SingHealth Pharmacists to provide
Minimum Standard of General
Pharmacy Practice:
The General Level Framework
Handbook
First Edition
February 2011
Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………. Page 2
Background……………………………………………………………………………………………... Page 3
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………... Page 4
- Camilla Wong Ming Lee, Allied Health Division, Singapore General Hospital
- Jacqueline Ong Kia Geok, Allied Health Division, Singapore General Hospital
- Anita Binte Mohamed Sani, Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital (Cover Page Design)
Page 2 of 48
Background
In 2007 the Singapore General Hospital (SGH), a member of the Singapore Health
Services (Singhealth) group, started collaborations with the UK Competency
Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG) to adapt their General Level
Framework (GLF) for use in SGH. The GLF is an assessment and developmental
tool that encompasses the holistic scope of pharmacy practice, namely knowledge,
skills and attitudes. Ultimately, the aim is to develop competent pharmacists who will
provide safe and effective healthcare to the nation.
In May 2009, an adapted version of the GLF was initiated within the Department of
Pharmacy. In December of the same year, experts from CoDEG visited Singapore
and a Memorandum of Understanding was exchanged between CoDEG and
Singhealth, a milestone in the continued collaboration between the two parties. In
addition, the experts conducted a GLF training programme that included a ‘train the
trainers’ session in which Singhealth pharmacists were educated and trained on the
framework’s concepts and processes, and who then took the lead in the training of
other GLF assessors within their own institutions. In 2010, all of the Singhealth
pharmacy leaders agreed to adopt a unified ‘SingHealth’ GLF. This was a major
breakthrough.
Recent developments have also seen the Singapore Ministry of Health (MOH)
endorse the use of such competency frameworks as part of the new national career
pathway for pharmacists. This is an exciting development, which has put
Singhealth’s competency training initiatives at the forefront of the profession’s
development in Singapore.
Page 3 of 48
Introduction
It is envisaged that this framework will be used to help with pharmacist training and
developmental activities. However, as the pharmacist develops, the framework also
has the potential to be used as a tool to help in appraisal and to track performance.
Page 4 of 48
Assessment Rating
The assessment rating is on a 4-point scale i.e. “Rarely”, “Sometimes”, “Usually” and
“Consistently” (see Table 1). An ‘Unable to Assess’ option is available for occasions
when a competency cannot be observed or is not appropriate.
Assessment should be referenced to the standard expected at a particular level of
practice. This may vary between levels of practitioners (for example, that expected of
a newly registered pharmacist will differ from that expected of a more experienced
pharmacist). Please refer to Appendix 2 for the current Singhealth mapping
reference.
Page 5 of 48
Assessment Tools
A portfolio (based on this framework) and the associated assessment tools can be
used to demonstrate a pharmacist’s ability to work at a general level. This provides a
platform for further development to a higher practice level.
Page 6 of 48
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX)
Purpose: The Mini-CEX is designed to assess the skills essential to the provision of
pharmaceutical care.
Setting: It is preferable to discuss cases that are currently under the pharmacist’s
care i.e. inpatients or outpatients.
Page 7 of 48
Case-based Discussions (CbD)
Purpose: CbD is designed to assess analytical skills and decision making, as well as
the clinical application of pharmaceutical knowledge in the care of the pharmacist’s
own patients. It also enables the discussion of professionalism and the ethical
aspects of practice, and in all instances, allows pharmacists to discuss why they
acted as they did.
Setting: It is preferable that each CbD focus on a clinical area which the pharmacist
has been involved in. The case discussion could be conducted retrospectively, i.e.
after counselling or patient discharge. A variety of areas should be covered through
a number of CbDs.
The documentation (or a copy) of a CbD should be retained by the pharmacist in his
/ her career portfolio. The assessment should end with formulating at least one
learning objective for the next encounter with the assessor.
Page 8 of 48
Table 2: Competency Areas and Relevant Descriptors
Competency Areas Descriptor
Identification of Able to correctly identify and prioritise DRPs.
drug-related
problems (DRP)
Analysis and Able to discuss treatment of the main medical problems
treatment including drug therapy (mechanism of action of drugs, dosage
recommendations range, key pharmacokinetic consideration, cautions,
contraindications, common side effects, major drug / food
interactions, patient counselling points), utilising evidence-
based treatment guidelines where appropriate.
Follow-up and Able to discuss the rationale for pharmaceutical care.
monitoring Able to demonstrate appropriate monitoring of therapy
(including renal function test, full blood count, drug levels etc)
Professionalism Able to prioritise activities and demonstrate timeliness.
Is ethical and aware of any relevant legal frameworks.
Has insight into own limitations.
Page 9 of 48
Medication Review and Dispensing Observations
The documentation (or a copy) of the findings should be retained by the pharmacist
in his / her career portfolio. The assessment should end with formulating at least one
learning objective for the next encounter with the assessor.
Page 10 of 48
The General Level Framework
Page 11 of 48
Section One
Page 12 of 48
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies
PATIENT CONSULTATION
This competency incorporates the structure and processes needed to obtain and
document information relating to the patient’s visit / admission, which will provide a
baseline for ongoing pharmaceutical care. The personal skills needed for effective
communication in this process are described in the professional competencies.
A pharmacist should always provide clear introduction to the consultation and agree
on an agenda with the patient. After determining the ability of the patient to
communicate, confirming the time is convenient to the patient and adopting a
suitable position to enable the consultation to take place comfortably, the pharmacist
should:
1.2 Questioning
Pharmacists must determine the specific goals of the interview and tailor the
questions and discussion to obtain the necessary data. The pharmacist must talk at
a level which enables the patient to hear, but does not compromise patient
confidentiality. Appropriate language must be used i.e. non judgemental, non
alarmist, reassuring, and using terminology that the patient will understand.
Page 13 of 48
ended questions to encourage the patient to explain and elaborate, then move to
close-ended questions to systematically minimise omissions. Leading questions
should be avoided as they can result in false information.
