nssf.org
similar names to one on the list, domestic violence convictions from reason for opposing such a system,
would be prevented from exercising purchasing firearms. saying “There are legitimate law
their constitutional right.iv enforcement reasons for keeping
Terrorist Notification System
the list secret: Disclosure of such
Current System Works These proposals are unlikely to
information would tip off known or
There are already methods in place prevent a terrorist attack, as most
to prevent terrorists and criminals suspected terrorists, who could then
would-be terrorists are either not on
from legally purchasing firearms. change their habits or identities to
the list before they commit crimes,
More than 95 percent of people escape government scrutiny.”
or are prohibited from purchasing
on the watch list are automatically firearms under existing law. Merely being suspected or simply
prohibited from purchasing firearms However, the proposals would hand having a name that is similar
because they are not American terrorists a useful tool: a government- to someone who is suspected
citizens or legal U.S. residents. run terrorist notification system. should not be enough to deny any
The citizens that appear on the
According to a 2005 Department American any fundamental right.
watch list would only be allowed
to purchase a firearm if they meet of Justice (DOJ) letter to the Legislative attempts to prohibit the
the current guidelines and pass a Senate majority leader, the DOJ purchase of firearms by anyone on
mandatory FBI background check.v strongly opposes such a system the terrorist watch list are overly
The FBI checks its Violent Gang since it would “jeopardize ongoing broad infringements on Americans’
and Terrorist Organization File for investigations” and “would alert [a constitutional rights and attempt to
every background check. Federal law suspect] that he or she is on the solve a problem that doesn’t exist by
already bars felons, unlawful drug watch list.” Even the TSC cited a using a method that wouldn’t work
users and those with misdemeanor 2010 Washington Post article in its and would provide a tool to terrorists.
i Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous any information learned to override the attorney were allowed to purchase firearms in 1,119
Terrorists Act of 2011, S. 34, 112th Cong. § general’s decision (at § 2(j)(1)(C)) transactions. Each and every one of the 1,119
2(a)(1) (2011). The same bill also attempted ii U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the transactions was concluded only after a successful
to set forth new evidentiary guidelines for cases Inspector General, Audit Division, “The Federal FBI background check. The transactions that
brought by individuals attempting to redress their Bureau of Investigation’s Terrorist Watchlist were allowed to proceed did so, just as they
placement on the terrorist watch list and stop the Nomination Practices,” Audit Report 09-25 should have, because the FBI confirmed that the
government’s violation of their second amendment (2009). purchasers were not criminals. Some erroneously
rights. The bill permitted the attorney general iii Id. at v refer to these successful transactions as a
to withhold evidence used to prevent a purchase iv Senator Kennedy was stopped multiple times loophole in the current system. The transactions
and present only selectively edited versions of in airports and prevented from boarding a plane are instead an indicator that the terrorist watch
documents. Subject to limited exceptions, only since his name was similar to a name on the list had led to American citizens being improperly
the judge deciding the appropriateness of the terrorist watch list. suspected of being a criminal at least 1,119
attorney general’s suspicion would be able to v Proponents of this proposal point to a 2010 times.
view the full documents. Despite being able to Government Accountability Office report saying
access the full information, the judge may not use that 650 individuals on the terrorist watch list