Anda di halaman 1dari 7

N A L A R T I C L E

Acute Effect of Cigarette Smoking on


Glucose Tolerance and Other
Cardiovascular Risk Factors
AL.BF.RTO C . FRATI, MD, FACP an independent cardiovascular risk factor
FEI.IPF. INIESTRA, MD (9). Nevertheless, the pathogenic linkage
C. RAUL ARIZA, MD, FACP between these changes and smoking is
not well understood. The acute effects of
cigarette smoking in smokers include
transient increases in heart rate and blood
pressure (10), a nonconsistent decrease of
OBJECTIVE To investigate the acute effect of cigarette smoking on glucose tolerance, serum HDL cholesterol (11,12), and im-
insulin sensitivity, serum lipids, blood pressure, and heart rate. paired insulin action (13). The acute ef-
fects of smoking in nonsmokers (i.e., pas-
RESEARCH DESIGN A N D METHODS This nonrandomized experimental control sive smoking) have not been studied. The
trial in a tertiary care center included 20 healthy chronic smokers and 20 age-, sex-, and
aim of this study was to investigate the
BMI-matched healthy volunteers. Two oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were performed on
each subject. Three cigarettes were smoked during the first 30 min in one of the tests. Serum acute effect of cigarette smoking on glu-
glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels were measured every 30 min; the area under the curve cose tolerance, insulinemia, insulin sensi-
(AUC) and the insulin sensitivity index (ISI) were calculated; serum total cholesterol, LDL tivity, serum lipids, heart rate, and blood
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured at 0 and 180 min; and blood pressure in nonsmokers as well as in
pressure and heart rate were recorded every 5 min throughout 180 min. chronic smokers.

RESULTS Smoking acutely impaired glucose tolerance: the AUC for glucose in smokers
was 2*5.5 1.03 mmol/1 (mean SE) (95% CI 22.9-28) during the smoking OGTT and 21.8 RESEARCH DESIGN A N D
0.85 mmol/1 (CI 19.2-24.3) in the control OGTT (P < 0.01); in nonsmokers, it was 19.7 METHODS Two groups of healthy
0.3 mmol/1 (CI 18.8-20.5) in the smoking OGTT and 18.7 0.35 mmol/1 (CI 17.8-19.5) in the volunteers were studied. They were re-
control OGTT (P < 0.05). Smoking acutely increased serum insulin and C-peptide levels and cruited from relatives of patients or hos-
decreased ISI only in smokers: ISI in smokers was 55 2.8 (CI 47.4-62.6) in the control OGTT pital personnel. At the beginning of the
and 43 2.7 (CI 35.4-50.6) in the smoking OGTT (P < 0.05). Smoking acutely caused a rise study, they were consecutively admitted,
of serum total cholesterol levels in both groups and increased LDL cholesterol and triglyceride divided into one of two groups according
serum levels significantly only in smokers (P < 0.05). A significant rise of blood pressure and to their smoking habits, and matched by
heart rate while smoking was present in all the subjects. sex, age, and BMI. Group I (nonsmokers)
included 10 men and 10 women who had
CONCLUSIONS Smoking acutely impaired glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity,
enhanced serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and raised blood pressure and heart rate.
never smoked. Their ages ranged from 20
These findings support the pathogenetic role of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular risk factors. to 55 years (29 7 [mean SD]); their
BMI (Quetelet index) was 24.9 0.5 kg/
m2. Group II (smokers) included 10 men
and 10 women ranging from 20 to 53

S
moking is a well-established major risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia years (29 7) of age with BMI of 24.8
risk factor for coronary and periph- and hypertension (3). 0.3 kg/m2. They had a history of smoking
eral vascular disease. Several epide- Cigarette smoking may increase at least 10 cigarettes per day (21.2 7
miological studies have shown that ciga- the incidence of NIDDM (4,5) and is ep- [range 10-40] during the last year) with a
rette smoking increases the incidence of idemiologically related to at least two mean duration of smoking of 7.5 6
myocardial infarction and sudden coro- other risk factors such as serum lipid years (range 2-20). Waist-to-hip ratio
nary death, and it adversely affects the changes and insulin resistance (6-8). The was not measured. Subjects with diabetes
prognosis in patients with previous myo- latter, which has recently been demon- or severe obesity, hypertension, or endo-
cardial infarction or angina pectoris (1,2). strated in a group of heavy smokers (8), crine, liver, or kidney diseases or those
Smoking also enhances the effects of other has also increasingly been mentioned as taking any medication were not included.
Two subjects in the group of nonsmokers
had a first-degree relative with diabetes,
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Especialidades del Centra Medico La Raza, Instituto
while three subjects in the group of smok-
Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico. ers had a first-degree relative with hyper-
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Alberto C. Frati, MD, FACP, Division de Medicina tension. No other hereditary factor for
Interna, Hospital de Fspecialidades del Centra Medico La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Seris glucose intolerance or atherosclerosis was
y Zaachila, Col. La Raza, 02990, Mexico DF, Mexico. clinically detected.
Received for publication 1 May 1995 and accepted in revised form 28 September 1995.
AUC, area under the curve; FFA, free fatty acid; ISI, insulin sensitivity index; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance All the subjects were ambulatory.
Before the test, they did not consume a