GATHERING INFORMATION
1.3 Allergies
confirm with the patient any history of drug allergies or previous adverse
reactions to any agents;
document the drug, reaction and date of reaction (if known) on the
prescription;
notify the doctor-in-charge of the drug allergy and reactions reported by the
patient and document as appropriate in the medication records and / or case
notes, and / or prescriptions, in a timely manner.
Background information about the patient’s health and social status is important in
the provision of pharmaceutical care. Without this information it is difficult to establish
the existence of, or potential for, medication-related problems. Review of medication
charts and prescriptions without this information risks flawed judgements on the
appropriateness of therapy for that individual. The details required depend on the
circumstances. The data collected should be succinct and relevant. The key focus
should be on obtaining the most relevant data rather than collection of all
information.
Page 14 of 48
Details required may include:
Age — the very young and the very old are most at risk of medication-related
problems. A patient’s age will indicate their likely ability to metabolise and
excrete medications and therefore has implications for appropriate selection
of drug dosage.
Working diagnosis of the medical team treating the patient — how would this
condition likely be managed? What drug therapy would be considered
appropriate and evidence-based? This will give an indication as to the classes
of medications that one should expect to see on the medication chart.
Relevant laboratory or other findings (if available) — focus on findings that will
Page 15 of 48
Renal Function
Liver Function
Blood Pressure
Cardiac Rhythm
Heart Rate
Temperature
Pain Scores
Consider not only the impact that these findings could have on the ongoing
management of drug therapy e.g. the need for dose adjustments, but also whether
these results could have been caused by an unwanted drug effect.
Nurses (including community nurses) – they are the frontline care providers for
the patients in a hospital and increasingly in primary care. Hence developing a
good working relationship with the nursing staff is a valuable exercise. In a
hospital, the nursing team may provide excellent information about the patient’s
current condition.
Page 16 of 48
Case notes – these will provide the most detailed description of the patient’s care
to date, although they are often lengthy and repetitive and should therefore be
used to confirm findings, rather than as a first source of reference. Previous
hospital admissions and subsequent discharge summaries, or prescriptions are
often useful to clarify medication histories.
An accurate medication history will assist in patient care and should include an
interview with the patient / carer. Taking accurate and complete drug histories has
been shown to have a positive effect on patient care. Pharmacists have
demonstrated an ability to accurately and reliably take medication histories. The
benefit of this to the patient lies in the fact that errors of omission or transcription
would be identified and corrected early, reducing the risk of harm and improving
care.
Queries regarding drug therapy should be clarified with the prescriber, or referred to
a more senior pharmacist. The core components of medication history taking are
listed in Tables 3 and 4.
Page 17 of 48
Table 3: Core Components of A Complete Medication History
1. Introduce yourself to the patient and explain the purpose of the visit /
consultation.
2. Identify and document any drug allergies or serious ADRs.
3. Determine the individual responsible for administration and management of
medication e.g. patient or carer.
4. Ascertain any information the patient is able to provide about their medication
from (in order of priority):
their own knowledge, the patient’s own medication list, or other
concordance aids;
the medication they brought to the hospital;
the community pharmacy;
repeat prescriptions;
a GP referral letter;
information available in medical notes;
the GP.
5. Ensure the following are recorded:
generic name of the medication (brand name to be recorded where
appropriate);
route / dosage form;
dose;
frequency;
duration of therapy if appropriate (e.g. antibiotics).
6. Document any recent changes to the medication regimen and reason(s) for
discontinuation or alteration of any medicines.
7. Ensure that items such as inhalers, eye drops and topical agents are included
and are used correctly, as patients often do not consider these to be
‘medication’;
8. Identify any self-medications that the patient may be using e.g. OTC, herbal,
homeopathic
(Source: Safe Medication Practice Unit, Queensland 2005)
Page 18 of 48
Table 4: Medication History Checklist
Medication History
Page 19 of 48
Patient’s own medication or list of medications;
The medication history obtained should be reconciled with that recorded in case
notes by medical staff and also with the inpatient medication record at the time of
admission. The pharmacist must be able to justify changes made to medications
taken prior to and on admission. If any changes of therapy were identified, check the
case notes and ascertain if these variances are intentional. The patient, nursing staff
and medical staff may also be contacted. Unintentional changes should be clarified
and communicated to the primary team medical officers or consultant and staff
nurses as appropriate.
Medications currently prescribed for the patient must also be reconciled with their
current problems and relevant patient background, for example with respect to
interactions as detailed in section 2.7
Discharge Prescription
“When required” medication used in hospital not required for discharge e.g.
analgesics, anti-emetics;
Regular inpatient medication used in hospital not required for discharge e.g.
Page 20 of 48
Completed courses of Antibiotics;
Chemotherapy;
Changes made during admission are identified so that details can be relayed
to the patient or community healthcare providers;
Labels are checked to ensure that they reflect current dosage and frequency
instructions.
PROVISION OF MEDICATION
The pharmacist should ensure that the medication as prescribed can be supplied
and administered safely and effectively to the individual patient. Particular attention
should be paid to the monitoring of parenteral therapy, which carries the additional
risk of extravasation, infection and administration errors.
Ensure all aspects of the prescription — drug name, dose, administration routes and
times — are clear and legible, in accordance with the medication, drug dispensing
Page 21 of 48
and controlled drug policy of the respective institutions.
Humalog Mix (Insulin Lispro / Protamine 30/70) which is not interchangeable with
NovoMix (Insulin Aspart / Protamine 30/70)
Check that the patient identifiers are present and the prescription is legal:
Quantity and strength are also legal requirements for discharge and
outpatient prescriptions including controlled drugs.
Pharmacists should ensure that the label on the dispensed medicines follow legal
requirements and clearly state the required information, i.e.
Drug quantity
Page 22 of 48
Duration (if applicable);
Date of dispensing;
Pharmacy details.
Follow local guidelines and hospital policies to obtain exemption and non-
formulary drugs and ensure that the appropriate documentation is
completed.
Communicate clearly with the relevant people to ensure the efficient and
safe supply of medication.
As listed in 1.8.
