Takahiro Kase, Yasutaka Sonobe *1, Tetsuo Matsushima *1 and Zexin Zhou *2
Toshiba International (Europe) Ltd.
Unit LG3 & LG4, Block 4, Mountjoy Research Centre, Stockton Road, Durham, UK, DH1 3UZ
*1 TMT&D Corporation
2-24-1 Harumi, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0057, Japan
*2 China Electric Power Research Institute
No.15, Xiaoying East Road Qinghe, Beijing, 100085 China
Abstract
This paper proposes new faulted phase selection methods for a distance relay. It is very important to select the faulted
phase for single phase to earth faults when single phase auto-reclosing is applied, and generally speaking, phase
selection methods for normal single phase to earth faults have been established. However, it is difficult for
distance relays to select the faulted phase correctly in case of multiple faults in parallel lines or in case of high
resistance faults. This paper proposes new phase selection methods for these types of faults. The performance of the
new phase selection methods have been proven by thousands of factory tests using RTDS and by a large number of
CEPRI tests using an analogue simulator. This paper introduces the results of the tests performed by CEPRI.
Keywords: phase selection, distance protection, evolving faults, high resistance faults
Fig.3.3 Proposed phase selection Fig.4.1 Directional Earth Fault element (DEF)
4.2 Phase selection for directional earth fault Phase A
3I0
element VA
It is apparent that a DEF element cannot select the
faulted phase. In the case of a high resistance fault, the θ
shock of the fault to the power system is not very
Phase C
severe, while the effect of 3-phase tripping may
Ik
actually be worse than the high resistance fault itself. VB
VC
Therefore single phase tripping is preferable and an
independent phase selection method is necessary to Phase B
provide single phase tripping.
Fig.4.2 is a single line diagram showing a high Fig.4.4 Phase selection element (PSEL)
resistance fault. Fig.4.3 shows the equivalent circuit in
case of an A-phase to earth fault, using sequential PSEL-A t 0
Trip-A
&
components. In the figures, subscripts A and B show
the terminals and 1, 2, 0 show positive sequence, PSEL-B
t 0 Trip-B
&
negative sequence, zero sequence respectively. RF is
PSEL-C
the fault resistance. It is clear from Fig.4.3 that the &
t 0 Trip-C
angular difference between the faulted phase voltage, Phase selection
ZA1 xZ1 (1-x)Z1 ZB1 Fig.5.1 shows CEPRI’s analogue simulator model
EA EB used for the tests. A large number of tests were executed
~ V1F ~ changing the various parameters shown in Table 5.1.
Relay
positive-sequence circuit IF The variation of line length and source capacities brings
significant differences of fault conditions, which are
ZA2 xZ2 (1-x)Z2 ZB2 very severe to distance protection.
3RF
Relay V2F 5.1 Multiple faults in parallel lines
negative-sequence circuit
A typical impedance condition in the case of
ZA0 I0 xZ0 (1-x)Z0 ZB0 multiple close-up faults in parallel lines has been shown
in the previous sections (Fig.3.2). Actually, the
V0F impedance conditions can vary with following
Relay
zero-sequence circuit conditions.
- Load current (i.e. magnitude, sending or receiving)
- The angular relationship between the faulted phase of
Fig. 4.3 Equivalent circuit using sequential components
Table. 5.1 Parameters for tests at the L-term side, and the faulted phase is the leading
Parameters Values phase in this case. (c) shows the case of a 200km model.
The faults occur at the N-term side and the faulted
Line length [km] 400, 200, 45
phase is the lagging phase. The evolving time of this
Source L capacity [MVA] 3000, 10000, 20000
case is shorter than the others. (d) shows the case of
Fault point 0 %, 50 %, 100 % 45km. The faults occur at the N-term side and the
(From N-term ) (0%, 100%: in adjacent line) faulted phase is the lagging phase. The fault current of
N-term L-term reverse fault is larger than that of other cases because
the line is short.
F4(0%) F5(100%)
Source N Source L It can be seen from these figures that the relay is
able to select the faulted phase in the forward direction
F1(0%) F2(50%) F3(100%) and trips single phase successfully in all cases.
6 CONCLUSION
This paper proposes new phase selection methods
for multiple faults in parallel lines and for high
resistance faults. The proposed new methods are based
on careful analysis of the phenomena occurring under
fault conditions. The method is applicable for various
conditions and that has been proven by thousands of
factory tests and CEPRI tests. A sample of the results
of the CEPRI tests are also introduced in this paper.
These new phase selection methods enable distance
relays to be more reliable and easier to apply.
Fig.5.5 High resistance fault (F3, L-term)
REFERENCES
[1] Y.Ohura, T.Matsuda, M.Suzuki, F.Andow, Y.Kurosawa,
A.Takeuchi, "A digital distance relay using negative
sequence current," IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol.5,
No.1, pp.79-84, 1990
[2] M.S.Jones, D.W.P.Thoms, C.Christopoulos, "A
non-pilot phase selector based on superimposed
components for protection of double circuit lines," IEEE
Trans. Power Delivery, Vol.12, No.4, pp.1439-1444, 1997 (a) I0 and phase voltages (b) I0 and V0
[3] IEEE PSRC working group, “Single phase tripping and Fig.5.6 Vectors in case of the high resistance fault (L-term)