City Banjarbaru
Cluster Name JPS_KAL_3G_B_052
(Outer City)
Abstract
This document is to provide report for XL Axiata on Provisional Acceptance site based for commercial UMTS launch.
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3
1.2. General Cluster Information ......................................................................................... 3
1.2.1. New Site ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.2.2. First Tier Neighbor Sites .............................................................................................. 3
1.2.3. Google Earth Snapshot ............................................................................................... 4
1.3. Drive test route and cluster border at Google Map ....................................................... 4
2 Performance Result ................................................................................................... 5
2.1. Drive Test .................................................................................................................... 5
2.1.1. Coverage Map Accuracy ............................................................................................. 5
2.1.2. RSCP Plot ................................................................................................................... 6
2.1.3. Ec/Io Drive test ............................................................................................................ 7
2.1.4. DL Throughput Drive Test............................................................................................ 9
2.1.5. Bad Spot Analysis ..................................................................................................... 10
2.1.6. Physical Tuning Summary ......................................................................................... 11
2.1.7. DT Optimization Result .............................................................................................. 12
2.1.8. Overshooting Analysis from TP Status....................................................................... 13
2.1.9. MRR KPI ................................................................................................................... 13
2.2. NMS KPI UMTS ......................................................................................................... 16
2.2.1. Accessibility ............................................................................................................... 16
2.2.2. Retainability ............................................................................................................... 16
2.2.3. RTWP ........................................................................................................................ 16
2.2.4. NMS KPI Trend ......................................................................................................... 17
2.2.5. Traffic & UTILIZATION .............................................................................................. 18
3 KPI 2G....................................................................................................................... 20
3.1. List of 2G sites inside 3G Polygon ............................................................................. 20
3.2. NMS 2G..................................................................................................................... 20
4 KPI Justification ...................................................................................................... 21
4.1. NMS KPI Trend ............................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
5 Recommendation..................................................................................................... 21
6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 22
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 3 (23)
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction
This document presents the result of Drive test and Network Performance KPI based on active
measurement and OSS data collection for Cluster JPS_KAL_3G_B_052.
The drive-test KPIs are evaluated by drive-test coverage and statistic according to the pre-defined drive-
test route that is mutually agreed by both parties.
The results of the measurements are then compared with the passing criteria agreed upon by XL and
HUAWEI.
Bad Spot 1
Bad Spot 2
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 11 (23)
Before After
Site Name Cellname Height Ant Type RET
Dir Mech Elec Dir Mech Elec
X313CI21G9_3G
3GBJ442211 72 10 0 RET 10 3 RET Tongyu-3band 2.0M -
_PANTAI
X313CI21G9_3G
3GBJ442212 72 170 0 RET 170 3 RET Tongyu-3band 2.0M -
_PANTAI
X313CI21G9_3G
3GBJ442213 72 210 0 RET 210 3 RET Tongyu-3band 2.0M -
_PANTAI
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 12 (23)
RSCP
Eclo
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 13 (23)
RSCP Plot
Cell KPI Aggregate for 7 days, taken at cell busy hour. Cell busy hour is defined as the hour when CS voice traffic
reach the peak value.
2.2.1. Accessibility
2.2.2. Retainability
2.2.3. RTWP
CS Access Rate already achieved KPI Target PS Access Rate already achieved KPI Target
PS RAB Drop already achieved KPI target Speech Drop Rate already achieved KPI target.
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 18 (23)
PS RAB Drop already achieved KPI target RTWP already achieved KPI target
2G+3G Voice Traffic stable after new site on air. (Only for 2G+3G Payload Data increase after new site on air. (Only for
information) information)
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 19 (23)
Code Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only for CE Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only for
information) information)
Power Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only for CNBAP Utilization keep stable after new site on air. (Only
information) for information)
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 20 (23)
Drive Test is out of 3G vendor scope of work. Therefore, the 2G aspect only review the NMS KPI in PAC report.
The target for NMS KPI is maintained of improved, comparing the best week (within 3 weeks) after new site on air
versus the week when PAC is collected.
2G nodes involved are applicable for nodes which are inside 3Gnew site polygon, regardless they have collocated
3G installed or not. All KPI, except availability are calculated during busy hour-payload UL+DL daily, averaged within
a week. Availability is monitored 24 hr daily.
3.2. NMS 2G
PAC
KPI Baseline Week Comments
Week
Assignment Success Rate (%) 100.00 100 Maintain
Perceive Drop Rate (%) 6.43 9.38 Maintain
Perceive Congestion Rate (%) 0.00 0 Maintain
SDCCH Drop Rate (%) 0.00 0.18 Maintain
SDCCH Congestion Rate (%) 0.00 0 Maintain
SDCCH Success Rate (%) 100.00 100 Maintain
TBF Failure Rate (%) 0.30 0.05 Improved
Cell Availability (%) 99.90 97.7 Degraded
HO Success Rate (%) 100.00 100 Maintain
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 21 (23)
5 Recommendation
6 Conclusion
We conclude that PAC of Cluster 2017B3_KAL_3G_C_026 is:
UMTS NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 23 (23)