UWRT 1104
November 6, 2017
The Privatization of Space and the Future It Holds for Space Travel
Going to space has always been a government controlled activity. The first man made
object in space and even the first man on the moon were achieved through the labor of two
governments racing for extraterrestrial dominance. American dreams of space travel have always Commented [CO1]: I think you should use Has.
rested on NASA and on their heels of their successes, as well as in the shadow of their failures. Commented [CO2]: I think you should put the.
The government had always had a hand in space travel. Even with severe budgets cuts and a Commented [CO3]: I think has should
dwindling public interest in space. This was the case until 2004, when private space travel was
made legal and the first private vessel made its way into space.
As of today, one of the biggest names in private space travel is Elon Musk. Elon Musk is
the founder and CEO of SpaceX. He earned his Bachelor of Arts and Sciences degree at the
University of Pennsylvania in 1994. SpaceX has changed the face of the private industry and the
way many view space. The company is making big strides in space travel, especially with the
development of its Falcon 9 rockets. The Falcon 9 are a family of two-stage rockets that are
helmed for their ability to have the first stage of the rocket land back on Earth to be reused. This
has huge implications for the future of missions to space, It also has big plans for the future, the
most outstanding of which are plans to go to mars * Insert elon musk quote about mars*- Commented [CO5]: Reminder
As of right now, the face of the private sector of space rest on companies landing special
contracts with NASA. These Commercial Resupply Contracts are essentially NASA
commissioning private companies to deliver cargo to the International Space Station (ISS). This
is a mutually beneficially relationship, NASA gets supplies to the ISS without having to spend as
much money and the private companies profit. Considering it costs $10,000 per pound to get
things into space, these contracts are crucial in getting important supplies into space. With these
contracts companies like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic can spend money on researching new
technologies.
An interesting argument is brought against private space travel is what happens if it all
goes private? What happens to NASA as we know it? According to Robert Frost, NASAs Flight
Operations Directorate that has trained astronauts and flight controllers on the guidance,
navigation, control & propulsion of the International Space Station for ten years, NASA had no
threat to worry about from the private sector. "The role of government in space exploration is to
do the things that the market cant support, but the people agree are beneficial" says Frost,
"When we send a spacecraft like New Horizons to take close up pictures of Pluto, we do so
because, as a people, we understand that science is important. We understand that learning about
the universe is good for our society." He expresses how the privatization of space isnt meant to
replace government involvement in space, only to complement the already existing system.
If everything was private, it would impede the advancement of science. For private companies,
no matter how noble the venture may seem, at the end of the day the project must turn a profit in
order to please shareholders and continue progress so that the company does not shut down.
Imagine having to pay every single time you wanted to see the latest pictures a deep space
telescope had taken. All the research and discoveries NASA makes are for the advancement of
human knowledge of outer space, which is why their findings are public. If this was moved to
the private sector, the advancement of knowledge would be locked behind a paywall. The
balance of private to government is a beneficial one, one that should help science in the long
run.
One of the main benefits of privatizing space travel is how much NASA saves on
expenses. It is extremely expensive to get things into space, and with NASA's budget sitting at
around 18.4 billion dollars, less than 1% of the federal budget, it severely hinders the progress
NASA is able to make. This amount of money is enough to sustain ongoing projects, it is not
enough to fund new ventures, and some existing programs still needed to be cut, like when the
Space Shuttle Program famously shut down in 2011. With our space shuttle decommissioned,
NASA must rely on the Russian Soyuz rocket to get American astronauts into space. A single
ticket on the Russian craft can cost anywhere from $52 million to $70
million dollars (Space.com). This means NASA could spend nearly 1.6 billion dollars per trip to
the ISS, or roughly 11.25% of its entire annual budget. With these costs mitigated with help
from private companies NASA is able to focus what little budget they have into other projects.
An article written by Nayef Al-Rodhan in the Geneva Centre for Public Security
Policy touches on an interesting point. It talks about the theoretical liability of a company versus
the government. If a something failed and resulted in one or more fatalities when NASA was at
the helm it would be easy to recover because it is viewed as a symptom of progress "because
there were no alternatives to government space programs, accidents were seen to some degree as
par for the course."(Nayef). Also, for governments, there no shareholders to please. However, if
a private company were to have an accident that resulted in one or more fatalities the
implications would be different because theyre a public entity. For private companies, they have
unlimited liability for those types of situations. Everything that goes wrong can immediately be
traced back to them and this has huge effect on how the public will view the company going
forward. Say if Virgin Galactic had an accident where they lost 5 astronauts, there would be
massive public outcry, their stock would go down and the company would overall sustain huge
losses. Now let's say that in light of Virgin Galactic's critical failure, Space X maintains it's near
flawless track record. This would trust the company even further into public favor. It's interesting
to see how private companies effect and influence things like this.
Space has always been in the background of human thought. Since the space race, interest
in space had declined, as well as government support for the program. However, human curiosity
prevailed as entrepreneurs are pushing past boundaries and making their way into space. Its very
interesting hoe private companies are cementing themselves in the quest to reach space and the Commented [CO6]: how
relationship they share with government entities like NASA. These companies have changed the
how people view space travel and will undoubtedly change the future. Commented [CO7]: Insert way for how
Achenbach, Joel. Which Way to Space? The Washington Post, WP Company LLC. 23 Nov
2013. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2013/11/23/which-way-to-
Geneva Centre for Security Policy, Geneva Centre for Security Policy. 14 Aug 2015.
http://www.gcsp.ch/News-Knowledge/Global-insight/The-Privatization-of-Space-When-
Frost, Robert. The Pros And Cons Of Privatizing Space Exploration. Forbes, B.
Redd, Nola Taylor. Scientists See Big Rewards (and Risk) in Private Spaceflight Space.com,
Rees, Martin. Mars needs millionaires. Foreign Policy, (137), 90. Carnegie Endowment for
https://librarylink.uncc.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
Fernholz, Tim. The Complete Visual History of SpaceXs single-minded pursuit of rocket
history-of-every-single-one-of-spacexs-attempts-to-land-its-booster-rocket-back-on-