INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The present study is the outcome of previous initial stages of studies i.e.
identification, pre-feasibility. The present Detailed Feasibility Study is based
user's demand and priorities, keeping in view the present Irrigation Policy,
Irrigation Regulation and Irrigation Directives.
This Farmers' Managed irrigation scheme was initiated in the past without
any formal organization. Later, farmers formed an autonomous project
organization for this project with the responsibility of all aspects of
construction, operation and maintenance as well as water allocation and the
solution of the problems and conflicts.
1
- To develop institutional capacity of Water Users' Association (WUA), so that
they can operate and maintain the system themselves
The project area was visited from head to tail with necessary interaction with
the farmers of head, middle and tail reaches. All problems and constraints of
the project area were noted.
The problems and constraints noted during the inventory were prioritized on
the basis of dialogue with the beneficiaries.
The project area is accessible from Mahendranagar Bazar. The Intake site is
at about 27 km from Jaleshwor, district headquarters of Mahottari district.
The proposed Intake site is about 1 km west from graveled road linked with
Janakpur-Dhalkevar road at Mahendranagar Bazar. The project area is easily
accessible from Janakpur too.
The command area was measured in the field by traverse survey and was
found to be 240 ha. Later it was marked in the topographical maps of scale
1:25000 and the value thus obtained closely matched with the measured
value in the field.
Since the project is rehabilitation type and the location of the existing Intake
site is located at the technically suitable position of external bend, and this
existing location has been devoid of conflict for ages. The proposed main
canal longitudinal slope has been established by trial and error and it was
3
found to be the best alternative. The command area thus fixed was measured
in the field and was found to be as mentioned earlier, i.e. 240 ha.
The main canal is a ridge canal passing totally through the plain area. The
topography of command area is also flat.
The soil types seen in the canal alignment are clay loam, loamy and silty
loam. The variation of soil type shows the absence of rock along the canal
alignment and command area.
There are various types of ethnic groups in the project area. The
dominant ethnic groups in the sub-project area are Shah followed by
Kurmi, Yadav, Brahmin and Kumhar. About 20% to 25% of the
population goes outside the project area for seasonal employment.
So, they can be said seasonal migrant of the area.
4
1.4.3.3 Land Tenure and Land Holding Size
Owner - Cultivator 96 60
Tenant 32 20
Landless 32 20
5
the local breeds of animals will be gradually improved in the
following generations.
- Overflow weir
6
- Contribution part will be done by Users' committee
- Contractors as per financial rules and regulations of
Government of Nepal will execute structural parts.
7
2. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN
The source of the sub-project is Aurahi River and is perennial. This is non-
snowfed river. Dudhmati pond is also used as additional source of water. The
length of the longest water course is 20 km. It originates from Siwalik range.
The area falls under hydrological region no. 7 of the regional hydrograph.
The catchment area of the river at Intake site is about 60 km measured on
1:25000 topographical map. By field inspection and verification from topo-
sheet, the catchment area consists of plain terrain having very low
longitudinal slope from north to south. The average slope was found to be
1:275. The command area does not have any forest except some patches of
mango and sisam trees. the discharge of Aurahi Khola at the intake site was
measured It was found to be 81 l/s on 26th Dec, 2006. Dudhmati pond also
feeds 50lps in the canal at ch 1+700.
The design discharge of the river at the proposed intake site is calculated
using various methods and the appropriate value by the technical
consideration has been adopted. The adopted methods for the estimation of
high flood discharge are as follows.
- Dickens's method
- Manning's Formula
The design flood adopted for the design is taken as 250m3/s.
8
2.2 Crop Water Requirement
Crop coefficient and Irrigation efficiency for early paddy, main paddy,
wheat, pulse, oilseed, potato and sugarcane are taken from PDSP manual
M.3 and are presented in the Appendix-D, Vol.-II. The various efficiencies of
the irrigation system have been adopted as per the same manual.
The sub-project has no U/S and D/S water rights problem. The water balance
has been calculated considering the U/S and D/S water diversion
requirements as per the duty of the proposed subproject. The discharge is
measured by float method. The summary of predicted 80% reliable monthly
flow computed by different methods is presented below.
