stated in the instrument or document, declares (c) signs the instrument or document in the
that he has executed the instrument or presence of the notary; and
document as his free and voluntary act and (d) takes an oath or affirmation before the
deed, and, if he acts in a particular notary public as to such instrument or
representative capacity, that he has the document.
authority to sign in that capacity. SEC. 7. Notarial Act and Notarization. -
SEC. 2. Affirmation or Oath. - The term Notarial Act and Notarization refer to any
Affirmation or Oath refers to an act in which act that a notary public is empowered to
an individual on a single occasion:chan robles virtual perform under these Rules.
law library
SEC. 8. Notarial Certificate. - Notarial which an individual on a single occasion:chan
Certificate refers to the part of, or attachment robles virtual law library
SEC. 10. Principal. - Principal refers to a SEC. 16. Petitioner. - Petitioner refers to a
person appearing before the notary public person who applies for a notarial commission.
whose act is the subject of notarization.chan robles
virtual law library
SEC. 17. Office of the Court Administrator. -
Office of the Court Administrator refers to the
SEC. 11. Regular Place of Work or Business. - Office of the Court Administrator of the
The term regular place of work or business Supreme Court.
refers to a stationary office in the city or
province wherein the notary public renders SEC. 18. Executive Judge. - Executive Judge
legal and notarial services.chan robles virtual law library refers to the Executive Judge of the Regional
Trial Court of a city or province who issues a
SEC. 12. Competent Evidence of Identity. - notarial commission.
The phrase competent evidence of identity
refers to the identification of an individual SEC. 19. Vendor. - Vendor under these
based on: Rules refers to a seller of a notarial seal and
shall include a wholesaler or retailer.chan robles
(a) at least one current identification document virtual law library
issued by an official agency bearing the
photograph and signature of the individual; SEC. 20. Manufacturer. - Manufacturer
orchan robles virtual law library under these Rules refers to one who produces
(b) the oath or affirmation of one credible a notarial seal and shall include an engraver
witness not privy to the instrument, document and seal maker.chan robles virtual law library
or transaction who is personally known to the
notary public and who personally knows the RULE III
individual, or of two credible witnesses neither COMMISSIONING OF NOTARY PUBLIC
of whom is privy to the instrument, document
or transaction who each personally knows the SECTION 1. Qualifications. - A notarial
individual and shows to the notary public commission may be issued by an Executive
documentary identification. Judge to any qualified person who submits a
SEC. 13. Official Seal or Seal. - Official seal petition in accordance with these Rules.chan robles
virtual law library
or Seal refers to a device for affixing a mark,
image or impression on all papers officially To be eligible for commissioning as notary
signed by the notary public conforming the public, the petitioner:
requisites prescribed by these Rules.
(1) must be a citizen of the Philippines;chan robles
SEC. 14. Signature Witnessing. - The term virtual law library
signature witnessing refers to a notarial act in (2) must be over twenty-one (21) years of
age;chan robles virtual law library
(3) must be a resident in the Philippines for at of the Executive Judge that he has read and
least one (1) year and maintains a regular fully understood these Rules.
place of work or business in the city or The Executive Judge shall forthwith issue a
province where the commission is to be commission and a Certificate of Authorization
issued;chan robles virtual law library
to Purchase a Notarial Seal in favor of the
(4) must be a member of the Philippine Bar in petitioner.chan robles virtual law library
good standing with clearances from the Office
of the Bar Confidant of the Supreme Court and SEC. 5. Notice of Summary Hearing. -
the Integrated Bar of the Philippines; and
(5) must not have been convicted in the first (a) The notice of summary hearing shall be
instance of any crime involving moral turpitude. published in a newspaper of general circulation
SEC. 2. Form of the Petition and Supporting in the city or province where the hearing shall
Documents. - Every petition for a notarial be conducted and posted in a conspicuous
commission shall be in writing, verified, and place in the offices of the Executive Judge and
shall include the following: of the Clerk of Court. The cost of the
(a) a statement containing the petitioner's publication shall be borne by the petitioner.
