■ Professionals in engineering, economics, management and other fields develop software to assist them in their work,
to perform calculations, summarize research and survey activities, and so forth.
■ Software development professionals (systems analysts and programmers) develop software products or firmware as a
professional career objective
_________________________________________
What is software?
Software is: Computer programs, procedures, and possibly associated documentation and data pertaining to the operation
of a computer system
■ Procedures
■ Documentation
An error can be a grammatical error in one or more of the code lines, or a logical error in carrying out one or more of the
client’s requirements.
A software faults are software error that can cause improper functioning of the software in general or in a specific
application
A software error can be “code error”, a “procedure error”, a “documentation error”, or a “software data error”.
Software quality is the degree to which a system, component, or process meets specified requirements.
Software quality is the degree to which a system, component, or process meets customer or user needs or expectations.
A set of activities designed to evaluate the process by which the products are developed or manufactured. Contrast with
quality control.
Quality control is defined as “a set of activities designed to evaluate the quality of a developed or manufactured product”
(1) Quality control and quality assurance activities serve different objectives.
(2) Quality control activities are only a part of the total range of quality assurance activities.
1. Assuring an acceptable level of confidence that the software will conform to functional technical requirements.
2. Assuring an acceptable level of confidence that the software will conform to managerial scheduling and budgetary
requirements.
3. Initiating and managing of activities for the improvement and greater efficiency of software development and SQA activities.
This means improving the prospects that the functional and managerial requirements will be achieved while reducing the
costs of carrying out the software development and SQA activities.
1. Assuring with an acceptable level of confidence that the software maintenance activities will conform to the functional
technical requirements.
2. Assuring with an acceptable level of confidence that the software maintenance activities will conform to managerial
scheduling and budgetary requirements.
3. Initiating and managing activities to improve and increase the efficiency of software maintenance and SQA activities.
This involves improving the prospects of achieving functional and managerial requirements while reducing costs.
Software engineering is defined as the application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development,
operation and maintenance of software; that is, the application of engineering to software.
The characteristics of software engineering, especially the systematic, disciplined and quantitative approach at its core,
make the software engineering environment a good infrastructure for achieving SQA objectives
It is commonly accepted that cooperation between software engineers and the SQA team is the appropriate way to
achieve efficient and economic development and maintenance activities that, at the same time, assure the quality of the
product of these activities.
__________________________________________
Many cases of low customer satisfaction are situations where software projects have satisfactorily fulfilled the basic
requirements of correctness, while suffering from poor performance in other important areas such as maintenance,
reliability, software reuse, or training. One of the main causes for these lapses is the lack of defined requirements
pertaining to these aspects of software functionality.
Therefore, there is a need for the comprehensive definition of requirements that will cover all aspects of software use
throughout all stages of the software life cycle.
Factor models define the broad spectrum of software requirements. We expected that those individuals who define
software requirements will refer to each factor and, accordingly, examine the need to incorporate the respective
requirements in their requirements documents.
McCall’s factor model classifies all software requirements into 11 software quality factors. The 11 factors are grouped into
three categories – product operation, product revision and product transition – as follows:
The two factor models from the late 1980s, alternatives to the McCall classic factor model, are:
These alternative models suggest adding five factors to McCall’s model. Two of these factors are very similar to two of
McCall’s factors; only three factors are “new”:
■ The Deutsch and Willis model adds the factors Safety and Manageability.
The client is not the only party interested in thoroughly defining the requirements that assure the quality of the software
product. The developer is often interested in adding requirements that represent his own interests, such as reusability,
verifiability and portability requirements. These may not, however, be of interest to the client. Thus, one can expect that
a project will be carried out according to two requirements documents:
_________________________________________________
■ Pre-project components.
Organizational considerations
■ Degree and nature of cooperation with other organizations carrying out related projects
■ Optimization objectives
■ Professional qualifications
6) Project milestones
■ Staff shortages
(6) Discuss the benefits of preparing development and quality plans for small projects
For small development projects (of not less than 15 man-days), preparation of development and quality plans is optional.
However, one should consider the substantial advantages obtained by the plan’s developer. The main advantages of plan
preparation are improvements in the developer’s understanding of the task, and greater commitment to complete the
project as planned. In addition, the plan documents contribute to a better understanding between the developer and the
customer, and easier and more effective project control.
(7) Discuss the benefits of preparing development and quality plans for internal projects.
It is recommended that internal projects, undertaken on behalf of other departments and for development of software
packages geared toward the market, be treated as “regular projects”. This implies that full-scale development and quality
plans are to be prepared. Their benefits include:
(a) The development department will avoid losses incurred by unrealistic timetables and budgets, as well as the
consequent damage to other projects and to the firm’s reputation.
(b) The internal “customer” will enjoy reduced risk of late completion and budget overruns in addition to and by improved
project control and coordination with the developer.
(c) The firm will enjoy educed risk of its software product’s late entry into the market, reduced risk of a decline in its
reputation resulting from late supply, and reduced risk of budget overruns.
_______________________________________________
(1) Describe the various software development models and discuss the differences between them.
