Anda di halaman 1dari 13

(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.

2013

Check list for the initial inspection / monitoring of the factory production control
according to DIN EN 1090-1:2012-02

Company name:         Audit type:

Address:        

        Initial inspection

        Continuous monitoring

Auditor(s):         Monitoring becauise of changes

Reference documents (status):        

Audit date:        

             

Signature (FPC Manager) Signature (auditor(s))

377628036.doc, page 1 of 13 pages


(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

1 General
1.1 What part of DIN EN 1090 is applied DIN EN 1090-2            
to the execution? DIN EN 1090-3   

1.2 In what execution class (EXC) would EXC 1            
the plant like to become active? EXC 2   

EXC 3
EXC 4
1.3 Who is the person responsible for Name:                      
the FPC? How is he integrated into Please attach annex(es)   
the organisation?  
e.g. organisation chart, responsibility
matrix, job descriptions or qualification
profiles
1.4 What declaration method is ZA3.2            
applied? ZA3.3   

ZA3.4
ZA3.5
1.5 How is the factory production control QMM            
(FPC) described? Procedure specifications   

Check lists
Miscellaneous:
       
1.6 Was initial testing carried out? Yes, ITC (initial dimensioning)            
and ITT (initial testing for   
manufacture)  
Yes, ITT (initial testing for
manufacture) with available
dimensioning, e.g. customer
order
1.7 Was the initial testing documented? Entry on drawings            
Reports   

Forms and check lists
Miscellaneous:
       
1.8 How are normative documents Procedure description            
(standards, guidelines, technical List of standards   
codes etc.) managed?  
Server for standards
Miscellaneous:
       
1.9 Is an EC performance declaration Yes            
(conformity declaration) elaborated No   
by the manufacturer? (see ZA.2.2)  
Remarks:
       
Present an example in the audit
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 2 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

1.10 How is the CE marking and the Yes            


inscription applied to the No   
construction product? (see ZA.3)  
Remarks:
       
Present an example in the audit
2 Special process of
"dimensioning" (see Table B.1
from DIN EN 1090-1, left column)
2.1 Should dimensioning activities be a Yes            
constituent of the certification? No   
(ITC "Initial calculation")  
If "no", continue with 3
Remarks:
       
2.2 Are dimensioning activities carried Are carried out by in-house            
out by in-house personnel or personnel   
subcontracted? Are subcontracted  
Name the subcontractor:
       
2.3 Who is the person responsible for Name:            
the dimensioning?           

2.4 Is the personnel qualified?         Yes   
No   

Remarks:
        
2.5 According to what standards and                    
rules is the dimensioning carried   
out?  
2.6 How is the dimensioning carried Computer/software            
out? Manually   

Remarks:
       
2.7 Is the dimensioning procedure         Yes   
operable? No   

Remarks:
        
2.8 Are the records kept for the Yes            
specified duration? (DIN EN 1090-1, No   
Section 6.3.4)  
Remarks:
       
3 Tasks in relation to the
production (see Table B.1 from
DIN EN 1090-1, right column)
3.1 Subcontracting measures
3.1.1 Are subcontracting measures taken? Subcontracting of processes:            
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 3 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

 Dimensioning   
Yes / No  
 Cutting to size / initial
processing
Yes / No
 Welding work
Yes / No
 Mechanical joints
Yes / No
 Corrosion protection
Yes / No
 NDT
Yes / No
 Fabrication monitoring
measures
(e.g. welding supervision)
Yes / No
 Heat treatments
Yes / No
Please name the subcontractors:
       
Miscellaneous:
       
3.1.2 Have specifications and selection Yes            
criteria for subsuppliers been No   
stipulated?  
Remarks:
       
How is the suitability of the e.g. attach certificates and            
subsuppliers established? attestations   

Remarks:
       
3.1.3 Are the necessary documents made Yes            
available to the subsupplier? No   

Remarks:
       
3.1.4 How is the compliance with the                    
relevant requirements in   
DIN EN 1090-2/3 ensured by the  
subsupplier?
3.2 Special process of "welding"
3.2.1 Who is/are the responsible welding Name:            
supervisor(s)?           

