COMMENT CONTROL SHEET

PROJECT: RPLC DEEP CONVERSION

DOC. No. V-SIE-EL001-COMMON-047-C
SIEMENS DOC. No. (4)G65076-D1001-401-C
DOCUMENT TITILE Line Protection Panel Drawings
REVISION C DATE 3/27/2014

Comment HYUNDAI-WISON Close-out

No. Sheet No. HYUNDAI-WISON Comment SIEMENS Reply
by Confirmation Status
 Regarding to the SIEMENS statement of "Trip on
bus bar coupler is necessary for security
reasons: F023 includes 25 function, both
incomes could be energized at same time" ,
following points shall be clarified and verified.
1) In the case of two incomings and bus tie
closed, it means the two bus bars of PAL barra 1
and barra 2 are interconnected through RPLC
230kV GIS.
2) The above condition may cause power flow
between barra 1 and barra 2 through RPLC. Is it
acceptable to PAL and RPLC?
3) If it is not acceptable, there should be proper Siemens confirm that 25 function is
interlock to allow the two incomings and bus tie considered for both incomings and bus bar
are closed same time only short time under 25 coupler, according SLD document V-SIE-
1 1 H. Shimizu relay permit. Such interlock is provided in the EL001-COMMON-043 (status A), for security
GIS? reasons, 50 BF stage 2 shall trip PAL feeder
and bus bar coupler circuit breakers.
(note 1) It is matter of course for RPLC 34.5kV
and lower level that such interlock is
mandatory. Because of this, the switch so called
"10" is provided for these switchgears and
guarantee close of 3 breakers only short time
(trip immediately the selected breaker by switch
"10" after 3 breaker closed).

(note 2) PMC has no objection with Siemens

decision to trip bus tie at 50BF of 50/51 of
incomings if Simens think it is more safe.
Because in any case it is very rare case.
 Regarding to the SIEMENS statement of
"Control of earthing switches and disconnector
switches is not part of the RCP's function. Far
safety interlocks, Siemens provides position
status signals of the earthing switches and Siemens confirm that control commands
disconnector switches in order to be sent to PAL (open and closed) of earthing switches and
substation by protocol" , following points shall disconnector switch are not included on
2 1 H. Shimizu be clarified and verified. protection scheme.
1) The above Siemens statement is acceptable Control scheme and Interloking between PAL
for interlock on PAL. and RPLC is out of Siemens scope.
2) However Siemens statement does not
include necessary interlock in RPLC GIS for Q8
earthing switch. Q8 earthing switch should only
possible to be closed when PAL disconnecting
switch open and earthing switch closed.

Clarification shall be made below point

regarding to the Q0 open command from PSCS.

This is the open command from PSCS without

through going Local/Remote selector switch on
the GIS local. Noted, this command will be removed from
3 10 H. Shimizu RCP drawings.
On the other hand, GIS Circuit diagram SIE-
EL001-COMMON-028 Rev B Sheet MA1 includes
PSCS off command as well through
Local/Remote selector switch. It is an operator
confusing logic, which shall be clarified by
Siemens/HIWIN and corrected.
 Typical Comment
If wiring to be connected with external panels
provided by Contractor, please state "By
4 10 W. S. Park contractor" . See comment N 3.
We will inform you the name of panel and
number of terminals.
Siemens shall incorporate it on this drawing.