Chronic Hepatitis
Histopathology
SWAN N. THUNG, MICHAEL A. GERBER, and
HANS POPPER
INTRODUCTION
SWAN N. THUNG and HANS POPPER • The Lillian and Henry M. Stratton-Hans Popper
Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, New
York 10029. MICHAEL A. GERBER· Department of Pathology, Tulane University School
of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112.
247
G. Gitnick (ed.), Modern Concepts of Acute and Chronic Hepatitis
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989
248 CHAPTER 18
cirrhosis was not yet or just barely visible. The second factor was the growing
application of hepatic tests, particularly of the aminotransferases, which led to
routine diagnosis or at least suspicion of milder degrees of liver injury and
permitted one to follow its evolution prospectively. This was particularly impor-
tant, since the clinical manifestations of milder degrees of chronic hepatitis are
rather nonspecific and mainly fatigability. A third factor was the development of
immunosuppressive therapy, predominantly corticosteroids. This therapy stimu-
lated the attempt to identify conditions in which it was indicated. The resulting,
originally therapeutic, classification is today, almost ironically, still the most
widely used, although the use of immunosuppressive therapy is now greatly
restricted.
The classification of chronic hepatitis is commonly based on morphologic
criteria. Clinical information is often needed for the diagnosis, particularly the
time of onset of the disease, but an accurate diagnosis is usually not possible on
clinical and biochemical grounds alone. Thus, liver biopsy is essential for the
diagnosis, but clinical information and results of biochemical tests must be taken
into account before a final diagnosis is reached.
Two main forms of chronic hepatitis have been widely accepted: (1) chronic
active hepatitis (CAH), also known as chronic aggressive hepatitis and chronic
periportal hepatitis, and (2) chronic persistent hepatitis (CPH) , also known as
chronic portal hepatitis. The major difference between these two forms is the
location of the inflammatory infiltrate. In CPH it is confined to the portal tracts,
whereas in CAH it extends into the periportal parenchyma, usually accompanied
by hepatocellular destruction and by fibrosis. This distinction plays a major role
in diagnosis and management of patients with chronic hepatitis. There are also
important differences between the prognoses for CAH and CPH, particularly
with respect to the development of cirrhosis, which may follow CAH but not
necessarily CPH.