3.2.2 What qualification(s) do(es) the IWE/EWE/SFI, number:         Number appropriate?   
responsible welding supervisor(s) IWT/EWT/ST, number:         Yes   
have? No  
IWS/EWS/SFM, number:
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 4 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

(Necessary level (B, S or C)       Qualification appropriate?


depending on the EXC, the material Other qualification, Yes
and the dimensions, Table 14 in number:         No
DIN EN 1090-2 and Table 7 in
DIN EN 1090-3) Submit proof or present it in the audit In the case of qualifications
other than SFI/EWE/IWE,
       
ST/EWT/IWT or
SFM/EWS/IWS: particular
expert discussion necessary
about the following contents:
Welding processes
Welding filler materials
Materials
Design
Calculation
Fabrication
Testing
Classification according to
DIN EN ISO 14731:
C: S: B:
3.2.3 Is the responsible welding         Yes   
supervisor authorised to be able to Please attach proof No   
make arrangements for necessary  
Remarks:
measures in the terms of
DIN EN ISO 14731?         
e.g. appointment or notice
3.2.4 Have the tasks and responsibilities         Yes   
of the welding supervisory personnel Please attach proof No   
been stipulated?  
Remarks:
e.g. responsibility matrix or job
description         
3.2.5 Are enough welders/operators         Number of certified   
available and qualified by means of Please attach a list of the available welders/operators appropriate?   
suitable qualification tests? welder/operator qualification test Yes  
certificates No
Qualification appropriate?
Yes
No
3.2.6 Is an up-to-date list of the         Yes   
fabrication and testing facilties Please attach a list No   
essential for production by means of  
Remarks:
welding technology available?
        
Examples:
- Welding power sources and other
machines
- Facilities for weld and surface
preparation and for cutting,
including thermal cutting
- Facilities for preheating and post-
weld heat treatment, including
temperature display devices
- Clamping and welding jigs
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 5 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

- Cranes and handling facilities


which are used for fabrication
- Personal occupational health and
safety facilities and miscellaneous
safety facilities which are directly
connected with the applied
fabrication processes
- Drying ovens, electrode quivers
etc. for the welding filler materials
- Facilities for surface cleaning
- Facilities for destructive and non-
destructive tests
3.2.7 Are the in-plant facilities sufficient         Yes   
and suitable for the planned area of No   
application?  
Remarks:
        
3.2.8 Are plans available for the         Yes   
maintenance of the facilities? No   

Remarks:
        
3.2.9 Is it ensured that damaged facilities         Yes   
are not utilised? No   

Remarks:
        
3.2.10 What welding processes are Please specify process numbers            
applied?           

3.2.11 Are welding procedure         Yes   
specifications (WPS) available for No   
the applied welding procedures?  
Remarks:
        
3.2.12 How are these welding procedures                    
qualified?   

3.2.13 Are work qualification tests         Yes   
according to DIN EN 1090-2/3 No   
required and available?  
Remarks:
        
3.2.14 Are work procedure specifications         Yes   
applied in addition to welding No   
procedure specifications?  
Remarks:
        
3.2.15 Has suitable fabrication planning         Yes   
been carried out? No   

Remarks:
        
3.2.16 Are monitoring measures and tests         Yes   
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 6 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

before/during and after welding No   


carried out in conformity with the Remarks:  
contract / set of rules?         
3.2.17 Is the status of the monitoring and         Yes   
the testing indicated in a suitable No   
way?  
Remarks:
e.g.         
- On the component
- In the accompanying documents
3.2.18 Are post-weld heat treatments Yes            
carried out (also subcontracting)? No (no further questions about   
heat treatment necessary)  
       
3.2.19 Have the responsibilities for the         Yes   
procedure for the execution of the No   
post-weld heat treatment been  
Remarks:
stipulated?
        