personal qualifications, including the The notice may include more than one
petitioner's date of birth, residence, telephone petitioner.
number, professional tax receipt, roll of
attorney's number and IBP membership (b) The notice shall be substantially in the
number; following form:
NOTICE OF HEARING
(b) certification of good moral character of the
petitioner by at least two (2) executive officers Notice is hereby given that a summary
of the local chapter of the Integrated Bar of the hearing on the petition for notarial
Philippines where he is applying for commission of (name of petitioner) shall be
commission; held on (date) at (place) at (time). Any
person who has any cause or reason to
(c) proof of payment for the filing of the petition object to the grant of the petition may file a
as required by these Rules; and verified written opposition thereto, received
by the undersigned before the date of the
(d) three (3) passport-size color photographs summary hearing.chan robles virtual law library
with light background taken within thirty (30)
days of the application. The photograph should _____________________
not be retouched. The petitioner shall sign his Executive Judge
name at the bottom part of the photographs.
SEC. 3. Application Fee. - Every petitioner for SEC. 6. Opposition to Petition. - Any person
a notarial commission shall pay the application who has any cause or reason to object to the
fee as prescribed in the Rules of Court.chan robles grant of the petition may file a verified written
virtual law library
opposition thereto. The opposition must be
received by the Executive Judge before the
SEC. 4. Summary Hearing on the Petition. - date of the summary hearing.chan robles virtual law
The Executive Judge shall conduct a summary library
hearing on the petition and shall grant the
same if: SEC. 7. Form of Notarial Commission. - The
commissioning of a notary public shall be in a
(a) the petition is sufficient in form and formal order signed by the Executive Judge
substance; substantially in the following form:
(b) the petitioner proves the allegations
contained in the petition; and REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
(c) the petitioner establishes to the satisfaction REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF
______________
This is to certify that (name of notary SEC. 10. Official Seal of Notary Public. - Every
public) of (regular place of work or person commissioned as notary public shall
business) in (city or province) was on this have only one official seal of office in
(date) day of (month) two thousand and accordance with these Rules.
(year) commissioned by the undersigned as
a notary public, within and for the said SEC. 11. Jurisdiction and Term. - A person
jurisdiction, for a term ending the thirty-first commissioned as notary public may perform
day of December (year)chan robles virtual law library notarial acts in any place within the territorial
jurisdiction of the commissioning court for a
________________________ period of two (2) years commencing the first
Executive Judge day of January of the year in which the
commissioning is made, unless earlier revoked
SEC. 8. Period Of Validity of Certificate of or the notary public has resigned under these
Authorization to Purchase a Notarial Seal. - Rules and the Rules of Court.chan robles virtual law
library
The Certificate of Authorization to Purchase a
Notarial Seal shall be valid for a period of three
(3) months from date of issue, unless extended SEC. 12. Register of Notaries Public. - The
by the Executive Judge. Executive Judge shall keep and maintain a
Register of Notaries Public in his jurisdiction
A mark, image or impression of the seal that which shall contain, among others, the dates of
may be purchased by the notary public issuance or revocation or suspension of
pursuant to the Certificate shall be presented notarial commissions, and the resignation or
to the Executive Judge for approval prior to death of notaries public. The Executive Judge
use. shall furnish the Office of the Court
Administrator information and data recorded in
SEC. 9. Form of Certificate of Authorization to the register of notaries public. The Office of the
Purchase a Notarial Seal. - The Certificate of Court Administrator shall keep a permanent,
Authorization to Purchase a Notarial Seal shall complete and updated database of such
substantially be in the following form: records.chan robles virtual law library
Within ten (10) days after the change of name SECTION 1. Revocation and Administrative
of the notary public by court order or by Sanctions. - (a) The Executive Judge shall
marriage, or after ceasing to maintain the revoke a notarial commission for any ground
regular place of work or business, the notary on which an application for a commission may
public shall submit a signed and dated notice be denied.chan robles virtual law library
of such fact to the Executive Judge.
