CEFR-aligned curriculum cascade

workshops: Day 5

3.3_Primary_2017 1
Day 5, Session 2: Handout 1
Micro-teaching evaluation form. Focusing on processes and outcomes in observation.
Group name:
Pupil feedback
agree
The teacher was friendly and encouraged me
to learn English.
I understood the purpose of the activity.
I followed the activity and the teacher did not
rush me to move to the next part of the activity.
I understood the new words and the teacher
helped me understand when I needed.
I practised the new learning and was
encouraged to speak in English during the
activity.
I used a textbook/internet/storybooks/.
during the activity and enjoyed it.
The teacher clearly told me that I did well or
showed me how to improve my English.
I know how I can use my new learning in the
future.
Any other comments?
3.3_Primary_2017
Teacher name:
Dis- Not Agree Observer feedback Dis- Not Agree
sure agree sure
The teacher was friendly and motivated
learning.
The teacher explained learning objective/s
using language suitable for pupils.
The teacher kept to time, paced the activity
well and allowed time for questions and
pupil interaction.
The teacher clarified any terminology used
and check the students understanding?
Pupil talk time was given priority in the
activity (questioning/group discussion/etc).
The lesson used resources
(textbook/internet/story books/.) to
enhance learning experience.
The teacher gave positive feedback and/or
demonstrated how to improve avoiding
pointing out errors.
The teacher summed up the activity,
repeated key learning objective and
provided a sense of achievement.
2
Handout D5.S2.2: staying on track checklist

Before the lesson Yes Partially No

Is the learning objective clear, precise and achievable?

Are success criteria given?
Is previous learning picked up on?
Do the activities facilitate active learning? (e.g. peer and group
work, many opportunities for the pupils to practise speaking and
asking questions)
Are the timings appropriate?
Is there enough support to help with concepts/skills that can be
particularly difficult?
Is there support for weaker pupils who require further support
and help for strong pupils to further their learning?
Are the resources helpful? Explain why.
Are monitoring and tracking progress strategies incorporated?
Is there a good plenary that summarises the lesson and keeps
the pupils engaged?
After the lesson Yes Partially No

Was the learning objective achieved?

Was the pre-lesson activity interesting and helpful?
Were all pupils involved?
Was the teaching delivery clear and engaging? Give examples
or evidence.
Did you differentiation strategies work according to the plan?
Were the resources as helpful as expected and planned?
Did you follow the timing as planned or do you have to amend
your timing for next time you deliver the same lesson?
Were all areas of learning difficulties addressed successfully?
Was it possible to monitor the pupils progress?
Was the plenary successful?
Any other comments

3.3_Primary_2017 3