THE PROBLEM
Introduction
The introduction renders an exposition of the situation that has made the study
necessary. The first paragraph of the introduction is the most important part of the paper.
It provides a “narrative hook” to the reader (Creswell, 2007). The narrative hook causes
the reader to pay attention and elicits an emotional or attitudinal response from the reader.
This rationale’s main purpose is to present the justification of the study. The
researchers may cite the: (1) reasons why they have chosen the topic; and/or (2) cite the
problematic situation, which prompted the researchers to conduct the study from the
macro to micro levels, that is, globally, regionally, nationally, and locally, to zero-in on
the local setting of the study. Discussions claimed should be with legal basis relevant to
the study. The researchers may present pertinent statistical data that could support the
claims. The presentations should be emphatic and explosive. It should create an impact
on the reader of the research. It should prod the reader to go on and find out what good is
The last paragraph of the rationale is the purpose statement. It states the purpose
of the researcher in order to address the gap or problem stated in the “situationer” and
This begins by stating the existing theory that the study intends to confirm or to disprove.
a study that has its roots in a specified conceptual model, the framework is often called
This is not the explicit theory or conceptual model, and often the underlying
theoretical rationale for the inquiry is not explained. Rather, the framework is often
study.
The theory or conceptual basis for the framework with which to anchor the study
quantitative studies are defined and operationalized. Supporting theories or concept may
conceptual level. The researchers are interested in defining the concepts operationally.
Researchers should make clear conceptual definition of their key variables or phenomena,
investigated in the study and there is minimal use of words. This will help express
abstract ideas in a concise and readily understandable form. Schematic diagram, which is
Concepts and the linkages between them are represented though the use of boxes, arrows,
or other symbols (also referred to as conceptual map). The schematic diagram is usually
framework.
include discussion on assumptions pertaining to: (1) ontology; (2) epistemology; (3)
axiology; (4) methodology; and (5) rhetoric. These enumerations are embedded from the
specific research tradition opted by the researcher. One must be careful in amalgamating
For qualitative studies conducted using inductive methodology, the theory is the output of
the study. The narrative description and conceptualization in the results and discussion is
the theory itself. There are three ways to do the bottoms-up mechanism: (1) identify a
theory that would fit the data; (2) modify an existing theory to fit the data; or (3) create a
The Problem Statement renders a statement of the central problem of the study.
compare; correlational – examine or assess; simple survey – determine) the (identify the
After filling in, it is advised to paraphrase the statement in correct syntax. The
subject of the study, what are to be measured, the time-frame and location are also being
identified.
After filling in, it is advised to paraphrase the statement in correct syntax. The
subject of the study, what are to be measured, the time-frame and location are also being
identified.
subproblem in which broad dimensions are divided into factors. The researcher should
identify the specific subproblems in logical and sequential order as they appear in the
paradigm. The problems must jive with the paradigm, conceptual framework, hypothesis,
and methodology and research instrument. This should be presented interrogatively. The
specific queries the researcher wants to answer in addressing the research problem. In
some cases, they are direct recordings of the statement of purpose, phased interrogatively.
It specifically: (1) identifies the key elements to be studied; and (2) guides the design and
recommended:
Descriptive. In (population) what is the frequency/prevalence/average value of (interest)?
Intervention without an Explicit Comparison. In (population) what is the effect of
(Intervention) on (O)?
Intervention with an Explicit Comparison. In (population) what is the effect of
(Intervention) in comparison to (Comparative Intervention) on (Outcome)?
Intervention with Moderator. In (population) what is the effect of (Intervention)
in comparison to (Comparative Intervention) on (Outcome) vary by (Moderating
Variable)?
Assessment/Diagnostic without an Explicit Comparison. For (population) does
(Assessment/Diagnostic Intervention) yield accurate and appropriate
diagnostic/assessment information about (Outcome)?
Assessment/Diagnostic with an Explicit. For (population) does (Assessment/Diagnostic
Intervention) yield accurate and appropriate diagnostic/assessment information than
(Comparative Assessment/Diagnostic Intervention) about (Outcome)?
Prognosis without an Explicit Comparison. For (population) does (Condition)
increase the risk for (or influence) (O)?
Prognosis with an Explicit Comparison. For (population) does (Condition) relative to
(Comparative Condition) increase the risk for (or influence) (O)?
Prognosis with Moderator. For (population) does (Condition) relative to (Comparative
Condition) increase the risk for (or influence) (O) differentially for (Moderating
Variable)?
Causation without an Explicit Comparison. Does (Exposure/Characteristic) increase
the risk for (Outcome) in (Population)?
Causation with an Explicit Comparison. Does (Exposure/Characteristic) increase the
risk for (Outcome) compared to (Comparative Exposure/Characteristic) in
(Population)?
