure 6
Q-Angle Variability (within 015 degrees) Permitted
by Vanguard Trochlear Groove
6|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Figure 9
Augment Attached to CR Knee
Figure 7
Ten Femoral Sizes
7|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Coronal Geometry
The Vanguard Complete Knee System provides a fully
congruent (coronally), moderately dished articulation
to reduce polyethylene stresses, while still allowing
physiological motion. The 1:1 condylar geometry
provides surgical flexibility by allowing complete tibial-
femoral interchangeability* (Figure 10).
Figure 11
Finite Element Analysis Demonstrates a Gradual Dispersion
of Forces Along the Patella
Sagittal Geometry
The Vanguard Knee has been designed to allow up
to 145 degrees of flexion without additional posterior
condyle resections (Figure 12), with early results
showing postoperative mean rage of motion of 125
degrees at three year follow-up.4
Figure 10
Tibiofemoral Contact
Figure 12
145 Degrees Range of Motion with Primary Bone Cuts
Standard CR
CR Lipped
Anterior Stabilized (AS)
These options provide intraoperative flexibility to meet
patient needs and surgeon preference.
Figure 13
High Flexion Patellar Tendon Relief
Curved Articulation
To increase contact area with axial rotation, the
Vanguard Knee features a rotated articulation
bearing surface (Figure 14). As compared to a linear
articulation, a rotated articulation increases the Standard CR:
3 degrees posterior slope
contact area by 13 percent.4
15 degrees internal/external rotation
No varus/valgus constraint
CR Lipped:
Enhanced posterior lip
Figure 14 15 degrees internal/external rotation
Rotated Articulation Bearing Surface
No varus/valgus constraint
AS Bearing:
Ultracongruent deep dish design
6 degrees internal/external rotation
No varus/valgus constraint
Figure 15
CR Bearing Options
9|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
EtO Sterilized
Weight Loss (grams)
ArCom Gamma
Sterilized
Cycles (millions)
Figure 16
Wear Testing
10|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
E1 Antioxidant Infused Bearings are neither annealed An internal Zimmer Biomet study demonstrated that
nor remelted. Instead, oxidative stability is achieved CR E1 tibial bearings had an 86 percent reduction in
by the infusion of Vitamin-E. Environmental Stress wear over CR DCM tibial bearings4 (Figure 19).
Crack Testing (ESC) mimics cyclic loading in vivo Volumetric Wear Rates
which is a major reason or mode for bearing of Largest Cruciate Retaining (CR)
Tibial Bearing Profile4
breakdown. ESC testing has shown E1 material 50
Tested at Zimmer Biomet Biomaterials Laboratory
(mm3/MC)
bearing material, which ultimately allows the bearing 86% CR wear
reduction
to retain its mechanical strength4,5 (Figure 18). 20 over Direct
Compression
Molded
Oxidation Profile4,18
After ESC testing 10
0.8 6.1
0.7
0.6 0
Oxidation Index (Absorbance Units)
DCM E1
0.5 UHMWPE Material
0.4
Figure 19
0.3
CR E1 Wear Rate
0.2
0.1
0.0
E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology FDA Cleared Claims:4
-0.1
Top
Surface
Center Bottom
Surface Prevents oxidative degradation of polyethylene
Sequentially Crosslinked and Annealed Loaded
Sequentially Crosslinked and Annealed Control
Protects polyethylene from oxidation
E1 Material Loaded
and cracking during environmental stress
E1 Material Control
crack testing
Figure 17
Oxidation Profile Maintains the mechanical strength
of conventional UHMWPE under small
Ultimate Tensile and Yield Strengths
for Multiple Polyethylenes4,19
punch testing
30
20.1 21.3 22.6 22.8
20 19.0
10
0
DCM Unaged1 DCM Aged1 E1 Material Unaged1 E1 Material Aged1 100kGy Remelted5
Figure 18
Ultimate Tensile and Yield Strengths
11|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Figure 20
Polyethylene Size/Thickness
Component Fixation
The Vanguard Complete Knee System incorporates
three types of fixation:
Figure 22
Interlok Finish PPS Coating
PPS Porous Plasma Spray Coating
In addition, PPS Coating has been proven to:
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct
Provide for more biologic fixation than CoCr
Interlok Finish material and has proven superior with regard to
biocompatibility and component fit over titanium
The Interlok Finish allows for proper cement
fiber mesh21
interdigitation into the surface for a more secure bond
in cemented applications (Figure 21). Maintain the implants inherent fatigue
strength4, 2224