112 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 1996


Frati, Iniestra, and Arizci

special diet, but they were not allowed to rate for different plasma glucose levels glucose in the smoking test was 25.5 :+:
drink alcohol or to smoke for 24 h before (15) as has been used by Lindhal et al. 1.038 mmol/l, which was significantly
the tests. Two oral glucose tolerance tests (16): ISI = M/MSG/log MSI. The glucose greater than in the test without smoking
(OGTTs) in random order were per- uptake rate (M) was estimated as the dif- (21.8 0.854 mmol/l) (P < 0.01). The
formed in each subject with an interval of ference between the glucose load (75,000 2-h serum glucose after smoking was
3 days. In one test, three tobacco ciga- mg) and the glucose left in the glucose >11.1 mmol/l in 8 individuals, >7.7 and
rettes were smoked (at 0,15, and 30 min), space. M was calculated as follows: M = <11.1 in 11 subjects, and <7.7 mmol/l
while the other test, without smoking, glucose load (120 + [0-h glucose 2-h only in 1 smoker subject.
was the control. The smoking velocity of glucose] X 180 X 0.19 X body weight/ The effect of cigarette smoking on
each cigarette was not monitored. The 120). MSG is the mean of serum glucose the OGTT was greater in usual smokers
nicotine content of each cigarette was 1 at 0 and 120 min. MSI is the mean of than in nonsmokers (Fig. 1). In smokers,
mg (information supplied by the manu- serum insulin concentration at 0 and 120 serum glucose values at 90, 120, and 150
facturer). Each test was performed after a mm. min in smoking test were means of 3,2.1,
night of normal sleep with subjects in the Data are means SE. Analysis of and 2.4 mmol/l above the control test, re-
fasting condition. Tests were started at variance was used for statistical calcula- spectively, compared with 0.9, 0.84, and
8:00 A.M. while the subject was resting tions, but the Mann-Whitney U test was 0.2 mmol/l above control test in non-
seated. A venous blood sample for labo- used to compare the time of the maxi- smokers (P < 0.01).
ratory measurements was drawn, and an mum peak of serum insulin. P < 0.05 Serum insulin levels in nonsmok-
oral glucose load of 75 g in 200 ml water (two-tailed) was considered significant. ers were similar in both OGTTs. The AUC
was given. The subject started to smoke Every volunteer was aware of the values for insulin were also similar in both
the first cigarette immediately after the purpose of the investigation and possible tests (smoking 932 66.7 pmol/1; con-
glucose load. Serum glucose, insulin, and hazards and side effects and signed an in- trol 889 63.8 pmol/1) (P > 0.05). In the
C-peptide levels were measured every 30 formed consent. To know if smoking (i.e., group of smokers, the AUC for insulin in
min throughout 180 min. Serum total passive) could also affect nonsmokers, the control OGTT was 832 66.7
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL choles- this group of volunteers had to be in- pmol/1, which was similar to that in the
terol, and triglyceride levels were deter- cluded. The long-term side effects of nonsmokers. However, a late peak of se-
mined at 0 and 180 min. Blood pressure smoking three cigarettes were thought to rum insulin concentrations was noticed
and pulse rate were recorded every 5 min be negligible. The study was approved by in chronic smokers. In the control OGTT,
throughout the test. the Investigation Committee and was per- the maximal peak of serum insulin levels
Serum glucose was measured im- formed according to principles of the Hel- in nonsmokers appeared at close to 90
mediately after the blood samples were sinki Declaration. min (range 30-150), while in smokers it
obtained by the glucose oxidase auto- appeared at close to 150 min; mode and
mated method (570 Alliance, Ciba Corn- RESULTS In the group of non- median also were 150 min (range 60-
ing Shimadzu, Oberlin, OH) (coefficient smokers, the control OGTT was normal 180). The difference was highly signifi-
of variance, 4%). Aliquots of serum were in 18 subjects and was classified as glu- cant (P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney 1/ test). In
kept frozen at 20C until insulin and cose intolerance (2-h glucose >7.7 and smokers, cigarette smoking had an en-
C-peptide were determined by a radioim- <11.1 mmol/l [>140 and <200 mg/dl]) hancing effect on serum insulin levels;
munoassay (CIS Biointernational, Oris in 2 subjects. Cigarette smoking was fol- these were significantly higher in the
Industrie SA, Gif-Sur-Ivette, France) that lowed by a further rise in serum glucose smoking than in the control test at 60 and
measures human insulin (100%) and hu- levels that was significant at 90 and 120 90 min (P < 0.05). The AUC for insulin
man proinsulin (40%). Total cholesterol, min (P < 0.01) (Table 1). The AUC for was greater in the smoking test (1,112
LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and glucose was 18.7 0.355 in the control 48 pmol/1) than in the control test (832 :+:
triglyceride levels were measured by en- test and 19.7 0.305 mmol/l in the 66.7 pmol/1) ( P < 0.01).
zymatic methods (PAP, BIO Merieux, smoking test (P < 0.05). Similarly to serum insulin, a sig-
France). The coefficient of intra-assay er- The control OGTT in the group of nificant rise of C-peptide levels after
ror for each method was <6%. Blood smokers showed significantly higher se- smoking was present only in the group of
pressure was measured with a standard rum glucose values than in nonsmokers at smokers. The AUC for C-peptide in the
mercury sphygmomanometer. The same 90, 120, 150, and 180 min (P < 0.01). control OGTT was similar in both groups
sphygmomanometer was used in every The AUC for glucose in the control OGTT (4.1 0.362 and 4.1 0.218 pmol/1);
instance, and the 12-cm-wide cuff was was also greater in smokers (21.8 0.854 after smoking, it was significantly greater
placed on the same arm in both tests. Di- mmol/l) than in nonsmokers (P < 0.01). in the group of smokers (4.9 0.218
astolic blood pressure was defined at Ko- In the group of smokers, the OGTT was pmol/1) (P < 0.05).
rotkoff 5. normal in 11 subjects and showed glu- The ISI in the control test was sig-
The areas under serum concentra- cose intolerance in 9 subjects. In the nificantly higher in nonsmokers (67 :+:
tion curves (AUCs) of glucose, insulin, group of smokers, the OGTT during cig- 4.1) than in smokers (55 2.8) (P <
and C-peptide were estimated by the lin- arette smoking was clearly different from 0.05). After smoking, a minor and non-
ear trapezoidal method. The insulin sen- the test without smoking. In the former, significant decrease of the index was ob-
sitivity index (ISI) was calculated accord- serum glucose levels were significantly served in the group of nonsmokers (60
ing to the formula of Cederholm and higher than in the control test at 90, 120, 2.9) (P > 0.05), while a significant dimi-
Wibell (14), adjusting the glucose uptake and 150 min (P < 0.01). The AUC for nution of the ISI was present in the group

