Logic of Phantasy 77

Jacques Lacan
雅克 拉康

Lacan Seminar 14:

The Logic of Fantasy 17
幻见的逻辑
Seminar 17: Wednesday, April 19, 1967

Such are the points that it is extremely necessary to articulate at the start of any induction into what the

unconscious says about sex, because this is properly what we have learnt to read in its discourse! Only,

where I speak about castration complex - with, of course, all the litigiousness that it involves, for the

least that one can say is that it may lend, however little, to an error about the person, especially on the

male side, concerning what Genesis describes for us so well, namely, the woman conceived of as this

something of which the body of man has been deprived.

在引导进入无意识对於性的说法开始时，这是我们极端需要表達的几点，因为这恰恰是我们在它的真理论

述所学习到的！只是在我谈到阉割情结的地方，它所牵涉到的争论。至少我们能够说，它可能促成人们的

错误，特别是在男性这一边，关於創世纪为我们描绘的，换句话说，女人被构想成为从男人身体上的肋骨

取出来。

(This is called, in (12) this chapter that you know well, a "rib", for the sake of modesty!) What has to be

seen, is that in any case, where I speak about the castration complex as original in the economic

function of jouissance, the psychoanalyst gargles the term of "objectal libido". The important thing is to

see that if there is something that deserves this name, it is precisely the carry-over of this negatived

function which is grounded in the castration complex.

这个章节你们耳熟能详，为了谦和的说来，就是所谓的「肋骨」。我们必须要明白的是，每当我谈论到阉割

情结，作为「欢爽」的经济功用的源头，精神分析师会冲口而出（客体的力比多精力）这个术语。重要的是

要看出，假如有某件东西应该获得这个名声，那确实就是根源於阉割情结的负面的功用的扱带者。

1
The jouissance-value prohibited at the precise point, at the organ-point constituted by the phallus, is

what is brought forward as "objectal libido" contrary to what is said, namely, that the libido described as

narcissistic is supposed to be the reservoir from which there has to be extracted what will be objectal

libido.

就在这一个明确的地方，在阳具所组成的器官的位置，「欢爽价值」受到禁忌。这个「客体的力比多精力」所

展现的部分，截然不同於一般所说的，被描述为自恋的力比多精力应该是一个生命力的储存库，从那里，

客体的力比多精力，汩汩而来。

This may appear as a subtlety to you. Because after all, you will tell me, if, as regards narcissism, there

is the libido which is brought to bear on one's own body, well hen - even though you specify things - it is

a part of this libido that is at stake, you will tell me. In what I am presently stating, it is nothing of the

kind! Very precisely because to tell you that one thing is extracted from another, it would be necessary

to suppose that it is purely and simply separated from it by way of what is called a cut, but not simply

by a cut, by something which subsequently plays the function of an edge.

你们听起来，可能会觉得有点玄虚。畢竟，关於自恋，你们可能会告诉我，力比多精力会给予自己的身体

有需要发泄的压力。即使你们明确地指出一些东西，你们会告诉我，这只是力比多精力岌岌可危的地方。根

本就不是那麽一回事！确实是因为，假如我要告诉你们，某件东西从另一件东西那里汩汩而来，我们必须

要假定，这两样东西纯粹就是分离区隔，藉由所谓的切割，但是不仅是切割而已，还有某件随后扮演「边

缘」的功用的东西。

Now this is precisely what is debatable and not simply what is debatable, but what is already settled.

The fact is that there is no homomorphism, there is no structure such that the phallic scrap (as one

might say) is graspable in the same way as a part of narcissistic investment. The fact is that it does not

constitute this edge, which is what we must maintain between what allows narcissism to construct this

false assimilation of the one to the other which is the doctrine in the traditional theories of love. The

traditional theories of love, in effect, leave the object of the good within the limits of narcissism.

现在，这确实是受到争议的地方，而且不仅是受到争议的地方，也是已经解决的地方。事实是，没有同一

形态的东西，没有一个结构，能够使阳具的争议性可以被理解，就像它是自恋被投注的一部分。事实上，

它並没有构成这个「边缘」。我们必须维持这个「边缘」，这样自恋才能够建构从生命力的储存库，到力比多

的精力的吸收。这是传统的爱情的理论的信条。事实上，传统的爱情理论，让美德的客体始终保持在自恋的

范围之内。

雄伯译

32hsiung@pchome.com.tw

2
3