CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

3rd Floor OZ Building

900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR LABORATORY REPORTS

Ranking: On a scale from 1(lowest performance) to 4 (highest), assign points to each dimension based on the criteria below:
Student Outcomes Performance Evaluation Exceeds Meets Below Not Score Equivalent
Indicators Criteria Expectations Expectations Expectations Acceptable Weight
(4) (3) (2) (1)

a. Ability to use a.1. Demonstrate Use of software Chosen the most Chosen the Performed the No tools used in
techniques, skills, skills in the use for the recent software appropriate manual graphing the presentation
and modern of modern presentation and for the software for the for the and analysis of
engineering tools engineering analysis of data presentation and presentation and presentation and data.
necessary for tools and (8%) analysis of data. analysis of data. analysis of data.
engineering practice. techniques
necessary for
engineering
practice.
b. Ability to design b.1. Design Experimental Experimental Experimental Experimental Missing several
and conduct procedures to procedure procedures are procedures are procedures are important
experiments, as well obtain data (8%) well-written in written in written in experimental
as analyze and through paragraph format, paragraph format, paragraph format, details or not
interpret data. experiments all experimental important with missing some written in
according to details are well- experimental important paragraph format
standard detailed. details are experimental
protocol. covered, some details
minor details
missing.
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

b.2. Analyze Analysis of data All important Results have been Some of the Incorrect
data from (24%) trends and data correctly results have been interpretation of
experiments comparisons have interpreted and correctly trends and
conducted. been interpreted discussed, only interpreted and comparison of
correctly and minor discussed; partial data indicating a
discussed, good improvements are but incomplete lack of
understanding of needed understanding of understanding of
results is results is still results
conveyed evident
b.3. Interpret All figures, All figures, Figures, graphs, Figures, graphs,
results from Data presentation graphs, tables are graphs, tables are tables are OK, tables contain
experiments and interpretation correctly correctly drawn, missing some errors or are
conducted. (24%) presented, are but some have important or poorly
numbered and minor problems or required features. constructed, have
contain could still be missing titles,
titles/captions. improved captions or
numbers, units
missing or
incorrect, etc.
c. Ability to c.1. Prepare Abstract/ All Less than 3 Occasional Frequent
communicate written Summary grammar/spelling grammar/spelling grammar/spelling grammar and/or
effectively. documents (12%) correct and very errors, mature, errors, generally spelling errors,
according to well-written readable style readable with writing style is
technical some rough spots rough and
specification. in writing style immature
Introduction All sections are in All sections are in Sections in order,Sections out of
(8%) order, well- order, well contains the order, too much
formatted, very formatted but minimum handwritten copy,
readable. could still be allowable amount sloppy formatting
improved. of handwritten
copy, formatting is
rough but readable
Conclusions and Conclusions have Conclusions have Conclusions have Conclusions did
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

Recommendation answered point answered some answered some not answer point
(8%) by point all the points in the point in the by point all the
research research research research
questions/objecti questions/objectiv questions/objectiv questions/objecti
ves with es with es but no ves and no
recommendations recommendation. recommendation. recommendation.
.
d. ability to function d.1. Contribute Teamwork Everybody Seventy-five Fifty percent of Less than fifty
on multidisciplinary ideas and skills dynamics (8%) contributed ideas percent of the the members of percent of the
teams as part of a and skills in the members of the the team members
multidisciplinary activity. team contributed contributed ideas contributed ideas
team. ideas and skills in and skills in the and skills in the
the activity. activity. activity.
TOTAL
INTERPRETATION
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

EXPERIMENT TITLE :__________________________________________________________ DATE: ___________________________________

Score Equivalent Score Equivalent Score Equivalent
Grade Grade Grade
NAME OF STUDENTS :_______________________________________________ 1.0 10 2.1 43 3.1 73
1.1 13 2.2 46 3.2 76
_______________________________________________ 1.2 16 2.3 49 3.3 79
1.3 19 2.4 52 3.4 82
_______________________________________________ 1.4 22 2.5 55 3.5 85
1.5 25 2.6 58 3.6 88
_______________________________________________ 1.6 28 2.7 61 3.7 91
1.7 31 2.8 64 3.8 94
1.8 34 2.9 67 3.9 97
1.9 37 3.0 70 4.0 100
EVALUATED BY :________________________________________________
2.0 40
Interpretations:

Range Description
REMARKS AND COMMENTS: 1.0 - 1.9 Does not meet expectations FAILED
2.0 - 2.9 Does not meet expectations, but FAILED
______________ show a little appreciation and
learning of the activity
3.0 - 3.3 Meet expectations, shows a little PASSED
appreciation and learning of the
activity
3.4 - 3.7 Meet expectations shows PASSED
appreciation and learning of the
activity
3.8 - 4.0 Exceeds expectation PASSED