Provide early stage fixation, helping to prevent
micromotion20
Provide late stage fixation, helping to offload
stresses between implant and bone20
Figure 21
Interlok Finish
12|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Locking Mechanism
Sizing
Tibial Baseplate Options
Stem Options
13|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Figure 26
Vanguard Symmetrical Tibial Tray Design
Figure 30
Modular Tibial Tray Stems
I-beam Tray Cruciate Finned Tray
Figure 31
Stem Extensions
15|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Series A Patella
Ritter, Lombardi, Insall, Ranawat, et al. have shown
excellent long-term results with domed patellar
designs.9,11,33,34 The domed patella is more forgiving in Figure 34
placement than other designs and can reliably provide Regenerex Three Peg Patella
congruent contact10 (Figure 32). Series A and Regenerex Patella size and thickness
offering listed below (Figure 35):
Diameter (mm)
Patella Sizing
Chart 25 28 31 34 37 40
Series A Low Profile 6.2 6.2 6.2 7.8 8.5 N/A
1-Peg Standard 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 10.0 10.0
Series A Low Profile 6.2 6.2 6.2 7.8 8.5 N/A
3-Peg Standard 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 10.0 10.0
Regenerex
Standard N/A 8.0 8.0 8.5 10.0 N/A
3-Peg
Figure 32
Domed Patella Figure 35
Patella Sizing Chart
Figure 33
Series A Standard One and Three Peg Patellas
16|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Signature Personalized
A
Patient Care
Signature Personalized Patient Care utilizes patient
B
specific femoral and tibial positioning guides A
B C
developed from MRI and CT imaging modality to D E
The Signature System features proprietary planning Signature Total Knee Planning Software
algorithms to generate an initial preoperative
plan incorporating traditional resection guides and Software built into the Signature System allows
allowing intraoperative position verification by the surgeons to visualize and specify an implant position
surgeon. for each patient plan.
D Lateral Distal Femoral Condyle The result of the preoperative surgical planning is
a more focused intervention with the instruments
E Medial Distal Femoral Condyle required for surgery as well as the operative plan.
F Posterior Condylar Axis
G Lateral Plateau
I Medial Plateau
Microplasty Instrumentation
Premier Instrumentation
Microplasty Elite Instrumentation
Vanguard Tensor Instrumentation
Premier Anterior Referencing Instrumentation
Figure 39
Premier Total Knee Instrumentation
Figure 41
Microplasty Elite Total Knee Instrumentation Vanguard Tensor Instrumentation
Figure 40
Microplasty Elite Total Knee Instrumentation
Figure 42
Premier Anterior Referencing Instrumentation
19|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
E1 Antioxidant Infused Tibial Bearing Technology See pages 3132 for more information regarding the
defines a new class of bearings and overcomes the Signature System.
limitations of remelted and annealed polyethylenes
by uniting true oxidative stability, high mechanical
strength, and ultra-low wear 4,5 (Figure 43).
Figure 45
Figure 43
Signature Personalized Patient Care
E1 Antioxidant Infused Tibial Bearing
20|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
The Vanguard femoral component has five main Extended Trochlear Groove
design features:
The trochlear groove has been lengthened to further
Rounded sagittal profile support the patella in deep flexion and provide more
support of the quadriceps tendon (Figure 47). The
Deeper/swept-back trochlear groove junction of the trochlear groove and PS box articulates
Extended trochlear groove with the quadriceps tendon at 105120 degrees of
Wider proximal trochlear groove flexion.
Sizing
015
Figure 49
Ten Femoral Sizes
Figure 48
PS Femoral Box Design
Q-Angle
The Vanguard Complete Knee System offers a closed
Sizing box and open box femoral component.
The Vanguard Complete Knee System offers ten femoral
Vanguard Instrumentation offers three resections
sizes specifically designed for optimal bone coverage
that accomodate both closed and open box femoral
of all patient populations.
component designs (Figure 50). The closed box (CL)
Femoral sizes increase A/P by an average of resection level is utilized when implanting a closed box
2.4 mm and M/L by 2.6 mm across all ten sizes femoral component. The open box femoral component
(Figure 49) can be implanted utilizing either the open box (OP) or
the bone conserving (BC) resection level.
