Laraeta case, the judge said this lawyers resort to all kinds of streets because he went home and

home and only after 15 mins he checked the

delaying tactics the witness was on the witness stand for the 1 whoel pulse of the father thats when he realized that father is dead. SC said
week and the lawyers just kept on asking the quest all over again. then that the testimony is incredible because he saw his father shot and
the judge said. I will allow each lawyer to cross- examine only and then went home and only after 15 mins to chefck the pulse.. The court
all the lawyers withdrew their attendance and said that your honor we said that they were convince that the son was not there.
are asking for time to hire new lawyers which is another delaying tactic
then the court assigned a counsel de oficio. so the supreme court
upheld the judge because this was another Manuever to delay the
case.

Now, there was another case where the accused was a minor. did not
even reach High school. He was charged with murder and he waived
his right to counsel the supreme court said that we are not satisfied
that the accused was confident to make the waiver because the
charge was murder and his educational attainment was just
elementary.

But even this counsel. somebody committed illegeal possession of

firearms and his counsel said that he was a a lawyer but he was an
imposter. The supreme court said that the decision would be set aside.

Gross negligence of a lawyer like there was somebody the father was
charged with rape the daughter testified the lawyer did not cross
examine and then the sister testified to corroborate thte testimony and
the lawyer jsut asked questions like how did she feel? and did not
cross examine the daughter who was the victim because he was
convince that she was telling the truth and did not present any
evidence. The supreme court said The presentation is not valid if the
accused by represented by somebody with conflicting interest.

there were 2 accused a rich businessman and a poor person. the

businessman can hire a lawyer. and the charge was murder. so this
poor person approached him saying that can you become my Lawyer
na din. Lawyer said that the poor person should say that he was the
one who shot the person and say that the rich businessman was not
there. But sasabihin mo self-defense. The judge convicted them with
murder. The Son was the only witness and said that he saw what
happened and that his father was killed but his father died in the