Anda di halaman 1dari 74

Resistance & Propulsion (1)

MAR 2010

Algorithm for the Prediction of


Power at the
Preliminary Design Stage

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope

Method is appropriate for large ocean going


vessels with modern slow speed direct drive
diesel engines

Method is a basic design tool using chart


series diagrams

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope

Ship owner require that a ship should achieve an average


speed in service at a certain engine power.

Initial acceptance will be based upon demonstration of a


higher speed on trial at the same power

Vtrial = Vservice + V

(V ! 1 knot)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope

Contract stipulate that the ship should achieve


trial speed with the engine developing 85% of
its maximum continuous power rating (MCR)

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

Estimate resistance and effective power for a range


of speeds using appropriate Methodical Series
Data or Statistical Analysis Data
(Holtrop & Menen)

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

PE = methodical series
or other

PE trial = (1 + x)PE From BTTP - 65


procedure

PE service = 1.2 PE trial Based upon 20%


sea margin

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
12000

Pe Trial (kW)
10000 PE Service (kW)

Plot trial and


8000
service conditions
Power (kW)

6000

4000

20% sea margin


2000

0
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Speed (knot)

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

Assumed vessel particulars from previous example:

Lbp = 135.34m
B = 19.3m
T = 9.16m
Cb = 0.704

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

Chose maximum permissible propeller diameter with


respect to hull clearances

Determine the optimum engine speeds corresponding to


trial conditions, the required maximum continuous power
and the mean face pitch.

Select an appropriate engine

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

Using the equations provided in the handout determine the


wake fraction and thrust deduction factor

The required diameter behind the hull is given as


DB ! 0.6T = 5.5m = D

This gives:

w = 0.304 t = 0.214

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

As the behind condition allows a smaller propeller


diameter calculate the equivalent open water
diameter

DB ! 0.6T

Corresponding open water diameter


DB
Do = = (5.79m)
0.95

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

Select Bp diagram on basis of blade number and blade


area ratio

For this exercise the B4.55 diagram is to be used

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
12000

10000
Pe Trial (kW)
PE Service (kW) At TRIAL speed read off from the
plot the effective power at trial
speed
8000
Power (kW)

6000

Remember D is not known as


4000
it requires knowledge of the
2000
propeller hull interaction.
0 (1 t)
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0
Speed (knot)
18.0 20.0
D = o R
(1 w)
D = k1 o
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Therefore a value is selected
12000

10000
Pe Trial (kW)
PE Service (kW) and an iteration is performed
until convergence
8000
Power (kW)

6000
D = 0.70
4000

Vs (trial) = 16 knots
2000

0
Pe (trial) = 3550 kW
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Speed (knot)

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

Assume an initial D = 0.7


12000

Pe Trial (kW)
10000 PE Service (kW)

8000
From the graph:
Power (kW)

6000
PE trial
PD =
4000
D
2000
3550
PD =
0
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
0.7
Speed (knot)

PD = 5071 kW

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

Flow through the propeller disc


12000

Pe Trial (kW)
10000 PE Service (kW)

VA = Vtrial (1 w)
8000
Power (kW)

6000

VA = 16(1 0.304)
4000

2000
VA = 11.14 knots
0
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Speed (knot)

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
1
2
N PD
Let: Bp = 1.158 2.5
VA
1
N 5071 2
Bp = 1.158
11.142.5

Bp = k2 N

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size

and 1 N Do
= = 3.2808
J VA

N 5.79
= 3.2808
11.14

= k3 N

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

Enter the BP delta values onto the diagram provided

For each RPM calculate the open water efficiency from


the diagram

Plot the results

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

For a range of values of N calculate Bp

N (rpm) Bp o
80 15.93 136.4 0.62
90 17.91 153.5 0.624
100 19.91 170.5 0.626
110 21.90 187.6 0.622
120 23.89 204.6 0.605

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
0.63
o = 0.626
0.625

0.62

0.615
o

0.61

0.605

N =100
0.6
75 85 95 105 115 125

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
0.65

0.64

0.63

0.62

0.61

0.6
o N

0.59

0.58

0.57

0.56

0.55
65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
N

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

More data is now available to update the initial


estimate of D

(1 t)
D = o R
(1 w)
(1 0.214)
D = 0.626 1.0
(1 0.304)
D = 0.707
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