Page 23 of 48
Ensure medications are labelled appropriately for the patient e.g. the
visually impaired, non-English speaking patients.
Page 24 of 48
Is the medication available in a suitable form for administration via the prescribed
route?
Is the route / formulation prescribed suitable for the patient e.g. oral liquid or
tablets for paediatric patients or patients fed via the nasogastric tube?
Are aids required to ensure safe and effective administration (e.g. volumatic
spacers for inhalers)?
The pharmacist should assess the prescription to ensure that the dose is
appropriate. This includes adjustments for:
Patient weight;
Patient age;
The pharmacist should assess the prescription to ensure the prescribed route is
available (e.g. is the patient nil by mouth? Is he / she able to take medicines orally?)
and appropriate (e.g. unnecessary prescription of IV medication when the patient
can swallow, or a solid dosage form when the patient has dysphagia) for that patient.
Page 25 of 48
correlates with medication administration rounds;
check the administration records of the medication and ensure that administration
has occurred and has been documented;
check with patients and / or their caregivers to ensure that patients have been
compliant with their medications at home;
identify occasions where drugs have not been administered and, if it was due to
unavailability of drug, ensure initiation of drug supply, or if it was due to non-
compliance, address the issues causing this.
PATIENT EDUCATION
It is expected that the pharmacist will provide medication and health information and
advice to patients, carers and medical staff where appropriate, e.g. in response to
information requested by an individual. In addition, the pharmacist should actively
seek opportunities to provide this aspect of the pharmacy service.
When consulting with patients and carers, the pharmacist should demonstrate a
structured, patient-centred process. The following information should be provided
where appropriate:
Advice on when it would be appropriate to seek further advice from either the
pharmacist or someone else if the condition does not improve;
The pharmacist must take into account the patient’s cultural and social background
Page 26 of 48
when assessing his / her health needs. This will influence the patient’s health beliefs
and may affect the style of communication adopted. Interpreter services should be
used when needed.
Common adverse effects, ways in which to minimise them and action required if
they occur;
Page 27 of 48
Details of new medications or medication regimens;
Storage requirements;
Relevant contact details of healthcare professionals and health services for any
follow-up information.
Mobilisation;
Physiotherapy;
Relaxation techniques.
Asking the patient to describe how they are going to take the medication;
Gauging the patient’s perception of their illness allows you to understand their
healthcare needs and may be related to their current illness or past medical
conditions. This knowledge will allow the pharmacist to accurately review current
Page 28 of 48
therapy and provide appropriate medicine information to the patient and / or carer.
Open ended questions such as ‘What has brought you into hospital?’ will often illicit
a patient’s perception of what has happened. This may impact on how the patient
deals with healthcare professionals and the way they use medication. A poor
understanding of their illness may need to be addressed before the patient can fully
understand what treatment is necessary and the rationale for treatment.
Control of symptoms;
Assess the patient’s understanding and attitude to their therapy and seek specific
information on the following:
Pharmacists should actively explore the patient’s need for lifestyle advice e.g. diet,
smoking and exercise. An awareness of local services and initiatives and the referral
process in primary care or discharge planning is essential e.g. Health Promotion
Board (HPB) Quitline, smoking cessation services at the respective hospitals or
community pharmacies.
Page 29 of 48
“People often have difficulty taking their medication… Do you have any difficulty
taking your medication?”
“About how often would you say you miss taking your medication?”
How are you taking the medicine? You have the supply at home?” for the
medicines that are always not collected from hospital/ polyclinic pharmacy.
Inform the medical staff if significant areas of poor compliance are identified.
Strategies to address poor compliance include use of dose administration aids, e.g.
education of carers, discharge medication records, a reduction in the number of
medications or simplification of the drug regimen, and / or changing to cheaper
alternatives where appropriate.
Knowing how medicines were managed prior to the patient’s hospital admission
allows therapy to be appropriately tailored to the patient and additional supports to
be initiated if needed. Factors such as cognition, alertness, mental acuity, literacy,
vision impairment and physical disabilities may impact the patient’s ability to manage
his / her medication.
For example:
Page 30 of 48
The pharmacist must retrieve information specific to a patient’s needs. Patients
commencing a medication are likely to require general information on indication,
administration, side effects and supply. Patients with ongoing supply may request
specific information regarding side effects they have experienced or use in
circumstances such as pregnancy and lactation.
The information must be accurate and retrieved from a reliable source such as
Lexicomp, SGH ePharmacopoeia, MIMS, product inserts, published literature or
medical databases such as Micromedex®.
The pharmacist should be aware of and keep updated on the established policies
and procedures with respect to medication error prevention and reporting.
Pharmacist active participation is essential for ongoing analysis and monitoring of
medication errors. Suggestions to initiate safety measures should be discussed and
actively implemented and lessons learned should be disseminated in department
meetings.
Page 31 of 48
Constructive feedback to the relevant individuals / pharmacists about the quality
achieved should be encouraged. It will not only help the pharmacist but the rest of
the team to strive towards a higher standard of service to patients.
Page 32 of 48
2. Problem Solving Competencies
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
The pharmacist should be able to identify high risk medications and patients for
whom ongoing monitoring of therapy is required. The pharmacist should monitor for
effectiveness of treatment and potential adverse effects, and also establish and
maintain a plan for reviewing the therapeutic objective / end point of treatment.
Drugs with narrow therapeutic range (e.g. digoxin, lithium, theophylline, immuno-
suppressants)
Chemotherapy
Insulin
Renal impairment
Cardiac
Liver disease
Transplantation
Mental health
Page 33 of 48
Cancer
Paediatrics
Elderly
2.2 Prioritisation
Once a problem has been identified, the pharmacist must be able to identify the
urgency of resolution and appropriately prioritise their actions. Factors that may be
considered include:
Who do I need to inform regarding this problem e.g. nurse, doctor, patient?
The pharmacist should be aware of his / her own limitations and always consult a
more senior colleague if necessary or refer the patient appropriately to another
healthcare professional. Referral can occur at different points during an episode of
care, for example:
Page 34 of 48
On the first review, when there is inappropriateness of medication management;
At the end of the consultation with the patient, when drug-related problems have
been identified and referral is needed to medical staff and community health
support.
