Structure
3.1 Introduction
Objectives
3.2 Need for Communicating Change
3.3 Factors Involved in Communicating Change
Developing a Communication Plan
3.4 Methods and Techniques for Communicating Change
Skills Involved in Communicating Change
3.5 Role of Top Management in Communicating Change
Communicating Change at the Local Level
3.6 Summary
3.7 Glossary
3.8 Terminal Questions
3.9 Answers
3.10 Case Study
Caselet
3.1 Introduction
In the previous unit, you learnt about the various models of organizational change.
All these models describe theoretical techniques for managing the process of
change within an organization. However, each organization is different, in terms
of its dynamics, location and work culture, and includes individuals from vastly
diverse backgrounds. For most human beings, it is difficult to break the usual
routine and reconcile to anything unfamiliar and ‘different’, which is exactly what
change means. It is important to note here that ‘unfamiliar’ should not
automatically translate into ‘unpleasant’. And change mostly brings about
improvements, even if it may not appear so initially. That is why, the success of
change depends upon how it gets communicated to its recipients. During the
change process itself, the communication becomes most important, as it
facilitates vision, enhances the feedback process and provides social support
for acceptance of change as it unfolds and starts becoming visible. The
consequences can be detrimental if the strategies to communicate change have
not been planned and implemented appropriately.
In this unit, you will learn about the role of communication in change
management. You will also learn about the factors and strategies of
communicating change and the role of the top management in an organization
in the communication process.
Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
• explain the need for communicating change
• identify the factors involved in communicating change
• select the techniques and methods for communicating change
• describe the role of the top management in communicating change
them on the need for change will ultimately influence how they view the
result of the change. They may view it as fair in terms of the outcome only
or they may also perceive the process of achieving the change as fair i.e.
procedural fairness.
• Involvement of employees in the change process: A common mistake
organizations frequently make is to not involve employees in the change
process, assuming that they would oppose change or will not be able to
cope with it. However, it is essential to involve employees all through the
change process, right from the ‘need for change’ step. Involving key
employees, ones who are opinion leaders, is a simple technique that can
be used by organizations today to ensure successful change. In order to
building ownership for change right from the start, involving employees
themselves in the change process helps in providing valuable and helpful
inputs that assist in ensuring successful and sustained change. These
employees serve as ‘Change Champions’ and support the communication
and implementation processes, by tailoring it to ensure it is appealing to
the organization’s employees on the whole.
Activity 1
Conduct a survey in your organization about the kind of media the employees
would prefer if they were part of a change in the organization.
Hint: Ask whether they would like to be told by the immediate manager or
the CEO, what medium would they prefer, face-to-face or an email and so
on.
There are a few recognized techniques, one of which a change manager would
generally use to communicate change. Listed here are those strategies:
• Spray and pray: As the name suggests, as per this technique, employees
are provided a lot of information and expected to understand what is
important and relevant and what is not. The basis of the theory is ‘more is
better’. Managers feel satisfied that they have provided all the information
possible and employees are satisfied because they are kept in the loop.
However, the disadvantage here is that employees are mostly unable to
filter out the important points from the whole information. They may
understand what is happening but do not understand the reasons and are
overwhelmed by all the information.
• Tell and sell: The employees are provided that information which pertains
only to core organizational issues. Here, change managers try to both
inform staff about changes and persuade them that the changes are
re-stating or paraphrasing what they have heard in their own words, to confirm
what they have heard and moreover, to confirm the understanding of both parties.
Selling change upward
To gain managerial attention for the support of change ideas, an organization
pushes upwards new ideas for change from employees and various modes of
argument. These change skills are referred to as the linguistic and persuasive
routines associated with ‘issue selling’; that is, the processes wherein specific
changes are presented to the senior managers by the individuals that they would
like to see occur.
Dutton has given key tactics to present the idea or how the idea can be
packaged, these are:
• The logic of the business plan to be linked with idea.
• Continuously raising the proposal.
• The size of the change should not appear to be too large, so the issue
needs to be packaged incrementally.
The second relates to bundling, that is, other ideas and issues also need
to be linked up, which can be achieved by tying the issue to the highly valued
goals such as:
• Profitability
• Market share
• Organizational image
• Concerns of key stakeholders
Toxic handlers
Unrealistic expectations or targets, internal competition, or belligerent and angry
bosses make the change toxic to the employees, which can in turn, result in
confusion, fear, and anguish among employees. The term ‘toxic handlers’ was
coined by Frost and Robinson. It refers to skillful professionals who handle the
concerns of the employees going through the pains of change in an organization.
Toxic handlers act as intermediaries between staff and organizational policies
and bosses that are becoming toxic to staff.
Modeling the communication process
The communication ‘mix’ includes a variety of areas i.e. content, voice, tone,
message, audience, medium, frequency, and consistency. Three potential
problems are highlighted during the communication process:
It has always been a point of contention in change management that who is the
ideal messenger for communicating change. There are differing views on this;
one common view suggests that in order to show the commitment of top
management for it, the CEOs should be personally involved in the communication
of change. This activity in the organization should not be delegated to others in
the organization. A second view to this is that as the supervisors are most trusted
by the staff so they are the best communicators of change.