(b) In addition, the Executive Judge may
The notary public shall not notarize until: revoke the commission of, or impose
appropriate administrative sanctions upon, any
notary public who:
(1) fails to keep a notarial register; grounds mentioned in the preceding
(2) fails to make the proper entry or entries in paragraphs (a) and (b).
his notarial register concerning his notarial
acts; SEC. 2. Supervision and Monitoring of Notaries
(3) fails to send the copy of the entries to the Public. - The Executive Judge shall at all times
Executive Judge within the first ten (10) days of exercise supervision over notaries public and
the month following; shall closely monitor their activities.chan robles virtual
law library
(4) fails to affix to acknowledgments the date of
expiration of his commission;
(5) fails to submit his notarial register, when SEC. 3. Publication of Revocations and
filled, to the Executive Judge; Administrative Sanctions. - The Executive
(6) fails to make his report, within a reasonable Judge shall immediately order the Clerk of
time, to the Executive Judge concerning the Court to post in a conspicuous place in the
performance of his duties, as may be required offices of the Executive Judge and of the Clerk
by the judge; of Court the names of notaries public who have
(7) fails to require the presence of a principal at been administratively sanctioned or whose
the time of the notarial act; notarial commissions have been revoked.
(8) fails to identify a principal on the basis of
personal knowledge or competent evidence; SEC. 4. Death of Notary Public. - If a notary
(9) executes a false or incomplete certificate public dies before fulfilling the obligations in
under Section 5, Rule IV; Section 4(e), Rule VI and Section 2(e), Rule
(10) knowingly performs or fails to perform any VII, the Executive Judge, upon being notified of
other act prohibited or mandated by these such death, shall forthwith cause compliance
Rules; and with the provisions of these sections.chan robles
virtual law library
(11) commits any other dereliction or act which
in the judgment of the Executive Judge RULE XII
constitutes good cause for revocation of SPECIAL PROVISIONS
commission or imposition of administrative
sanction. SECTION 1. Punishable Acts. - The Executive
(c) Upon verified complaint by an interested, Judge shall cause the prosecution of any
affected or aggrieved person, the notary public person who:
shall be required to file a verified answer to the
complaint. If the answer of the notary public is (a) knowingly acts or otherwise impersonates a
not satisfactory, the Executive Judge shall notary public;chan robles virtual law library
conduct a summary hearing. If the allegations (b) knowingly obtains, conceals, defaces, or
of the complaint are not proven, the complaint destroys the seal, notarial register, or official
shall be dismissed. If the charges are duly records of a notary public; and
established, the Executive Judge shall impose (c) knowingly solicits, coerces, or in any way
the appropriate administrative sanctions. In influences a notary public to commit official
either case, the aggrieved party may appeal misconduct.
the decision to the Supreme Court for review. SEC 2. Reports to the Supreme Court. - The
Pending the appeal, an order imposing Executive Judge concerned shall submit
disciplinary sanctions shall be immediately semestral reports to the Supreme Court on
executory, unless otherwise ordered by the discipline and prosecution of notaries public.
Supreme Court.
RULE XIII
(d) The Executive Judge may motu proprio REPEALING AND EFFECTIVITY
initiate administrative proceedings against a PROVISIONS
notary public, subject to the procedures
prescribed in paragraph (c) above and impose SECTION 1. Repeal. - All rules and parts of
the appropriate administrative sanctions on the rules, including issuances of the Supreme
Court inconsistent herewith, are hereby
repealed or accordingly modified.chan robles virtual law
library
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
SEC. 2. Effective Date. - These Rules shall
Manila
take effect on the first day of August 2004, and
shall be published in a newspaper of general
FIRST DIVISION
circulation in the Philippines which provides
sufficiently wide circulation.
