POBRE VS MIRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO disciplinary proceeding under the Rules of Court.
The disciplinary actions falls under the Congress
FACTS: JBC through public invitation publish the provided in The Rules of the Senate contains a soon vacant position of Chief of Justice, hence provision on Unparliamentary Acts and Language Santiago was one of the applicant but that enjoins a Senator from using, under any unfortunately informed by the JBC that only circumstance, offensive or improper language incumbent associate justice would qualify the against another Senator or against any public position. During her privilege speech on the institution. Senate President had not apparently Congress to wit; “x x x I am not angry. I am irate. called her to order, let alone referred the matter to I am foaming in the mouth. I am homicidal. I am the Senate Ethics Committee for appropriate suicidal. I am humiliated, debased, degraded. And I disciplinary action, as the Rules dictates under such am not only that, I feel like throwing up to be living circumstance. The lady senator clearly violated the my middle years in a country of this nature. I am rules of her own chamber. Therefore the nauseated. I spit on the face of Chief Justice disbarment case proceeding was DISMISSED. Artemio Panganiban and his cohorts in the Supreme Court, I am no longer interested in the position [of Chief Justice] if I was to be surrounded by idiots. I would rather be in another environment but not in the Supreme Court of idiots.xxx ANTERO J. POBRE in his sworn letter/complaint invites the attention of the court and asks that disbarment proceedings or other disciplinary actions be taken against the lady senator.
Issue: Does the disbarment proceeding and other
disciplinary actions should be taken against the senator?
Ruling:
NO, because the delivery of speech was conducted
while the Congress is in session and therefore she is covered with the state immunity provided in our Constitution Art. VI Sec.11 of the Constitution. Indeed, her privilege speech is not actionable criminally or in a disciplinary proceeding under the Rules of Court. The plea of Senator Santiago for the dismissal of the complaint for disbarment or disciplinary action is well taken. Indeed, her privilege speech is not actionable criminally or in a