English 360 Charter Peer Review Sheet (CSU iFixers)

Peer Review Categories (directly from our classs SLOs):

Rhetorical Awareness
To what extent does this charter attend to its purpose and its audience's needs? Id say the
charter has two audiences: 1) the teams members, and 2) the professor. Given that
information, would you say the charter written at an appropriate reading level and style?
Explain. To what extent has the charters purpose (defining expectations, goals, etc.) been met?
Explain.
They did well to team up to attend both its purpose and audience needs, kept organized and easy
to follow for both professor and audience. Well organized with goals and expectations. One
comment on the mission statement, audience does not need to know the members job position
only the professor.

Ethical Research
To what extent does this charter consistently and correctly use quotation marks and MLA- ,
APA-, or number system in-text (parenthetical citations) and end-of-text (reference list) citations
for all sources, whether quoted directly or paraphrased? Does it avoid relying too much on a
single source?
Rely heavily on quoting citations, need to state own beliefs on how to apply use-citation to team
collaboration purpose. Use as reference, not direct points.

Support/Evidence
How well does the charter support any claims it makes with relevant, thorough, authoritative,
and specific evidence? To what extent is the charter objective and unbiased?
Does not welly support the charter to make any claims relevant, thorough, authoritative, does use
specific evidence.

Organization
How organized is the charter? For instance, does it use clear, specific organizational devices
(like descriptive headings, topic sentences to govern paragraphs, and transitions) to tie ideas and
topics together logically and seamlessly? Are paragraphs are unified (i.e., one topic per
paragraph)? Good organization, display of table is good organization

Language & Design

Are the sentence structures effective and varied? Is the language effective, concise, and
varied? Does the language respect the diversity of the charters readers (e.g., does it avoid
bigoted or biased language)? Is a standard memo format followed? Language and design is
consistent. Has good organization for a standard memo format.
Collaboration
To what extent does the document confirm that this team worked well together? For example, is
it complete? Does it follow the instructions? Does the language throughout seem to be from one
writeror does it seem like three people wrote three separate parts at home and then pasted it
together without smoothing out the style?
Consistent in team collaboration in the document. It does follow the instructions, the language
seems it is from each member of the team in writing separate parts and then collaborate together
in one document.