G.R. No. 177898 August 13, 2008
Promulgated this 6th day of July, 2004.chan robles
virtual law library SIGMA HOMEBUILDING CORPORATION, petitioner,
vs.
INTER-ALIA
Davide, Jr. C.J., Puno, MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, DEVELOPMENT BANK OF RIZAL,
Vitug, Panganiban,
RESOURCESSandoval-
Quisumbing, Ynarez-Santiago, CORPORATION, HASTING REALTY and DEVELOPMENT CORPORA
Gutierrez, Carpio, Austria-Martinez,the
OF DEEDS for PROVINCE of CAVITE, respondents.
Corona,
Carpio-Morales, Callejo, Sr., Azcuna and
Tinga, JJ. RESOLUTION
CORONA, J.:
Petitioner Sigma Homebuilding Corporation filed a complaint for annulment of sale, cancellation
damages1 against respondents, namely, Inter Alia Management Corporation (Inter-Alia), Intercon
Corporation (Intercon), Hasting Realty and Development Corporation (Hasting),2 Development B
the Register of Deeds of the Province of Cavite, in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Trece Mar
23.
Petitioner alleged that its real properties4 in Tanza, Cavite were sold by its assistant vice-presiden
Inter-Alia without its knowledge and consent and without the requisite board resolution authoriz
turn, sold them to DBR. DBR then sold the same to Intercon which conveyed them to Hasting.
Summonses were served on all respondents, except Inter-Alia as it no longer held office at its giv
For its part, Hasting filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint stated no cause of
stated that the annotations in petitioners cancelled TCTs (which were attached to the complaint)
Parcero was authorized to sell the lots to Inter-Alia. Also attached to the complaint were the duly
sale (signed and executed by Parcero, in representation of petitioner) and the acknowledged rece
in the amount of P1,522,920.00. Hasting went on to allege that, based on the complaint, petitione
party in interest to the subsequent successive transfers of the properties to the different responden
action for annulment of sale.
In its comment/opposition to Hastings motion to dismiss, petitioner merely insisted that it had a
controvert Hastings material assertions.
Respondent Intercon filed an answer.5 The other respondents, however, were not able to file thei
lawphil
pleadings.
Today is Sunday, October 16, 2011
Subsequently, in an order dated July 3, 2002, the RTC dismissed the complaint for failure to stat
ruled that the action for reconveyance was not proper since the properties had already passed on
purchasers in good faith and for value. Petitioner moved for reconsideration. It was denied.6
Petitioner appealed to the CA.7 The appellate court affirmed the decision of the court a quo.8 The
nsideration.9 party has availed himself of the remedy of new trial, appeal, petition for relief or other appropria
he has failed to avail himself of those remedies through his own fault or negligence.21
ew on certiorari in this Court was denied for failure to show that the appellate court had
10
a petition for review on certiorariWEin this Court. It was, however, denied on August 8, 2007 for
CONCUR:
6, 2007, its motion for reconsideration was denied with finality. Thus, the August 8, 2007
executory on January 18, 2008. Entry of judgment was made on April 25, 2008.
REYNATO S. PUNO
Chief Justice
uses to give up. In a letter-appeal dated June 30, 2008,17 it implored this Court to take another
Chairperson
case. Petitioner reiterated that it was effectively deprived of its right to due process when the
nt against the other respondents. It also pleaded for a liberal interpretation
ANTONIO of the rules of
T. CARPIO ADOLFO S. AZCUNA
Associate Justice Associate Justice
merit. TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO
Associate Justice
in the nature of a second motion for reconsideration which is a prohibited pleading under the
was filed despite the fact that an entry of judgment had already been made. It was obviously a
cts of the final and executory resolutions of this Court.
CERTIFICATION
o grant petitioners letter-appeal based on its alleged substantial compliance with the pertinent
antive aspect of its arguments left much to be desired.
