Charles G. Widmer, D.D.S., M.S. Courtney J. Wold, D.M.D., M.D. Ethan M. Stoll,
M.S., D.O. M. Franklin Dolwick, D.M.D., Ph.D.
PII: S2212-4403(14)01237-1
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.08.013
Reference: OOOO 992
To appear in: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral
Radiology
Please cite this article as: Widmer CG, Wold CJ, Stoll EM, Dolwick MF, Atypical Temporomandibular
Joint Pain: A Case Report, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology (2014), doi:
10.1016/j.oooo.2014.08.013.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
PT
Authors: Charles G. Widmer, D.D.S., M.S.1, Courtney J. Wold, D.M.D., M.D.2 , Ethan M. Stoll,
M.S., D.O. 3 and M. Franklin Dolwick, D.M.D., Ph.D.4
RI
1
Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida
SC
2
Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of
Florida
3
Surgical Pathology Fellow, Department of Pathology, Immunology & Laboratory Medicine,
U
College of Medicine, University of Florida
AN
4
Professor and Chair, Parker E. Mahan Facial Pain Endowed Professor, Department of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Florida
M
D
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32610-0444
Phone: 352-273-5696
Fax: 352-846-0459
C
e-mail: widmer@dental.ufl.edu
AC
Disclosures: All authors report no disclosures associated with this case report.
Abstract
Atypical temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain can consist of an unusual intensity, location
or set of pain descriptors that do not match what is traditionally observed for TMJ capsular pain,
disc displacements or arthritic conditions. An atypical pain report regarding a unilateral TMJ
PT
pain as the chief complaint is presented in this case report. An overview of typical vs atypical
TMJ pain is also reviewed to highlight unusual signs and symptoms so that the clinician can
RI
identify these atypical presentations and pursue further diagnostic approaches.
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
Pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) typically presents as a low to moderate level of pain
that is enhanced with function such as chewing. When a patient presents with an atypical, high
temporomandibular joint is indicated. The following case report provides details of one patient
PT
with an unusually high level of TMJ pain only at maximum opening and atypical pain descriptors
RI
SC
CASE REPORT
A 69 year old African-American male presented with a chief complaint of left-sided jaw
pain and a history of pain in his left temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area only while chewing and
U
opening wide during yawning. This pain started approximately five years prior to being
AN
examined and had increased over the last three years. Based on the McGill Pain
Questionnaire, he described his pain as sharp, shooting, hurting and aching pain with other
M
descriptors including blinding, troublesome, piercing, tight and dreadful. His highest level of
D
pain was rated at an intensity of 90/100 on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and was only elicited
TE
when he was opening his jaw wide during yawning. A positive history of reciprocal clicking in
the left temporomandibular joint was reported during mandibular opening along with crepitus (a
EP
grinding sound). He denied a history of facial trauma but acknowledged diurnal bruxism
(clenching his teeth). His medical history was positive for diabetes, hypertension and arthritis.
C
lymphadenopathy and no palpable pain lateral to the temporomandibular joints or while loading
either TMJ. Auscultation of the TMJs revealed course crepitus near his maximum opening of 45
mm. Maximal protrusive and right lateral excursion elicited pain in his left TMJ that duplicated
his chief complaint and no pain was elicited with left lateral excursion. A recent panoramic film
depicted the left condyle with an intact cortical lining but had a vague radiolucent region in the
Impression
The differential diagnosis for this clinical presentation included: (1) osteoarthritis
with a subchondral cyst; (2) a tumor involving the mandibular condyle; or (3) an
PT
aneurysmal bone cyst. Given the patient’s age and sex, the most likely tumor causing
RI
Metastatic lesions in the mandible usually present as radiolucent defects. These
SC
lesions may be well circumscribed similar to this patient’s lesion; however, more often
they are irregular with a “moth-eaten” appearance2. Additionally, the prolonged duration
U
of this patient’s lesion is inconsistent with the rapid growth typically seen in malignant
AN
lesions.
connective tissue lining. Pain and swelling are common; however, crepitus is rare.
