Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Modern Philology.
http://www.jstor.org
420 MODERN PHILOLOGY
conflict" (p. 8); since such radical desires remain occluded, conven-
tional accounts of history offer "a series of substitutes for what has
been hidden or eclipsed, although not entirely lost" (p. 186). The
critic's task is not to recover a defined historical meaning but to scru-
tinize the "discontinuities, inconsistencies, or gaps" that reveal the
multiple "displacements" in a text's version of the past (p. 187).
In the case of early modern Spain, Cascardi argues that literature
entertains and mediates historical contradictions grounded in the
tension between two "incommensurable modes" of social order: "the
one based upon traditional hierarchies associated with the values of
caste; the other associated with the relatively more modern structure
of social classes" (p. 2). Treating literature as a medium shaped by
social tensions and as a social instrument in itself, Cascardi reads
Golden Age texts in terms of the imaginary means through which they
attempt to contain or deny historical conflict.
This book presents an important argument about the ideological
force of literature in the Golden Age. All but one of its chapters have
been published previously as separate studies. Here, however, a new
introduction and cogent additions to various chapters sustain and de-
velop the main line of argumentation. Cascardi clearly acknowledges
his affiliations with influential historians of Spanish culture, princi-
pally Americo Castro, who studied Golden Age society in terms of its
caste structure, and Jose Antonio Maravall, who studied the Spanish
baroque as an urban mass culture in transition from feudalism to cap-
italism.1 But he also stresses that his approach differs from Maravall's
widely diffused view of the baroque as a culture directed from above
by a seigneurial elite in its attention to the formation of the individual
as a subject who desires to be controlled (pp. 111-14). The question
of subject formation in a society shaped by social and historical ten-
sions informs Cascardi's readings of such canonical texts as Lope de
Vega's Fuenteovejuna(1612-14), Tirso de Molina's El burladorde Sevilla
(1630), Calder6n de la Barca's La vida es sueno (1635), Cervantes' Don
Quixote (1605, 1615) and Los trabajosde Persilesy Sigismunda (1617),
and the poetry of Garcilaso de la Vega. In its extended treatment of
ideology and subjectivity and its integration of historical and theoret-
ical reflection, the book is more consistent and unified than a stan-
dard set of collected essays.
Cascardi's readings of Fuenteovejunaand La vida es sueno illustrate
the general strengths of his approach. In "The Spanish Comediaand
the Resistance to Historical Change" (chap. 1), Cascardi argues that
Stephen Rupp
Universityof Toronto
The Great Fire of London has always had a place in literary history, a
place secured by (and mostly limited to) John Dryden's "Annus Mira-
bilis" (1667) and Samuel Pepys's diary entries for September 1666.
Now Cynthia Wall has provided a fuller account of the literary and
cultural importance of the fire and its aftermath. Wall's ambitious and
impressive book "situates the literature of the Restoration and early
Augustan England ... within the historical and cultural contexts of
the rebuilding of London after the Great Fire" (p. ix). Wall reads the
fire as an unsettling, traumatic event- "Allthat had been familiar, set-
tled, phenomenologically given was suddenly and entirely swept away"
(p. ix)-that ushered in a new spatial awareness in English culture