Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Secret Aristocracies

By Dominique Venner
http://www.counter-currents.com/2010/06/secret-aristocracies/

Translated by Greg Johnson


Czech translation based on this English translation here, Russian translation here
Jean-Paul Sartre once said of Ernst Jünger: “I hate him, not as a German, but as an aristocrat . . .”
Sartre had some grave defects. In his political impulses, he was mistaken with a rare obstinacy.
Fairly cowardly during the Occupation, he turned into an Ayatollah of denunciations once the
danger had passed, castigating his colleagues who did not commit themselves with all necessary
blindness to Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot. Along with an infallible instinct for error, he had a keen
sense for any elevation of spirit, which horrified him, and, conversely, for any baseness, which
attracted him.
He was not wrong about Jünger: “I hate him, not as a German, but as an aristocrat . . .” Jünger
was not an aristocrat by birth. His family belonged to the cultivated middle-class of Northern
Germany. If he was an “aristocrat”—in other words, if he continually showed nobility and poise,
moral and physical—it was not because he was born with a “von,” for that alone does not shelter
one from baseness in one’s heart or deeds. If he was an “aristocrat,” it was not a matter of rank,
but of nature.
Heroic warrior in his youth, sensational writer of the “conservative revolution,” who then
became a contemplative sage of sorts, Jünger had an exceptional life, traversing all the dangers
of a dark century and remaining free of any stain. If he is a model, it is because of his constant
“poise.” But his physical poise did nothing more than manifest a spiritual poise. To have poise is
to hold oneself apart. Apart from base passions and the baseness of passion. What was superior
in him always repelled the sordid, infamous, or mediocre. His transformation at the time of On
the Marble Cliffs might be surprising, but there is nothing vile about it. Later, the
warrior-botanist reinvented himself, writing in his Treatise on the Rebel that the age required
recourse other than the schools of yoga. These are the sweet temptations that he now kept at bay.
I have just written that Jünger was not an aristocrat by birth. I was wrong. He was. Not by family
origin, but by a mysterious inner alchemy. In the manner of the little girl and the concierge in
Muriel Barbery’s novel The Elegance of the Hedgehog (L’élégance du hérisson, Gallimard,
2006). Or in the manner of Martin Eden in Jack London’s novel of the same name. Born in the
depths of poverty, Martin Eden had a noble nature. Mere chance puts any young person in a
refined and cultivated milieu. He fell in love with a young woman who belonged to that world.
The discovery of literature awoke in him the vocation of writer and a fantastic will to overcome
himself, to completely leave his past behind, which he accomplished through tremendous
ordeals. Having become a famous writer, he discovered simultaneously the vanity of success and
the mediocrity of the young bourgeois woman whom he thought he loved. Thus he committed
suicide. But that does not affect my point. There are Martin Edens who survive their
disillusionment, and there always will be. They are noble, energetic, and “aristocratic” souls. But
for such souls to “break out of the pack,” as one says of good hunting dogs, and rise to the top,
role models are absolutely necessary. Living exemplars of inner heroism and authentic nobility
down through the ages constitute a kind of secret knighthood, a hidden Order. Hector of Troy
was their forerunner. Ernst Jünger was an incarnation in our time. Sartre was not wrong about
that.
From Nouvelle Revue d’Histoire, no. 45

Anda mungkin juga menyukai