Abstract
This paper describes the synthesis of a magnetic and conducting liquid consisting of cobalt nanoparticles dispersed in mercury. The
magnetic nanoparticles are obtained in one step by the electroreduction of a cobalt(II) solution on mercury. These particles are then
extracted using an organic solution of surfactant in order to obtain a ferrofluid based on cobalt nanoparticles.
r 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 44 27 27 57; fax: +33 1 44 27 36 75. The electrolysis was performed using a generator (Delta
E-mail address: neveu@ccr.jussieu.fr (S. Neveu). Electronika, Power Supply E030-1) under constant stirring
0304-8853/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.04.024
ARTICLE IN PRESS
R. Massart et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 308 (2007) 10–14 11
lasting at least 5 h. At the cathode, a platinum rod was in volume of the aqueous solution: 300 mL,
contact with the mercury. The anode consisted of a medium: Ammonium citrate (0.3 mol L1), citric acid
platinum plate. The setup is described in Fig. 2. (0.3 mol L1), ammonium chloride (0.1 mol L1), pH ¼ 6.5,
The electrolysis was performed either in a homo- electrolysis duration: 7.5 h.
geneous medium (sodium citrate or ammonium citrate;
Co2+ ions being dissolved as complexes) or in a hetero- 2.1. Coulometry
geneous medium (sodium hydroxide; Co(II) being
precipitated as Co(OH)2). In this way, a magnetic phase During the electrolysis, the current decreases with time
consisting of cobalt nanoparticles in mercury could be (Fig. 3). The amount of electricity consumed during
R
obtained. the electrolysis ( idt ¼ 1410 C) corresponds to the
As an example, the results described below were formation of 7.3 103 mol of cobalt.
obtained in the case of an electrolysis performed in a
homogeneous medium. 2.2. Optical spectrophotometry
The amount of cobalt incorporated in mercury was
determined by two different methods during the electrolysis When the electrolyte solution is a cobalt citrate complex,
in a homogeneous phase with the following experimental its absorbance is proportional to the cobalt concentration
conditions: according to the BeerLambert law (at l ¼ 506 nm,
characteristic wavelength of the cobalt complex). The
mass of mercury: 307.5 g, difference between the absorbance before and at the end
initial amount of cobalt (CoCl2): 0.026 mole, of the electrolysis is due to the disappearance of Co(II) in
solution, and therefore, due to the formation of metallic
cobalt. The amount of metallic cobalt calculated by means
E of this method is equal to 6.3 103 mol of cobalt. This
value is close to the value found by coulometry. These two
H+ methods give similar amounts of metallic cobalt. In the
0V
Co2+ Co(OH)2 following calculations, a mean value equal to
(E2)
6.8 103 mol of cobalt will be used.
-0.28V
H2 2.3. Magnetic characterization
Co
The magnetic measurements were performed using a
(E3) Foner device [16]. A typical magnetization curve for cobalt
(E1) dissolved in mercury is shown in Fig. 4. The curve obtained
4.7 6.9
pH by increasing the field follows the Langevin law [17]. For
an ideal monodisperse solution of nanoparticles (diameter
Fig. 1. Standard redox potential–pH diagram: E1 ¼ E Hþ =H2 ¼ 0.06 pH, D), the magnetization M is given by
E2 ¼ E Co2þ =Co ¼ 0.29 V (for pHo6.9); E3 ¼ E Co2þ =Co ¼ 0.124–0.06 pH
(for pH46.9). mB kT
M ¼ M s ctnh ,
kT mB
where Ms ¼ msf is the saturation magnetization of the
solution, ms the saturation magnetization of the
magnetic material, f the volume fraction of cobalt, T the
absolute temperature, k the Boltzmann constant, B the
0.5
0.4
0.3
i (A)
0.2
0.1
0
0 2 4 6 8
t (hours)
In these cases, black magnetic nanoparticles were obtained. JCPDS data: the characteristic peaks of the hexagonal
These particles were washed several times with acetone and close-packed cobalt (Co hc) ((1 0 0), (0 0 2), (1 0 1)) are
alcohol, and then dried. observed (Fig. 6). A supplementary peak (3 1 1) is
Fig. 5 shows the black magnetic nanoparticles observed attributed to cobalt oxide, Co3O4. It seems that the cobalt
by transmission electron microscopy. The particles are nanoparticles are covered by an oxide shell that protects
polydisperse with a mean diameter of the order of 4.5 nm. them against increased oxidation. Therefore, these black
Their crystallographic structure is compared with the magnetic particles are stable in air and stay magnetic with
exposure time.
5. Conclusion
20
7574, University Pierre et Marie Curie) for the X-ray
diffraction patterns.
15
References
10
[1] S. Sun, C.B. Murray, J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 4325.
5
[2] A.C.S. Samia, K. Hyzer, J.A. Schlueter, C.J. Qin, J.S. Jiang, S.D.
Bader, X.M. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (12) (2005) 4126.
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [3] H. Bonnemann, W. Brijoux, R. Brinkmann, N. Matousevitch, N.
(b) Waldöfner, N. Palina, H. Modrow, Inorg. Chim. Acta 350 (2003)
617.
Fig. 5. (a) TEM picture of the cobalt nanoparticles extracted from the [4] H.D. Jang, D.W. Hwang, D.P. Kim, H.C. Kim, B.Y. Lee, I.B. Jeong,
mercury, and (b) corresponding histogram. Mater. Res. Bull. 39 (2004) 63.
[5] I. Lisiecki, M.P. Pileni, Langmuir 19 (2003) 9486. [12] E. Dubois, J. Chevalet, Langmuir 19 (2003) 10892.
[6] S. Linderoth, L.H. Rasmussen, S. Morup, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (8) (1991) [13] D.E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. 2 (1970) 1.
5124. [14] Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th ed., CRC Press, Boca
[7] F.E. Luborsky, J. Electrochem. Soc. 108 (1987) 1138. Raton, 1984–1985, E76.
[8] L. Keiling, S.W. Charles, J. Popplewell, J. Phys. F 14 (12) (1984) [15] V.B. Lazarev, Y.I. Malov, Fiz. Met. Metalloved 24 (3) (1967) 565.
3093. [16] S. Foner, E.J. Macniff Jr., Rev. Sci. Inst. 39 (1968) 171.
[9] S.W. Charles, J. Popplewell, IEEE Trans. Magn. 12 (6) (1976) [17] R.W. Chantrell, J. Popplewell, S.W. Charles, IEEE Trans. Magn. 14
795. (1978) 975.
[10] V.A. Alekseev, I.Yu. Veprok, S.G. Minukov, A.I. Fedonenko, [18] R. Kayser, G. Miskolczy, J. Appl. Phys. 41 (1970) 1064.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 85 (1990) 133. [19] J.C. Bacri, R. Perzynski, D. Salin, V. Cabuil, R. Massart, J. Magn.
[11] E. Dubois, J. Chevalet, R. Massart, J. Mol. Liq. 83 (1–3) (1999) 243. Magn. Mater. 62 (1986) 36.