3.2.20 Are post-weld heat treatments         Yes   
carried out according to written No   
procedure specifications?  
Remarks:
In relation, for example, to:         
- Base material
- Welded joint
- Component
- Application standards /
specifications
3.2.21 Has a procedure been set up for the         Yes   
elaboration, checking and archiving No   
of quality-relevant documents?  
Remarks:
e.g.:
        
- Material certificates
- WPS
- WPQR
- Test certificates
3.3 Special process of "joining with
mechanical joining materials"
3.3.1 Has the personnel been adequately         Yes   
instructed (and qualified) for the No   
execution of mechanical joints?  
Remarks:
        
3.3.2 Do the operating materials satisfy         Yes   
the requirements in Chapter 8 of No   
DIN EN 1090-2/3?  
Remarks:
        
3.3.3 Are procedure descriptions         Yes   
available? No   

Remarks:
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 7 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

        
3.3.4 Have the stipulated procedure         Yes   
qualification measures been taken? No   

Remarks:
        
3.3.5 How are the manufactured joints                    
tested?   

3.3.6 How are the results of the tests                    
documented?   

3.4 Special process of "NDT"
3.4.1 Who is responsible for the selection Name:            
of NDT procedures?           

(With an indication of the
qualification)
3.4.2 Are testing procedures applied (in Yes, which?            
addition to direct visual inspection)? No   

Penetrant test (PT)
Magnetic particle test (MT)
Radiographic test (RT)
Ultrasonic test (UT)
Miscellaneous
       
3.4.3 Is the personnel adequately         Yes   
qualified for non-destructive tests? Please attach proof of qualification No   
(see 12.4.1 in DIN EN 1090-2 and  
Remarks:
12.4.2.2 in DIN EN 1090-3)
        
3.4.4 Are the available testing facilities         Yes   
suitable for NDT? Please attach a list of testing No   
e.g. list of testing materials materials  
Remarks:
        
3.4.5 How are the testing facilities                    
monitored?   

3.4.6 Are procedure descriptions available           Yes   
for the execution of the tests? No   

Remarks:
        
3.4.7 How are the results of the tests                    
documented?  

3.5 Special process of "corrosion

1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 8 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

protection"
3.5.1 What corrosion protection                    
procedures are applied?   

3.5.2 Has the personnel been adequately         Yes   
instructed (and qualified) for the No   
execution of corrosion protection?  
Remarks:
(see EN 1090-1, Point 6.3.2)
        
If necessary, requirements
graduated according to the type of
the coating systems (metal
construction, bridge construction
etc.)
3.5.3 Do the operating materials satisfy         Yes   
the requirements in Section 10 of No   
DIN EN 1090-2/3?  
Remarks:
e.g.         
- Rooms
- Mechanical preparation
- Blasting
- Manual coating
- Industrial coating
- Dew point determination
- Coat thickness measurement
3.5.4 Are procedure descriptions available           Yes   
for corrosion protection? No   

Remarks:
        
3.5.5 Have the stipulated procedure         Yes   
qualifications been carried out? No   

Remarks:
        
3.5.6 How are the manufactured coatings                    
tested?   

3.5.7 How are the results of the tests                    
documented?   

3.6 Other special processes
3.6.1 Are any other special processes Yes, which?            
applied? No   

Thermal cutting
Flame straightening
Shearing
Perforation/punching
Miscellaneous:
       

1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 9 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

3.6.1 Are process qualifications available                    


for these special processes? Present proof documents of rthe   
Thermal cutting audit (e.g. test report)  
Flame straightening
Shearing
Perforation/punching
Miscellaneous:
       
4 Calibration, verification and
validation
4.1 Have measuring, monitoring and         Yes   
testing facilities been calibrated, No   
verified and validated?  
Remarks:
e.g.         
Responsibilities
Procedures
(For terms, see DIN EN ISO 9000
and, with regard to welding, see
DIN EN ISO 17662)
5 Construction materials used for
manufacture
5.1 Are material certificates available Please attach examples Yes   
for the utilised base materials,         No   
welding filler materials, screws,  
Remarks:
corrosion protection substances
etc.?         
5.2 Have retraceability and appropriate         Yes   
documentation been ensured? No   
(DIN EN 1090-1, Section 6.3.5)  
Remarks:
        
6 Storage of construction materials
6.1 How are the construction materials                    
stored (also those provided by the   
customer)?  
6.2 Are the marking/identification and         Yes   
retraceability ensured during the No   
storage and fabrication periods?  
Remarks:
e.g.
        