Pursuant to Section 13, Article VIII of the Constitution, I certify that the conclusions in the abov
reached in consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Courts D
y argue that the dismissal of the complaint motu proprio against the other respondents
right to due process. It must be pointed out that petitioners complaint went to great lengths to
REYNATO S. PUNO
ts properties was (Inter-Alia) down to the current owner thereof, which is Hasting. As title to the
Chief Justice
vested in Hasting, there was really no need for petitioner to implead all the other respondents for
f its action for annulment of sale against Hasting. A perusal of the complaint reveals that all the
ven real parties in interest19 in this case, to begin with. The only real parties in interest in this
petitioner and Hasting for they were the only ones who stood to be benefitted or injured, as the
nt in the suit. Footnotes
1
Docketed
rrect in holding that, as petitioner had already as Civil
availed of theCase No. of
remedy TMCV-0021-02.
appeal, it could no
annulment of judgment. A petition for 2annulment of judgment is an extraordinary remedy and is
Also referred
nately by the Court. It is allowed only in exceptional to asand
cases Hastings
cannotinbesome
used of
bythe pleadings.
a losing party
20
promulgated decision long final and executory. The remedy may not be invoked where the
Insurance Corporation (PDIC), as receiver of respondent
which equally
DBR,applies
was named
to the filing
as oneofofsuch
the a motion in the Supreme Court as expli
ners complaint for annulment of sale. However, it was
Rule no would
56-B, longer reveal
impleaded
that: as a respondent in
w filed in this Court.
Sec. 2. Second motion for reconsideration. No second motion for reconsideratio
te total area of 126,910 sq. m. resolution by the same party shall be entertained.
19
d the material allegations in the complaint Section
and claimed
2, Rule
that3 itofbought
the Rules
the of
subject
Courtrealties
definesina good
real party in interest:
Sec. 2. Parties in interest. A real party in interest is the party who stands to be b
2002. judgment in the suit, or the party entitled to the avails of the suit. Unless otherwis
Rules, every action must be prosecuted or defended in the name of the real party i
R. CV No. 76928.
20
Veneracion v. Mancilla, G.R. No. 158238, 20 July 2006, 495 SCRA 712, 724 and Repu
e Justice Eliezer R. de los Santos (now No. 141241,
retired) 22 November
and concurred in by2005, 475 SCRA
Associate 608,
Justices 617.
Eugenio
ired) and Arturo D. Brion (now a member of this Court) of the Former Third Division of the
21
llo, pp. 120-134. Dated August 10, 2005. Id., Republic v. "G" Holdings, pp. 617-618.
22
ctober 20, 2005. Republic v. "G" Holdings, supra at 622.
No. 170174.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
ebruary 1, 2006.
6.
ate Justice Mariano C. Del Castillo and concurred in by Associate Justices Lucenito N. Tagle
F. Barza of the Former Special Seventeenth Division of the Court of Appeals. Rollo, pp. 24-25.
motion for extension of time to file petition for review on certiorari. It was denied in a resolution
for failure of petitioners counsel to submit his IBP O.R. No. showing proof of payment of IBP
year (as the IBP O.R. No. is dated November 20, 2006) and for submitting an affidavit of service
ls to comply with the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice on competent evidence of affiants
led a motion for reconsideration of said resolution. Its counsel contended that while his IBP
ber 20, 2006, he actually made two (2) payments on said date one for the year 2006 and past
the year 2007. Said counsel admitted his non-compliance with the 2004 Rules on Notarial
nt evidence of affiants identity. However, he explained that the same was due to mere
part and that he subsequently filed a petition for review with due compliance with the rules.
was denied on October 3, 2007.
56-B, which pertains to the procedure in the Supreme Court for appealed cases, provides:
dure. The appeal shall be governed by and disposed of in accordance with the applicable
the Constitution, laws, Rules 45, 48, sections 1, 2 and 5 to 11 of Rules 51, 52 and this Rule.
Section 2, Rule 52, which governs motions for reconsideration filed in the Court of Appeals and