I listen to me: the rankings are too intriguing and enticing not to at
least take a sneak peak. I know my families are looking at them,
so what I want to do is discuss the value of the rankings, the flaws of
the rankings, and the danger of the rankings. I want to encourage
responsible use of the rankings.
What would you think if you were a boy in high school and you
were dating a girl at your high school, and I came up to you and said,
"I have ranked all of the girls in our school from number 1 to number
1000 in our school and I just want to ask, why are you dating number
87 when number 16 on my rankings has a crush on you?" First of all,
you would look at me like I was insane, but here is what you would
144 171 ANSWERS TO THE MOST-ASKED COLLEGE ADMISSIONS QUESTIONS
1. Washington Monthly
2. Forbes
3. Kiplinger
4. Niche
5. Princeton Review
6. Business Week
7. Newsweek
8. Times Higher Education World University Rankings
9. Center for World University Rankings
10. Parchment Student Choice College Rankings
11. Collegiate Choice
12. Money Magazine
13. College Factual Rankings
The best article I have ever read on the college rankings was published
on August 9th, 2016 by Jeremy Ratcliff, and it is titled, "Deciphering
the Different College Rankings." I strongly encourage you to Google
this article. Ratcliff talks about how in high school, he was rankings-
obsessed but then he decided to do a study of the rankings. In this
article, he goes over the different formulas for a bunch of the rankings
and then he draws attention to their biases. For example, Ratcliff says
USNWR is biased against regional universities and up-and-coming
universities. I would also add that it is biased against public colleges; it
doesn’t do enough surveying of students about their experiences, and
it definitely doesn’t factor in the value of racial and socio-economic
diversity into its rankings. If you want to read the best article I have
ever read about the deleterious impact USNWR college rankings have
had on American higher education, I strongly encourage you to
Google the following article: “How U.S. News college rankings
promote economic inequality on campus,” September 10th, 2017, by
Benjamin Wermund of Politico.
The Washington Monthly rankings do a great job of looking at
whether a college improves society by educating the less fortunate, but
they do not even look at political diversity and cultural intolerance.
They rank Washington & Lee, where General Lee was serving as
President when he died and became the school's namesake, as the 7th
ranked school in the country. W & L has their strengths, but the
student body overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump, so for a lot of
the students I work with, when they go through the process of
assessing the political and cultural environment they want, there is no
way Washington and Lee is going to be the 7th ranked school based on
what they are looking for. According to collegedata.com, fewer than 1
in 40 W & L students are Black. That is not going to be enough racial
diversity for most of the students I work with, so the number 7 ranking
is irrelevant.
MARK STUCKER 147
Ditto for their question about the top 20 colleges where professors get
high marks. But it isn’t perfect, because all you have to do is look back
the year before and you will see that by surveying different people you
get different results.
Let me share an example of how to combine responsible use of
the rankings with you customizing the rankings to reflect your values.
I think Bloomberg’s Business Week does as good a job as any
rankings at having a respectable formula. For their 2016 top
undergraduate business schools, they surveyed over 30,000 students
and 600 companies, and here is how they weight everything in their
formula:
While this is nice, what if a school is in the boonies and you would die
if you were not in the city? What if a school is in freezing cold weather
and you get depressed without your large dose of sunshine? What if
you value a racially and socio-economically diverse student body?
What if cost is a concern? None of those things are factored into
Bloomberg’s rankings. In chapter 16, I discuss the 32 factors that will
help you determine the right college for you.
Ratcliff's summary of his article was so on point; I agree with every
single word:
“I hope you can take one thing away from it: college rankings
should only be taken with a grain of salt. No college ranking can
accurately say where you will be the most successful, feel the most
MARK STUCKER 149