Note: Since
The project area lies in hydrological region 7. For this region this method
gives only minimum enveloping curve values of monthly flows, whereas for
the computation of crop water requirement, 80% reliable values are
emphasized upon. The minimum values thus obtained must be considerably
less than 80% values. Hence the values obtained by this method are not
adopted. WECS method for low flow yielded very high absurd values. Hence
this method, too, is not used. NZIDP regression method yielded plausible
80% reliable monthly flow values which have been adopted for subsequent
analyses.
10
2.2.5 Water Balance with the Subproject
There is sufficient water to irrigate more than 240 ha of land for monsoon
paddy and other crops according to designed cropping The canal size is
determined with 15% extra for future possibilities of extension and the
design discharge for the canal is 400 lps.
2.2.6 Conclusion
The Aurahi Irrigation Project has reliable water availability and no water
right problem.
Design of project facilities have been made, in principal, on the basis of " Design
manuals for irrigation Projects in Nepal" prepared under Planning and Design
Strengthening Project, 1990 and are given in the Appendix-G.
4.2 Intake
A permanent side intake has been constructed for the water diversion to the
canal. The course of river is confined and banks are stable at the proposed
site. The left bank at intake side will be further protected by providing
gabion box and other protective devices.
Side Intake
Width : 1m
The canal is a ridge canal and bed slope of the canal is maintained within
1:1500 to 1:500 The canal shape is trapezoidal with side slope 1.5:1 (H:V).
The sections of the main canal is designed for discharge of 0.4m3/s at
The sub-project area is partially irrigated area. The soil of the command area
has high permeability value. Existing drainage network in the area is
sufficiently efficient. Hence no further improvement is necessary.
The WUA will be responsible for the overall system operation. Decision
regarding canal discharges, rotation schedule will also come under the
responsibility of WUA. They will also be responsible for the equitable water
distribution among secondary and tertiary canals to conflict resolution and
prevention of water theft.
12
3. AGRICULTURE
The farm households in the project area are divided into four categories by land
holding size: small, medium, large and very large excluding landless farmers. The
land holding status in the project area is estimated on the basis of land records given
by the WUA. The land holding situation is summarized as below.
About 75% farm households belongs to small and medium category, while only 25%
farm households fall under the category of very large. The average land holding size
is 1.5 ha (=240ha/160 beneficiary HH).
The project area is mainly dominated by agriculture of the total gross area of 290 ha.
The share of cultivated land is 240 ha. A breakdown of existing land use, based on
information collected during field survey from local farmers and key informants, is
presented as below.
Nearly 85% of the GCA covers cultivated land and rest covers grazing land, shrubs
and others. The information collected from the local people showed that most of the
cultivated areas are rainfed.
13
3.3 Cropping Area, Cropping Intensity, Crop Yield and Production
The main crops grown in the project area are paddy, potato, oilseed, wheat
and pulses. During the rainy season, paddy is grown in almost all of the
cultivated land while sugarcane is grown on rainfed land during this season.
During the winter season, the main crop grown is wheat. The cropping
intensity for the project area is about 128% at present. Total area of cropping
land is 307 ha during this season. Cropping area and intensity are given in
the Table 3.2. The low cropping area and intensity is basically attributable to
lack of reliable irrigation facilities.
The annual planted area, unit yield and production of major crops in the
project area were estimated from the agricultural statistics in the Dhanusha
District and the farm survey. The unit yield of major crops remains very low
not only due to shortage of irrigation water but also due to insufficient
agricultural inputs and traditional farming practices. Moderate yield level of
crops can be attributed to the following overall factors.
The cropping pattern and cropping calendar with cropping area and yields
for the project area as shown in the Table 3.2 which is averaged for the
whole area.