The referral and consultation process should form part of continuing professional
development and it is expected that during the course of an individual’s work,
repeated exposure to similar pharmaceutical problems will result in development of
the pharmacist’s experience and competence.
KNOWLEDGE
2.4 Pathophysiology
An understanding of normal organ function and the effect of disease state on this is
relevant to the effects of, and the effects on, drug therapy. The pharmacist should be
able to clearly describe the pathophysiology relevant to the therapeutic areas in
which they are currently working and apply this knowledge when reviewing the
therapeutic use of drugs.
2.5 Pharmacology
The pharmacist should be able to clearly discuss the mode of action of medications
that they routinely review in the course of their daily practice. An appreciation of the
absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of these medications and the
influence of disease states (e.g. renal failure) and patient factors (e.g. age) should
also be demonstrated.
Knowledge of the common and major side effect profile of routinely used
medications must be demonstrated. The pharmacist should be able to both discuss
the potential for these with patients and recognise and describe any appropriate
monitoring parameters.
Page 35 of 48
interactions and be able to identify which type of interaction applies.
With the appropriate use of reference material, pharmacists are expected to:
Understand the potential for unwanted effects of medications, e.g. allergies and
other adverse drug reactions (ADRs);
Review the prescription to ensure that no medications likely to cause harm have
been prescribed;
Understand how these mechanisms may be altered by the disease (e.g. renal
impairment);
Page 36 of 48
Table 5: Prioritising Action (Risk Rating based on Harm)
Following review of the guidelines, the pharmacist should demonstrate the ability to
summarise the information and extract the key points that influence drug therapy.
Page 37 of 48
pharmacist should be able to assess information for the following aspects:
Relevance to patient care — the impact or potential impact that the information
has on the pharmaceutical care of the individual patient or group of patients.
The pharmacist should demonstrate that they have considered the various options
available to them to resolve a problem. They should consider the possible outcomes
of any action and recognise the pros and cons of the various options. In order to
achieve this, the pharmacist should determine the goal of treatment. This might be
one of the following:
Preventing a disease;
Having appraised a selection of options, the pharmacist should be able to identify the
most appropriate solution and be able to justify the decision taken. However,
pharmacists should recognise their personal limitations and seek advice from
another colleague wherever necessary.
Page 38 of 48
reference should be made to appropriate literature or to colleagues.
The content and style of presentation should be appropriate to the recipient’s needs.
Establishing the reason for the request and appreciating what action will be taken on
receipt of the information should be a first priority. The pharmacist should
demonstrate that they have considered these aspects and respond appropriately by
tailoring the information that they provide.
FOLLOW-UP
Education needs;
Page 39 of 48
2.11 Monitoring and Problem Resolution
Once a medication has been appropriately selected for a patient, supplied and
administered, ongoing use of the drug should be assessed, both for the desired
therapeutic effect and the appearance of adverse reactions. Therapeutic drug
monitoring (TDM) is an essential duty for hospital pharmacists. Assessment involves
the following steps:
Page 40 of 48
3. Professional Competencies
ORGANISATION
3.1 Prioritisation
The pharmacist should be able to prioritise his / her own work and adjust priorities in
response to changing circumstances; for example, knowing which patients / tasks
should take priority. Prioritisation of clinical workload may include:
Ensuring that all medications are appropriate and that the patient is informed
about their medications;
Ensuring newly prescribed medications are safe for the patients and sufficient
supplies are available;
3.2 Punctuality
The pharmacist should ensure he / she attends appointments and meetings on time,
and is there to provide cover at previously agreed times, e.g. back from lunch or the
ward as rostered.
The pharmacist should organise his /her time effectively, assigning appropriate
amounts of time to different tasks with regular review and revision of time frames and
Page 41 of 48
deadlines. For example, a pharmacist may be allocated a morning to cover a ward.
He / she may spend his / her time seeing new patients, reviewing existing patients,
providing counselling and organising discharges. If any of these time lines slip, the
others have to be adjusted to allow the work on the ward to be completed in the
allocated time.
Pharmacists should be able to use their time productively with minimum waste. For
example, only review the renal function of patients taking medications that may
require dose adjustment, rather than routinely check and record the renal function of
the all patients regardless of medical conditions.
The pharmacist should be able to complete tasks within a previously agreed time
frame. This time frame may be set by a pharmacy manager, supervisor, or someone
outside the pharmacy department (e.g. consultant or nurse manager). For example,
reviewing and conducting medication reconciliation for new cases of the allocated
ward on a daily basis; or having discharge medication ready prior to the patient
leaving by ambulance.
3.4 Initiative
PROFESSIONALISM
3.6 Confidentiality
Page 42 of 48
information about the patient’s condition can be shared with colleagues. This
includes an awareness of hospital policies and relevant legislation, e.g. Code of
Ethics.
3.7 Confidence
All pharmacists must be confident of their own abilities and portray an image of
confidence to patients and other healthcare professionals.
3.8 Responsibility
The pharmacist should understand the need and take personal responsibility for
Continuing Professional Development. This involves:
Reflecting on his / her own practice, e.g. using critical incident review;
Evaluating learning;
Page 43 of 48
Being self-motivated and eager to learn;
Being willing to accept criticism for the benefit of his / her own development;
3.9 Organisational
The pharmacist is able to describe the structure and appreciate value of the
employing organisation. Pharmacists should take responsibility to keep themselves
updated with departmental goals and how they are aligned with institutional strategic
goals. This will provide direction to pharmacists during planning and implementation
of department work plans.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS
3.10 Communication
Questioning;
Explaining;
Listening — active listening demonstrates genuine respect and concern for the
Page 44 of 48
Feedback — to ensure that the message is understood. It can take the form of
appropriate questions and asking the individual to demonstrate that they have
understood or can now do what you have explained;
Empathy — seeking to understand where other people are coming from and what
their wants and needs are;
Non-verbal communication;
Negotiating;
Influencing.
