Capability Analysis
Minitab® 18 Support
Overview
Capability Analysis
Example
Complete the following steps to interpret a normal capability analysis. Key output
Specify a transformation histogram, normal curves, and capability indices.
Your process should be stable and the original (or transformed) process data shou
All statistics and graphs distribution. The histogram and tted normal curves provide an informal way to q
potential problems.
Methods and formulas
Methods IMPORTANT
For a more thorough analysis of these requirements, use Normal Capability Six
Potential capability
Visually examine the distribution t
Overall capability Compare the solid overall curve to the bars of the histogram to assess whether yo
approximately normal. If the bars vary greatly from the curve, your data may not b
Johnson transformed data capability estimates may not be reliable for your process. If your data appear to b
Individual Distribution Identi cation to determine whether you need to transform
nonnormal distribution to perform capability analysis.
Con dence intervals and
bounds
Observed performance
Compare the within and overall curves
Graphs Compare the solid overall curve and the dashed within curve to see how closely th
substantial di erence between the curves may indicate that the process is not sta
signi cant amount of variation between the subgroups. Use a control chart to ver
is stable before you perform a capability analysis.
https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/help-and-how-to/quality-and-process-improvement/capability-analysis/how-to/capability-analysis/nor… 1/4
30/10/2017 Interpret the key results for Normal Capability Analysis - Minitab
NOTE
If you are analyzing a process that naturally exhibits large variation between su
batch process, and the variation is not due to special causes, consider using Be
Capability Analysis.
In this histogram, the process spread is wider than the speci cation spread, which suggests po
Although most of the data are within the speci cation limits, there are nonconforming items b
speci cation limit (LSL) and above the upper speci cation limit (USL).
NOTE
To determine the actual number of nonconforming items in your process, use
LSL, PPM > USL, and PPM Total. For more information, go to All statistics and g
In this histogram, although the sample observations fall inside of the speci cation limits, the p
distribution curve is not centered on the target. Most of the data exceed the target value.
Generally, higher Cpk values indicate a more capable process. Lower Cpk values in
process may need improvement.
Compare Cpk with a benchmark that represents the minimum value that is a
process. Many industries use a benchmark value of 1.33. If Cpk is lower than
consider ways to improve your process, such as reducing its variation or shif
Compare Cp and Cpk. If Cp and Cpk are approximately equal, then the proce
between the speci cation limits. If Cp and Cpk di er, then the process is not
Generally, higher Ppk values indicate a more capable process. Lower Ppk values in
process may need improvement.
Compare Ppk to a benchmark value that represents the minimum value that
your process. Many industries use a benchmark value of 1.33. If Ppk is lower
benchmark, consider ways to improve your process.
Compare Pp and Ppk. If Pp and Ppk are approximately equal, then the proce
between the speci cation limits. If Pp and Ppk di er, then the process is not
Compare Ppk and Cpk. When a process is in statistical control, Ppk and Cpk
equal. The di erence between Ppk and Cpk represents the improvement in
that you could expect if shifts and drifts in the process were eliminated.
IMPORTANT
The Cpk and Ppk indices measure the capability of the process in relation only
limit that is closest to the process mean. Therefore, these indices represent on
process curve, and do not measure how the process performs on the other sid
curve. If your process produces nonconforming items that fall outside both the
https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/help-and-how-to/quality-and-process-improvement/capability-analysis/how-to/capability-analysis/nor… 3/4