11-18, 2014
Available online at http://advancingwomen.com/awl/awl_wordpress/
ISSN 1093-7099
The aim of this study is to examine female participation in Saudi labor market as leaders. The leadership skills with which
students in Saudi universities and colleges can how educational institutions make their students career ready. However,
considering the low female participation in the Saudi labor market, exploring the gender differences in leadership skills is
equally crucial as the leadership skills acquired in higher education institution can significantly influence employment
opportunities. In addition, the gender differences in perceived leadership skills is the fact that the social roles assigned to women
in Saudi society bear great significance on how they perceive their skills, which will be discussed further in the discussion
portion of this paper.
Table 5 On the other hand, until recently in the Saudi society, “it is
T Test Data (Probability) for Gender believed that the role of women was basic to maintaining the
Scale t SD p structure of the family and therefore of society” (Hamdan,
Total score -1.936 0.5541 0.049 2005, p. 45). The social role that assigned women to be the
Work in groups -6.781 0.4321 0.009 bearers of the family and society, in general, leads them to
Understanding of self -7.765 0.8165 0.014 acquire skills that are “interpersonally facilitative and friendly
Perceived communication -5.431 0.7654 0.017 behaviors that can be termed communal” (Eagly, Wood, et al.,
Decision making -4.212 0.6881 0.022 2000, p. 126). Therefore, it is not surprising that female
Perceived leadership -3.212 0.9894 0.032 students perceived themselves as better communicators and
better in working in groups—qualities that match their social
The results provided in this investigation indicate that the role. The complications, however, are that in a competitive job
differences between means for both the entire survey and each market, it is important that female students acquire leadership
of the subscales are significant at the 0.05 level. While the skills that make them more employable.
results indicate that gender differences are important, t tests Recommendations
only measure the statistical significance of the differences
between means (Motulsky, 2010). Only by examining the The results of this investigation indicate that for female college
scores for males and females is it possible to identify where students there are specific strengths and weaknesses in
differences exist. Based on the data provided in Tables 3 and 4, perceived leadership. While female college students perceive
it is possible to see that female college student scored higher in themselves to be quite adept at working in groups,
areas of working in groups, understanding of self, and understanding themselves, and communicating with others
communication. Males scored higher in areas of decision when compared with males, they do not perceive themselves to
making and perceived leadership. Although total scale scores be better than males at decision making or overall leadership. In
were statistically different, the probability is close to the p = terms of cultivating leadership capabilities in female college
0.05 limit set. Overall, the differences between males and students, it is evident that specific areas of focus may be needed
females on the LSI are not that substantial. to help bolster how females view their leadership capabilities
(O’Bannon, Garavalia, Renz, & McCarther, 2010). By
Discussion developing leadership programs for women in this manner, it
The results of this investigation indicate female college may be possible to target specific leadership deficits and
students perceive themselves to be quite adept at working in improve skills to create well-rounded leaders (Debebe, 2009).
groups, understanding themselves, and communicating with