To test convergence the difference from the original


and new D should be less than 0.005

0.707 - 0.7 = 0.007

use the new value of and re-calculate the delivered power


and repeat BP d diagram

Continue until convergence to get


N and D
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

For this exercise the previous calculation is assumed


converged, therefore:

D = 0.707
N = 100

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Once the propulsive efficiency is known the power


required for sea trials can be calculated

PE trial 3550
PB(trial) = PB(trial) =
D S 0.707 0.98

PB(trial) = 5123.7 kW

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

From this Break Power required to satisfy the trial


speed, the contract specified that the engine should
only be at 85% of its total rating

PB(trial)
PB(installed) =
0.85

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

PB(installed) = 6028 kW

This value can now be used to calculate the required


engine size

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Finally modify the propeller diameter using the


empirical relationships given previously

Re- calculate (as in example 1 of the numerical example


the new diameter for the same delivered power

Plot Bp on the diagram and read the


P/D ratio

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Calculate the delivered power at the trial condition

PD = PB(trial) s

PD = 5123.7 0.98
PD = 5021.23

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Calculate the delivered power at the trial condition

1
100 5021.23 2
Bp = 19.81
Bp = 1.158
11.142.5

100 5.50
= 3.2808 = 161.97
11.14

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Enter the final values onto the diagram

Bp = 19.81 = 161.97

P
= 1.0
D
mean face pitch:

1.0 DB = 5.50

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Calculated optimum rpm = 100


Trial power = 5123.7 kW
Installed power = 6029 kW

Calculate the power per cylinder and use suitable engine


diagrams to select an engine

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection

Engine R1
Power

installed power

85% MCR trial power


R4
reducing fuel
consumption

R3 R2

Engine RPM
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Engine R1
Power

R4

R3 R2

Engine RPM

1. Assume a number of Cylinders


2. Calculate the required number of installed power
per cylinder
3. from range of engines select the appropriate engine
with optimum RPM and power range

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Engine R1
Power

R4

R3 R2

Engine RPM

4 Cylinders:
5123.7 / 4 (trial) = 1280.92 kW/cyl
6028.0 / 4 (total) = 1509 kW/cyl

Suitable engines could be RTA68 and RTA62 at 4 cyl.

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

The final stage is to find the new ship service speed


and propeller rate of rotation at constant power of:

PD = 0.85 PB s

i.e with the engines developing 85% of their Brake Power


(including transmission losses)

PD = 5123.7 0.98 = 5021.23 kW

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Caution:
This method is different than the calculation for the trial
condition.

For the trial condition the propeller was designed to absorb


a particular power

In the service condition the propeller design is fixed :


Diameter (behind) = 5.5m Pitch = 1.0

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

At this new condition there will be a new wake fraction to


allow for hull roughness, wind, waves, etc.

This is defined as:

w = 1.1wtrial
w = 1.1 0.304 = 0.3344
(assume previous values for t & R )

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

The propulsive efficiency will change for this new


condition therefore another iteration must be
performed

This iteration of D follows a different method than


previous to obtain the optimum efficiency

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Assume an initial value of D

PE service = PD D

PE service = 5021.23 0.7 = 3514.86 kW

Use the plots of trial and service power to read off


the PE service value. Read from the plot the service
speed this occurred

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
8000
PE (service)
7000 PE (trial)

6000
Vs (service) = 15.25 knots
5000
Power [kW]

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
13 14 15 16 17 18
Speed [kn]

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Re-calculate the advance velocity based on this power


and new wake fraction

Va = Vs (1 w)
Va = 15.25 (1 0.3344)
Va = 10.15 knots

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

1
Let: N PD 2

Bp = 1.158 2.5
VA

1
N 5021.23 2
Bp = 1.158
10.152.5

Bp = k4 N

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Let: ND
= 3.2808
VA

N 5.50
= 3.2808
10.15
= k5 N

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

As before use a range of shaft rotations and calculate the


new Bp coefficients

Plot these values directly on the Bp diagram

Where this curve intersects the P/D of the propeller


designed previously is the required value

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

For range of values of N calculate Bp

N (rpm) Bp o

80 19.99 142.16

90 22.49 159.93

100 24.99 177.77

110 27.49 195.47

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Basic Design - BP delta diagrams
P
D