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 1996 113


Smoking and glucose tolerance

Table 1Effects of smoking on serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels during OGTT

Nonsmokers Smokers
Glucose Insulin C-peptide Glucose Insulin C-peptide
Test (mmol/1 [mg/dl]) (pmol/1) (pmol/1) (mmol/1 [mg/dl]) (pmol/1) (pmol/1)
0 min
Control 5.6 0.26 [101.1 4.7] 111 4 0.42 0.03 5.5 0.19 [100.6 3.5] 90 7 0.55 0.06
Smoking 5.6 0.13 [100.5 2.4] 113 10 0.46 0.06 4.9 0.18 [88.5 3.3] 137 7 0.62 0.05
30 min
Control 6.0 0.14 [109.5 2.6] 128 22 0.60 0.09 5.8 0.23 [105.2 4.2] 96 12 0.55 0.05
Smoking 6.0 0.11 [109.7 2.0] 124 11 0.42 0.05 5.5 0.26 [100.2 4.7] 210 53 0.81 0.11*1
60 min
Control 6.8 0.23 [122.5 4.2] 320 46 1.36 0.27 7.2 0.27 [131.3 4.9] 262 51 1.28 0.13
Smoking 6.5 0.18 [119.9 3.3]* 220 41 1.30 0.15 8.0 0.55 [144.6 10.0]*t 426 62*T 1.46 0.15
90 min
Control 7.0 0.18 [127.3 3.3] 428 68 2.09 0.23 8.0 0.28 [144.0 5.1]*t 322 39 1.80 0.16
Smoking 7.9 0.18 [143.7 3.4]* 457 33 1.72 0.12 10.9 0.60 [146.7 10.4]*t 459 41* 1.89 0.13
120 min
Control 6.3 0.24 [113.8 4.4] 403 54 2.01 0.20 8.2 0.34 [148.5 6.2]t 363 35 1.99 0.11
Smoking 7.1 0.18 [128.4 3.3] 365 38 1.93 0.17 10.3 0.48 [187.0 8.7]*t 408 25t 2.20 0.17
150 min
Control 6.0 0.24 [108.2 4.4] 370 54 1.81 0.14 8.1 0.39 [146.7 7.1]t 426 45t 2.12 0.17
Smoking 6.2 0.22 [112.8 4.0] 393 44 1.93 0.15 10.5 0.65 [190.1 11.8]t 497 53t 2.51 0.18*t
180 min
Control 5.0 0.27 [90.2 4.9] 154 17 1.57 0.25 7.4 0.42 [134.5 7.1] 320 38t 1.78 0.14
Smoking 5.2 0.16 [93.8 2.9] 250 41 1.55 0.08 7.5 0.59 [135.1 10.7] 363 22t 2.43 0.12*t
Data arc means SH. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) *smoking vs. control test; +smokers vs. nonsmokers.

of smokers (43 2.7) (P < 0.05 vs. the and 110 2.5/71 1.77 mmHg in the ment was obtained between calculated ISI
control test). smoking test (P > 0.05 for systolic and P values at the OGTT and metabolic clear-
No differences between groups in < 0.05 for diastolic). Values of heart rate ance rate and steady-state plasma glucose
basal serum levels of total cholesterol, from 5 to 60 min were 63 1 and 73 values at the clamp (the gold standard)
LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and 1.9 beats/min in the control and smoking and insulin suppression tests (14). The
triglycerides were noticed. However, in tests, respectively (P < 0.01). In the mechanism of insulin resistance in this
both groups, total cholesterol levels rose group of smokers, these values were sys- case cannot be determined by this study.
after smoking (P < 0.05). A significant tolic/diastolic blood pressure of 103 However, an enhancement of catechol-
increase in serum LDL cholesterol and tri- 2.1/64 1.1 in the control test and 110 amines may be at least partially responsi-
glyceride concentrations after smoking 1.7/69 1 . 5 mmHg in the smoking ble. Nicotine absorbed during smoking
was present in the group of smokers, test (P < 0.05 for systolic and <0.01 for increases the discharge of catecholamines
while similar, although not statistically diastolic). Heart rates from 5 to 60 min from the adrenal medulla and from extra-
significant, changes were observed in the were 65 1.2 and 74 2.2 beats/min in adrenal chromaffin tissue, which causes
group of nonsmokers (Table 2). control and smoking tests, respectively (P heart rate and blood pressure to rise
Basal systolic and diastolic blood < 0.01). No effect on blood pressure and (17,18). In our study, an early rise in heart
pressure values were marginally lower in heart rate was seen after the 1st hour. rate and blood pressure induced by
smokers than in nonsmokers: 103 1/63 smoking was seen in both smokers and
1 mml Ig (systolic/diastolic) in smokers C O N C L U S I O N S This study nonsmokers.
and 106 1/65 0.8 mmHg in non- shows that cigarette smoking acutely de- On the other hand, hyperinsu-
smokers. The difference was not statisti- teriorates glucose tolerance in healthy linemia, which is a feature of insulin re-
cally significant (P > 0.05). Basal heart nonsmokers as well as in usual tobacco sistance, may cause adrenergic activation
rate was similar in both groups (64 0 . 8 smokers. This impairment was more ma- (19). Nevertheless, sympathetic overac-
beats/min). In both groups, cigarette jor in chronic smokers than in nonsmok- tivity (tachycardia, high blood pressure)
smoking caused a rise of blood pressure ers. This effect is probably due to dimin- due to smoking appeared before signifi-
and heart rate that started at 5 min, and it ished sensitivity to insulin since the ISI cant hyperinsulinemia was present. Thus,
was sustained throughout the 1st hour decreased significantly after smoking it is more likely that adrenergic activity
(Fig. 2). In nonsmokers, systolic/diastolic compared with the test without smoking. induced by smoking was responsible for
blood pressure from 5 to 60 min was 106 ISI has been used as a practical measure of insulin resistance than that hyperinsu-
1.2/66 1 . 3 mmHg in the control test insulin resistance (14,16). Good agree- linemia caused adrenergic activation.

114 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 1996


Frati, hiiestra, and Arizci

cigarette smokers and in snuff users was


NON SMOKERS SMOKERS reported by Eliasson et al. (21), while nor-
mal plasma insulin concentrations in
o I '\ smokers were found by others (22). Se-
rum insulin and C-peptide basal levels
and AUCs were similar in smokers and in
nonsmokers in the present study, but
chronic cigarette smokers had impaired
glucose tolerance compared with non-
smokers. Impaired glucose tolerance in
smokers was probably caused by insulin
resistance, since the LSI was lower in
smokers than in nonsmokers. Both glu-
cose tolerance and ISI were further im-
INSULIN paired immediately after subjects smoked
three cigarettes. Chronic heavy cigarette
smokers have been recently found to be
hyperinsulinemic and insulin resistant
compared with a matched group of non-
smokers (6). Janzon et al. {22) also
showed that smokers had a delect in glu-
cose removal in response to an intrave-
C PEPTIDE nous glucose challenge. Recently it has
been shown (2.3) in a group of healthy
pmol/L male smokers that the amount of nicotine
smoked per day is related to the degree of
OJ insulin resistance measured by an eugly-
60 120 180 0 60 120 180 cemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. As far as
we know there is only one report con-
MINUTES MINUTES
cerning the acute effect of smoking on in-
#<0.05 sulin resistance (13). These authors stud-
0<0.01 ied seven smokers with the euglycemic
Figure 1Serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels during an OGTT performed while subjects clamp technique and reported that smok-
were smoking three cigarettes ( ) or without smoking ( ). The OGTT while subjects smoked ing impaired insulin action mainly be-
.showed significantly higher values of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide than the control test in the group of cause of lower peripheral glucose uptake.
smokers. A higher serum glucose level in the smoking test was also present in nonsmokers.
Nicotine also affects gastric emp-
tying, which in turn can modify glucose
Moreover, enhancement of serum insulin plasma glucose concentrations before and tolerance tests (24). However, if rapid
levels by glucose challenge alone, as in the after an oral glucose challenge in smokers gastric emptying were the cause of the
control test, did not affect heart rate and and nonsmokers and failed to find signif- high glycemic levels, early high serum in-
blood pressure. Artificially induced high icant differences between the groups. sulin levels would also be expected in the
hyperinsulinemia does not acutely raise However, higher serum insulin levels af- smoking test.
blood pressure (20). ter glucose intake were present in the A surprising finding was that sub-
Facchini et al. (8) measured group of smokers. Hyperinsulinemia in jects who smoked had a retarded peak of

Table 2Acute effect of cigarette smoking on serum lipids

Total cholesterol LDL cholesterol HDL cholesterol Triglyeerides


Basal values (mmol/1)
Nonsmokers 3.96 0.151 2.6 0.151 1.08 0.05 1.25 + 0.070
Smokers 3.36 0.379 2.8 0.151 1.08 0.05 1.40 0.158
Changes after OGTT (mmol/1)
Nonsmokers -0.07 0.151 -0.22 0.126 -0.05 0.025 -0.08 + 0.045
Smokers -0.02 0.151 -0.05 0.126 -0.05 0.025 -0.02 + 0.00
Changes after OGTT plus smoking (mmol/1)
Nonsmokers +0.45 0.151* +0.12 + 0.126 -0.10 0.025 +0.08 0.112
Smokers +0.43 0.101* +0.68 0.126;:; -0.05 0.025 +0..S2 0.0lV>(v
Data arc means SE. *P < 0.05 vs. basal values and control OGTT.

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 1996 115


Smoking and glucose tolerance

NON SMOKERS SMOKERS


BP 120.
SYSTOLIC
110.
mmHg /' " " ' * ' v
^\.i

100^

70 >*
DIASTOLIC
60
smoking test
80_
control test
HEART
RATE 70
beot/min
60J
CIGARETTE
SMOKED 6 60 120 180 0 60 120 180
MINUTES MINUTES
<0.05*
<0.01 O
Figure 2Blood pressure and heart rate during an OGTT while subjects were smoking ( ) or without smoking ( ). Cigarettes were smoked at 0,
15, and 30 min (arrows). A significant rise ofdiastolic blood pressure and ojheart rate during the 1st hour in the smoking test was seen in both groups of
subjects. Systolic blood pressure also rose, but it was significant only in the group oj smokers.

serum insulin in the OGTT, as occurs in conflicting results (6-8,21,29-31). How- smokers. Postprandial smoking is a fre-
NIDDM patients (25,26). This rinding ever, the general conclusion is that smok- quent habit. The explanation of these
would be easily explained if individuals ers have high serum concentrations of changes is far from clear. However, we
with NIDDM were inadvertently included total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cho- know that nicotine stimulates the release
in the group of smokers. However, none lesterol, and VLDL cholesterol and have of adrenaline, which in turn raises plasma
had an OGTT indicating diabetes accord- low serum HDL cholesterol values (7). No concentrations of free fatty acids (FFAs)
ing to American Diabetes Association and differences in serum total cholesterol, through enhanced lipolysis and FFA mo-
World Health Organization criteria LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and bilization from adipose tissue (34). FFAs
(27,28) in the test without smoking. Fur- triglyceride concentrations were found stimulate the hepatic secretion of VLDLs
thermore, age, sex, BMI, and family his- between smokers and nonsmokers in our and triglycerides and also cholesterol (7).
tory of insulin-resistant related condi- study, perhaps because of the small size of An inhibition of lipoprotein lipase activity
tions (diabetes, obesity, or hypertension) the sample herein studied. by smoking has also been proposed as a
were similar in both groups. Moreover, In this study, smoking acutely mechanism of enhanced levels of circulat-
despite that, an OGTT indicating glucose caused a rise in serum levels of total cho- ing triglycerides and VLDLs (35). Never-
intolerance was more frequent in the lesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycer- theless, adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase
group of smokers: the 11 smoker subjects ides. Reports about the acute effect of activity is increased in smokers (36). This
who had a normal control OGTT had a smoking upon serum lipid concentra- enzyme promotes the storage of triglycer-
similarly retarded peak of insulin (median tions are also controversial, ranging from ides in adipose tissue and perhaps has a
150 min, range 90-180) than the 9 sub- no effect to a decrease in plasma total cho- counterregulatory role in the mainte-
jects with glucose intolerance (median lesterol, triglycerides, VLDLs, and HDL nance of body weight in smokers (36).
150 min, range 60-180). To our knowl- cholesterol (11,12,32,33). The acute ef- The data from this investigation
edge, this finding has not previously been fect of smoking on serum lipids has been agree with other reports showing that
reported. A role of retarded insulin releas- studied in the fasting condition, but only smoking acutely raises heart rate and
ing in the overall impairment of glucose in one instance (11). The test in this study blood pressure (37-40). Despite the tran-
tolerance and insulin-resistant condition was performed after an oral glucose load. sient rise of blood pressure caused by nic-
cannot be ruled out. The combined effect of glucose intake and otine, data from epidemiological studies
Measurements of serum choles- tobacco smoking was a rise of serum total have generally shown smokers to have
terol, triglyceride, and lipoprotein con- cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyc- lower blood pressure than nonsmokers
centrations in smokers have disclosed eride concentrations mainly in usual (41). The importance of the effect of to-

116 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 19, M M M R 2, FIBRIARY 1996


