Received March 20, 2013; revised April 23, 2013; accepted May 18, 2013
Copyright © 2013 S. Ramesh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Ceria based electrolyte materials are very useful in intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell (IT-SOFC). The
compositions Ce0.85Gd0.15 − xCaxO2 − δ (x = 0.0 - 0.075) were prepared through sol-gel method. Their structure was stud-
ied by X-ray diffraction. Dense ceramic Ce0.85Gd0.15 − xCaxO2 − δ samples were prepared by sintering the pellets at 1300˚C.
The lattice parameter was calculated by Rietveld refinement of XRD patterns. Four probe A.C. impedance spectroscopy
was used to study the total ionic conductivity of doped and co-doped ceria ceramics in the temperature range 200˚C -
700˚C. The Ce0.85Gd0.125Ca0.025O2 − δ composition showed maximum ionic conductivity with less activation energy.
Keywords: Ceramic; Sol-gel Process; Activation Energy; Electrical Conductivity; Solid Electrolyte
ples were measured in water using the Archimedes me- Figure 2 shows the lattice parameter as a function of
thod. The sintered samples have more than 96% of the dopant concentration. Lattice parameter increases line-
theoretical density. arly with an increase in dopant concentration (Ca). This
X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples were ob- indicates the validation of Vegard’s rule.
tained by Bruker D8 advanced X-ray diffractometer The lattice parameter increased with an increase in the
(XRD) using Cu Kα radiation (1.54056 A˚ operated at 40 Ca amount. This is due to difference in ionic radii of Ce4+
kV, 30 mA) at room temperature, in the Bragg’s angle (0.96 A˚), Ca2+ (1.12 A˚) and Gd3+ (1.053 A˚) [15]. The
range of 20˚ ≤ 2θ ≤ 80˚ with a scan rate of 2˚ min−1. The introduction of Gd3+ and Ca2+ into Ce4+ can cause a small
lattice parameter was calculated rietveld refinement of shift in the ceria peaks. This shift is indicative of change
XRD data. FE-SEM was used to take surface images. in the lattice parameter. As the Ca content increases, the
Electrical impedance (Z) and phase angle (θ) were lattice parameter increases for Ce0.85Gd0.15 − xCaxO2 − δ (x
measured using Agilent impedance analyzer (4294 A) in = 0.0 - 0.075) samples. This indicates that Ca dissolved
the frequency range 42 Hz - 5 MHz on dense sintered into the Ce sites in Ce0.85Gd0.15 − xCaxO2 − δ system.
pellet. Zsimpwin software was used to analyze the im- Figure 3 shows the cross sectional view of breaked
pedance data and to calculate the total ionic conductivity pellet of SEM picture of Ce0.85Gd0.125Ca0.025O2 − δ sample.
of the samples. The electrical conductivity measurements It is can be seen that few closed pores are presented.
were taken at various temperatures in the temperature
range 200˚C - 700˚C in air. Silver paste was brushed to 3.2. Impedance Spectroscopy
each side of the samples, which was subsequently dried
(at 600˚C for 15 min) producing solid silver electrode on Figure 4 shows the Nyquist plots of
both sides of the pellet. Ce0.85Gd0.125Ca0.025O2 − δ ceramic sample at 300˚C. It is
noticed that incomplete depressed arc, complete semi-
3. Results and Discussion circle and a part of arc are clearly seen. High frequency
depressed arc corresponds to grain resistance (Rb), inter-
3.1. Structure Analysis mediate frequency semi-circle corresponds to grain boun-
To confirm the phase formation, dissolution of dopants in dary resistance (Rgb) and low frequency incomplete arc
CeO2 lattice, XRD patterns were measured for calcium corresponds to electrode resistance (Re). Grain and grain
co-doped ceria ceramics as shown in Figure 1(a). Cal- boundary resistance arcs are well-resolved at 300˚C. In
cium co-doped ceria samples show that the samples this case the equivalent circuit (Figure 4) is used to fit
contain only a cubic fluorite structure with the space the impedance data and to calculate grain (Rb) and grain-
group Fm3m (JCPDS powder diffraction File No. 34- boundary resistance (Rgb). The use of simple capacitor is
0394). not sufficient to model the electrical response of the ma-
Figure 1(b) shows the rietveld refinement of terials due to depression of arcs in some cases. For this
Ce0.85Gd0.125Ca0.025O2−δ sample. Structure analysis and purpose a constant phase element (CPE) is used to fit the
Lattice parameter was claculated using Rietveld refine- results [16]. Electrode resistance is not considered for the
ment software. total conductivity calculations in the present paper.
Structure 100.00%
(111)
(220)
(311)
(200)
(222)
(420)
(331)
(400)
X = 0.075
Intensity (arb.unit)
X = 0.05
Counts
X = 0.025
X = 0.00
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78
2θ (degree) 2Th Degrees
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of Ce0.85Gd0.15 − xCaxO2 − δ system. (b) Rietveld refinement of Ce0.85Gd0.125Ca0.025O2 − δ. (Black color:
Experimental, Red color: Fitted, Blue color: Difference).
fit
2 The addition of gadolinium and calcium into cerium
300 ˚C
oxide (CeO2) would create oxygen vacancies at low
dopant concentration. From Figure 5 it can be seen that
1
the conductivities of gadolinium and calcium co-doped
ceria (x = 0.025 and 0.05) are higher than the single-
doped ceria
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 The activation energies of Ce0.85Gd0.15 − xCaxO2 −δ (x =
Z' (×103 Ω) 0.0 − 0.075) ceramics are shown in Table 1. The change
in activation energy is attributed to an order and disorder
Figure 4. Impedance spectrum of Ce0.85Gd0.125Ca0.025O2 – δ transition of the oxygen sublattice [1]. The activation
sample. energy is minimum (Table 1) for the composition
4. Conclusion
-1
Co-doped ceria samples successfully synthesized through
sol-gel process. All compositions showed cubic structure.
Over 96% of relative density was obtained. Co-dopants
-2
improved the electrical conductivity of Gd-doped ceria.
[13] Y. F. Zheng, H. T. Gu, H. Chen, L. Gao, X. F. Zhu and L. [15] R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallographica Section A, Vol.
C. Guo, Materials Research Bulletin, Vol. 44, 2009, pp. 32, 1976, pp. 751-767. doi:10.1107/S0567739476001551
775-779. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.09.021 [16] W. Lai and S. M. Haile, Journal of the American Ceramic
[14] H. Yoshida, T. Inagaki, K. Miura, M. Inaba and Z. Ogumi, Society, Vol. 89, 2005, pp. 2979-2997.
Solid State Ionics, Vol. 160, 2003, pp. 109-116. doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00740.x
doi:10.1016/S0167-2738(03)00153-X