Synergy peer-reviewing form

Title of article: Parole della degustazione. Comunicare

il vino.
Barolo, Brunello, Amarone.
Ionela CHIRU
Date at which the article was received by 17.10.2016
peer-reviewer:
Date at which the peer-review report was sent 18.10.2016
to the editor:
Name of peer-reviewer: Maria Ana Oprescu

Compliance with publication criteria

Please take into consideration to what extent the reviewed article responds to the following
questions.

Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

1. Formal completeness Da
 Does it have an abstract? Da
 Are the keywords indicated? Da
 Are there section headings and Da
subheadings?
 Is there a list of references?
2. Contribution to the field of research: Da
 Is it relevant for the area of study? Da
 Is it innovative and original for its field of
research?
3. Title, keywords, abstract Da
 Does the title respect the topic suggested? Da
 Are the keywords suggestive for the Da
logical demonstration of the article?
 Does the abstract offer enough
information regarding the article?
4. Content and overall organisation Da
 Is there a clear, logical presentation of ideas? Da
 Is there a clear structuring of the article Da
into sections and subsections? Da
 Are they organised in a logical manner and Da
with clear links between the text parts? Da
 Is the methodology clearly explained and
closely followed?
 Are conclusions/recommendations
relevant for the research?
  Are the bibliographical references
relevant, sufficient and recent?
5. Language and style Da
 Is it written in a clear, concise language? Da
 Is the style appropriate for publication? Da
 Is the quality of linguistic expression
(grammar, vocabulary, spelling) adequate?
6. Compliance with submission requirements Da
 Does it respect the submission
requirements in the guidelines for
contributors (size, font, paragraphing,
subheadings)?
7. Citation and referencing Da
 Does it respect the citation and Da
referencing requirements?
 Are all the authors cited / all the titles
referred to in the text included in the
bibliography list?

No
8. Plagiarism
 Are there parts of the article or the article as a whole copied from other sources or do you
suspect they can be found in other sources?
 Do you suspect that the article or parts of it have been published previously in other
journals/volumes/on line sources, etc.?

Acceptance of the article for publication based on the publication criteria

Please check one of the boxes below and suggest changes as necessary:

Peer-reviewer’s recommendation
Suggestions for revision

Acceptance without revision Da

Acceptance with minor changes

Aceptance with major changes

Rejection

Comments regarding meeting the criteria for the editorial board (they are confidential and will
not be seen by the author(s)):
Articol corect documentat,bibliografie suficienta,
expunere .............................................................................................................................................
....................clara.Il recomand spre publicare in
revista..................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................

_Maria Ana Oprescu___________________ _____________________

__________________
Name of peer-reviewer Signature Date,
18.10.2016