Causation with Moderator. Does (Exposure/Characteristic) increase the risk for
(Outcome) compared to (Comparative Exposure/Characteristic) in (Population)
differentially for (Moderating Variable)?
are only commencing points used for grounding data collection. It must be drafted in
such a way that it does not prohibit discovery. It is sufficiently flexible and can be altered
Example:
The purpose of this study is to analyze the culture-based health care practices
among well and ill Cebuanos. This study will be conducted in the Province of Cebu for
1. How are the lived experiences of Cebuanos in the use of culture-based health care
practiced in the;
2. How are the culture-based health care practices provided by the Tambalans in the:
Null Hypothesis
needs to be subjected statistically. The null hypothesis represents the formal statement of
absence until proven with significant relationships after doing the appropriate statistical
test. Null hypothesis are not required for plain descriptive quantitative study and
qualitative study.
Example:
various sectors such as the management, the workforce, the clients, suppliers, and the
general public. The researchers need to identify those who are to benefit from the study:
people, institutions, and agencies. The researchers need to cite how they will be benefited
from the findings of the research. The researchers should not fail to include the other
researchers as beneficiaries and what they are expected to benefit. Presented below is an
example:
Faced with the challenge of nursing practice in diverse cultural settings and folk health
Cebuanos. The Cebuanos will benefit from the culture-based nursing care plan
that will be implemented. The traditional health care practices and culture of Cebuanos
are preserved and maintained, accommodated or negotiated, and when harmful to health
repatterned or restructured.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The first step is to determine the key terms or phrases used in the study. The
researchers need to determine first its conceptual definition before defining them
magazine and journals. After determining its conceptual definition, the researchers define
the key terms and phrases operationally. Operational definition is how these key terms or
phrases are: (1) taken to mean in the study; (2) used in the study; or (3) measured in the
Example:
Cebuanos refer to the individuals who speaks Visayan dialect rooted from Astro-
Malayan language and who performs a specific culture-based health care practice. This
study, mathematics achievement refers to the score of a student in the thirty-item teacher-
Related Literature
Conceptual literature cited should be taken from books, news papers or magazines. The
Statements copied verbatim from original sources should be typed single space inset. It is
advised that long citations should be paraphrased. In this case, the researchers should
restate the author’s thoughts in his or her own words. Citations should be documented
properly following the APA format. The researchers must provide a critique for every
abstracted literature. This should focus on the quality of the data and not based on
personal opinion.
Read and evaluate the relevance of the literature to your topic. After selection,
organize the literature into a coherent picture of studies and documents on your topic.
Provide a topic side heading for each group. Literature can also be presented in sequence
To find out the relevance of the literature, the following questions may be used to
Topic relevance: Is the literature on the same topic as your proposed study?
Individual and site relevance: Does the literature examine the same individuals
Problem relevance: Does the literature examine the same research problem as
Related Studies
This should be taken from published or unpublished thesis, journals and other research
arrangement should be based on the paradigm. There is a need to cite those studies which
are relevant to the study. In presenting the related studies, the researchers need to cite the
methodology, the participants, the data analysis procedure, and the major findings. There
is a need to use the researchers own words in presenting the review. Citations should be
documented properly following the APA format. The researchers must provide a critique
for every abstracted related study. This should focus on the quality of the data, quality of
The researchers need to cite first the similarities of the related literature and study
with the researchers own study. Then, cite the aspects where they differ. After which, cite
the aspects that make the study original or novel. Similarities and differences should be
Note: For qualitative studies which are inductive in nature, this chapter is omitted in
this portion and related literatures and studies are integrated in the results and
discussion chapter/s or collapsed in the theoretical framework as the case may be.
Chapter 3
Methods
A research method refers to the design for data collection and data analysis. The
comparative. For experimental study it could be true experiment (post-test only, pretest-
(nonequivalent control group before-after, time series, time series nonequivalent control
group design, time series with multiple institutions of treatment, time series with
intensified treatment, time series with withdrawn and reinstituted treatment), and pre-
experiment (nonequivalent control group after-only, one group before-after). The specific
design features must be presented (refer to p. 203 of Nursing Research, Polit & Beck,
2008).
Environment
presented with its locale. The research environment presents a profile, historical account,
vision-mission, and the feature of the participants being studied. Present the practices,
experimental, we only present the research locale without the research environment.
Participants
use the appropriate terminology, informants for qualitative researchers, respondents for
those who answer the questionnaire, and subjects for those being acted upon by the study.
Describe the respondents by presenting the eligibility criteria (including inclusion and
exclusion criteria). This includes the characteristics and profile of the research
This presents a table of participants which depicts the population size, sample size
study, probability sampling designs are recommended, but may use nonprobability
recommendations.
purposively chosen. Another set of informants may be purposively chosen for focused
group discussions.
For phenomenology, five to ten informants are chosen utilizing criterion sampling
method, a specific type of purposive sampling design. All participants must have
experienced the phenomenon and must be able to articulate what is like to have lived that
experience.
people, using theoretical sampling. The goal is to select informants who can best
contribute to the evolving theory. Sampling, data collection, data analysis, and theory
construction occur concurrently, and so study participants are selected serially and
Instruments
need to decide on the type of research instrument that will best gather the data and
interpreting the instrument. Make sure the instructions are clear and explicit. Erroneous
instructions will affect the respondent’s responses and likewise the data.
adopted. There is also a need to mention the source or author of the scoring pattern being
adopted. Describe the scoring or point system for every variable. The data quantification
should help in the statistical analysis. Explain also how the data will be interpreted.
Discuss validation of the instrument, its validity and reliability and/or the need for
adopted from previous studies more often than not, do not need to be revalidated. When
changes or revisions have been made to suit the needs of the study, there is a need for
revalidation.
Instruments used from published studies that are not culture free needs validation
and item analysis. Instruments used in unpublished studies that are not rigorously
validation (at least 3 experts) and face validation (pre-testing). There is also a need to
frame item analysis through three reliability tests. Cite the justification why there is no
Dry Run Procedures. This segment renders an exposition of the dry run
procedures for establishing the functionality and reliability of the data collection
instruments.
Data Collection. This segment describes and narrates the step-by-step process,
courses of action or sequence of events in the administration of the instruments and the
retrieval of accomplished instruments. This includes what the researchers actually intend
to do and the individuals who will act as research aid. Take note of unusual events,
observant and take note of whatever happens during data gathering, if triangulation was
employed.
This segment discusses in detail the treatment of data. This presents the statistical
tests used in the processing of data. Describe the statistical tools used and for what
purpose it is used. There is no need to include the different formula/e and the legend for
the symbols used. Indicate also at what level of significance the interpretations will be
based. If a software was used in the computation, then indicate the software and its
For qualitative research, please discuss on the specific data analysis procedure.
coding qualitative data. For ethnography, phenomenology and grounded theory, please
utilize specific analysis techniques. For ethnography, the researcher needs to use analysis
analysis. For grounded theory, the researcher needs to use specific grounded theory
analysis including Glaser and Strauss’s Grounded Theory Method, or the Strauss and
Corbin’s Approach. For descriptive qualitative studies not based on specific traditions,
Specific data analysis procedures for focus group data and triangulated data
Present an introductory statement for this chapter. The chapter is organized and
divided into topics according to the sub-problems. The researchers present only relevant
data.
Since qualitative data is narrative and extensive, one theme should be presented in one
chapter and subthemes are emphasized with a header. Analyze the basic data and interpret
them in the light of the related literature. If opinions would substantiate the findings then
In reporting quantitative data, summarize the results and analysis through tables,
information on the value of the test, degree of freedom, probability level, and the
direction of the effect. The analysis of data should be objective and logical. Interpret the
results in a narrative form after the table Textual presentation should supplement or
expand the contents of tables and charts, rather than duplicate them. Present facts as
much as possible. If opinions would substantiate the findings then it should be supported
with related literatures. In interpreting data, point those that are consistent or inconsistent
SUMMARY
The Summary is the recapitulation of the problems and the methodology. Present
briefly on how the research was conducted including the summary of the problem in
study.
FINDINGS
Present in outline form the main findings without giving any interpretation. The
order should follow the sequences of the topics previously based on the sub-problems.
CONCLUSIONS
presents broad statements or generalizations based on the findings of the study with the
purpose of answering the main problems. Broad generalizations not supported by data or
findings should be avoided. The statements should be based from the theory used.
RECOMMENDATIONS
findings and conclusions of the study itself. The researchers are advised to suggest five
related studies related to the undertaken study. These would serve as research buds. It
includes; (1) replication study for triangulation purposes; (2) more advanced or
sophisticated methodology based from the evidence-based practice hierarchy; (3) studies
that would cover areas uncovered by the present research; and (4) improved methodology
American
Psychological
Association (APA)
APPENDICES
2. Make sure that whatever you append are related to your study and will be useful
1. Never use personal pronouns like: I, me, we, are, us and you.
3. Observe confidentiality.
6. Paging before chapter 1, use the lower case letters. (i, ii, iii, etc.)
9. Page number should be written at the upper right corner of the page.
10. Define major terms as presented in title and subproblems of the study.
11. Borders should be measured one and one-half inches from left side while
12. Everything should be in double space except for direct paragraph/long quotations