14
Table 3.2 Present cropping Area, Pattern, Yield/Production and cropping
calendar
Area Yield Time of
S.N. Crops Production (t)
ha % (t/ha) Planting Harvesting
1. E Paddy 15 6.3 2.1 31.5 Apr-1 Mar-1
2. Main Paddy 200 83.4 2.8 560 July-2 Nov-2
3. Wheat 30 12.5 1.9 57 Nov-2 Mar-1
4. Sugarcane 5 2.1 30 7.5 Aug-1 Jun-2
5. Pulse 25 10.42 0.4 10 Nov-2 Apr-1
6 Oilseed 25 10.42 0.3 7.5 Nov-2 Feb-1
7. Potato 5 2.1 6.0 30 Nov-2 Feb-1
8 Winter veg. 2 0.8 2.8 5.6 Nov-2 Feb-2
Total 307 128
Cropping Intensity = 128%
The principal inputs used in the fields in the project area are human labor,
draft animal power, seeds, chemical fertilizer, farm yard manure and agro-
chemicals.
Majority of the farmers of the project area use local seeds and few farmers
use improved seeds. The main source of the seeds is farmers' own stock.
Farmers get seed from AIC and co-operatives but they use their own seed
because seeds of AIC and co-operatives are costly and not reliable according
to the farmers. The farmers of the project area use fertilizer mainly on
sugarcane, paddy and wheat crops.
Since the existing cropping system is totally traditional one, no improved and
sophisticated tools and implements are used by the farmers.
15
Table 3.3 Distribution of Labor days Requirement in Different Crops
Area (ha) Labor days/ha Labor days requirement
Crop
Present Future Present Future Present Future
15 30 110 175 1650 5250
3.4.3E Paddy Pric
M Paddy 200 215 142 175 28400 37625
Wheat 30 70 55 95 1650 6650 es
Sugarcane 5 20 195 180 975 3600
Pulses 25 35 50 66 1250 2310
of
Oilseeds 25 35 50 63 1250 2205
Potato 5 15 180 140 900 2100
W Vegetables 2 10 190 200 380 2000
Total 36455 61740
Farm Products and Seeds
16
3.4.5 Labor Wages
The farm survey indicated that hiring labor cost is at NRs. 115.00 per day. It
is also indicated that the price of draft-animals is NRs. 250 for pair of
bullocks.
Gross income, production costs and the profit of major crops per ha in the
project area under the present condition were estimated from the results of
the field survey and various information. The gross income was calculated
from the farm-gate price and the average yield of each crop, under partially-
irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. The production cost of each crop was
estimated on the basis of input quantity and labor cost under the present
condition.
The total crop production value and total net profit value were estimated
from the cropped area, gross income and net return per ha.
The total crop production value and total net profit value are NRs
9817000.00 and NRs 4260000.00 respectively.
17
The provision of irrigation water and introduction of improved technology
by the project will not basically cause the change of the land use pattern, but
will raise the cropping intensity.
As almost all the farmland to be covered by the project are the existing
paddy fields, no significant change in the type of crops to be planted will
occur even in the future, and paddy will remain as the main crop in the rainy
season. With the completion of the Aurahi Irrigation project, all the paddy
fields in the project area will be fully irrigated and more intensive use of the
farmland will be realized.
For the design of future cropping pattern, the preparation was made in due
consideration of the factors such as climate, agronomic conditions including
availability of irrigation water, present cropping pattern and farm practices,
socio-economic conditions, farmers preferences, market limitations and
prices, present and future availability of agricultural inputs.
18
After construction of the project facilities, the crop yields would gradually
increase from the present level to the target level and stabilize after the
completion of the project facilities. To achieve the targeted yields, optimum
application of farm inputs as well as effective water management is required.
Total agricultural production in the project area with and without project
conditions is estimated by multiplying the target unit yield and cultivation
area of the proposed crops and given in Table 3.5.
To achieve the targeted yields, optimum application of farm inputs and labor
are required. The organic matter content of the soil is very low. So farmers
should include green manuring crops in their crop rotations after the project
to supply organic matter and other nutrients. Similarly, legume crops such as
gram, lentil, moong and arhar should also be managed in the cropping
pattern to maximize the nitrogen content of soil from the atmospheric
nitrogen.
