article ts
Culture, economy and tourist studies
© 2003
tourism commodities sage publications
London,
Thousand Oaks and
Social relations of production and New Delhi
vol 3(2) 123–141
DOI: 10.1177/
consumption 1468797603041629
www.sagepublications.com
Irena Ateljevic
Auckland University of Technology
Stephen Doorne
University of South Pacific, Fiji
Introduction
Tourism is undoubtedly a powerful agent of economic development driven in
part by the search for cultural diversity and the ethnic identity of the ‘Other’
(Van der Berge, 1994; Allcock, Bruner and Lanfant, 1995). In predominantly
‘Western’ cultures, leisure and tourism consumption serves as an arena for social
differentiation and the expression of identity (Featherstone, 1990; Miller,
1995a), in line of Bourdieu’s (1984) notion of ‘cultural capital’.Traffic in touris-
tic goods revolves around largely aestheticized assumptions of authenticity, and
at the same time satisfies the urge to engage in a global cultural connectedness
(Hannerz, 1996). In this context this study builds upon the work of Appadurai 123
041629 Ateljevic & Doorne 5/2/04 4:16 pm Page 124
dry. Women are normally involved in the tying process to the extent that has
become a feature of domestic life in the area. Over time, home-based workshops
have appeared as commonplace in villages in the area.The following discussion
illustrates social relations of production around tie-dyeing in Dali region.
ment of the factory, however, she noted how these traditional skills are reas-
suming both economic and social significance.
Another of the group, Li, described typical current pressures facing families
with respect to the limited availability of land.The process of land allocation to
the individual households creates an increasing demand for productivity and
resources with each additional generation. She noted that ‘it is a common situ-
ation in which several generations live in single households, we are all depen-
dant on the same piece of land [for our economic livelihood]’. The women’s
work for the factory provided then with an opportunity to ‘escape’ from those
immediate domestic pressures and spend time with other women in similar cir-
cumstances.
It takes each individual about four days to complete a complex design for
which they may earn 3–4 Yuan per day, but for smaller more simple work they
can earn 8–10 Yuan per day.The factory pays them every three months during
which time each woman will have completed her share of both simple and
complex designs printed on the fabric in the factory. For them the activity is
valued more for its social significance rather than the immediate economic
reward. Each of the women’s husbands works as a labourer on construction sites,
also taking them away from the household. As Lu commented, the flexibility of
‘piecework’ enables them to balance domestic responsibilities, childcare and
income-generating activities.
Potentially, women can earn more money working at the factory but they
described the factory work and its commitments as too rigid. As one of the
group, Bi Sue, commented: ‘We like what we do and don’t think of it as work.
When we come here we tell jokes, and know we can bring our domestic prob-
lems and talk with each other about our husbands, and children and parents . . .
and know we will get [advice and support]’. The women have been gathering
together in the same place for ‘many years’ and say they will continue to do so
as long as they continue to get along one with another.
Each of the women has her own ‘personal purse’, savings for a new house or
so their children can one day be independent from the extended family. They
talk often about a better future for their children, wanting them to go to school
and wanting them to get better jobs than they have themselves. When talking
about their futures they revealed few personal ambitions. None were attracted
to opening a shop themselves. This, they said, would deprive them of their
opportunity to spend time together as a group.
Practised in this way, the traditional skill of tying cloth has significance
beyond their immediate economic and social needs, but is a way of realizing
their own futures through the opportunities it provides for their children by re-
engaging with a practice which has been part of their cultural heritage for gen-
erations. Although these women and their activities are an integral part of a
broader tourism economy, they exhibited little awareness of the complex web
of relations flowing downstream from them, nor were they particularly interes-
ted in what became of the cloth they tied. For them, their activity means social
041629 Ateljevic & Doorne 5/2/04 4:16 pm Page 130
Brooklyn, Wellington
Nicki’s sister, a lawyer also based in Wellington, received the summer dress and
the tie-dyed cloth as a gift. For a period of a year after Nicki’s travels we met Katy
several times principally to find out about the use and the significance of the
dress and the fabric. For Katy,‘tie-dyed fabric’ held strong associations with the
hippie era, something she noted was a barrier to her wearing the dress in public
041629 Ateljevic & Doorne 5/2/04 4:16 pm Page 135
(‘I really wouldn’t want to be seen in a tie-dyed dress’).This association also sti-
fled the process of finding an appropriate role for the cloth in her home – even
though she identified that the two styles were different in many ways. Initially
she thought the cloth might be useful for cushion covers, but having recently
bought a ‘stylish and funky’ lounge suite, the clash of symbolic images seemed
incongruous.After some experimentation in various places around the house the
cloth simply became a dust cover for stored items in hall cupboard. She did not
find the cloth especially attractive or aesthetically appealing and kept it only
because it was a present from her sister. Indeed, she indicated that this sentimen-
tal attachment was the only thing preventing it from being thrown away.
We told Nicki about what became of the cloth she had given her sister and
she said that on reflection she wasn’t surprised, but was little disappointed she
didn’t value it in the same way and that it wasn’t accorded a level of prominence
among her sister’s things.
which the value-coherence can be created through the act of juxtaposition and
display of an otherwise random collection of objects.
Similarly, the authors throughout numerous presentations and seminars asso-
ciated with this project, also used the tie-dyed cloth as a ‘prop’ for the commu-
nication and construction of multilayered contexts for education and academic
discourse, also fundamentally built upon power, knowledge and an introspective
hyper-awareness of social contexts. Depending on the audience, these props
have been used to construct the arguments around marketing, human geo-
graphy, consumer psychology and socio-economic development. To some
extent the items are used to authenticate the integrity of the argument, to pro-
vide evidence of a ‘worldliness’, which in turn enhances the personal and pro-
fessional identity of the presenter. Clearly, as Jackson (1999) argues, the same
item can be re-produced and re-consumed across multiple contexts and be
assimilated among a diversity of use and symbolic values.
Clearly, development and opportunity at the personal level have much to do
with power-knowledge and the breadth of an individual’s ‘world view’, and the
role of tourism engagement in facilitating and informing that view. In this way,
this article demonstrates a clear relationship between identity formation in con-
sumption cultures and the dynamics of development and change in the places
of production. Tourism commodities in this context reflect not only the social
relations of production and consumption but their particular role in cultural
communication however distorted, reconstituted, and reinterpreted they
become through time and space.
re f e re nc e s
Abram, S., J.Waldren and D.V. L. Macleod (1997) Tourists and Tourism: Identifying with
People and Places. Oxford: Berg.
Allcock, J., E. Bruner and M. F. Lanfant (eds) (1995) International Tourism: Identity and
Change, Anthropological and sociological Approaches. London: Sage.
Appadurai, A. (ed.) (1986) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1998) The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage.
Blum, S. D. (2000) ‘Tales from the Fields of Yunnan’, Modern China 26(2): 148–65.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. London: Routledge.
Britton, S. (1991) ‘Tourism, Capital, and Place:Towards a Critical Geography of
Tourism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9: 451–78.
Clifford, J. (1992) ‘Travelling Cultures’, pp. 96–116 in L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P.
Treichler (eds) Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.
Crain, M. (1996) ‘Negotiating Identities in Quito’s Cultural Borderlands: Native
Women’s Performance for the Ecuadorian Tourist Market’, pp. 125–37 in D.
Howes (ed.) Cross-Cultural Consumption: Global Markets, Local Realities. London:
Routledge.
Crewe, L. and M. Lowe (1995) ‘Gap on the Map? Towards a Geography of
Consumption and Identity’, Environment and Planning A 27: 1877–98.
041629 Ateljevic & Doorne 5/2/04 4:16 pm Page 140