- Type of marking
- Material test certificates
7 Component specifications
(execution documents)
7.1 Do the component specifications         Yes   
include the demanded information No   
(e.g. execution class, dimensions  
Remarks:
and tolerances, assessment groups
and monitoring and testing plans)?         

1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 10 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

8 Product assessment
(performance characteristics
according to Table ZA.1)
8.1 Permissible deviations for                    
dimensions and shape   

8.1.1 Do the stipulations for the         Yes   
tolerances meet the conditions in No   
Section 11 of and Appendix G to  
Remarks:
DIN EN 1090-2/3?
        
8.1.2 How are tolerances for dimensions                    
and shape checked and   
documented?  
8.2 Weldability
8.2.1 What materials are utilised and how                    
is the weldability ensured when   
welding technology procedures are  
applied?
8.3 Fracture toughness / notched-bar               
impact strength (only for steel)   
Note: The performance  
characteristics of fracture toughness
and notched-bar impact strength are
identical and mean the notched-bar
impact energy at a stipulated testing
temperature.
8.3.1 Is information about the values of Please attach examples Yes   
the notched-bar impact energy and         No   
the testing temperature included in  
Remarks:
the material documentation?
        
8.4 Load-bearing capacity On this subject, see Chapter 2 of            
(Only relevant if the ZA 3.3 this check list   
declaration procedure is applied)          
8.5 Fatigue strength On this subject, see Chapter 2 of            
(Only relevant if the ZA 3.3 this check list   
declaration procedure is applied)          
8.6 Fire resistance Yes            
Are products with requirements on No   
fire resistance manufactured?  
Remarks:
       
8.6.1 If "yes", according to what                    
procedure is the classification   
carried out?  
Notes: (See 5.7 in DIN EN 1090-1)
8.7 Fire behaviour Yes            
Is proof demanded for the fire No   
behaviour?  
Remarks:
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 11 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

       
8.7.1 In so far as proof is demanded for Yes            
the classification of fire behaviour No   
according to DIN EN 13501-1, is this Remarks:  
available?
       
Notes: (5.8 in DIN EN 1090-1)
REMARKS:
With regard to fire behaviour,
construction materials made of steel
and aluminium come under the A1
class according to the European
classification and no further
documentation is required.
Galvanised steels and anodised
aluminium components also come
under the A1 class.
In the case of coated components, it
must be proven that the class of the
component complies with the
requirements with regard to its
application and function. The
classification must be carried out
according to EN 13501-1.
Coatings which are applied to steel
or aluminium components for
surface protection or for other
reasons may alter the A1
classification. Information about the
fire behaviour of organically coated
steel sheets is included in EN 14782
and EN 14783.
8.8 Release of cadmium and its                    
compounds Note: In general, the following is   
specified in the case of  
components made of steel and
aluminium: NPD "no performance
determined"
8.9 Release of radioactive radiation                    
Note: In general, the following is   
specified in the case of  
components made of steel and
aluminium: NPD "no performance
determined"
8.10 Durability                    
On this subject, see Section 3.5,   
"Corrosion protection"  
9 Non-conforming products (lack of                    
compliance and corrective   
measures)  
9.1 Have measures been stipulated for         Yes   
how to proceed in the event of a   
1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 12 of 13 pages
(T2, A1, FB37.1), status: 20.02.2013

Questions/requirements Remarks/notes: Audit result: R1)


Filling-in by the manufacturer Filling-in by the auditor

lack of compliance with stipulated No  


requirements? Remarks:
e.g.         
- Marking
- Responsibilities
- Repair procedure specification /
repair
- Repeat test
- Measures in order to prevent any
reoccurrence

1) R = result, 0 = not applicable, 1 = fulfilled, 2 = partially fulfilled, still acceptable, 3 = partially fulfilled, not acceptable, 4 = not fulfilled
377628036.doc, page 13 of 13 pages