TE
Aneurysmal bone cysts typically affect patients under the age of 303, which places this
The age of the patient and the presence of distinct crepitus within the TMJ would
contributing factor for his pain4. The reciprocal clicking was consistent with an anteriorly
AC
contact at maximal opening and was responsible for the crepitus sound. However, the
protrusion and not associated with loading the TMJ is not typical of an active
inflammatory process involving bony remodeling of articular tissue. The high level of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
pain reported by the patient was also a concern, although the pain was not constant (a
common characteristic of tumors). Atypical pain presentations are indications for further
PT
Additional Diagnostic Testing. A cone beam CT (CBCT) study was acquired to allow a more
detailed examination of the left TMJ (Fig. 2). The CBCT images depicted a 0.8 x 0.7 x 0.9 cm
RI
lytic lesion that occupied approximately the lateral half of the left mandibular condyle with loss of
SC
cortical integrity on the superior-lateral articulating surface. To further explore the status of the
bony remodeling and to explore the potential for an active infection, further diagnostic testing
U
was pursued using skeletal scintigraphy with correlative gallium imaging. An increase in
AN
Technetium-99 was observed in the left TMJ condyle (Fig. 3) suggesting an increase in
metabolic activity but gallium imaging was negative supporting the lack of infection. The results
M
of the scintigraphy study were consistent with a reactive process. The patient was subsequently
scheduled for a biopsy of the cyst within the left mandibular condyle. During entry into the left
D
temporomandibular joint space, an abundant amount of synovial fluid was encountered with no
TE
defined articular disc. The cystic cavity identified in the condyle from the CBCT was exposed
from a posterior approach and it was found that the cavity extended to the most superior aspect
EP
of the condylar head perforating the articular surface. The entire contents of the cystic cavity
were removed and submitted for pathological examination and interpretation. The results of the
C
biopsy were consistent with dense fibrocollagenous tissue with fragments of non-viable
AC
cartilage, secondary to osteoarthritis (Fig. 4). The patient has been followed for six years
following his surgery and has not had a return of pain. Since there has been no TMJ pain or
joint bony anatomy. However, he continued to have crepitus in the left temporomandibular joint.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
(OARSI) as “a progressive disease of synovial joints that represents failed repair of joint
damage that results from stresses that may be initiated by an abnormality in any of the synovial
PT
joint tissues, including articular cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, menisci (when present),
peri-articular muscles, peripheral nerves or synovium”5. TMJ osteoarthritis (OA) has been
RI
described as a four-stage pathogenesis: (1) initial and repair; (2) early; (3) intermediate; and (4)
late6. Pain is reported in the three later stages, crepitus is palpated in the last two stages while
SC
subchondral cysts can be observed in the last stage. Sex differences for the occurrence of
U
degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joint have been equivocal. One study of 22
higher overall prevalence in males8. A multicenter study of 204 consecutive adult patients (age
M
range 18-90) with pain, TMJ sounds or limitation of mandibular opening was evaluated for
D
degenerative changes in the TMJ and, based on logistic regression, found that age and sex
TE
(females) were predictors of degenerative changes with age as the most dominant predictor9.
However, this study was not a cross-sectional epidemiological study and had a predominant
EP
female representation (75%). Thus, it remains unclear whether sex has a predominant effect on
the development of TMJ osteoarthritis whereas older age has a much higher relationship.
C
The presentation in this reported case is consistent with late stage OA. Pain was elicited
AC
when the superior aspect of the condyle (the location of the subchondral cyst) was
approximated to the opposing bone of the articular eminence such as when the mandible was
protruded or when he opened maximally. Since the anterior-superior surface of the condyle
was unaffected and this is where a load is exerted when biting in centric occlusion, direct
pressure was not induced on the articular tissue that was degenerated and there was no biting
Common intracapsular conditions that can cause pain in the temporomandibular joint
include disc displacement with or without reduction, arthridities and post-traumatic injuries.
PT
Using the report of pain in combination with joint and muscle palpation, joint loading, range of
motion studies and joint sounds, a diagnosis of an intracapsular source of pain can be achieved
RI
without the need for advanced diagnostic techniques such as imaging. Most of the patients with
common intracapsular conditions with pain will report that the pain occurs during function such
SC
as chewing and will have a positive response to loading the TMJ. In the current clinical case,
our patient did not respond to imposed loading of either TMJ and the duplication of pain (his
U
chief complaint) could only be achieved when the patient opened maximally or protruded
AN
maximally causing condylar translation in both TMJs or by moving the mandible to the right side
causing translation of the condyle in the left TMJ. Deviation of pain complaints from the
M
expected should be used as an indicator to more thoroughly evaluate potential sources of pain
D
Another deviation from the norm observed in this clinical case was the high intensity of
pain during chewing. Most TMJ pain reports will be in the moderate range (VAS = 40-60) and
are usually lower than masticatory muscle pain (VAS = 50-70)10, 11. The patient was able to
EP
minimize his pain during times that he did not use the mandible and the intermittent pain, even
C
though of high intensity, did not result in central sensitization12 (unmasking of inputs on second
AC
order neurons that result in a broad distribution of allodynia or pain from palpation). The very
limited ability to elicit pain in this case study supports the observation that his pain had not
progressed to promoting a central response even though he had multiple episodes of chewing
pain per day at a high intensity. The intermittent pain experience during chewing and the lack of
pain for significant intervals were important to minimize effects such as central sensitization.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
Central sensitization requires a persistent barrage of afferent input from peripheral structures
The patient described his pain on the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) as sharp,
shooting and aching pain and this is a typical sensory description of pain from the TMJ with an
PT
anteriorly displaced disc or osteoarthritis. However, the MPQ affective and miscellaneous
descriptors chosen by the patient (Table I) are not commonly reported with temporomandibular
RI
joint pain14, particularly a pain that is intermittently experienced. These uncommon descriptors
SC
reported by this patient may have been secondary to the high intensity pain perception and
U
The sex of the patient may be another factor that may explain the pain experience of this
the development of the bony lesion in the condyle. However, functional pain such as chewing
M
elicited a high level of pain that may not be controlled by endogenous opiate release. In this
D
clinical case, the age of the patient was early to middle 60’s when he started having pain and he
TE
most likely would have reduced circulating levels of testosterone that occurs with aging.