■ The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) model ■ The spiral model
The classic SDLC model is a linear sequential model comprising several phases, beginning with requirements definition
and concluding with regular system operation and maintenance. At the end of each phase, outputs are reviewed and
evaluated by the developer as well as, in many cases, by the customer. The outcomes range from approval of the phase
results and continuation to the next phase, to demands to correct, redo or alter parts of the respective phase. The waterfall
model can be viewed as the basic frame work for the other models, which can be considered as complementary and
represent different perspectives of the process, or as referring to diverse development contexts. According to the
prototyping methodology, the developed system’s users are required to comment on versions of the software prototypes
prepared by the developers. The developers thereafter correct the prototype and incorporate additional parts into the
system. This process is repeated till the software system is completed or till the goal of prototyping is achieved. The main
advantages of the prototyping over the SDLC model, for small to medium sized projects, are the shorter development
process, substantial savings in development resources, better fit to customer requirements, reduced risk of project failure,
and clearer user comprehension of the new system. The spiral model provides an improved methodology for larger and
more complex projects. This improvement is achieved by introducing and emphasizing elements of risk analysis and
customer participation in the development process. Each of the model’s iterations includes planning, risk analysis and
resolution, engineering, and customer evaluation. The advanced spiral model (the Win–Win model) places extra emphasis
on communication and negotiation between customer and developer. The customer wins by improving chances to receive
a system that satisfies most of his needs while the developer wins by improving chances of completing the project within
budgetary and timetable constraints. The object-oriented model deals with the situation of intensive reuse of software
components. According to this model, the development process begins with a sequence of object-oriented analysis and
design activities. The design phase is followed by acquisition of a reusable software library together with “regular”
development of the unavailable software components. Copies of newly developed software components are “stocked” in
the library for future reuse.
(2) Explain the considerations affecting application of quality assurance activities.
The decision about the number of quality assurance activities to be applied is affected by project and team factors. Project
factors include project magnitude, its complexity and difficulty, extent of reusable software components, and the severity
of the outcomes if the project fails. Team factors include its professional qualifications as well as acquaintance with the
project and related experience, availability of professional support, and staff familiarity with team members.
(3) Explain the different aspects of verification, validation and qualification for quality assurance activities.
Quality assurance activities examine three different aspects of quality by means of software product verification,
validation and qualification.
■ Verification examines the consistency of current development activities with the products from previous phases. Doing
so enables the examiner to confirm whether the developer has fulfilled his requirements while disregarding deviations
from the original requirements that may have arisen during development.
■ Validation represents the customer’s interests by examining the extent to which the customer’s original requirements
have been fulfilled.
■ Qualification focuses on operational aspects, where maintenance is the main issue. Qualification reviews project
application of professional standards and coding procedures, based on the assumption that applying these standards
facilitates maintenance.
Quality assurance activity planners are required to determine which of these aspects should be examined in each of the
planned quality assurance activities.
(4) Describe the model for SQA defect removal effectiveness and cost.
The model deals with two quantitative aspects of an SQA plan designed for a specific project:
(1) Total effectiveness of defect removal. (2) Total cost of defect removal.
■ Various review and test software assurance activities serve as filters, removing a percentage of the entering defects
while allowing the rest to pass to the next software assurance activity.
■ Incoming defects are the sum of defects passed from the former quality assurance activity together with “new” defects
created in the current development phase.
■ The cost of defect removal is calculated by multiplying the number of defects removed by the relative cost of removing a defect.
■ Defects passed to the customer will be detected by him or her; their full removal at this phase will incur heavy costs.
The model allows calculating estimates of the cost of decisions regarding the quality assurance plan, e.g.:
■ Application of current quality assurance procedures activity versus application of a more efficient yet more costly procedure .
Utilization of the model thus enables comparison of SQA policies/strategies and activity plans.
_____________________________________________
■ To perform the required testing in an efficient and effective way, within budget and scheduling limitations.
(2) Discuss the differences between the various testing strategies, their advantages and disadvantages.
■ “Big bang testing”: tests the software as a whole, once the completed package is available.
■ “Incremental testing”: tests the software piecemeal– software modules are tested as they are completed (unit tests),
followed by groups of modules composed of tested modules integrated with newly completed modules (integration tests).
Once the entire package is completed, it is tested as a whole (system test).
There are two basic incremental testing strategies: bottom-up and top-down. In top down testing, the first module tested
is the main module, the highest level module in the software structure; the last modules to be tested are the lowest level
modules. In bottom-up testing, the order of testing is reversed: the lowest level modules are tested first, with the main
module tested last.
■ Big bang vs. incremental testing. Unless the program is very small and simple, applying the “big bang” testing strategy
presents severe disadvantages. Identification of error in the entire software package when perceived as one “unit” is very
difficult and, in spite of the vast resources invested, is not very effective. Moreover, performing perfect correction of an
error in this context is frequently laborious. Obviously, estimates of the required testing resources and testing schedule
tend to be rather fuzzy. In contrast, the advantages of incremental testing, because it is performed on relatively small
software units, yields higher percentages of identified errors and facilitates their correction. As a result, it is generally
accepted that incremental testing should be preferred.
■ Bottom-up vs. top-down. The main advantage of the bottom-up strategy is its relative ease of performance, while its
main disadvantage is the lateness of the stage at which it is possible to observe the program as a whole. The main
advantage of the top-down strategy is the early stage at which it is possible to demonstrate the program as a whole, a
condition that supports early identification of analysis and design errors. The main disadvantage of the approach is the
comparative difficulty of its performance.
(3) Describe the concepts of black box testing and white box testing, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.
■ Black box testing identifies bugs only according to malfunctioning of the software as revealed from its outputs, while
disregarding the internal paths of calculations performed by the software.
■ White box testing examines the internal paths of calculations in order to identify bugs.
■ For test classes that can be carried out by both white and black box testing, black box testing requires considerably
fewer resources.
■ It requires vast resources, much above those required for black box testing.
■ It cannot test the performance of software in terms of availability, reliability, stress, etc.
“Path coverage” is defined as the percentage of possible paths of software processing activated by the test cases. “Line
coverage” is defined as the percentage of executed lines of code examined during the tests.
The concepts of path testing and line coverage are applicable for estimating white box testing coverage only. In most
cases, the achievement of full path coverage is impractical because of the scope of resources required for its
implementation.
(1) Output correctness tests – in most cases, the class of tests that consume the largest weight of testing resources