Frati, Inicstra, and Arizu

bacco on blood pressure might be over- tions in basal plasma glucose concentra-
References tion on glucose utilization 0 and meta-
looked because the transient elevation of
blood pressure may occur often in heavy 1. Wilhclmsen L: Coronary heart disease: bolic clearance (.MCR") rates during
smokers. The effect of repeated nicotine epidemiology of smoking and interven- insulin clamp studies in patients with
tion studies of smoking. Am Heart] 115: non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
stimuli on blood pressure was assessed by
242-249, 1988 Diabetes 31:396-400, 1982
Mann et al. (42) in untreated hypertensive 2. McGill HC: The cardiovascular pathology 16. Lindhal B, Asplund K, Hallmans G: High
patients monitoring 24-h ambulatory of smoking. Am Heart] 115:250-257, scrum insulin, insulin resistance and their
blood pressure; smokers maintained a 1988 associations with cardiovascular risk lac-
higher daytime ambulatory systolic blood 3. Mancia G: Opening remarks: the need to tors: the Northern Sweden MONICA
pressure than nonsmokers even though manage risk factors of coronary heart dis- population study. / Intern Med ?. W:.'.6 V
blood pressure in the office was similar. ease. Am Heart] 115:240-242, 1988 270,1993
In this study, the changes acutely 4. Feskens EJ, Kromhout D: Cardiovascular 17. Cryer PE, Haymond M\V, Santiago )V,
caused by smoking were in general more risk factors and the 25-years incidence of Shah SD: Norepinephrine and epincph
pronounced in chronic smokers than in diabetes mellitus in middle-aged men. Am rine release and adrenergic mediation of
] Epidemiol 130:1101-1108, 1989 smoking-associated hemodynamic and
nonsmokers, and in the latter, even the
5. Rimm EB, MansonJE, Stampfer MJ, Cold- metabolic events. N t:.n$l J Med 295:'->7 V
nonstatistically significant changes itz GA, Willet WL, Rosner B, Hennekens 577,1976
seemed to behave similarly to those in the CH, Speizer FE: Cigarette smoking and 18. Trap-Jensen J: Effect of smoking on heart
group of smokers. The differences in the the risk of diabetes in women. Am] Public and peripheral circulation. Am Hcait /
magnitude of response might suggest Health 83:211-214, 1993 115:263-256,1988
some kind of sensitization or memory 6. Willet W, Hennekens CH, Castelli W, 19. Minaker KL, Rowe J\V, Young JB, Spar-
elicited by cigarette smoking. Rosner B, Evans D, Taylor J, Kass EH: Ef- row D, Pallotta JA, Landsberg I.: Meet o\
The influence of long-term low- fects of cigarette smoking on fasting tri- age on insulin stimulation of sympathetic
concentration tobacco smoke exposure glycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL- nervous system activity in man. Metabo
(as chronic passive smokers) or of acute cholesterol in women. Am Heart ] 105: Item 21:1181-1184, 1982
417-421, 1983 20. Frati AC, Ariza CR, Martine.-.-Cedillo J,
passive smoking cannot be entirely in-
7. Craig WY, Palomaki GE, HaddowJE: Cig- Altamirano P: Efecto de la hiperinsuline
ferred from this investigation. However, arette smoking and serum lipid and li- mia aguda en la tension arterial de indi
since metabolic and hemodynamic poprotein concentrations: an analysis of viduos sanos. Anh lnst Cardiol Mex 60:
changes appeared also in healthy non- published data. Br Med ] 298:784-788, 571-576, 1990
smokers and the magnitude of these 1989 21. Eliasson M, l.undblad D, Hagg F: Cardio-
changes depends on both the duration 8. Facchini FS, Hollembeck CB, JeppesenJ, vascular risk factors in young snuff users
(group of chronic smokers) and the inten- Ida Chen YD, Reaven GM: Insulin resis- and cigarette smokers. / Intern Med ?A0:
sity (acute smoking) of the exposure, it is tance and cigarette smoking. Lancet 1992: 17-22, 1991
highly probable that at least small changes 339:1128-1130 22. Janzon L, Berntorp K, Jansson M, l.indell
can occur in passive smokers. 9. Reaven GM: Treatment of hypertension: SE, Trell E: Glucose tolerance and smok-
focus on prevention of coronary heart dis- ing: a population study oi oral and in-
Smoking causes metabolic and
ease. J CHn Endocnnol Metab 76:537-540, travenous glucose tolerance test in mid-
hemodynamic changes that are similar to 1993 dle-aged men. Diabetologia 25:86-88,
those described in syndrome X (insulin 10. Freestone S, Ramsay LE: Effect of coffee 1983
resistance syndrome) (43). This syn- and cigarette smoking on the blood pres- 23. Eliasson B, Attvall S, Taskinen MR, Smith
drome is thought to be a primary condi- sure of untreated and diuretic-treated hy- U: The insulin resistant syndrome is re-
tion; however, smoking tobacco caused pertensive patients. Am J Med 73:348- lated to smoking habits. Arfniosi KT
an acute syndrome X. Smoking might be 353,1982 Thromb 14:1946-1950, 1994
an acquired and easily avoidable cause of 11. Stamford BA, Matter S, Fell RD, Sady S, 24. Horowitz M, Eraser R: Disordered gastric
this syndrome. Papanek P, Cresanta M: Cigarette smok- motor function in diabetes mellitus. Phi-
The overall epidemiological, clin- ing, exercise and high density lipoprotein betologia 37:543-551, 1994
cholesterol. Atherosclerosis 52:73-83, 25. Polonsky KS, Given BD, Hirsch l.J, lillil
ical, and experimental data support a role
1984 H, Shapiro ET, Beebe C, Frank RH, Gal
lor several concurrent pathogenic mech- 12. Swank AM, Fell RD: Effect of acute smok- lowayJA, Van Canter H: Abnormal pat-
anisms for cigarette smoking-induced ing and exercise on high-density lipopro- terns of insulin secretion in non insulin
vascular damage: changes in serum lipid tein-cholesterol and subfractions in black dependent diabetes mellitus. N' lingl J Med
concentrations, enhanced peroxidation of female smokers. Metabolism 39:343-348, 318:1231-1239, 1988
I.DI. and its metabolism by macrophages 1990 26. Frati-Munari AC, Roca-Vidcs RA, Lope;:-
(44), insulin resistance, elevated blood 13. Attvall S, FowelinJ, Lager I, Von Schenck Perez RJ, De Vivero 1, Rui;:-Vela;:co M:
pressure, and altered hemostatic function H, Smith U: Smoking induces insulin Indices glucemicos de algunos alimentos
(45). This study shows that some of these resistance: a potential link with the in- comunes en Mexico. Cac Med Mex \?.Y:
sulin resistance syndrome. J Intern Med 163-170, 1991
(actors such as hyperglycemia, hyperin-
233:327-332, 1993 27. World Heath Organization: Piabetes Mi1!-
sulinemia, insulin resistance, hypercho-
14. Cederholm J, Wibell L: Insulin release litus: Report of a WHO Study Croup. Ge
lesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and and peripheral sensitivity at the oral glu- neva, World Health Org., 1985 OVch.
high blood pressure are acutely provoked cose tolerance test. Diabetes Res Clin Pract Rep. Ser., no. 727)
by cigarette smoking. Repeated stimuli 10:167-175, 1990 28. Rull JA: Definicion, elasilicaeion y diat;
may lead to sustained changes and con- 15. Doberne L, Greenfield MS, Rosenthal M, nostieo de la diabetes melliius: analisis de
tribute to atherogenesis. Widstrom A, Reaven GM: Effect of varia- los criterios del Grupo Nacional de Datos

