MEANING:-A personal action dies with the person APLICABILITY:-It is a common rule applicable to torts ,now it is applicable to actions for defamation, seduction, enticement of a spouse & claims for damages for adultery EXCEPTIONS:- Action under contracts; unjust enrichment of tort feasors estate. CASE LAW:-1.BAKER VS. BALTON- wife of plaintiff died due to brick falling on her, plaintiff asked for damages for death as well as the sufferings he had to go through, but it was considered unnecessary under this maxim. after this law reform act 1934 came and overruled this case 2.TAMILNADU VS. RAJAPRIYA:- in this case plaintiff's wife died due to motor vehicle accident, so she asked for damages for his death and was awarded the same AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM MEANING:-right of opposite party to be heard in court APPLICABILTY:-this maxim is a part of natural justice so is applicable everywhere EXCEPTION:-the only exception to the rule is the legislative intention to the contrary. This rule can be overlooked in some exceptional cases; exclusion in emergency; exclusion in case of the dire; public interest; exclusion in cases of confidentiality; academic adjudication; impracticability; interim preventive action; legislative action. CASE LAW:-1.Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India:- In this case, the passport of mrs. Maneka Gandhi was impounded by the central government in public interest, without giving her a fair hearing as also without furnishing her the reasons for passing an order, Held that it was held that the order was clearly violation of natural justice embodied in the maxim audi alteram partem. 2.ERRINGTON VS. MIN. OF HEALTH:-demolishing of building and inspection without residents knowledge DAMNUM SINE INJURIA MEANING:-damage without infringement of legal right APPLICABILITY:-torts CASE LAW:-gloucestor grammer school(school case) chesmore vs. richards(water mill &well case) EXCEPTIONS:- NONE INJURIA SINE DAMNUM MEANING:-violation of legal right without damages. APPLICABILITY:-torts EXCEPTIONS:- no exceptions CASELAW:- Ashby vs. White(vote case) Bhim singh vs. state of j&k(mla entry) DELEGATUS NON PROTEST DELEGATE MEANING:-No delegated power can be further delegated APPLICABILTY:-It is applicable in constitutional and administrative law EXCEPTIONS:- When principal expressly authorises the agent to delegate the responsibilty to third person or another agent; special order passed by court; the concept of delegation can take place if required for proper performance; present the account o demand of principal CASE LAWS:- AK ROY VS. STATE OF PUNJAB( FOOD SAFETY MINISTRY FILES CASE) STATE VS.KUNJA BEHRI CHANDRA( MINISTRY DELEGATES COMMITEE COMMITEE DELEGATES OFFICER) NEMO DAT QUAD NON HABET MEANING:-No one can convey a better title than what he himself has. APPLICABILITY:-Sales of goods act EXCEPTION:-Title by estoppel; title under act of broker; sale under special rights ; sale in open market; transfer of negotiable instruments CASE LAWS:-pearson vs. rose & young(car was supposed to be kept only to know offers for it, but the shopkeeper sold it.which was unlawful under this maxim ) RES IPSA LOQUITOR MEANING:-the things speaks for itself APPLICABILITY:-the maxim is applicable to those accidents which could not have happened without defendents negligence EXCEPTION:- no exception CASE LAWS:-marakkar vs. state of kerala(man falling into pothole made by defendent and left open carelessly) 2.municipal corporation of delhi vs. shubhangwati( clock tower whose life was 40yrs was not repaired till 80 yrs and thus it fell and killed) RESPONDENT SUPERIOR MEANING: LET the principal be liable APPLICABILITY:-Almost every case related to master servant relation EXCEPTIONS:-the servant had acted beyond his powers; the act was done when not on service. CASE LAWS:-Baxi amrik singh vs.U.O.I(millitary truck hit a car and govt paid damages) state of rajasthan vs. vidhyawati( govt jeep going for repair man took lift had accident man killed, govt held liable) UBI JUS IBI REMEDIUM MEANING:-where there is a right there is remedy EXCEPTIONS:- THERE is no legal remedy for all moral or political wrong. CASE LAWS:- ASHBY VS. WHITE(VOTE) BHIM SINGH VS. STATE OF J&K(MLA ENTRY) VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA MEANING:-damages suffered by consent is not a cause for action APPLICABILTY:- TORTS EXCEPTIONS:-negligence; unlawful act; scienti non fit injuria(only knowledge of risk does not mean acceptance) CASE LAWS:-1.HALL VS. BROOKLAND AUTO RACING CLUB(CAR RACING ACCIDENT ONE CAR WENT TO AUDIENCE AND HURT THEM BUT NOT ACTIONABLE) 2.PADMAVATI VS. DUGGANAIKA( MAN TOO LIFT IN JEEP ,TIRES SCREW CAME OUT, PASSENGER DIED BUT NOT ACTIONABLE)
August 1, 2018, G.R. No. 163959MARCELINO E. LOPEZ, FELIZA LOPEZ, ZOILO LOPEZ, LEONARDO LOPEZ, and SERGIO F. ANGELES, Petitioners Vs - THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS and PRIMEX CORPORATION, R