Narrow anterior flange maintains a small profile
to reduce the likelihood of femoral overhang
Conserving
Closed
The open box design allows for additional preservation Extended Cam
of distal bone. Utilizing the bone conserving resection
The Vanguard PS features an extended cam (Figure 52)
with the open box design will conserve bone anteriorly
for increased resistance to dislocation in deep flexion.
while additional box resection is made for closed box
design (Figure 51). If needed, IM nails can be utilized
in the intercondylar notch with the open box femoral
component.
Box Volume
BC
OP
CL
Box Volume (cm^3)
Figure 52
Extended Cam
Extended Cam
Cam and Post Engagement
Dislocation Height
Figure 53
45 Degrees Cam and Post Engagement
Figure 54
Cam and Post Contact Points
Articulation Features
The Vanguard Complete Knee System features optimized
tibiofemoral articulation based on the enhanced
design of the following elements:
Figure 56
Coronal Geometry Finite Element Analysis Demonstrates a Gradual Dispersion of
Forces Along the Patella
Sagittal Geometry
Curved Articulation Sagittal Geometry
Coronal Geometry The Vanguard Knee has been designed to allow up to
145 degrees of flexion without additional posterior
The Vanguard Complete Knee System provides condyle resections (Figure 57), with early results
a fully congruent (coronally), moderately showing postoperative mean rage of motion of
dished articulation to reduce polyethylene 125 degrees at three year follow-up.4
stresses, while still allowing physiological
motion. The 1:1 condylar geometry provides
surgical flexibility by allowing complete
tibiofemoral interchangeability* (Figure 55).
Figure 57
*with the exception of the Vanguard Anterior Stabilized (AS) Bearing
145 Degrees Range of Motion with Primary Bone Cuts
24|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
PS
PS Plus
PS Bearing Design
The Vanguard PS post geometry is rounded to
Figure 58 minimize forces on the post due to femoral rotation
High Flexion Patellar Tendon Relief (Figure 60). According to a mechanical wear simulation
test, the Vanguard PS Bearing had a 71 percent
Curved Articulation reduction in gravimetric wear at 5.5 million cycles,
To increase contact area with axial rotation, the as compared to standard square post design
Vanguard Knee features a rotated articulation geometry.4
bearing surface (Figure 59). As compared to a linear
articulation, a rotated articulation increases the
contact area by 13 percent.4
Figure 60
Vanguard Rounded PS Post
Figure 59
Rotated Articulation Bearing Surface
25|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
ArCom Polyethylene
Oxidation negatively impacts the mechanical
properties of polyethylene by causing pitting and
delamination in knee bearing surfaces. Following
Zimmer Biomets traditional engineering approach, it
was the first company to use inert gas (argon) to replace
oxygen during the sterilization and packaging process.
The use of argon reduces the degradative effects
Figure 61
Prominent Anterior Lip
of oxygen in polyethylene bearings.5 Furthermore,
gamma sterilization in an argon atmosphere has
been shown to decrease wear over EtO sterilized
The PS Plus bearing is more constrained than the
polyethylene by 44 percent12 (Figure 63).
standard PS bearing (Figure 62). The PS Plus bearing is
indicated for use in a primary situation when more
stability and initial constraint is desired to resist rotation Hip Simulator Wear Testing
EtO vs. Gamma 12
ArCom Gamma
Sterilized
Cycles (millions)
Figure 63
Wear Testing
commitment to long term clinical success with its Ultimate Tensile and Yield Strengths
for Multiple Polyethylenes4,19
bearing technologies. ArCom Polyethylene has been
clinically proven to be resistant to wear, delamination 50
48.1 40.8 45.8 46.1
(Strength MPa)
30
20.1 21.3 22.6 22.8
polyethylene wear.1 20 19.0
10
0
DCM Unaged1 DCM Aged1 E1 Material Unaged1 E1 Material Aged1 100kGy Remelted5
E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology
Tensile Strength (MPa) Yield Strength (MPa)
E1 Antioxidant Infused Tibial Bearing Technology
Figure 65
defines a new class of bearings and overcomes the
Ultimate Tensile and Yield Strengths
limitations of remelted and annealed polyethylenes
by uniting true oxidative stability, high mechanical A second, independent study conducted through the
strength, and ultra-low wear.4,5 The foundation of University of Nebraska, reported that PS E1 tibial
this advancement in bearing technologies is ArCom bearings had an 87 percent reduction in wear over PS
Polyethylene. DCM tibial bearings (Figure 66).4
15
shown E1 material to be more oxidatively stable than 87% PS wear
(mm3/MC)
Figure 66
Oxidation Profile4,18
PS E1 Wear Rate
After ESC testing
0.8
0.7
E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology FDA Cleared Claims:4
0.6
Oxidation Index (Absorbance Units)
0.2
cracking during environmental stress crack
0.1
testing
0.0 Maintains the mechanical strength of conventional
-0.1
Top Center Bottom
UHMWPE under small punch testing
Surface Surface
Figure 64
Oxidation Profile