The ‘patient’ in this context means any person the pharmacist provides any
pharmaceutical service to. The ‘carer’ may be a relative or friend of the patient as
well as a social services or private agency care worker.
Healthcare professionals include doctors, nurses, and the other Allied Health
professionals (e.g. dietitians, medical social workers, physiotherapists, occupational
therapists, podiatrists, speech therapists, etc) as well as ward clerks, cleaners, GP
receptionists and medical secretaries.
Page 45 of 48
The pharmacist must take into account the patient’s cultural and social background
when assessing his / her needs and understanding. This will influence his / her
interpretation and may affect the style of communication adopted. Interpreter service
should be used when needed.
The pharmacist must interact with colleagues both within the pharmacy department
and outside to convey information gained both within the hospital and externally. For
example, the pharmacist must:
TEAMWORK
Understanding the roles and responsibilities of team members and how the team
works;
Respecting the skills and contributions of colleagues and directly managed staff;
Page 46 of 48
Identify when team members need support and provide it;
Accept responsibility for own work (and for those in training where appropriate);
The pharmacist should recognise the roles and skills of other healthcare
professionals and seek to establish cooperative working relationships with
colleagues, based on an understanding of and respect for each other’s roles.
Page 47 of 48
AT THE END OF THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD
At the end of the GLF assessment period, a summary sheet (Appendix 6) should be
completed to highlight the pharmacist’s strengths, areas for development and the
objectives to be achieved for the next assessment.
Page 48 of 48
Appendix 1 – The General Level Framework
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies
a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
PATIENT CONSULTATION
1.1 Opening the CONSISTENTLY provides a b USUALLY provides clear a b SOMETIMES provides clear a b RARELY provides clear a b
consultation clear introduction to the introduction to the introduction to the introduction to the
c d c d c d c d
consultation consultation consultation consultation
Comments
1.2 Questioning CONSISTENTLY uses a b USUALLY uses appropriate a b SOMETIMES uses a b RARELY use appropriate a b
appropriate questioning to questioning to obtain relevant appropriate questioning to questioning to obtain relevant
obtain relevant information c d information from patient c d obtain relevant information c d information from patient c d
from patient from patient
Comments
GATHERING INFORMATION
1.3 Allergies CONSISTENTLY confirms or a b USUALLY confirms or a b SOMETIMES confirms or a b RARELY confirms or a b
documents accurate and documents accurate and documents accurate and documents accurate and
comprehensive allergy and/or c d comprehensive allergy and/or c d comprehensive allergy and/or c d comprehensive allergy and/or c d
adverse drug reaction history adverse drug reaction history adverse drug reaction history adverse drug reaction history
Comments
1.4 Relevant CONSISTENTLY retrieves all a b USUALLY retrieves all a b SOMETIMES retrieves all a b RARELY retrieve all relevant a b
patient relevant medical information relevant medical information relevant medical information medical information from
background from medical, nursing and c d from medical, nursing and c d from medical, nursing and c d medical, nursing and c d
electronic records electronic records electronic records electronic records
Comments
2
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1.5 Medication CONSISTENTLY takes or a b USUALLY takes or checks for a b SOMETIMES takes or checks a b RARELY takes or checks for a b
reconciliation checks for an accurate and an accurate and for an accurate and an accurate and
comprehensive medication c d comprehensive medication c d comprehensive medication c d comprehensive medication c d
history where appropriate history where appropriate history where appropriate history where appropriate
CONSISTENTLY reconciles a b USUALLY reconciles a b SOMETIMES reconciles a b RARELY reconciles a b
medication history with medication history with current medication history with medication history with current
current medication prescribed, medication prescribed, current medication prescribed, medication prescribed,
medical history and current medical history and current medical history and current medical history and current
c d c d c d c d
condition where appropriate condition where appropriate condition where appropriate condition where appropriate
(including reconciling (including reconciling (including reconciling (including reconciling
transcribed IMRs and transcribed IMRs and transcribed IMRs and transcribed IMRs and
discharge prescriptions) discharge prescriptions) discharge prescriptions) discharge prescriptions)
CONSISTENTLY consults a b USUALLY consults a b SOMETIMES consults a b RARELY consults a b
appropriately on any appropriately on any appropriately on any appropriately on any
c d c d c d c d
inconsistencies inconsistencies inconsistencies inconsistencies
Comments
PROVISION OF MEDICATION
1.6 Prescription is CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures clarity of a b SOMETIMES ensures clarity a b RARELY ensures clarity of a b
unambiguous clarity of the prescription the prescription of the prescription the prescription
c d c d c d c d
Comments
1.7 Prescription is CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures legality of a b SOMETIMES ensures legality a b RARELY ensures legality of a b
legal legality of prescription c d prescription c d of prescription c d prescription c d
Comments
1.8 Labeling of The label on the dispensed a b The label on the dispensed a b The label on the dispensed a b The label on the dispensed a b
the medicine medicine CONSISTENTLY medicine USUALLY includes medicine SOMETIMES medicine RARELY includes
c d c d c d c d
includes required information required information includes required information required information
Comments
3
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies
a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
1.9 Medication CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures availability a b SOMETIMES ensures a b RARELY ensures availability a b
supply availability of medication of medication availability of medication of medication
(Example: procedure to c d (Example: procedure to obtain c d (Example: procedure to obtain c d (Example: procedure to c d
obtain exemption drugs) exemption drugs) exemption drugs) obtain exemption drugs)
CONSISTENTLY ensures that a b USUALLY ensures that the a b SOMETIMES ensures that the a b RARELY ensures that the a b
the right medication is right medication is supplied to right medication is supplied to right medication is supplied to
supplied to the right patient c d the right patient with the right c d the right patient with the right c d the right patient with the right c d
with the right labeling labeling labeling labeling
CONSISTENTLY ensures the a b USUALLY ensures the supply a b SOMETIMES ensures the a b RARELY ensures the supply a b
supply of the drug is of the drug is documented supply of the drug is of the drug is documented
c d c d c d c d
documented documented
Comments
DRUG SPECIFIC ISSUES Check for the 8 ‘Rs’ : Right patient, medication, dose, route, time and frequency, duration, diluent, rate of infusion
1.10 Drug CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures need for a b SOMETIMES ensures need a b RARELY ensures need for a b
selection need for the drug c d the drug c d for the drug c d the drug c d
CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures cost- a b SOMETIMES ensures cost- a b RARELY ensures cost- a b
cost-effectiveness of c d effectiveness of medication c d effectiveness of medication c d effectiveness of medication c d
medication use use use use
Comments
1.11 Selection of CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures a b SOMETIMES ensures a b RARELY ensures appropriate a b
formulation, appropriate formulation and appropriate formulation and appropriate formulation and formulation and dose
concentration, dose equivalents taken into dose equivalents taken into dose equivalents taken into equivalents taken into
rate and diluent account. Appropriate c d account. Appropriate c d account. Appropriate c d account. Appropriate c d
information given for information given for information given for information given for
concentration/rate/diluent of concentration/rate/diluent of concentration/rate/diluent of concentration/rate/diluent of
parenteral drugs parenteral drugs parenteral drugs parenteral drugs
Comments
4
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1.12 Checking of CONSISTENTLY checks that a b USUALLY checks that patient a b SOMETIMES checks that a b RARELY checks that patient a b
dose, frequency, patient has received the has received the correct dose patient has received the has received the correct dose
timing, route and correct dose and frequency, at and frequency, at the correct correct dose and frequency, and frequency, at the correct
duration the correct time via most c d time via most appropriate c d at the correct time via most c d time via most appropriate c d
appropriate route for the right route for the right duration appropriate route for the right route for the right duration
duration duration
Comments
PATIENT EDUCATION
1.13 Patient is CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures a b SOMETIMES ensures a b RARELY ensures appropriate a b
counseled on appropriate oral/written appropriate oral/written appropriate oral/written oral/written information is
medication information is provided to c d information is provided to c d information is provided to c d provided to patient. c d
patient patient. patient.
CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures advice a b SOMETIMES ensures advice a b RARELY ensures advice a b
advice given on non- given on non-pharmacological given on non-pharmacological given on non-pharmacological
pharmacological therapy c d therapy when appropriate c d therapy when appropriate c d therapy when appropriate c d
when appropriate
CONSISTENTLY assesses a b USUALLY assesses patient’s a b SOMETIMES assesses a b RARELY assesses patient’s a b
patient’s comprehension of comprehension of information patient’s comprehension of comprehension of information
c d c d c d c d
information information
Comments
1.14 Compliance CONSISTENTLY identifies a b USUALLY identifies patients a b SOMETIMES identifies a b RARELY identifies patients a b
assessment patients with compliance with compliance issues and patients with compliance with compliance issues and
issues and manages manages appropriately issues and manages manages appropriately.
appropriately c d (Example: literacy, visual c d appropriately c d (Example: literacy, visual c d
(Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability, (Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability,
impairment, disability, cognition/memory) impairment, disability, cognition/memory)
cognition/memory) cognition/memory)
Comments
5
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1.15 Need for CONSISTENTLY identifies a b USUALLY identifies and a b SOMETIMES identifies and a b RARELY identifies and a b
information and responds appropriately to responds appropriately to responds appropriately to responds appropriately to
identified patient’s need for more c d patient’s need for more c d patient’s need for more c d patient’s need for more c d
information information information information
Comments
1.16 Risk CONSISTENTLY documents a b USUALLY documents a b SOMETIMES documents a b RARELY documents a b
management medication errors c d medication errors c d medication errors c d medication errors c d
Comments
1.17 Service CONSISTENTLY looks to a b USUALLY looks to improve a b SOMETIMES looks to a b RARELY looks to improve a b
improvement improve quality of service quality of service improve quality of service quality of service
c d c d c d c d
Comments
6
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
2.1 Identification of CONSISTENTLY identifies a b USUALLY identifies drug- a b SOMETIMES identifies drug- a b RARELY identifies drug-drug a b
drug-related drug-drug interactions drug interactions (including drug interactions (including interactions (including
c d c d c d c d
problems (including complementary complementary medicines) complementary medicines) complementary medicines)
medicines)
CONSISTENTLY identifies a b USUALLY identifies drug- a b SOMETIMES identifies drug- a b RARELY identifies drug- a b
drug-related problems in related problems in special related problems in special related problems in special
special patient groups patient groups patient groups patient groups
(Example: Use of warfarin in (Example: Use of warfarin in (Example: Use of warfarin in (Example: Use of warfarin in
c d c d c d c d
an alcoholic creates an alcoholic creates an alcoholic creates an alcoholic creates
unwarranted level of risk, tube unwarranted level of risk, tube unwarranted level of risk, tube unwarranted level of risk, tube
feeding, paediatric/elderly, feeding, paediatric/elderly, feeding, paediatric/elderly, feeding, paediatric/elderly,
G6PD) G6PD) G6PD) G6PD)
CONSISTENTLY identifies a b USUALLY identifies drug- a b SOMETIMES identifies drug- a b RARELY identifies drug- a b
drug-disease interactions c d disease interactions c d disease interactions. c d disease interactions c d
(Example: NSAID in HF) (Example: NSAID in HF) (Example: NSAID in HF) (Example: NSAID in HF)
Comments
2.2 Prioritization CONSISTENTLY prioritizes a b USUALLY prioritizes drug- a b SOMETIMES prioritizes drug- a b RARELY prioritizes drug- a b
drug-related problems c d related problems appropriately c d related problems appropriately c d related problems appropriately c d
appropriately
Comments
2.3 Consultation or CONSISTENTLY a b USUALLY understands own a b SOMETIMES understands a b RARELY understands own a b
referral understands own limitations, limitations, considers most own limitations, considers limitations, considers most
considers most appropriate c d appropriate referral point, c d most appropriate referral point, c d appropriate referral point, c d
referral point, refers in a refers in a logical, clear and refers in a logical, clear and refers in a logical, clear and
logical, clear and concise concise manner concise manner concise manner
manner
Comments
7
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
KNOWLEDGE
2.4 CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to discuss (or a b SOMETIMES able to discuss a b RARELY able to discuss (or a b
Pathophysiology discuss (or able to access able to access information (or able to access information able to access information and
information and use this to c d and use this to describe) the c d and use this to describe) the c d use this to describe) the c d
describe) the underlying underlying pathophysiology of underlying pathophysiology of underlying pathophysiology of
pathophysiology of disease disease disease disease
Comments
2.5 Pharmacology CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to discuss (or a b SOMETIMES able to discuss a b RARELY able to discuss (or a b
discuss (or able to access able to access information (or able to access information able to access information and
information and use this to c d and use this to describe) how c d and use this to describe) how c d use this to describe) how c d
describe) how drugs work drugs work drugs work drugs work
Comments
2.6 Side-effects and CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to describe a b SOMETIMES able to describe a b RARELY able to describe a b
monitoring describe major side-effects major side-effects and major side-effects and major side-effects and
c d c d c d c d
and monitoring parameters monitoring parameters monitoring parameters monitoring parameters
Comments
2.7 Interactions CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to describe a b SOMETIMES able to describe a b RARELY able to describe a b
(drug/disease/ describe mechanisms of mechanisms of interactions mechanisms of interactions mechanisms of interactions
special patient interactions c d c d c d c d
groups)
Comments
8
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
2.8 Use of CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to access a b SOMETIMES able to access a b RARELY able to access a b
guidelines and access recent clinical recent clinical guidelines recent clinical guidelines recent clinical guidelines
evidence guidelines and/or relevant c d and/or relevant references c d and/or relevant references c d and/or relevant references c d
references
CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to analyze a b SOMETIMES able to analyze a b RARELY able to analyze a b
analyze information and information and critically information and critically information and critically
critically appraise literature c d appraise literature c d appraise literature c d appraise literature c d
CONSISTENTLY able to a b USUALLY able to identify a b SOMETIMES able to identify a b RARELY able to identify a b
identify evidence gaps evidence gaps evidence gaps evidence gaps
c d c d c d c d
CONSISTENTLY a b USUALLY demonstrates a b SOMETIMES demonstrates a b RARELY demonstrates clear a b
demonstrates clear decision clear decision making clear decision making decision making
c d c d c d c d
making
Comments
2.9 Information CONSISTENTLY provides a b USUALLY provides accurate a b SOMETIMES provides a b RARELY provides accurate a b
provision to other accurate information c d information c d accurate information c d information c d
healthcare CONSISTENTLY provides a b USUALLY provides relevant a b SOMETIMES provides a b RARELY provides relevant a b
professionals relevant information c d information c d relevant information c d information c d
CONSISTENTLY provides a b USUALLY provides timely a b SOMETIMES provides timely a b RARELY provides timely a b
timely information c d information c d information c d information c d
Comments
9
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
2.10 CONSISTENTLY documents a b USUALLY documents drug- a b SOMETIMES documents a b RARELY documents drug- a b
Documentation of drug-related problems using related problems using drug-related problems using related problems using
drug-related appropriate styles and appropriate styles and appropriate styles and appropriate styles and
problems methods c d methods c d methods c d methods. c d
(Example: intervention forms, (Example: intervention forms, (Example: intervention forms, (Example: intervention forms,
case notes, prescriptions, case notes, prescriptions, case notes, prescriptions, case notes, prescriptions,
ADR reports) ADR reports) ADR reports) ADR reports)
Comments
FOLLOW UP
2.11 Monitoring & CONSISTENTLY L monitors a b USUALLY monitors drug a b SOMETIMES monitors drug a b RARELY monitors drug a b
problem resolution drug therapy appropriately. therapy appropriately. therapy appropriately. therapy appropriately.
(Example: TDM, high risk (Example: TDM, high risk (Example: TDM, high risk (Example: TDM, high risk
drugs/diseases/special patient c d drugs/diseases/special patient c d drugs/diseases/special patient c d drugs/diseases/special patient c d
groups) groups) groups) groups)
CONSISTENTLY ensures a b USUALLY ensures drug- a b SOMETIMES ensures drug- a b RARELY ensures drug- a b
drug-related problems are related problems are resolved related problems are resolved related problems are resolved
resolved (including following c d (including following up c d (including following up c d (including following up c d
up interventions) interventions) interventions) interventions)
Comments
10
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
3. Professional Competencies
a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
ORGANIZATION
3.1 Prioritization CONSISTENTLY prioritizes a b USUALLY prioritizes work a b SOMETIMES prioritizes work a b RARELY prioritizes work well a b
work well c d well c d well c d c d
Comments
3.2 Punctuality CONSISTENTLY punctual a b USUALLY punctual a b SOMETIMES punctual a b RARELY punctual a b
c d c d c d c d
Comments
3.3 Time CONSISTENTLY uses time a b USUALLY uses time a b SOMETIMES uses time a b RARELY uses time efficiently a b
management efficiently resulting in tasks efficiently resulting in tasks efficiently resulting in tasks resulting in tasks being
being completed within c d being completed within c d being completed within agreed c d completed within agreed c d
agreed deadlines agreed deadlines deadlines deadlines
Comments
Comments
11
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
3. Professional Competencies
a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
PROFESSIONALISM
3.5 Professional CONSISTENTLY practices a b USUALLY practices within a b SOMETIMES practices within a b RARELY practices within a b
code of ethics within Code of Ethics c d Code of Ethics c d Code of Ethics c d Code of Ethics c d
Comments
3.6 Confidentiality CONSISTENTLY maintains a b USUALLY maintains a b SOMETIMES maintains a b RARELY maintains a b
confidentiality c d confidentiality c d confidentiality c d confidentiality c d
Comments
Comments
3.8 Responsibility CONSISTENTLY takes a b USUALLY takes responsibility a b SOMETIMES takes a b RARELY takes responsibility a b
responsibility for own actions for own actions and for patient responsibility for own actions for own actions and for patient
and for patient care c d care c d and for patient care c d care c d
