by
Harry Borden M a r s h a l l
CHEMISTRY
The U n i v e r s i t y of B r i t i s h Columbia
A p r i l - 1931.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.
1. P r e p a r a t i o n of Stannic C h l o r i d e .
2. P r e p a r a t i o n o f Caesiian 0hloride.
r
3. Method.
INTRODUCTION.
The existence of isotopes has explained a great many-
d i s c r e p a n c i e s i n the theory of atomic s t r u c t u r e . I t has also
d e f i n i t e l y s e t t l e d the v a l i d i t y o f the whole number r u l e f o r
the atomic weights of the elements. Henee any experimental
work whieh w i l l corroborate the existence o f i s o t o p e s , w i l l
be o f great importance i n strengthening the proof of the
atomic Theory.
1
F. W. Aston, by u s i n g the p o s i t i v e ray spectograph, and
p l a t e s of i n c r e a s e d s e n s i t i v i t y to p o s i t i v e rays, has found
i t p o s s i b l e t o d e f i n i t e l y prove that a group of eight l i n e s ,
corresponding approximately t o atomic weights of 116, 117,
118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124, was due t o T i n . I t i s extremely
l i k e l y that these eight i s o t o p e s do e x i s t i n the case of t i n ,
but as y e t no d i r e c t chemical evidence has proven t h e i r
existence.
One method of a t t a c k i n g t h i s problem i s t o determine the
atomic weight of t i n i n i t s d i f f e r e n t ores. Due to extremely
d i f f e r e n t g e o l o g i c a l formation there may be wide v a r i a t i o n s
i n the concentration of the isotopes i n these d i f f e r e n t ores.
Such a v a r i a t i o n might be detected by separate atomic weight
determinations of the t i n i n the d i f f e r e n t samples.
T h i s was the o r i g i n a l problem attempted. However, the
e x t r a c t i o n of t i n from i t s ores proved to c o n s t i t u t e a
problem i n i t s e l f , and t h i s t h e s i s w i l l deal l a r g e l y w i t h
t h i s p a r t of the work, together w i t h the preparation of pure
t i n from the m a t e r i a l e x t r a c t e d .
3. The D i s i n t e g r a t i o n of Stannite.
Very l i t t l e study has been made of the d i s i n t e g r a t i o n
of s t a n n i t e ores. A c c o r d i n g l y those methods which are
s u c c e s s f u l i n f u s i n g C a s s i t e r i t e , were also t r i e d w i t h stannite
with varied results.
5. The P u r i f i c a t i o n of Stannite T i n .
j
IE
2 o
gave a value f o r the atomic weight of t i n whieh was much too
high, i n d i c a t i n g that the weight of the p r e c i p i t a t e was
correspondingly low. Moreover, on evaporating the f i l t r a t e
and wash water a number of c r y s t a l s s e t t l e d out. As the
f i l t r a t e should contain nothing but a s l i g h t concentration of
caesium c h l o r i d e , i t was concluded that the low r e s u l t s could
be a t t r i b u t e d to the s o l u b i l i t y o f caesium ehlorostannate.
Two more determinations were made taking greater
precaution to decrease an e r r o r due to s o l u b i l i t y and more
accurate values were obtained. This j u s t i f i e s the assumption
that the e r r o r i s due at l e a s t i n part to s o l u b i l i t y .
As very l i t t l e work has been done on t h i s compound i t
was considered necessary to obtain more d e f i n i t e information
on i t s s o l u b i l i t y i n v a r i o u s concentrations of h y d r o c h l o r i c
a c i d and caesium c h l o r i d e . Such information would enable us
to s t a t e more d e f i n i t e l y whether t h i s method i s s u i t a b l e or
not f o r atomic weight determinations, and i f so, the most
s u i t a b l e concentration f o r p r e c i p i t a t i o n . Accordingly, t h i s
has c o n s t i t u t e d another phase of the i n v e s t i g a t i o n .
Apparatus.
I n order to a g i t a t e the s o l u t i o n s at a constant
temperature u n t i l the e q u i l i b r i u m of s a t u r a t i o n was obtained,
a g r a n i t e k e t t l e of f o r t y l i t r e s capacity was nearly f i l l e d
w i t h water and covered w i t h a t h i c k l a y e r of f e l t to prevent
radiation. The water was maintained at constant temperature
by a tungsten lamp which was c o n t r o l l e d by a thermostat and
o o
relay. The temperature remained w i t h i n .05 of SO with t h i s
apparatus. Pyrex t e s t tubes of twenty-five c c . capacity
were used and rubber stoppers which had been p r e v i o u s l y b o i l e d
f o r s e v e r a l hours w i t h ammonium hydroxide.
Method of Determination.
To the tubes were added twenty-five c c . of s o l u t i o n , and
somewhat more of the caesium chlorostannate than would
d i s s o l v e i n that p a r t i c u l a r concentration. The s a l t was
prepared as i n the determinations above. The rubber stoppers
were then wired i n and the tubes attached to the s t i r r i n g
apparatus and rotated f o r twenty-four hours.
In order to determine how much of the s a l t had d i s s o l v e d ,
the t e s t tube was placed i n the bath so that the top just
stood above the water. A f t e r the excess s o l i d had s e t t l e d
to the bottom, the l i q u i d was drawn up i n t o the c a l i b r a t e d
p i p e t t e and two t e n c.e. p o r t i o n s withdrawn. The t i p of the
p i p e t t e was prepared by t y i n g a f i l t e r paper around i t w i t h
a small piece of s i l k thread. I n t h i s manner the p o s s i b i l i t y
of s o l i d p a r t i c l e s being drawn o f f was e l i m i n a t e d .
The twenty c.e. p o r t i o n s of l i q u i d were c a r e f u l l y
evaporated i n small p o r c e l a i n c r u c i b l e s , and the amount
d i s s o l v e d taken as the weight of the residue obtained on
evaporation.