challenge.
Dr. Clara Bocchino, AHEAD-GLTFCA Network and Programme Coordinator
In Southern Africa, a war-torn region until the mid 1990s with a history of
fortress conservation that functioned on the exclusion of rural indigenous
communities from any use of natural resources, the concept of transfrontier
conservation was promoted as a pathway to peace, cooperation and
development between the new constitutional state of law in all countries in the
region. Particularly, in consideration of the role played by Apartheid South
Africa in fomenting regional conflict, and through the work of the corporate
magnate Anton Rupert, South Africa placed itself geopolitically as the main
driver of transfrontier conservation as the telos for sustainable development
in Southern Africa (Bsher, 2013). This was done through the use of the
expression Peace Park to describe the newly established transfrontier
conservation areas across countries that were previously in conflict. However,
the initial focus revolved around biodiversity conservation and tourism
development. The approach was very much in line with a global trend that
viewed tourism as a development solution for rural areas in developing
countries neighbouring existing or potential biodiversity hotspots, be they
coastal or in-land. The inception of the Great Limpopo transfrontier
conservation area, for instance, saw the promotion of the unification between
Kruger National Park in South Africa and the new Limpopo National Park in
Mozambique as a bush-to-beach tourism experience: a pathway of potential
income generation that would begin in Kruger, through Limpopo and lead all
the way to the coastline of Mozambique.
Of course, the surge in the organised crime for illegal hunting of rhino horn
and ivory, particularly along the South Africa Mozambique border, has not
contributed to redress this conflict, rather it presents itself as the unwanted but
inevitable reaction to a decade of unheeded promises of financial returns from
state-based conservation. The rise in the demand for the products in the Far
East has met, thanks to both a globalised world and ancient trade routes, with
the need for cash and the growing resentment against conservation in rural
Africa. The match would be made in heaven if it was not so obvious that
besides the threat to species conservation, this is neither a legal nor a
sustainable income generation, if the number of animals declines below the
recruitment level. Yet, from a Sustainable Use and Livelihoods perspective, it
may not be too late to start thinking of conservation in a traditional African
perspective as a land and resource use practice, and shift its growing
anachronism by including in its management the very people who are now in
conflict with wildlife, and their respective governments. The enduring
challenge is to bring all those positive experimentations in the region back to
life and, this time, engage in a renewed conservation and development
debate, in which trans-frontier conservation becomes a positive driver of
sustainable use and development.