MAR 2010
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope
Vtrial = Vservice + V
(V ! 1 knot)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
PE = methodical series
or other
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
12000
Pe Trial (kW)
10000 PE Service (kW)
6000
4000
0
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Speed (knot)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
Lbp = 135.34m
B = 19.3m
T = 9.16m
Cb = 0.704
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
This gives:
w = 0.304 t = 0.214
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
DB ! 0.6T
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
12000
10000
Pe Trial (kW)
PE Service (kW) At TRIAL speed read off from the
plot the effective power at trial
speed
8000
Power (kW)
6000
10000
Pe Trial (kW)
PE Service (kW) and an iteration is performed
until convergence
8000
Power (kW)
6000
D = 0.70
4000
Vs (trial) = 16 knots
2000
0
Pe (trial) = 3550 kW
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Speed (knot)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Pe Trial (kW)
10000 PE Service (kW)
8000
From the graph:
Power (kW)
6000
PE trial
PD =
4000
D
2000
3550
PD =
0
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
0.7
Speed (knot)
PD = 5071 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Pe Trial (kW)
10000 PE Service (kW)
VA = Vtrial (1 w)
8000
Power (kW)
6000
VA = 16(1 0.304)
4000
2000
VA = 11.14 knots
0
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Speed (knot)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
1
2
N PD
Let: Bp = 1.158 2.5
VA
1
N 5071 2
Bp = 1.158
11.142.5
Bp = k2 N
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
and 1 N Do
= = 3.2808
J VA
N 5.79
= 3.2808
11.14
= k3 N
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
N (rpm) Bp o
80 15.93 136.4 0.62
90 17.91 153.5 0.624
100 19.91 170.5 0.626
110 21.90 187.6 0.622
120 23.89 204.6 0.605
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
0.63
o = 0.626
0.625
0.62
0.615
o
0.61
0.605
N =100
0.6
75 85 95 105 115 125
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
0.65
0.64
0.63
0.62
0.61
0.6
o N
0.59
0.58
0.57
0.56
0.55
65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
N
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
(1 t)
D = o R
(1 w)
(1 0.214)
D = 0.626 1.0
(1 0.304)
D = 0.707
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
D = 0.707
N = 100
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
PE trial 3550
PB(trial) = PB(trial) =
D S 0.707 0.98
PB(trial) = 5123.7 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
PB(trial)
PB(installed) =
0.85
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
PB(installed) = 6028 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
PD = PB(trial) s
PD = 5123.7 0.98
PD = 5021.23
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
1
100 5021.23 2
Bp = 19.81
Bp = 1.158
11.142.5
100 5.50
= 3.2808 = 161.97
11.14
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Bp = 19.81 = 161.97
P
= 1.0
D
mean face pitch:
1.0 DB = 5.50
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Engine R1
Power
installed power
R3 R2
Engine RPM
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Engine R1
Power
R4
R3 R2
Engine RPM
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Engine R1
Power
R4
R3 R2
Engine RPM
4 Cylinders:
5123.7 / 4 (trial) = 1280.92 kW/cyl
6028.0 / 4 (total) = 1509 kW/cyl
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
PD = 0.85 PB s
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Caution:
This method is different than the calculation for the trial
condition.
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
w = 1.1wtrial
w = 1.1 0.304 = 0.3344
(assume previous values for t & R )
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
PE service = PD D
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
8000
PE (service)
7000 PE (trial)
6000
Vs (service) = 15.25 knots
5000
Power [kW]
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
13 14 15 16 17 18
Speed [kn]
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Va = Vs (1 w)
Va = 15.25 (1 0.3344)
Va = 10.15 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
1
Let: N PD 2
Bp = 1.158 2.5
VA
1
N 5021.23 2
Bp = 1.158
10.152.5
Bp = k4 N
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Let: ND
= 3.2808
VA
N 5.50
= 3.2808
10.15
= k5 N
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
N (rpm) Bp o
80 19.99 142.16
90 22.49 159.93
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Basic Design - BP delta diagrams
P
D
0
1.0
o = 0.583 BP BP
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 26th February 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
(1 t)
D = o R
(1 w)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
(1 0.214)
D = 0.583 1.0
(1 0.334)
D = 0.688
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
PE (service) = 3454.60 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
8000
PE (service)
7000 PE (trial)
6000
Vs (service) = 15.15 knots
5000
Power [kW]
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
13 14 15 16 17 18
Speed [kn]
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
BP = 24.2
B = 174
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
VA = VS (1 w)
VA = 15.15(1 0.3344)
VA = 10.08 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
ND VA
= 3.2808 N=
VA 3.2808 D
174 10.08
N=
3.2808 5.50
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Using the previous trial conditions:
T = 9.16m
N = 100 rpm
D = 5.50m
PD = 5021.23 kW
VA = 16 (1 0.3044) = 11.14 knots
P
= 1.0 o = 0.626
D
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
D
h= + 0.2
2
h = 2.95
Text
shaft immersion at centreline
H =T - h
H = 9.16 - 2.95
H = 6.21m
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
p e = 99629 10179H
p e = 99629 10179 6.21
p e = 162840.59 N/m 2
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
qt = 224261.2 N/m2
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
162840
r =
224261.2
r = 0.726
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
r = 0.726
c = 0.23
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
T
= c q T
AP
T
= 0.23 224261.2 = 51580.08
AP
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
PD o
T VA
= 1941.3
AP AP
1941.3 PD o
AP =
VA ATP
1941.3 5021.23 0.626
AP =
11.14 51580.08
AP = 10.62 m 2
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
AP
AD =
1.067 0.229 D
P
10.62
AD =
1.067 0.229 1.0
AD = 12.67 m 2
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
AD
BAR = D 2
4
12.67
BAR = 5.52
4
BAR = 0.533
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Ae
Selected Ao was 0.55 Assuming Ae AD
Ae
= 0.533
AD
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
End of Presentation
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008