0

1.0

o = 0.583 BP BP

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 26th February 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power

As before use the propulsive efficiency formula below


and iterate until the difference between successive
iterations is within 0.005

(1 t)
D = o R
(1 w)

On convergence the ship speed in service condition


has been calculated

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

(1 0.214)
D = 0.583 1.0
(1 0.334)

D = 0.688

(D )assumed (D )previous = 0.7 0.688 = 0.0011

(no need for iteration)

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

PE (service) = 5021.23 0.688

PE (service) = 3454.60 kW

Read from the power diagram the PE (service) for


3454.6 kW

Vs (service) = 15.15 knots

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
8000
PE (service)
7000 PE (trial)

6000
Vs (service) = 15.15 knots
5000
Power [kW]

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
13 14 15 16 17 18
Speed [kn]

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

At the intersection of the new line with the pitch


line read off from the BP diagram the Service
values of BP

BP = 24.2
B = 174

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Re-calculate the advance velocity for the final


service speed of 15.15 knots

VA = VS (1 w)

VA = 15.15(1 0.3344)

VA = 10.08 knots

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Finally at the service condition calculated read off


the B and calculate the RPM in service

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

ND VA
= 3.2808 N=
VA 3.2808 D

174 10.08
N=
3.2808 5.50

Nservice = 97.2 rpm

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance

Therefore at 85% MCR:

The vessels service speed is 15.15 knots

The propeller rate of rotation is 97.2 rpm

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

Final stage in the design algorithm is to calculate blade


surface area and blade area ratio

This is performed for TRIAL condition

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Using the previous trial conditions:

T = 9.16m
N = 100 rpm
D = 5.50m

PD = 5021.23 kW
VA = 16 (1 0.3044) = 11.14 knots
P
= 1.0 o = 0.626
D

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

D
h= + 0.2
2
h = 2.95
Text
shaft immersion at centreline

H =T - h
H = 9.16 - 2.95
H = 6.21m

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

Calculation of the cavitation number


pe
r =
qt
The static component

p e = 99629 10179H
p e = 99629 10179 6.21
p e = 162840.59 N/m 2

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

The dynamic component

qt = (11.66VA ) + (0.828 nD) 2 2

qt = (11.66 11.14)2 + (0.828 100 5.50)2

qt = 224261.2 N/m2

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

The resultant cavitation number becomes:

162840
r =
224261.2

r = 0.726

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

Entering this value onto the Burrill Diagram:

r = 0.726

c = 0.23

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

T
= c q T
AP

T
= 0.23 224261.2 = 51580.08
AP

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

PD o
T VA
= 1941.3
AP AP
1941.3 PD o
AP =
VA ATP
1941.3 5021.23 0.626
AP =
11.14 51580.08
AP = 10.62 m 2

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

AP
AD =
1.067 0.229 D
P

10.62
AD =
1.067 0.229 1.0

AD = 12.67 m 2

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

AD
BAR = D 2
4

12.67
BAR = 5.52
4

BAR = 0.533

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

Ae
Selected Ao was 0.55 Assuming Ae AD

Ae
= 0.533
AD

Selected area was 0.55, therefore the design will provide


a low risk of cavitation

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission

To satisfy the requirements of the coursework the


following is required:

A typed report covering the 4 stages:

1. Effective power prediction


2. Design of propeller and engine
3. Prediction of performance in service,
4. Blade surface area and BAR

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission

To satisfy the requirements of the coursework the


following is required:

The report should include a detailed hand calculation


for one speed (e.g. service speed)

Include tables from Excel where necessary and


appropriate graphs

If you only present Excel tables and make a mistake,


you cannot collect method marks.

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission

Submission date is:

2nd May 2008

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas

End of Presentation

Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008

Anda mungkin juga menyukai