Process Plant Design Competition Scoring Sheet

Plant Model Display Session

Name of Judge: Group No:

Needs (X)
Criteria for Judging Accomplished Commendable Developing Actual
Improvement Factor
Quality 10-9 8-6 5-3 Score
2-0
Outlook Very attractive Presentable Relatively Poor and messy 1 /10%
(10%) and presentable presentable design

Materials Low cost, Low cost, High cost, Neither cost 0.5 /5%
usage (5%) environmentally environmentally environmentally effective nor
friendly, entirely friendly, mostly friendly. environmentally
made of waste made of waste friendly
products / products /
recycled recycled materials
materials
Originality Novel process Major retrofitting Few elements of No originality 2 /20%
(20%) design and found retrofitting (comparable to
technology found exiting design)

Plant
Design
Significance Novel and very Some significant Weak impact on No impact on 2.5 /25%
Model
of project significant impacts on the the topic given the topic given
(25%) impacts on the topic given
topic given

Layout of Excellent plant Good plant layout Good plant Poor plant 1.5 /15%
the plant layout with and unit layout layout
(15%) compliances to operations are
safety issues designed with
and unit proper scaling
operations are factors
designed with
proper scaling
factors
compared to
actual scale
 Decoration Very Presentable Relatively Poor and messy 0.5
of booth presentable and presentable decoration /5%
(5%) attractive

Poster Well organized Well organized Poor Poor 1.5 /15%

(15%) structure, no structure, no presentation presentation
grammatical grammatical and structure, no structure,
and spelling spelling error grammatical grammatical
error, conveyed and spelling and spelling
message with error error
maximum
Creativity
engagement
and impact,
easy to read and
arouse interest
in the topic
Use of Clear model Clear model Few model No model labels 0.5 /5%
model labels on all labels on most labels
labels units showing units
(5%) the flow of
pipelines

Evaluated by,

Percentage score :

________________

Judge’s Name :