Carter Johnson
Abstract
In todays society, America is trying to erase any racist figures in our nation. In my essay,
I talk about how the confederate statues are being removed and why I believe they shouldnt be
removed. Some of the reasons they shouldnt be removed is that they are a part of history and
need to be remembered. Also, if we dont have something to remember history could then repeat
In todays society America is divided on pretty much everything. Mainly on the idea of
race and ethnicity. Many years ago, America went through a major war within itself over the
succession of the Confederate States of America. In the years 1861-1865, America divided into
two separate sections: The Union States and the confederate states. Although the major reason
people see for the secession is slavery, there are actually many other reasons for it: sectionalism,
protectionism, state rights, territorial crisis, and national elections. For the next 4 years, the
Union and the Confederacy fought in many battles resulting in 828,000 Union casualties and
864,000 Confederate casualties. Now you may be wondering what this has to do with todays
society but today hundreds of statues and monuments of confederate soldiers and leaders are
displayed across the nation. But people are calling for them to be removed because they
represent slavery and racism which is a major social issue going on. I dont believe the statues
should be removed because they are lessons people need to see, people need to see different
perspectives, and history could repeat itself if the civil war is forgotten.
In modern society there is a big push to erase all bad history in America, one being the
civil war and the confederates. I believe that this push is causing more division and more hate
into America rather than alleviating it. By trying to removal all statues and remembrances of the
confederates will not change what people believe. People today have the mentality that I am right
and you are wrong, even though the other side of the argument could be correct as well. I saw a
video on the internet that talked about why a pastor believes people are destroying each other in
America. He states that people are dividing themselves because of the lack of knowledge
between them. In the video he has two people stand face to face and he holds a Coke bottle
between them. He has each person read their side of the bottle, which is different. He then states,
The Civil War of Today 4
Perspective to me, is why there is such a racial divide in our nation which I agree completely
with. He then states that neither are wrong but they could argue that their side is right and the
other persons is wrong because its what they see that is correct. Both are correct, it just has to
perspective of the individual. America shouldnt point the finger at the south on the topic of
slavery, they should point it at America as a whole because it wasnt just the south who owned
slaves. The Union also owned slaves during the war but it was towards the end that they began
using slaves as soldiers to win the war. Americans got the mentality to start pointing fingers at
other people so they dont look in the wrong which is why we are in a crisis in todays society.
Americans believe that by getting rid of things that cause finger pointing, America will then be
perfect. This is where I disagree. America is trying to show its self in the world as a perfect
country and show that nothing is wrong with us where, in reality, there are actually a lot of things
wrong with this nation. I believe that the statues need to stay to be a lesson to Americans of why
the war was fought and what could come back. America is trying to have the social networking
effect, which is where people tend to present the best version of themselves and not what goes on
behind the scenes. I believe that Americans need to accept that the civil war happened and need
to move forward to prevent it from happening again. The civil war will never go away, it
happened and there isnt any way to make it unhappen so rather fight on things from the past, we
In Memphis there is talk of removing the statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest and digging
up the graves of Forrest and his wife (Sterling, 2015). People want to dig up the grave of the
Confederate Army General to get rid of any form of racism in America. The General was born in
Bedford County, Tennessee. The statue is in Memphis, Tennessee about 3 hours west. Why
should we dig up a citizen of America who is buried in his home state? A lot of people will say
The Civil War of Today 5
that because he was apart of the Confederacy and one of the leaders of the Ku Klux Klan he
shouldnt be remembered with a statue. Rather than look at his statue as a bad thing, why dont
we look at the statue as a lesson for Americans. Let the statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest tell his
full story, which might surprise many But seldom are we told that 45 of Forrests slaves rode
and fought alongside him as equals, their loyalty such that they remained with him even after he
gave them their freedom paper (Sterling, 2015). Also, that Forrest spent his final years
advocating for political and social advancement for black Americans (Sterling, 2015) and over
3,000 African Americans showed up to Forrests funeral. People only see the bad in people and
oversee the good things that people do. You can do 99 things for someone and all theyll
remember is one thing you didnt do. I believe that if you ask anyone in todays society who
Nathan Bedford Forrest was and why is he important, most people will either not know who he is
or they will say he was a racist human in the confederate army. This is why we shouldnt look at
the statues as symbols but more as lessons and stories of what the soldiers reasons were for
fighting. And same goes with other statues such as Robert E Lee, Jefferson Davis, Thomas
There are many reasons people think the confederate monuments should be removed. For
example, people say that they resemble racism and should not be remembered as a statue but
should be remembered in a museum. And I agree that statues should be represented in museums
if the statues of the person are in random areas. But I dont agree that they should be moved if
they are represented in the soldiers home state or birthplace. For example, the Nathan Bedford
Forrest statue is in his home state and is by his grave so I dont believe that it should be
represented in a museum because his ancestors and legacy are still there. Now, I believe that a
statue or monument in a random place such as the unions states, then I do believe that it should
The Civil War of Today 6
be removed and placed in a museum because it does not have a purpose for being placed. Yes,
some statues, I believe, should be removed because they dont need to be there but if the statue
has a purpose for being placed where they then I believe they should stay to show the history of
Another argument they make is that you dont see statues of Adolf Hitler in Germany so
why should we honor Confederate soldiers. I disagree with the statement because what Hitler did
and what the Confederates did were completely different and in no way similar. Hitler was
responsible for the murder of over 6 million Jewish people and many other people of different
races during World War II and the holocaust. The Confederates killed about a tenth of that.
There were 828,000 Union casualties in total from the war, a lot not the confederates doings.
About 500,000 of the deaths were in battle or from confederate prisons. The confederates fought
against the Union to protect the rights that their states had. This is how most wars start. Both
sides have a stance that they believe is right and both are fighting to keep those rights alive. To
say that the confederates and Hitler are similar is like saying that apples are similar to oranges
because they are both somewhat round. Yes, both were responsible for deaths but the reason
behind the deaths are completely different so I dont believe that a comparison between the two
With division throughout America, people are trying to blame others for why this
division is happening. One of the arguments is that the confederate statues should be removed
because they are a bad part of history so there should be no reason that they are remembered. I
dont see the statues as racist but more as stories and lessons that everyone needs to see. If
people were able to see other sides of arguments, humans wouldnt be at such a disagreement
with each other. Perspective is key and people have a hard time of seeing the other side. For
The Civil War of Today 7
example, that the slave trade was a big part of the economy in the South so they were fighting to
save their economy because that was their lifestyle. Slaves had been in America for over 250
years so the people living during the civil war believed that slaves were apart of human life. This
perspective changed once the civil war was over. The confederate statues and monuments should
not be removed to show Americas history and to show that if times dont change, they may be
References
Blake, J. (2013, January 08). What Lincoln misses and another Civil War film gets right.
pbs/index.html
F. (2017, November 09). Deep: Pastor Says Perspective Is Why Our Nation Has A Strong Racial
v=wP1s7XdWbAY
History.com Staff. (2009). Slavery in America. Retrieved November 18, 2017, from
http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/slavery
PRO AND CON: Should Confederate monuments be removed? (2017, May 16). Retrieved
should-confederate-monuments-be-removed/article_494c851c-34b2-11e5-8ec1-
9b24a8cc97e6.html
Pruitt, S. (2012, September 21). 5 Things You May Not Know About Lincoln, Slavery and
things-you-may-not-know-about-lincoln-slavery-and-emancipation
Sterling, K. W. (2015, July 27). STERLING: Lets start a new conversation on Confederate
opinion/guest-columnists/article_a0bd0f2f-bf78-5222-be21-ec73402ca410.html