Comments
3.9 Organizational Can CONSISTENTLY a b Can USUALLY describe the a b Can SOMETIMES describe a b Can RARELY describe the a b
describe the structure and structure and values of the structure and values of structure and values of
values of employing c d employing organization c d employing organization c d employing organization c d
organization
CONSISTENTLY uses a b USUALLY uses relevant and a b SOMETIMES uses relevant a b RARELY use relevant and up a b
relevant and up to date up to date procedures for and up to date procedures for to date procedures for practice
procedures for practice c d practice c d practice c d c d
Comments
12
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
3. Professional Competencies
a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Comments
3.11 Staff CONSISTENTLY willing to a b USUALLY willing to share a b SOMETIMES willing to share a b RARELY willing to share a b
development share learning experiences learning experiences and give learning experiences and give learning experiences and give
and give feedback/guidance c d feedback/guidance to support c d feedback/guidance to support c d feedback/guidance to support c d
to support staff development staff development staff development staff development
CONSISTENTLY active in a b USUALLY active in educating a b SOMETIMES active in a b RARELY active in educating a b
educating and training and training healthcare educating and training and training healthcare
healthcare professionals c d professionals c d healthcare professionals c d professionals c d
Comments
13
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners
General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________
Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
3. Professional Competencies
a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
TEAM WORK
3.12 Pharmacy CONSISTENTLY recognizes a b USUALLY recognizes the a b SOMETIMES recognizes the a b RARELY recognizes the a b
team the value of team members c d value of team members c d value of team members c d value of team members c d
CONSISTENTLY works a b USUALLY works effectively a b SOMETIMES works a b RARELY works effectively as a b
effectively as part of a team c d as part of a team c d effectively as part of a team c d part of a team c d
CONSISTENTLY passes on a b USUALLY passes on relevant a b SOMETIMES passes on a b RARELY passes on relevant a b
relevant information c d information c d relevant information c d information c d
Comments
3.13 CONSISTENTLY recognizes a b USUALLY recognizes value a b SOMETIMES recognizes a b RARELY recognizes value of a b
Multidisciplinary value of other team members c d of other team members c d value of other team members c d other team members c d
team CONSISTENTLY works a b USUALLY works effectively a b SOMETIMES works a b RARELY works effectively as a b
effectively as part of a team c d as part of a team c d effectively as part of a team c d part of a team c d
Comments
14
UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
ASSESS ( UA)
Record as UA under Demonstrates the expected standard of Implies standard practice with occasional Much more haphazard than ‘usually’ Very rarely meets the standard expected.
comments practice with very rare lapses lapses No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG
General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia.
Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
Appendix 2 – GLF Mapping
General Level Framework Mapping
C R P
C=CONSISTENTLY; U=USUALLY; S=SOMETIMES; R=RARELY; = Clinical track; = Research track; =
Professional track 3
*Also to fulfil minimum criteria on ALF depending on the track to pursue – see point 4
General Level Framework Mapping
3. PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES
C R P
C=CONSISTENTLY; U=USUALLY; S=SOMETIMES; R=RARELY; = Clinical track; = Research track; =
Professional track 4
*Also to fulfil minimum criteria on ALF depending on the track to pursue – see point 4
Appendix 3 –
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) Form
Mini-clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX)
This tool is designed to be used on the ward/in the clinic, to assess the pharmacist’s provision of
pharmaceutical care to new patients. The purpose is to assess the thought process and overall
performance of the GLF pharmacist, not necessarily the depth of their clinical knowledge.
Pharmacist name:
Clinical Area:
Topic:
Date:
Please grade the Significantly Below Borderline Meets Above Significantly Not
below expectations above observed
following areas
using the scale
below:
Delivery of Patient Care
Patient
consultation
Retrieves relevant
medical/drug
information
(including allergies)
Evaluates the
appropriateness of
drug selection
Appropriate patient
education given
Professionalism
Problem Solving
Identifies drug-
related problems
Demonstrates
required drug-
related knowledge
Analyzes information
and makes
appropriate
recommendations
Overall clinical care
© 2007 CoDEG
Mini-CEX used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK.
Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
Anything especially good? Suggestions for development
Action
completed?
Comments
(if any)
Name:
Reviewer
Signature:
Date:
Date: ________
© 2007 CoDEG
Mini-CEX used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK.
Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
Appendix 4 - Case Based Discussion (CbD) Form
Case Based Discussion (CBD)
This tool is designed to assess clinical decision-making and the application or use of pharmaceutical
knowledge in a patient they have managed. It may be used during clinical rounds or formal case
presentations, where the pharmacist has had time to prepare and research the case.
Pharmacist name:
Clinical Area:
Topic:
Date:
Please grade the Significantly Below Borderline Meets Above Significantly Not observed
below expectations above
following areas
(please tick
using the scale if unable to
below: comment)
Identification of
drug-related
problems
Analysis and
recommendations
Follow up and
monitoring
Professionalism
Overall clinical
judgment
© 2007 CoDEG
CBD used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK.
Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
2
Anything especially good? Suggestions for development
Action
completed?
Comments
(if any)
Name:
Reviewer
Signature:
Date:
Date: ________
© 2007 CoDEG
CBD used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK.
Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
3
Appendix 5A: Medication Review/ Dispensing Observation
for GLF Pharmacist
1. Medication Review
Activities during Comments / Remarks Suggestions for
Medication Review Round (Please specify the date) Development
Clinical skills
Decision making
(prioritisation,
counselling
arrangement,
handling enquiries
etc)
Communication
Confidence level
Overall
Pharmacist: Date:
Note: This assessment will be conducted for ALL pharmacists at the end of each
rotation. However, for new pharmacists joining the department, a baseline assessment
will be completed.
Clinical knowledge
Clinical skills
Decision making
(prioritisation,
counselling
arrangement,
handling enquiries
etc)
Communication
Confidence level
Overall
Rotation/clinical area: