Professor Strickland
English 1010
10/22/17
Legalizing Marijuana
The conflict between the anti and pro marijuana users is current and ongoing.
The public health is the most important to one side, while the other battles to have
marijuana available for the medicinal purposes. Currently there are over 35 million
Americans who use marijuana recreationally each year, according to the latest federal
make marijuana legal, originally published in the Washington Post on April 15,
2016, points out why a national organization of doctors formulated a group to legalize
country, express that the negation and illegalization of marijuana is more harmful than
good for the publics well-being. Using the example of the objections placed by
legal use in 1937, having done so has cited numerous marijuana arrest, racial and
regulating high prices creating a risk of public safety. According to DFCR founder
and board president David L. Nathan, decriminalizing and regulating the marijuana
market is the best way to assure the safety and wellness of the public (Ingraham). The
author was able to effectively achieve his purpose of showing why legalized
marijuana use would be a positive thing for the public. Through his strong use of
ethos and logos language, as well as acknowledging the ways that this issue has both
The author used effective logos language when he said that 90 percent of
This method of approach developed an ethos and logos that was most effective when
he interviewed DFCR founder and board president David L. Nathan, who is against
gives him the credibility on a medical level that supports the decriminalization for
medicinal use. Because of the backgrounds of the people interviewed, the author
Ingraham acknowledges that the issue has heightened the tension that divides
the medical community. For example: AMA criminalized marijuana due to objections
that were not fully disclosed, even though treatment was used for medical conditions.
Nathan of DFCR remarked, We believe that the best way to improve the situation is
to enact full legalization with smart regulation (Ingraham). There may be a division
in the community, but for some physicians their differences in political disposition
only unifies there favor for cannabis legalization. Physicians of the Republican,
Democratic, and Independent parties set their differences aside and come together as
explaining why decriminalization of marijuana is a positive thing for the public. The
credibility of his facts are substantial evidence and reason as to why the issue has both
divided and unified groups of the medical community to influence the medicinal use
of marijuana. His use of the ethos and logos language construct a strong supportive
Ingraham, Christopher. More and more doctors want to make marijuana legal. The Washington
www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/04/15/more-and-more-doctors-want-to-make-
marijuana-legal/?utm_term=.7dcbbd4d6f3b