Jacob Diaz
Jacob Diaz
RWS 1302-17424
The purpose of this essay will be to weigh the risks and benefits of genetically modified
foods. Genetically modified foods or genetically engineered foods are those whos genetic
structure has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally. Genetically modified foods
have the potential to improve the efficiency of food production and provide potential health
benefits. For the purposes of this essay I will be focusing on the text from a research article
titled, Genetically Modified (GM) Foods and Ethical Eating and the audio from the TED Talk,
TED Talks has gained a sizeable following so people may stumble across the video and
become interested on the subject of genetically modified foods. The target audience of this video
is people who have formed an opinion whether it be for or against genetically modified foods
because it aims to persuade the viewer. If the viewer happened to accidentally stumble upon the
video they not might be informed on the subject of genetically modified foods, but if they found
the video by searching for a key words they are likely to have knowledge on the subject being
explored in the video. This video is pushing for the use of genetically engineered foods from and
ethical standpoint. In my opinion the intended audience for this article is people who are
researching the topic of genetically modified foods. Since this is such a specific subject it is not
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS 3
likely that somebody who is not research the topic would accidentally stumble across this article.
This article aims to inform the reader with important information with minimal to no bias on the
topic of genetically modified foods and let the reader form their own opinion.
The speaker from TED Talks, Pamela Ronald is a plant pathologist and geneticist. She is
a professor and faculty director of the Institute for Food and Agriculture Literacy at the
University of California and received her Ph.D. in molecular and physiological plant biology
from UC Berkeley. In the video, Pamela Ronald touches on the sensitive subject of children in
under developed countries suffering from malnutrition. Particularly, the 5000 children who go
blind due to vitamin A deficiency, from which more that half will die. She then goes on to
explain how scientist where able to genetically engineer a type of rice to produce -carotene
(Ronald, 2015). The fact that genetically engineering rice has the ability to prevent thousands of
children from going blind and possibly saving their lives would appeal to the emotions of many
people. Pamela Ronald also talks about the science behind genetically engineering foods. She
explains how while rice can grow while submerged in water, if it is submerged for to long that it
will die. One of her colleagues and his graduate student were studying an ancient variety of rice
while had the ability to be submerged for to weeks and still grow. They were able to isolate this
gene and when submerged in water this variety of rice grew three time more than the
conventional kind. The article, Genetically Modified (GM) Foods and Ethical Eating was
written by a team of scientists, doctors, and nutritionists. To appeal to the emotions of the reader
the authors state that there is a rising issue of weighing the disadvantages of genetically modified
foods against the benefits, especially since genetically modified foods have the potential to help
developing nations in need of economic stimulation and food security. If such benefits do exist,
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS 4
the responsible use of genetically modified foods should be employed. By stating this there are
effectively saying that there is a way to positively impact malnutrition in developing nations
which could save hundreds of thousands of lives (Dizon and others, 2015). They go on to
explain the science of splicing the genes of plants and combining them with trace amounts of
For this particular genre since it is a video, but I am focusing on the audio it is limited by
lack of visuals. The structure of the video is very linear, and by that I mean that the speaker
explains the science behind engineering a certain food and then lists the potential benefits of
doing so. The video is very organized and the audience is not allowed to ask questions until the
end of the presentation due to time constraints. The structure of the article, Genetically Modified
(GM) Foods and Ethical Eating seems to be organized in the same way as a research essay. The
article explains the purpose in an introductory paragraph, goes into the science of genetically
engineering foods and the benefits of doing son in the main body of the articles. It closes with a
conclusions paragraph stating what was accomplished in the article and touches on the ethical
I believe that the video, Pamela Ronald: The case for engineering our food was more
effective in conveying its message because the speaker already had a formed opinion on whether
genetically modified foods were beneficial or not and was trying to persuade you into agreeing
with her. The article, Genetically Modified (GM) Foods and Ethical Eating was not as effective
in my opinion because it was not persuasive. While the article did provide the reader with
important information on the subject, most of which was positive, they allowed the reader to
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS 5
form their own opinion because the authors never stated whether they were for or against
References
Dizon, F., Costa, S., Rock, C., Harris, A., Husk, C., & Mei, J. (2015). Genetically Modified
(GM) Foods and Ethical Eating. Journal of Food Science, 81(2). doi:10.1111/1750-
3841.13191
Ronald, P. (Director). (2015, May 4). Pamela Ronald: The case for engineering our food [Video
file]. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZ2TF8-
PGQ4&t=356s