Modelling the first Disconnector outside substation

This disconnector cannot be a member of a equipment container substation_180. It instead belong to voltage level 13 (11KV) :

<cim:Disconnector rdf:ID="KSP_D0205_3406" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<cim:ConductingEquipment.Of_Feeder rdf:resource="#FD_7" />

<cim:PowerSystemResource.DispatchNumber>7</cim:PowerSystemResource.DispatchNumber>

<cim:Equipment.MemberOf_EquipementContainer rdf:resource="#VL_13" />

<cim:PowerSystemResource.PSRType rdf:resource="#PSRTYPE_435" />

<cim:Naming.mRID>3406</cim:Naming.mRID>

<cim:RateCurrent />

<cim:Switch.normalOpen>1</cim:Switch.normalOpen>

<cim:Naming.name>KSP_D0205</cim:Naming.name>

<cim:PowerSystemResource.Location rdf:resource="#LOC_3406:L" />

</cim:Disconnector>

Hence we propose that the following should be removed as they are not necessary or are wrong

<cim:Equipment.MemberOf_EquipementContainer rdf:resource="#Substation_180" />

<cim:NormallyInService>1</cim:NormallyInService>

<cim:SwitchOnDate />

<cim:ConductingEquipment.BaseVoltage rdf:resource="#BV-11kV" />

The following is also removed because it is a duplication:

<cim:IdentifiedObject.GIScode>KSP_D0205</cim:IdentifiedObject.GIScode>
Modelling the Line between first disconnector outside substation and last component outside substation
The AC line segment shown below has duplications and things which should not be here
(coloured yellow):
<cim:ACLineSegment rdf:ID="100ACSR11K3_5807" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-
ns#">
<cim:IdentifiedObject.GIScode>100ACSR11K3</cim:IdentifiedObject.GIScode>
<cim:ConductingEquipment.Of_Feeder rdf:resource="#FD_7" />
<cim:ConductingEquipment.BaseVoltage rdf:resource="#BV-11kV" />
<cim:PowerSystemResource.DispatchNumber>7</cim:PowerSystemResource.DispatchNumber>
<cim:Equipment.MemberOf_CircuitSection rdf:resource="#CIRSEC_102464" />
<cim:Conductor.ConductorType rdf:resource="#ConductorType_1" />
<cim:Conductor.r>0.3230</cim:Conductor.r>
<cim:Conductor.x>0.3490</cim:Conductor.x>
<cim:PowerSystemResource.PSRType rdf:resource="#PSRTYPE_310" />
<cim:ACLineSegment.MemberOf_EquipmentContainer rdf:resource="#FD_7" />
<cim:Naming.mRID>5807</cim:Naming.mRID>
<cim:NormallyInService>1</cim:NormallyInService>
<cim:Naming.description>MV_SECTION_ID 102464</cim:Naming.description>
 <cim:Naming.name>100ACSR11K3</cim:Naming.name>
<cim:Conductor.length>1.8</cim:Conductor.length>
<cim:ACLineSegment.CableHeadTerminal rdf:resource="#Terminal_022" />
<cim:ACLineSegment.CableTailTerminal rdf:resource="#Terminal_023" />
<cim:PowerSystemResource.Location rdf:resource="#LOC_5807:L" />
</cim:ACLineSegment>

However we propose an AC Line segment in the example above be as follows.

<cim:ACLineSegment rdf:ID="5807" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<cim:ACLineSegment.MemberOf_EquipmentContainer rdf:resource="# CIRSEC_102464" />
<cim:ConductingEquipment.BaseVoltage rdf:resource="#BV-11kV" />
<cim:Conductor.ConductorType rdf:resource="#ConductorType_1" />
<cim:Conductor.r>0.3230</cim:Conductor.r>
<cim:Conductor.x>0.3490</cim:Conductor.x>
<cim:Naming.mRID>5807</cim:Naming.mRID>
<cim:Conductor.length>1.8</cim:Conductor.length>
</cim:ACLineSegment>
 <cim:CircuitSection rdf:ID="CIRSEC_102464" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<cim:PowerSystemResource.Location rdf:resource="#LOC_5807:L " />
</cim:CircuitSection>
.
.
.
<cim:Location rdf:ID="LOC_5807:L" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<cim:Location.PowerSystemResource rdf:resource="#5807" />
.
.
</cim:Location>

<cim:PositionPoint rdf:ID="5807:L:PP:1" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<cim:PositionPoint.xPosition>377514</cim:PositionPoint.xPosition>
<cim:PositionPoint.yPosition>8550438.2</cim:PositionPoint.yPosition>
<cim:PositionPoint.SequenceNumber>1</cim:PositionPoint.SequenceNumber>
<cim:PositionPoint.Location rdf:resource="#LOC_5807:L" />
</cim:PositionPoint>
<cim:PositionPoint rdf:ID="5807:L:PP:2" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<cim:PositionPoint.xPosition>377514</cim:PositionPoint.xPosition>
<cim:PositionPoint.yPosition>8550440</cim:PositionPoint.yPosition>
<cim:PositionPoint.SequenceNumber>2</cim:PositionPoint.SequenceNumber>
<cim:PositionPoint.Location rdf:resource="#LOC_5807:L" />
</cim:PositionPoint>

<cim:Terminal rdf:ID="Terminal_022" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<cim:Terminal.ConductingEquipment rdf:resource="#5807" />
<cim:Terminal.ConnectivityNode rdf:resource="#CN_016" />
</cim:Terminal>

<cim:ConnectivityNode rdf:ID="CN_016" xmlns:cim="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<cim:ConnectivityNode.MemberOf_EquipmentContainer rdf:resource="#VL_19" />
</cim:ConnectivityNode>

What do you think about this ????