The analysis suggests that substantial policy changes made over the last
three years to encourage more apartment development have not had the
desired effect. In fact changes to apartment standards have coincided with
distinct periods of decline in new applications in Dublin for apartment
construction
The fact that new planning applications for apartments were so stunted in
2017 suggests that developers are holding back to see what changes are
made to apartment standards before designing their projects and seeking
finance. There was also a number of planning applications withdrawn after
the announcement by the Minister of his intention to change apartment
standards in October 2017
The implications of our analysis is that any further changes proposed by the
Government to apartment building standards must be introduced without
delay, as these appear to be holding back new planning applications for
apartment construction. Furthermore, the market must be given assurance
1
Authored by Dublin Chamber, Feb 2018
that no new changes in apartment standards will be introduced for the
foreseeable future
While there has been criticism of the substance of these changes3, some
commentators have also been critical of the frequency of the reforms to
regulations and standards for apartment construction.
Less concerned with the substance of the changes, this argument is that the
constant tinkering with standards has created uncertainty in the market.
Changes in standards – even where these are positive from the developers’ point
2
Design Standards for New Apartments - Guidelines for Planning Authorities - Draft Update (Dec. 2017)
available here: http://www.housing.gov.ie/planning/guidelines/apartments/design-standards-new-
apartments-guidelines-planning-authorities-draft
3
For example, a common criticism of the reduced minimum size guidelines was that it would allow the
proliferation of ‘shoebox’ apartments in Dublin City, such as by journalist Frank McDonald in Irish Times
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/analysis-minister-dumbs-down-apartment-guidelines-
1.2475452
of view – have led to withdrawn and delayed applications for new apartment
developments. Apartment development proposals that have to be redesigned
also renegotiating their terms of financing, which adds to the time delay.
For example architect and commentator, Orla Hegarty, has argued that the
Minister’s announcement in October 2017 of changes to apartment standards
will cause delay in new development: “Anybody who has a site or has planning
permission is going to wait to see if they can do a more profitable development
under the new standards”. She claimed the lack of consistency and certainty was
holding back investors: “Investors need certainty and are also looking at the
competition…someone is not going to develop when they think the adjoining
sites will have greater density in 6 or 9 months’ time…..the real risk [of changes
in standards] is that everybody will have to sit back and wait”4
The central argument is that the frequent tinkering means that many
applications in the pipeline are either withdrawn or plans about to be submitted
for planning have been redesigned to take advantage of the new standards, such
as the Ministerial Order (known as ‘Section 28’ changes) mandating reduced
minimum apartment size standards in 2015.
4RTE News 6th Oct 2017, Interview with Orla Hegarty. Available here: https://www.rte.ie/news/player/2017/1006/21246295-interview-
orla-hegarty-of-ucd-school-of-architecture-on-housing-plans/
This analysis supports the argument that changes to apartments standards in
Dec 2015 led to a significant stymying of new development in 2016. There’s also
some evidence that anticipation of new Section 28 changes to apartment
standards – including those on building height, car parking requirements, dual
aspect, units per lift core and percentage of studios – that were signalled well in
advance of their announcement in Oct 2017, could have encouraged developers
to delay making planning applications for new apartment developments
(from Q1 to Q4 2017).
Overall, the data on planning permission applications tells a different story on
the state of the housing market to other commonly used metrics such as
planning permission applications granted (from the CSO) or measures of housing
activity, such as housing commencements or completions.
Data on new planning applications is more immediately sensitive to regulatory
and policy changes, than standard data on planning permissions granted. This is
because planning permissions that are granted in a specific month are already in
the system before policy changes are made. Planning applications can take
many months or even years to be granted and hence are not immediately
reflective market response to policy changes.
The graph below points to the importance of looking at the permission
applications data (extracted from the APAS Planning system in Dublin City, Dun
Laoghaire-Rathdown and Fingal Local Authorities), rather than just the
permissions granted data (from CSO) when assessing the impact of regulatory
changes.
The data on planning permissions granted show a linear recovery from Q1 2012
to Q3 2017 in apartment development in Dublin. By contrast, the data on new
applications made show a significant slow-down in new apartment activity during
2016 and into 2017. This is commensurate with the view that frequent
regulatory changes have delayed or stymied development of new apartments.