Table 3.7 Proposed inputs used in various crops
19
Agro-
Fertilizer chemicals Labor
Crops Seeds (kg/ha) (Rs./ha)
Chemicals (kg/ha) Human Animal
N P K (md/ha) (ad/ha)
E Paddy 30 80 40 20 200 175 44
Main Paddy 30 80 40 20 250 175 44
Wheat 100 80 40 20 260 95 35
Sugarcane 4000 50 30 20 180 180 50
Pulse 40 20 20 10 280 66 19
Oilseed 9 20 20 10 200 63 24
Potato 1500 60 50 30 400 140 50
Winter veg. 10 70 50 40 280 200 50
The future agriculture production in the project area with and without project
conditions is estimated by multiplying the target unit yield and cultivation
20
area of the proposed crops. Net incremental benefit of the project is
estimated to be NRs. 42,60,022.65.
4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE
4.1.1 Population:
21
S.N. Name Percentage HH Number
1 Kurmi 20 33
2 Yadav 20 32
3 Shah 22 34
4 Brahmin 16 25
5
Kumhar 10 15
6 Others 13 21
Total
100 160
The total population of the project area consists of 47% male and 53%
female which indicates that the proportion of female is slightly more than
that of male.
Not Available
Not Available
22
There are all together about 160 households in the command area, having
population of 1440. The major occupation of households is agriculture. Some
of the members of these households work as daily labor at different places.
About 20% to 25% of people go outside the project area for the seasonal
employment and 5% of population is found to be migrating to the project
area.
There is no accurate data available, because some of the labor force works
outside the village and even abroad.
5. INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT
There is already existing formal water users' association in the project area.
At present, they have formed a Water User's Association and registered in
Central Irrigation Development Division No.1. They have some rules and
regulations for the management of the project. According to their rules and
regulations, every user, who owns land in the command area has rights to be
a member of WUA.
Existing canal system which is not in good condition and thus incapable to
carry the water discharge to irrigate the proposed command area, can't
provide reliable and adequate irrigation facility in the command area. After
construction of the project, water allocation rules and regulations will be
decided.
24
5.3 Institutional Linkages to Support Services
Farmers have presented their willingness to cooperate at all stages of the project
development. They are committed to contribute for;
Two years back, in F/Y 062/63, Government of Nepal had provided assistance to the
system in form of cash amounting to NRs 1,50,000.00. Even after the government
launches the project through donor agencies, the involvement of the NGOs and
INGOs in the future can not be predicted.
Post construction supports are extension services, credit, agriculture inputs, post
harvest facilities and marketing, which should be provided by different line agencies
at proper time.
After completion of the construction work WUA will operate and maintain the
system. The CIDD-1 will provide necessary training for strengthening and
development of institutional capacity of the WUA.
Construction supervision
Water management and irrigated agriculture
Resource mobilization
O&M of the system
Institutional Strengthening/Capability Building
Benefit monitoring
Conflict resolution
Womens participation etc.
The WUA will make a maintenance plan in close assistance from CIDD-1, which
covers
- rules and regulation for system maintenance
- implementation of rules and regulation effectively
- penalizing system for water users who do not comply with the rules and
regulations
i) Regular maintenance
ii) Routine maintenance
iii) Emergency maintenance
The WUA will prepare annual maintenance program based on the following tasks.
26
i) Identification of maintenance need
ii) Identification and Provision of needed resources for carrying out the
maintenance
iii) Timing or schedule of various maintenance activities
iv) Keeping records of maintenance including labor mobilization of members
v) Regular review of improvement of rules and regulations
vi) Penalties for violation of rules and regulations
vii) Arrangement of required tools and equipment
The actual system maintenance plan will be made and enforced after first irrigation
in the command area.
27
6.1. Environmental effects due to site selection
There is no forest except some patches of mango and sisam in the command
area and canal alignment, it does not pose any problem to the flora of this
area. Therefore this category of the impact is ranked at D1 level.
Such objects are not located in the sub-project area and ranking is done at D1
significance level.
River training works will be provided for flood control providing bank
protection, check dam, plantation etc. the impact is ranked at D1 level
There is not any big industry in the watershed area. So the water pollution
problem is not a major issue and the available water is suitable for irrigation
in the project area. Hence the impact is ranked at D1 level.
The command area can be provided with proper drainage in lowland area;
hence drainage will not be a problem. Thus the impact is ranked at D1
significance level.
There is no major conflict about land use. It can be solved within Water
Users' Group (WUG) and VDC and ranked at D1 level of significance.
Canals are designed for full supply discharge with safety factor and no
problem of insufficient canal capacity. This is also ranked at D1 level.
6.2.7. Passageways
29
Though there is permanent weir structure across the river, it has been well
protected and scouring possibility has been adequately incorporate in design
and estimated part. Serious scouring hazards are not expected and thus, the
impact is ranked in D1 level.
The project area is a plain area and does not have steep slope. Major
problems of soil erosion and landslide will not result from minor box cutting.
Considering the minor landslides that may occur during the construction
stage, provision is made for mitigation measures in the project cost
estimates. Thus ranking can be done at D1 level.
No blasting will be done for the construction works, so there is no such risk
of environmental problem. Hence it is ranked at D1 level.
30
CIDD-1 and other support agencies shall extensively advice the users
regarding the use of chemical fertilizers and other modern inputs. Hence
these adverse effects will not be the major issues for the sub-project.
The still water stored in the project area may cause communicable diseases
related to water use. These diseases can be prevented by forewarning the
people through training.
Same as in 6.4.2.
The project will have no adverse impacts on existing and future community
water supply schemes.
As per the impact significant criteria, all of the environmental issues listed in
the checklist are categorized as D1, it indicates that further EIA studies are
31
not necessary for this subproject implementation. The subproject is
environmentally sound.
7. RESETTLEMENT PLAN
There are existing canal alignment, so there will be no need of resettlement of any farmers.
32
8. SUB-PROJECT COST AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
33
The analysis of rates includes,
- analysis of transportation cost,
- analysis of material cost,
- analysis of labor cost,
- Taxes
- Availability of materials
- Others
The material and labor costs for F.Y.2063/64 are obtained from District
Development Committee's Technical Office, Janakpur.
The quantity estimate is based on shape and size of designed structures and canals.
Quantities for canals have been calculated from cross-sections. Total project cost is
estimated to be NRs. 9817000.00 including overhead, contingencies and farmer
contribution cost. Cost per hectare is estimated to be NRs 36740.00.
Assured irrigation facilities would ensure the farmers both for timely
cultivation and use of complementary inputs. Thus, the productivity and
production of crops would increase rapidly.
34
8.3.2 Socio Economic Benefit
The following assumptions have been made for performing the economic
analysis of this project.
8.3.3.2 Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit Cost (B/C) Ratio
35
In order to determine economic feasibility of the project discounted
cash flow method is used. Present worth benefit cost ratio at different
discount rate and Economical Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) is
determined.
The EIRR calculation revealed that the EIRR value is 32.13% and
BCR at 10% and 12% discount rate are 2.84 and 2.51 respectively.
Sensitivity analysis has been conducted for three cases:
It is found to be economically feasible even in different adverse
conditions.
36
The project works comprise the following major components
The survey and detailed design works, drawings and cost estimate have been
completed.
Immediately after approval of cost estimate tendering will be commenced.
The construction works will be completed within one year.
The WUA training program will be carried out simultaneously.
The project will be handed over to WUA for operation and maintenance
(O&M) as per irrigation policy after completion.
10.1 Conclusions
37
The Aurahi Irrigation Project is a major rehabilitation project having perennial type
of river source. The project is technically viable. The results of economic analysis
revealed that the project is feasible. The structures are designed in such a way that
locally available materials can be used. Farmer's enthusiastic response towards the
project implementation ensures that the project beneficiaries are both eager and
capable of managing the system in future.
10.2 Recommendation
During the present hardship of low economic status, it is essential to bring more area
under irrigation to grow more food thereby economically uplifting living standard of
people in the area. Based on the conclusions drawn, the Aurahi Irrigation Project is
strongly recommended for immediate implementation.
38