Although we do not know what the minimum level of testosterone that is required to affect pain
EP
perception, this patient may not have experienced as much reduction of perceived pain due to
CONCLUSIONS
joint from more commonly encountered pains such as those associated with anteriorly displaced
discs (with or without reduction) or osteoarthritis. The clinician should evaluate each patient’s
pain presentation using standardized pain assessments such as Visual Analog Scales (VAS) or
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
the McGill Pain Questionnaire16 to recognize these “red flags” as indicators of uncommon
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
References
2. Neville BWD, D. D.; Allen, C. M.; Bougout, J. E. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd
PT
Ed. ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009.
RI
120 maxillofacial aneurysmal bone cysts: a nationwide quest to understand this enigma.
SC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72(8):1523-30.
U
in temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. Cranio 2012;30(2):103-9.
2011;19(5):478-82.
M
6. Dijkgraaf LC, de Bont LG, Boering G, Liem RS. The structure, biochemistry, and
D
1995;53(10):1182-92.
Scandinavica 1984;42(4):205-14.
C
material in respect of age, gender, temporomandibular joint changes, and some dental
between temporomandibular joint symptoms, signs, and clinical diagnosis using the
Pain 2008;22(3):239-51.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
10. McCreary CP, Clark GT, Merril RL, Flack V, Oakley ME. Psychological distress and
11. Plesh O, Curtis D, Levine J, McCall WD, Jr. Amitriptyline treatment of chronic pain in
PT
12. Hu JW, Sessle BJ, Raboisson P, Dallel R, Woda A. Stimulation of craniofacial muscle
RI
neurones. Pain 1992;48:53-60.
SC
13. Greene CS. Neuroplasticity and sensitization. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140(6):676-8.
14. Mongini F, Italiano M. TMJ disorders and myogenic facial pain: a discriminative analysis
U
using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 2001;91(3):323-30.
15. Fischer L, Arthuri MT, Torres-Chavez KE, Tambeli CH. Contribution of endogenous
AN
opioids to gonadal hormones-induced temporomandibular joint antinociception. Behav
Neurosci 2009;123(5):1129-40.
M
16. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain
D
1975;1:277-99.
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
Figure Legends
Fig. 1. Panoramic film of patient with chewing pain and pain at maximum opening in the left
temporomandibular joint. A vague radiolucent area in the left mandibular condyle can be
PT
Fig. 2. Corrected CBCT reconstructed images made perpendicular to the long axis of the
RI
condyle to visualize cross-sections of the left condyle from medial to lateral. The lesion (white
SC
arrow) can be easily identified in the series of images.
U
Fig. 3. Coronal images of Technetium-99 scans demonstrate an active inflammatory process in
the left temporomandibular joint (white arrow). Image sequence represents scans progressing
AN
from superior to inferior through the head.
M
Fig. 4. Representative microscopic image of the biopsy (H&E stain) recovered from the
D
subchondral cyst of the left mandibular condyle. Dense fibrous tissue with mild chronic
TE
inflammation (white arrows) can be observed with non-viable entrapped cartilage (black arrow).
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table I
Comparison of Typical and Atypical Symptoms and Signs of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ)
Osteoarthritis
PT
History of TMJ sounds Crepitus Crepitus and clicking
History of pain during mandibular Chewing Pain only when opening
function wide such as yawning
RI
Pain description (MPQ*) Tiring Sharp
Troublesome Shooting
Nagging Blinding
SC
Sore Piercing
Tender Tight
Aching Dreadful
Pain intensity (VAS†) 40-60/100 90/100
Objective
U
AN
TMJ sounds (current) Crepitus Crepitus only at maximal
opening (45 mm)
Palpable tenderness lateral to TMJ Yes No
Pain with temporomandibular joint Yes No
M
condylar translation)
Horizontal range of motion with pain Full range of protrusion and Only at maximum
lateral excursion towards protrusion and maximal
opposite side of involved right lateral excursion
EP
temporomandibular joint
Muscle pain Yes No
C
†
Visual Analog Scale
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC