Reaction Heuristic
PFR – used for high production rates and for short residence time reactions.
The reactor must not exceed 800C to prevent significant cracking.
High exothermic heat of reaction – increase the amount of hydrogen added to the reactor
(excess reactant).
In practical instances, the ratio of hydrogen to toluene should be high to prevent coking.
Initially, for the non-recycle scenario, we can classify our reaction set as consecutive. This is
because reaction 2 cannot occur until reaction 1 has taken place. When dealing with a set of
consecutive reactions, we must look at the activation energy of the reactions to determine
optimal reactor operating conditions. The activation energy of reaction 1 is greater than
reaction 2, therefore we should use a decreasing temperature profile through our PFR in to
favour reaction 1 as much as possible.
In the scenario with the recycle stream, reactions 1 & 2 will occur simultaneously as reaction
2 reactants will be present in the feed stream. The activation energy for the desired reaction 1
is greater than the activation energy for reaction 2 – therefore, heuristically, we should operate
the reactor at a high temperature to favour reaction 1. This can be confirmed by analysing the
reaction kinetics using an Arrhenius expression.
From the above plot it can be seen that, to achieve the greatest comparative favourability for the
desired reaction to the unwanted secondary reactions, we must operate the reactor at a higher
temperature.
General Heuristic: A batch or plug flow reactor should be used for multiple reactions in
series.
2.1.4 Distillation
Heuristics: for the initial simulation adhere to the following suggestions for convergence – set the
actual number of trays to twice the minimum value, set the reflux ration to 1.2 times the minimum
value. These values can be taken from shortcut methods.
Column 1 should ideally operate with a partial condenser in order to allow the highly volatile
components (hydrogen and methane) to leave the system easily. Partial condensers should be used
when components in the system have BPs below -40C.
The recycled biphenyl stream could be passed through a reactive distillation column – this would
allow the benzene that is produced to be separated and recovered before it can take part in the reverse
reaction as the removal of the product would drive the production of more.
Tray spacing should equal: S=0.5D^0.3
A safety factor of 10% on the minimum number of trays should be used.
A safety factor of 25% on the reflux ratio to account for reflux pump efficiency
The L/D diameter of a column should ideally be between 20 and 30.
Bubble Cap trays should be used when low liquid and vapour flowrates are present in the column
The energy balance (figure 2) presents all heat flow required and released from the system. However,
its important to mention that the enthalpy of component is not considered in here, however this can be
found in the simulation model.
Figure (1) Mass balance data sheet
•There is no rule of thumb for selecting the purge composition or the ratio of hydrogen to toluene
required in the new feed for the process containing the recycle structure.
•We want to ensure there is sufficient hydrogen at the reactor inlet to prevent coking within the reactor
– therefore it is desirable to recycle the hydrogen.
•Our PFR reactor is originally operating at a very high conversion so a recycle stream may not be
needed
•For the secondary reaction, we want to shift the equilibrium to the right to produce more benzene. To
do this, we must maximise the amount of hydrogen at the inlet. This is another reason to recycle
hydrogen back to the inlet of the reactor.
Purge
• Heuristic: Whenever there is a light reactant (BP < -48C) and a light feed impurity (Methane
on the recycle) use a gas recycle and a purge stream for the first design.
• Purge is required in order to provide a sink for the methane. The methane produced does not
take part in any of the reactions and will therefore build up in the system if an infinite recycle was used
with no purge. However, some of the methane must be recycled through the system due to the difficult
and highly economically inefficient separation of hydrogen and methane – we would look at
introducing a membrane separation unit for separation.
• Methane and Hydrogen are non-toxic species, so a purge system is feasible (however both are
highly flammable, so it is highly likely that a purge system would simply be connected to a flare tower).
• SUGGESTIONS: Recycle the Biphenyl to extinction by passing it back through the reactor
with excess hydrogen to favour the reverse reaction and generate methane – the reaction conditions
would have to favour the reverse reaction – by increasing the concentration of biphenyl I the reactor –
the equilibrium would shift to the left and more benzene would be produced provided hydrogen is in
excess.
• RECYCLE OPTIMISATION – To determine the optimum purge/recycle ratio, an optimisation
of the recycle process needs to be carried out. This is due to the costs associated with recycle –
recycling large amounts of material will result in higher operating costs (i.e compressor/pump duties)
but will reduce raw material costs. Whereas a low recycle and large purge will have the opposite
economic effect. The CAPEX and OPEX should therefore be calculated for a variety of purge ratios
in the simulation to see which value would minimise the over related costs.