Larkin and Larkin maintain that face to face meetings for small groups
should be conducted involving especially frontline supervisors so that it becomes
more strategic as the latter will be in contact with frontline staff and be better
able to communicate with them about the change. Another expert believes that
an important part of managing change is to manage the conversation that takes
place among the individuals who lead the change effort and those who will be
actually implementing the strategies.
Many times managers fail to understand that even while they are not formally
communicating with change recipients, they are still unknowingly sending out
messages. For example, a change task force meets in isolation to identify the
methods of accomplishing a change. They may not find it necessary during this
period to communicate more widely in the organization about the impending
change. This virtually guarantees that the change effort will fail—as the people
are already aware that the change task force is meeting—so rumors will circulate,
and the final outcome will not be the desired one of employee acceptance. This
situation may be avoided by the transition management team, the responsibility
of whom is to shift information across the organizational boundaries by stimulating
conversation across functional, isolated parts of the organization. The most
productive outcome is the result of early, open-ended conversations. The
transition management team in pursuit of fast results should avoid closing down
conversations early and allow time and space to people to organize and articulate
their thoughts.
The top management must recognize that the most significant message
to convey to affected staff falls into two categories:
1. Message regarding the actual change itself
• the existing situation and the justification for the change
• an image of the organization as it will become after the change has
been implemented
• the essentials of what exactly is up for change, how it will change,
and when it will change
• the prospect that change is essential and is not optional
• regular updates on the status of the completion of the change
process, and also success stories to boost morale
2. Message regarding the impact of the change on the employee
• how the change will affect the everyday activities of the individuals
• repercussions of the change on job guarantee
• how the employee is expected to behave and act in view of the change
or to show support for the change
• what would be the procedure for getting assistance when change
implementation is in progress
Activity 2
Conduct a research on the Internet and identify the last change management
process undertaken at a large multinational firm. Create a report on your
findings.
Hint: Try to find out the strategies used by companies like IBM wipro,... they
used to communicate with employees and how did the employees react to
the change.
External stakeholders
The impact of the change on organizational performance is affected deeply by
the way internal changes are communicated to external stakeholders. Due to
the uncertainty attached to its outcomes, stock market performance is potentially
under threat during transformational change. Even where announced changes
(e.g., downsizing) are initially well received by shareholders, stock performance
may increase in the short term but can decline over the duration of change
implementation. This recognizes how important it is that the external stakeholders
should be told about the change in exactly the correct way.
Arndt and Bigelow have identified four key defensive impression
management practices that may be used to protect the organizations from
negative reactions by their stakeholders:
• Excuses attributed to the need for the change to forces beyond the
stakeholder, such as the external environment. The effect of this will be to
distance the stakeholder from responsibility for any negative consequences
of the corporate restructuring.
• Justifications about the decision taken to be presented in a positive light
without referring to negative consequences that may be possible.
• Disclaimers providing reassurance by pointing to careful planning, and
the like, that preceded the restructuring decision.
• Concealment statements downplaying the innovative nature of the change
can be used thereby reducing the perception of attached risk.
12. Managers fail to understand that even while they are not formally
communicating with change recipients, they are still unknowingly sending
out messages. (True/False)
13. Machine imagery of change is based on the ‘build and develop’ view. (True/
False)
14. In business process language, __________ refers to a different work steps
in sequential manner: in organization development language, it is refers
to the way to proceed.
3.6 Summary
3.7 Glossary
3.9 Answers
1. Value proposition
2. Distortion
3. True
4. False
5. Face-to-face meetings
6. Technical
7. Tell and sell
8. False
9. True
10. Therapeutic
11. Toxic handlers
12. True
13. False
14. Process
Terminal Questions
as per these three categories. After they have been classified, the
management can take the support of the convinced individuals to soften
the stand of those resisting change and convert those who are
undecided.
Discussion Questions
1. What is the basic objective of a strategy for change management?
2. Which steps help formulate a strategy for change?
Source: Adapted from http://www.etransform.org/gti/node/197 (retrieved on
1st December 2012)
References
• Lewis, L.K. (2000). Communicating Change: Four Cases of Quality
Programs, Journal of Business Communication 37(2): 128-55.
• Marshak, R.J. (1993). Managing the Metaphors of Change, Organizational
Dynamics 22(1): 44-56.
• Palmer, I, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin (2008). Managing Organizational
Change: A Multiple Perspectives Approach, TMH, New Delhi.
• Stace, D., and Dunphy, D. (2001). Beyond the Boundaries: Leading and
Recreating a Successful Enterprise. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, Sydney.
e-References
• http://www.etransform.org/gti/node/197 (retrieved on 1st December 2012)
• http://www.infosys.com/global-sourcing/white-papers/Documents/
OCM.pdf (retrieved on 30th November 2012)