27|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Size Thickness
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
(mm)
Polyethylene
Articulating 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Thickness (mm)
Figure 67
Polyethylene Size/Thickness
Figure 69
PPS Coating
Component Fixation In addition, PPS Coating has been proven to:
The Vanguard Knee system incorporates three types
of fixation: Provide for more biologic fixation than CoCr
material and has proven superior with regard to
Interlok Finish biocompatibility and component fit over titanium
PPS Porous Plasma Spray Coating fiber mesh21
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct Maintain the implants inherent fatigue
strength4, 2224
Interlok Finish Provide early stage fixation, helping to prevent
The Interlok Finish allows for proper cement micromotion20
interdigitation into the surface for a more secure bond Provide late stage fixation, helping to offload
in cemented applications (Figure 68). stresses between implant and bone20
Figure 68
Interlok Finish
Regenerex material provides for: Features of the locking mechanism design include
(Figure 71):
Average porosity of 67 percent4
Average pore size of 300 microns4 Peripheral polyethylene thickness is maintained
by locating the locking mechanism anteriorly and
High strength and flexibility4 within the intercondylar area
Fixation in as early as two weeks was reported in Vanguards Locking Mechanism compresses
canine studies 4,7 the polyethylene bearing against the tray by
The large potential surface area for biologic fixation utilizing an oversized titanium locking bar that
makes this tray an optimal option for patients with forces the bearing against a 10 degree posterior
good bone quality. boss
The Coventry Award-winning study by Parks
Tibial Tray Design Features and Engh, and a study published by Sosa, have
Concerns have been raised about modularity and shown the Vanguard Locking Mechanism to be
bearing micromotion as a contributor to osteolysis the most stable overall. 25,26,28
and early failure.2529 Feng, et al. have found that
the most severe polyethylene wear occurs at the
periphery, where the tibial component had a raised
metal edge.30 These concerns have been addressed
with the Zimmer Biomet modular tibial tray design.
Incavo, et al. examined eight tibial tray designs, The Regenerex Tibial Tray is compatible with four
consisting of six symmetrical and two asymmetrical primary articulations within the Vanguard Complete
baseplates. The study demonstrated that the sizing Knee System.
rationale for the AGC Total Knee System, which is
closely paralleled by the Vanguard Knee System, CR
offers optimal coverage as compared to competitive CR Lipped
asymmetrical designs32 (Figure 73). AS
PS
The Vanguard Complete Knee System is compatible with
the following cobalt chrome baseplate options: I-beam,
cruciate finned, or Microplasty tray with an Interlok Finish
(Figure 76).
Figure 73
Symmetrical Tibial Tray Design of the Vanguard
Of all the tibial trays tested in one study the modular tray I-beam Tray Cruciate Finned Tray
Figure 74 Figure 75
PPS Baseplate Regenerex Baseplate
30|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Figure 77
Modular Tibial Tray Stems
Figure 80
Series A Standard One and Three Peg Patellas
Figure 78
Stem Extensions
31|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
A B
B C
D E
Figure 81
Regenerex Three Peg Patella
F F
Series A and Regenerex Patella size and thickness
offering listed below (Figure 82). G H
I
Diameter (mm)
Patella Sizing
Chart 25 28 31 34 37 40
Series A Low Profile 6.2 6.2 6.2 7.8 8.5 N/A
1-Peg Standard 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 10.0 10.0
Series A Low Profile 6.2 6.2 6.2 7.8 8.5 N/A
J
3-Peg Standard 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 10.0 10.0
Regenerex
Standard N/A 8.0 8.0 8.5 10.0 N/A
3-Peg
Figure 83
Figure 82
Signature Planning Landmarks
Patella Sizing Chart
A Anterior/Posterior Axis
Signature Personalized
Patient Care B Epicondylar Axis
Signature Personalized Patient Care utilizes patient C Distal Femoral Mechanical Axis
specific femoral and tibial positioning guides developed
from MRI and CT imaging modality to offer an D Lateral Distal Femoral Condyle
individualized approach to total knee replacement. The
E Medial Distal Femoral Condyle
Signature System fits the femoral and tibial components
independently. When used with the Vanguard F Posterior Condylar Axis
Complete Knee System, it offers a comprehensive
solution for personalized patient care. Features of the G Lateral Plateau
Signature System include:
H Proximal Tibial Mechanical Axis Landmark
Signature Planning Landmarks
I Medial Plateau
Signature Total Knee Planning Software
J Medial One-third of the Tibial Tubercle
Signature Positioning Guides
32|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Signature Total Knee Planning Software Tibial positioning guides register on the anteromedial
tibial plateau to establish:
Software built into the Signature system allows
surgeons to visualize and specify an implant position Tibial resection
for each patient plan.
