Fatima Arriola
Professor Batty
English 102
17 October 2017
work involving of symbols and metaphors that, together, similar a relationship between two men
(one, a seemingly heterosexual male; the other concealing themselves in the appearance of a
female) and the power of the West over the East. Critics normally conclude that Hwang was, in
fact, emphasizing these metaphors to represent this image of an entire Western culture over the
supposedly unassuming Chinese culture. However, he's focusing on different images and giving
a diversity of meanings to each representation, but at the same time, it tells a beautiful story
about two lovers who technically are homosexual. While not disregarding the strength of these
opinions and concepts, my argument instead focuses on the idea that the separate homosexual
identities of the characters of Song and Gallimard by playing a crucial role in understanding the
burdens of gender roles in a mainly heterosexual world and context. By contrast, it is Song's
sympathetic of Western men, which shoot from actual knowledge and observation, which allows
him to deceive Gallimard. Song and Gallimard both share the conventional idea of how a person
Hwang jumps off the play by allowing Gallimard to give a monologue to the viewers
about his current difficulty and how the name of the play came about. The title, M. Butterfly, he
says, comes from Puccini's opera Madame Butterfly in which a white, American man falls for a
Arriola 2
young Asian woman. They start to have romantic relations and ultimately marry the young
woman who has a child that's technically his; the American then leaves for three years, only to
his return to tell his earliest that he has married an American woman. Discouraged, the young
Oriental commits suicide and leaves her child with the American (Hwang 12-19). Many critics
such as Irmscher surround their main argument this point: Hwang is using this similarity of
Puccinis opera with his own story of homosexual lovers to clear a carriage f Western
imperialism over Eastern cultures (623-624). Irmscher sees continuously more thing in the play
than ever before. For example, Hwang, though using the suggestion to indicating western
dominance, could also suggest another resolution for its use: to observe the separate sexualities
of Gallimard and Song and the ways they are shaped by a society which is required
heterosexuality.
As we get taken back to Gallimard's earlier life, we see that Gallimard, a French
ambassador in China, has fallen in love with an Asian "woman" who's beyond beautiful by the
name of Song, while he was in his job. He describes her as a "butterfly" due to her playing this
role in Asian Theater and becomes obsessed with her, which leads to ultimate desire and a 20-
year love affair. Eventually, we learn that Song is a spy who has disguised himself as a woman to
collect information for the Communist Party; Gallimard cannot handle this exposure and
commits suicide creating yet another similar to Madame Butterfly (Hwang 69). At this moment
of death is when the second purpose of that opera's title becomes important in connection to the
issue of homosexuality. Close to the beginning of the play, Gallimard defends the Oriental
woman's suicide in Madame Butterfly who quotes, "Death with honor/ Is better than life/ Life
Arriola 3
with dishonor," (Hwang 17). This quote can be connected with Gallimard's suicide as he views
homosexuality as a shame to himself and mankind, and feels the only outflow is death.
The serious problem that keeps both the reading and the analysis of this play is pointed
to the political monarchy of the hidden lookout that people (specifically Americans) will view
the play in a mostly heterosexual, white, protestant field that creates this type of "tunnel dream"
which gives us an incomplete lookout. What most people tend to disrespect, is the extraordinary
matter of whether Gallimard is a homosexual or not. In a 1989 Hwang had an interview with,
Don Digaetani who asked him a question about the relationship that Gallimard and Song had in
his story. In his respond, Hwang chose to leave the open-ended question saying, "On some level,
he knows he's gay yet he lived in a homophobic period," Hwang then debates the issue of
homosexuality in different cultures and tries to inhabit into describing an obedient East (Hwang
and Digaetani 145). It is interesting to see Hwang answer such question in a very informal way.
The play was out in the late 1980's when homosexuality was beginning to become more open,
but in many places, it was still a debatable topic. As a result, Hwang likely did not want to risk
an obvious respond as it could lead to a disaster in the audience numbers. We can still see,
through Hwang's writing, the indication that shows a gay Gallimard and Song, especially in the
character descriptions and stage directing. According to Hwang, when directors are casting Song,
they should, "Preferably find a man," and if they choose a woman to play Song instead they "run
the risk of abusing the very sexual domination it pursues to judge," (Hwang 89). Critics such as
Zamora argue that Hwang uses this "American-based theme to instill a political and cultural
reformation," (35). However, Hwang is not only trying to send political notions of the
overlapping East/West theme but possible also to change cultural attitudes towards
Arriola 4
homosexuality. Song's make-up on stage, for example, is stark white, to represent the western
values of beauty. It also can be to serve the domain of thought as a female perspective; after all,
Song is trying to cover up the exile of being a homosexual by masking himself with a white,
heterosexual body. Now that we have discussed Hwang reason of writing such story, let's move
Gallimard's homosexual nature and character, are several symbols that lead to the statement
that Song and, more importantly, Gallimard are gay. First, we have the jail cell in which
Gallimard is kept. This space represents Gallimard's inside sexuality, as the heterosexual world
outside cannot accept his homosexuality, and therefore, he has to restrict this "difference" to a
separate monarchy of thought. These homosexual thoughts are becoming Gallimard nightmares
just how his desires are gone away from the heterosexual world. This symbol relates directly to
Glover and Kaplan's analysis of Queer Theory as they try to "define queer" and categorize it as a
Hwang's theme of Western imperialism over Eastern cultures conveys with it the concept
of the heterosexual privilege. As an outcome, both audience members and critics fail to see the
actual importance of Gallimard and Song's relationship. Their internal struggle is a straight result
of the heterosexual world's feminization and dominance of the obedient homosexual society. Just
as in Western dominance has led to colonization and submissiveness of the Eastern world,
heterosexual dominance has firmed and continues to further failure the domain of homosexual
culture and closets "queer" sexualities. Especially in the society we live in, I feel disgusted every
day by the hate that homosexual get. It's a disappointment to see people reactions toward others,
which is why I think Song and Gallimard story is calling them into questions. The audience will
Arriola 5
always have different opinions even if the authors are trying to persuade a mortal lesson in his
story.
Arriola 6
Works Cited
Glover, David, and Cora Kaplan . Genders. 2nd. New York: Routledge, 2009. Print.
Hwang, David Henry. M. Butterfly. New York, N.Y.: New American Library, 1989.
Print.
Hwang, David, and John Digaetani. M Butterfly: An Interview with David Henry
Hwang.TDR; 33.3(1989):141-153.
Zamora, Maria C., and Inc ebrary. Nation, Race & History in Asian American Literature: