Mestizo Robotics
G U S T AV O C R E M B I L A N D P A U L A G A E T A N O A D I
With a cultural and material “cannibalistic” approach, the authors future of “crabs with brains” [5]—an inclusive programmatic
A BST R A C T
aim to revise certain technological discourses by introducing TZ’IJK, platform where dirt and mud are seen not as a representation
a “mestizo” robotic artwork developed in the Peruvian Amazon. Far
exclusively of poverty but also one of life and biodiversity [6,7]?
from the utopian visions of Hollywood sci-fi movies populated by highly
intelligent, anthropomorphic and responsive machines, TZ’IJK employs a Aiming to confront these questions in the field, we ar-
combination of high and low technologies that embody Latin America’s rived at San Roque de Cumbaza, in the Peruvian Amazonian
anthropophagic, postcolonial and hybrid nature. Mestizo Robotics highlands, to develop a robotic prototype (Fig. 1). Initially,
proposes an alternative approach to the development of embodied we were looking for contributions to our project: local arti-
artificial life forms, from both theoretical and technological viewpoints. sans who could help to build our project and context outside
the protection of our studios and labs. We arrived not know-
ing much, except the remoteness of this location. Not many
In the New World’s Spanish colonies, craft workshops cul- years ago the area was under the disputed control of Sendero
tivated fertile operations of knowledge cross-transference Luminoso (the Shining Path), a Maoist guerilla group ac-
between Spanish craft masters and indigenous apprentices tive during the 1980s. The local peasants often mentioned
and established the ground base for the development of a nearby matanzas (killings) and enfrentamientos (warring);
“Baroque subjectivity” that persists today. Tropicalismo, tour operators we met quickly dismissed the conflicts, as they
Mangue Bit, along with less programmatic and popular ap- did not want their eco-branding efforts tarnished with recent
propriations such as telenovelas, carnival, tango and cumbia violence. We soon learned that la selva (the jungle) was not
music, are just a few examples of the art that was born as just a metaphor; it was ominously present. In the jungle, all
a consequence of mestizaje—a phenomenon far from har- is gutted and swallowed, without negotiation. Mestizaje, here,
monic but rather “an heterogeneous juxtaposition aiming is not a plan but a consequence. That is perhaps the most
toward hybridity” [1], interactions, interchanges and reap- profound and radical condition of this place: Despite the
propriations [2–4]. intentions of colonization, the pretensions of capital to ben-
Mestizaje is normally understood as a process that blends efit and the ideals of missionaries and ecotourists, the jungle
races or languages. Can its dynamics be extended to help bet- exerts its will and the rule is survival. And it rains often,
ter understand or experiment with the realm of making, of very often.
things? Outside the nativisms that use the idea of mestizaje to
hide the contradictions (and privileges) of uneven develop- TZ’IJK
ment and cultural exploitation, could a “mestizo technology” TZ’IJK (mud or clay in the Mayan language Ch’orti’) is a ro-
be possible? Can a “mestizo technology” promote an otro botic art installation composed of a community of blind, deaf
and “dumb” autonomous mobile agents “made with mud.”
Gustavo Crembil (architect, educator), Architecture, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Inspired by the Quiché Maya’s narration of the creation of the
110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A. Email: <crembg@rpi.edu>. world, the project attempts to bring to life the most popular
Paula Gaetano Adi (artist, educator), Experimental and Foundation Studies, Latin American mytho-historical story of the earth’s first hu-
Rhode Island School of Design, 2 College Street, Providence, RI 02903, U.S.A.
Email: <pgaetano@risd.edu>. man inhabitants.
See <www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/leon/50/2> for supplemental files associated The Popol Vuh (the Book of the People) ascribes the cre-
with this issue. ation of man only with the purpose of serving the gods.
According to the narration, man was created as a being
Article Frontispiece. Amazónico TZ’IJK robot (close up) before
quincha plastering, San Roque de Cumbaza, Peru, summer 2013. far inferior to the gods, considered nothing more than an
(© Gaetano Adi/Crembil. Photo: Alejandro Borsani.) imperfect automaton, subject to divine whims and fancies.
©2017 ISAST doi:10.1162/LEON_a_01150 LEONARDO, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 132–137, 2017 133
Fig. 1. Geodesic structure completed with internal mechanism, ready to be plastered with quincha paste,
San Roque de Cumbaza, Peru, summer 2013. (© Gaetano Adi/Crembil. Photo: Alejandro Borsani.)
After the earth and animals were created, the gods in fact Our first robotic prototype, El Amazónico (the Amazo-
made several false starts in setting humanity upon the earth. nian) (Article Frontispiece and Figs 2 and 3), consisted of a
The first attempt was a man created out of mud, which soon 48-inch-diameter mud-covered sphere with an internal mo-
proved unsuccessful; the mud men lacked speech, souls and bile mechanism. The structure is defined by a series of layered
intellect. They were useless, blind and clumsy automatons and interlocked geodesic systems. The first layer is an interior
without understanding, insight or perceptiveness [8]. laser-cut transparent polycarbonate geodesic membrane (3v
Leaving behind the imaginary inventory of literature and frequency) reinforced by a rib-frame bolted together with the
mythology, humanity’s quest to replicate living beings goes folded flaps of the pentagon and hexagon faces. This layer is
back thousands of years. As a natural consequence, the dis- then tied together with a spherical circle-covering armature
course of robotics and artificial life has always resembled made with angarilla, a very flexible indigenous wood. The
different creationist myths, as if the idea
of creating synthetic beings was a way to
challenge God or evolution or a way to
please our profound creationist desires.
Far from the utopias of super-intelligent,
anthropomorphic and responsive ma-
chines, TZ’IJK proposes an ironic posi-
tion different from the view of an agent
as a competent system of autonomy and
determination, which seems to be the he-
gemonic rhetoric when trying to make
an artificial technological creature in
the “image and likeness” of the human
being.
10 Some of the activities that took place while the robot inhabited the
References and Notes plaza included building a shelter for the rain, taking shifts to watch
For a more extended version of this text, see G. Crembil and the robot at night, and pushing it across the hill or just having normal
P. Gaetano Adi, “Mestizo Robotics,” in Re-New 2013 Proceedings, ed- school classes, soccer matches, and French bracelets sessions next to
ited by G. Nadarajan (Copenhagen: Re-New Digital Arts Forum, 2013) the robot as a way of embracing its existence in the town.
pp. 96–100.
11 Advanced conversations are in development with the Laboratorio de
1 This is a nonfusioned, nontransculturalized notion of mestizaje. See Arte Electrónico e Inteligencia Artificial at the Universidad Nacional
George Yudice, “De la antropofagia al sampling: nuevas experiencias de Tres de Febrero, Buenos Aires; and the Nano Lab at the School
de heterogeneidad e hibridismo en las culturas latinoamericanas” of Fine Arts, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Other target
(Keynote Lecture) Conference La Jornada Literaria 2005. Rutgers locations include art collectives or institutions in major cities such
Univ., New Brunswick, November 2005. as Mexico DF, Bogotá, Caracas, Lima, Quito, and Santiago.
2 Néstor García Canclini, Hybrid Cultures, Strategies for Entering and 12 Warwick Anderson, “Introduction: ‘Postcolonial Technscience,’ ” So-
Leaving Modernity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, cial Studies of Science 32, No. 5–6, pp. 643–648 (October–December
1995). 2002).
3 Serge Gruzinsky, The Mestizo Mind (New York: Routledge, 2002). 13 F. Varela, E. Thompson and E. Rosch, The Embodied Mind (Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993).
4 F. Laplantine and A. Nouss, Mestizajes, de Arcimboldo a zombi (Bue-
nos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2007). 14 Hubert Dreyfus, What Computers Still Can’t Do (Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press, 1992).
5 Caranguejos com Cerebro (Crabs with Brains) is the foundational
manifesto of the Mangue Bit music movement from Recife, Brazil 15 R. Arkin, Behavioral-based Robotics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
written by Fred 04 and DJ Renato in 1992. 1998).
ANNOUNCING
In general, the earliest papers, from the 1960s and 1970s, concern themselves with the develop-
ment of new chemicals and chemically based methods for creating art. Many of the more recent
papers have a theoretical slant, with the most recent emphasizing nanoscience. Based on changing
trends in the field since the 1960s, the articles in this e-book fall naturally into the following four
topic areas:
• Nanoscience
See <www.amazon.com/Art-and-Atoms-ebook/dp/B00A9Y3ZCW>.