Varus/valgus angle
Automated planning algorithms generate Tibial slope angle
preoperative plan based off mechanical axis
Tibial rotation
User-friendly software for surgeon fine-tuning
Positioning guides incorporate preoperative
Instrumentation Platforms
surgeon alteration The Vanguard Complete Knee System is supported
by five instrumentation platforms, allowing the
The result of the preoperative surgical planning is
physician to evaluate soft tissue and bone deficiencies
a more focused intervention with the instruments
intraoperatively without making a preoperative
required for surgery as well as the operative plan.
commitment to the level of constraint. These
instrumentation platforms include:
Signature Positioning Guides
Microplasty Instrumentation
Preoperative surgeon planning is integrated into
Signature positioning guides (Figure 84). Premier Instrumentation
Microplasty Elite Instrumentation
Vanguard Tensor Instrumentation
Premier Anterior Referencing Instrumentation
Figure 84
Signature Positioning Guides
Figure 86
Premier Total Knee Instrumentation
Figure 87
Microplasty Elite Total Knee Instrumentation
Figure 89
Premier Anterior Referencing Instrumentation
34|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
References
1. Ritter, M. The Anatomical Graduated Component Total Knee 20. Ritter, M. Twenty-year Survivorship of Cementless Anatomic
Replacement: A Long-Term Evaluation with 20-year Survival Graduated Component Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of
Analysis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 91-B(6):74549, Arthroplasty. 25(4):507-13, 2010.
2009.
21. Hofmann, A., et al. A Response of Human Cancellous Bone to
2. Lombardi, A. et al. An Algorithm for the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Identically Structured Commercially Pure Titanium and Cobalt
In Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Chromium Alloy Porous-Coated Cylinders. Clinical Materials.
Research. 392:75-87, 2001. 14:10115, 1993.
3. Bassett, R. Results of 1,000 Performance Knees Cementless Versus 22. Yue, S. et al. The Fatigue Strength of Porous-coated Ti-6% Al-4% V
Cemented Fixation. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 13(4):409-13, 1998. Implant Alloy. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 18:104358,
1984.
4. Clinical and bench test data on file at Biomet. Bench test results not
necessarily indicative of clinical performance. 23. Pilliar, R. Powder Metal-Made Orthopedic Implants with Porous
Surface for Fixation by Tissue Ingrowth. Clinical Orthopaedics.
5. Kurtz, S. et al. The UHMWPE Handbook: Ultra High Molecular 176:42-51, 1983.
Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint Replacement. Elsevier Academic
Press. San Diego, CA. 2004. 24. Georgette, F. et al. The Effect of HIPing on the Fatigue and Tensile
Strength of a Cast, Porous-coated Co-Cr-Mo Alloy. Journal of
6. Hahn, H. et al. Preliminary Evaluation of Porous Metal Surfaced Biomedical Materials Research. 20: 1986.
Titanium for Orthopedic Implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials
Research. 4(4): 57177, 1970. 25. Parks, N. et al. Modular Tibial Insert Micromotion. Clinical
Orthopaedics and Related Research. 356:1015, 1998.
7. Testing done on animal models.
26. Engh, G. et al. In Vivo Deterioration of Tibial Baseplate Locking
8. Peterslidge, W. et al. The Effect of Trochlear Design on Patellofemoral Mechanisms in Contemporary Modular Total Knee Components.
Shear and Compressive Forces in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 83-A:16605, 2001.
Orthopaedics and Related Research. 309:13645, 1994.
27. Wasielewski, R. et al. Tibial Insert Undersurface as a Contributing
9. Ip, D. et al. Comparison of Two Total Knee Prostheses on the Source of Poly Wear Debris. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
Incidence of Patella Clunk Syndrome. International Orthopaedics. Research. 345:539, 1997.
26(1): 4851, 2002.
28. Sosa, M. et al. Micromotion Between the Tibial Tray and the
10. Kavolus, C. et al. Comparison of the Insall-Burstein II and NexGen Polyethylene Insert. Fifth World Biomaterial Congress, Toronto,
Legacy Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems with Respect to Patella Canada, May, 1996.
Complications. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 23(6):822-25, 2008.
29. Pagnano, M. et al. Tibial Osteolysis Associated with the Modular
11. Bartel, D. et al. The Effect of Conformity, Thickness, and Material on Tibial Tray of a Cemented PS Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of
Stresses in Ultra-High Molecular Weight Components for Total Joint Bone and Joint Surgery. 83-A(10):154548, 2001.
Replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 68-A(7):1041,
1986. 30. Feng, E. et al. Progressive Subluxation and Polethylene Wear in
Total Knee Replacements with Flat Bearings. Scientific Exhibit, 59th
12. Schroeder, D. et al. Hip Simulator testing of Isostatically Molded Annual AAOS Meeting, San Francisco, California, February 1993.
UHMWPE: Effect of ETO and Gamma Irradiation. 42nd Annual
Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Atlanta, Georgia, 31. Mensch, J. et al. Knee Morphology as a Guide to Knee Replacement.
February, 1996. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 12:23141, 1975.
13. Ritter, M. et al. Long-Term Follow-up of Anatomic Graduated 32. Incavo, S. et al. Tibial Plateau Coverage in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 299:8185, 1994.
and Related Research. 388:5157, 2001.
33. Ranawat, C. et al. Impact of Modern Technique on Long-term
14. Meding, J. et al. Total Knee Arthroplasty with 4.4mm of Tibial Results of Total Condylar Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics
Polyethylene an Update. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 25(5):772-4, and Related Research. 309:131-35, 1994.
2010.
34. Lombardi, A. et al. The PCL: To Save or Not to Save. A Mid-to-
15. Robertson, O. et al. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, A Long-Term Survivorship Comparison within a Single Total Knee
Nation-Wide Study of 30,003 Knees 1976-1992, Department Arthroplasty System. Scientific Exhibit, 69th Annual AAOS Meeting,
of Orthopaedics, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Acta Dallas, Texas, February, 2002.
Orthopaedica Scandanavica. 65:375386, 1994.
35. Banks, S. et al. Function of Total Knee Replacements During Activities
16. Paavaolainen, P. Long-Term Results of Total Joint Arthroplasty. of Daily Living. Scientific Exhibit at AAOS, Orlando, Florida, 2000.
Results of a 15-year Follow-up on a Nationwide Registration
Programme in Finland with 67,714 TJAs. National Agency for
Medicines Medical Device Center. 111, 1994.
17. Emerson, R. et al. The AGC Total Knee Prosthesis at Average 11
Years. Journal of Arthroplasty. 15(4): 418423, 2000.
18. Nabar, S. et al. Comparison of Second Generation Highly Crosslinked
Polyethylenes Under Adverse Aging Conditions. ORS 2008. Poster
No. 1684.
19. Bhambri, S. et al. The Effect of Aging on Mechanical Properties
of Melt-annealed Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE. Crosslinked and
Thermally Treated Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene for
Joint Replacements. 171-82, 2004.
35|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Notes
36|Vanguard Complete Knee SystemDesign Rationale
Notes
*A collaborative partnership with Materialise.
All trademarks herein are the property of Zimmer Biomet or its
subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated.
This material is intended for the sole use and benefit of the Zimmer
Biomet sales force and physicians. It is not to be redistributed, duplicated
or disclosed without the express written consent of Biomet.
For product information, including indications, contraindications,
warnings, precautions and potential adverse effects, see the package
insert and Zimmer Biomets website.
2016 Zimmer Biomet
Legal Manufacturer
Biomet Orthopedics
P.O. Box 587
56 E. Bell Drive
Warsaw, Indiana 46581-0587
USA
BOI0465.1-en-REV0816 zimmerbiomet.com