DlABMHS CAR!-:, VOLUME 1 9 , NUMBER 2 , FEBRUARY 1 9 9 6 117


Smoking and glucose tolerance

dc Diabetes y de la Organization Mundial Heart] 115:272-275, 1988 40. Benowitz NL: Pharmacologic aspects of
de la Salud. In Diabetes Mellitus. Ariza CR, 35 Elkeles RS, Khan SR, Cowdhury S, cigarette smoking and nicotine addiction.
Frati AC, Eds. interamericana-McGraw- Swallow MB: Effects of smoking on oral NEnglJ Med 319:1318-1330, 1988
Hill, Mexico City, Mexico, 1993, p. 621 fat tolerance and high density lipopro- 41. Green MS, Jucha E, Luz Y: Blood pressure
641 tein cholesterol. Clin Sci 65:669-672, in smokers and non smokers: epidemio-
29. Howell RW: Smoking habits and labora- 1983 logic findings. Am Heart] 111:932-940,
tory tests. Ixincet ii: 152, 1970 36. Carney RM, Goldberg AP: Weight gain af- 1986
30. Tucker LA: Use of smokeless tobacco, cig- ter cessation of cigarette smoking. N Engl] 42. Mann SJ, James GD, Wang RS, Pickering
arette smoking, and hypercholesterol- Med 310:614-616, 1984 TG: Elevation of ambulatory systolic
emia. Am] Public Health 79:1048-1050, 37. Aronow WS, Cassidy J, Vangrow JS, blood pressure in hypertensive smokers: a
1989 March H, KernJC, Goldsmith JR, Khemka case-control study. JAMA 265:2226-
31. Wynder EL, Harris RE, Haley NJ: Popula- M, Pagano J, Vawter M: Effect of cigarette
2228,1991
tion screening for plasma cholesterol: smoking and breathing carbon monoxide
43. Reaven GM: Role of insulin resistance in
community-based results from Connecti- on cardiovascular hemodynamic in angi-
cut. Am Heart J 117:649-656, 1989 nal patients. Circulation 50:340-347, human disease. Diabetes 37:1595-1607,
32. Gnasso A, Haberbosch W, Schettler G, 1974 1988
Schmitz G, AugustinJ: Acute influence of 38. Freestone S, Ramsay LE: Effect of coffee 44. Harats D, Dabach Y, Hollander G, Ben-
smoking on plasma lipoproteins. Klin and cigarette smoking on the blood pres- Nairn M, Schwartz R, Berry EM, Stein O,
Wochenschr 1984:62 (Suppl. 2):36-42 sure of untreated and diuretic-treated hy- Stein Y: Fish oil ingestion in smokers and
33. Quensel M, Agardh CD, Nilsson-Ehle pertensive patients. Am J Med 73:348- non smokers enhances peroxidation of
P: Nicotine does not affect plasma li- 353,1982 plasma lipoproteins. Atherosclerosis 90:
poprotein concentrations in healthy men. 39. Robertson D, Tseng GJ, Appalsamy M: 127-139, 1991
.Saint/J Clin Lab Invest 49:149-153, Smoking and mechanisms of cardiovas- 45. Fitzgerald GA, OatesJA, NowakJ: Ciga-
1989 cular control. Am Heart J 115:258-262, rette smoking and hemostatic function.
34. Mjos OD: Lipid effects of smoking. Am 1988 Am Heart] 115:267-271, 1988

118 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 1996

Anda mungkin juga menyukai