400 18,000
Apartment Planning Applications vs Applications Granted (Dublin)
350 16,000
14,000
300 Planning Applications
Mentioning Apartments
12,000
250 New Permissions Granted -
Individual Applications
New Permissions Granted - 10,000
200 Apartment Units (Right Axis)
8,000
150
6,000
100
4,000
50 2,000
0 -
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The slow-down in new applications could be due to the changes to minimum size
standards introduced in Dec 2015. Furthermore the continued lull in new
applications in 2017 could be due to the anticipation of further changes to
regulatory standards, such as those that were announced on 6th Oct 2017 to car
parking requirements, lift shafts, dual aspect etc.
It is important to note that our analysis using the data on new planning
applications submitted is different from the Department of Housing’s own
assessment of the changes. For instance, after the changes made to minimum
apartment size standards in Dec. 2015, the Department claimed an uptick in
planning permissions granted for apartment developments was indication of the
success of this policy change. A written reply from the Department in May 2017
cited the increase in planning permissions granted as evidence that the changes
to minimum apartment sizes were having the desired impact: “planning
permissions granted for apartments in 2016 stood at 3,894 units, representing a
39% increase on 2015’’5. Of course, in the majority of instances these
permissions would have been lodged prior to the decision on reduced apartment
sizes.
5
Response to Parliamentary Question, 10 May 2017; available here https://goo.gl/o3YW8o
The Department also claimed recently there is no evidence of a slowdown as a
result of regulatory changes to apartment standards: “My Department is not
aware of any significant withholding of applications or withdrawals as a result of
the introduction of the Guidelines in 2015. The intention of the focussed review
of the current Guidelines is to examine the scope for any further planning
measures that could be deployed in relation to the viability of apartment
development in our cities and towns, in the context of achieving more compact
urban development”6.
In actual fact, the four quarters after this change to standards experienced a
very substantial reduction in the number of new planning applications for
apartments, which is the opposite of what was hoped for and expected by the
policy change.
Overall, the analysis sheds light on the impact of the policy changes over the
past three years in encouraging new apartment supply coming on stream.
35
Planning Applications Mentioning Apartments (Bi-Monthly): Dublin City, Fingal, Sth Dublin
7 July 15
Planning Applications Mentioning Part V
30 Apartments (Bi-Monthly) for 3 Dub Reduced
LAS with Complete Data
4 Mth Moving Average
10 Nov 15
25 New Min.
Apartment
3 March 14 Size
Building Control
20 Amendment
Regulations
6 Oct 17
15 Changes to
Apartment
Standards
Signalled
10
0
01/01/2003
01/06/2003
01/11/2003
01/04/2004
01/09/2004
01/02/2005
01/07/2005
01/12/2005
01/05/2006
01/10/2006
01/03/2007
01/08/2007
01/01/2008
01/06/2008
01/11/2008
01/04/2009
01/09/2009
01/02/2010
01/07/2010
01/12/2010
01/05/2011
01/10/2011
01/03/2012
01/08/2012
01/01/2013
01/06/2013
01/11/2013
01/04/2014
01/09/2014
01/02/2015
01/07/2015
01/12/2015
01/05/2016
01/10/2016
01/03/2017
01/08/2017
6
Response to Parliamentary Question, 7 Dec 2017; available here https://goo.gl/9VYnug
Key Findings
60
40
20
2. Withdrawal of Applications
There has also been an uptick in the number of planning applications that were
withdrawn after the announcement of recent changes to apartment regulations
in October 2017.
For instance, an application for 98 dwellings in Fingal, including 45 apartments,
was withdrawn in Nov. 2017 – one month after the Minister announced his
intention to change apartment density regulations. Another application in Fingal
for a five storey apartment block was withdrawn on 30th June 2017, two weeks
after appointment of the new Minister for Housing, who signalled early on his
intention to review planning regulations and issues around building costs, as part
of a review of the Rebuilding Ireland Action Plan.
3. No Evidence of Increased Applications Due to Planning Reforms
Furthermore there is no evidence that reduced Part V obligations on developers
had the desired effect on increasing number of planning applications for new
apartments.
However it is also the case that there was no noticeable increase in the number
of planning applications that were withdrawn after these planning changes, as
has been argued by some commentators. Reduced Part V contributions could be
renegotiated between developers and local authorities without going back to
planning, so this makes sense.
Finally there is no evidence that the new Building Control Regulation
Amendments in 2014 lead to a reduction in applications, as has been argued by
many. In fact, the introduction of new building control regulations in March 2014
coincided with the beginning of an upward trend in planning permission
applications for new apartments.