CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSA.CED.A2
Create equations in two or more variables to represent
relationships between quantities; graph equations on coordinate
axes with labels and scales.
Students complete the Activity sheets while doing the activity. I will know for
each student when questioned if they can complete the material, and
understand the individual components. This assessment method works well
for the students who are engaged and work hard to do well. This allows me
to assess if they can solve a system by graphing.
Teacher can use these assessments to evaluate how the lesson was
received, and how well the material was presented and if the students
understand the concepts. I can use this to assess myself in my materials
used and in my delivery to see if I am reaching all learners in an effective
way. I can also then have the students evaluate themselves based on our
conversations and graded material.
3. INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE
5. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY:
I felt the introduction of the lesson went really well. The students were
interested and engaged. However I feel I need to improve my questioning to elicit
more responses. I had thought about this, and had ideas and questions, but in
the future I will write them down, and have more ideas to direct students when
they are not going in the direction I need them to. I was not getting the types of
responses I intended. When I asked if the clotheslines were a graph, what would
they represent, a student replied The axis and I acknowledged it, and
attempted to prompt further answers, so I improved from earlier lesson in that I
did not ignore the wrong response, but I had not thought about potential wrong
answers in my planning so eventually I was giving the information out in bits to
try to nudge them along. In short I need to prepare for wrong answers, possibly
listing potential ones and how to use it to re-guide with further questioning. I
think this will help in future situations be better prepared to guide students in
the right directions through questioning.
During the grouping part, I felt this did not go well due to the fact that I
was unprepared for the fact that they had never been in 4-person groups and
were uncomfortable with it. I had not discussed this aspect of the lesson with my
mentor teacher and was informed in the discussion with her afterward that with
this group that has never been done, they do not know each other and it makes
them extremely uncomfortable. In my future classes I will definitely address this
early in my teaching, by doing get to know you activities and grouping with less
pressure so that grouping can be included in activities as I feel it is a very
valuable tool. For this lesson I backed off on the group job requirement to
accommodate them individually, but tried to encourage some collaboration even
though they were doing it more in pairs than in the group.
I know that the groups prior concept knowledge is very fragile. I did
not however take into consideration that this does not only apply to their
previous education, but to their current one as well. I did assume that since they
had just finished a unit on graphing lines that they would be able to do that now.
I was incorrect. Many of the students during the walk around assessment could
not recall how to find the slope, the intercept and use it to graph a line. For me
personally as a teacher, I would never have moved on to a new concept, when so
many students had not already mastered the previous one. We cannot build on a
shaky foundation. A review lesson would be in order and a reassessment should
take place prior to moving to a new concept. In my own class this is how this
situation would be handled. Had I known that most students failed the test
5
before spring break, I would have done review of graphing lines first, and then
had them graph two. Also, having the section on the sheet to check the answer
was completely lost on them. I would have also reviewed solving equations and
checking the answers with them.
The students asked many questions during the circulation and every
student I interacted with was able to eventually come to the point of
understanding how to graph and to solve the system. This was a very positive
aspect and having three teachers in the room was invaluable. This shows me
that co-teaching and student teacher ratio is really important to consider when
planning and executing a lesson. This lesson would have been a disaster during
the group part with only one teacher. It reminds me to be mindful when creating
lessons of the class size and the feasibility of different activities.
Due to these issues we did not get through the whole activity and this
prompted me to decide that the next class will be finishing the activity pages,
but only with their shoulder partner as they are comfortable with them and also
to review the answers with them after they complete it. Then we can move into
the practice assignment they need to do for a grade and do this during class
time. Only then will I be able to assess whether or not they meet the second
learning goal of being able to create their own system and graph it.
I also created another assignment to follow that one with more
practice before I will consider moving on to the next area of solving systems. I
could see that from the questions asked during class that they need more
practice.
For the students that I interacted with that were done however I will
create an assignment for them to do that is more difficult as there really needs to
be more differentiation in the assignments for a select few students. I had hoped
that these students would assist the others during the group but that was not
the case, so I will also individually discuss with them if that is something they
would consider doing moving forward. I discussed with one student that had the
assignment completed what he would like to see in the future to accommodate
him and what could I do to serve his needs better as a teacher. He asked if he
could have something else to do after he finished. For this student, he can move
on to the practice assignment and be given some more challenging work to do.
He could also be introduced to the next concept and possibly asked if he would
be interested in being a peer helper.
Finally, I lost track of time and so did not properly wrap up the
assignment. I was alerted by the teacher we only had 2 minutes until the end of
class and this was not sufficient in my opinion to properly discuss the lesson. I
did my best, but I will need to do this the next class when they finish the activity
to ensure they do not miss out. Everything I had planned for the closure was not
done. Even though the lesson was only partially finished, a more concise
discussion about the two systems we did graph would have been appropriate. I
need to keep track of the time and have a smooth transition to clean up and
discussion for each lesson. To do this, a timer could be set to signal the end of
the activity time. This would ensure not losing track of time and missing out on
this valuable tool.