Anda di halaman 1dari 20

i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

journalhomepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/he

Optimal design of a radial-flow membrane reactor as a novel


configuration for continuous catalytic regenerative naphtha
reforming process considering a detailed kinetic model

a a a a
Davood Iranshahi , Mitra Jafari , Razieh Rafiei , Mohsen Karimi ,
a a,b,
Shahram Amiri , Mohammad Reza Rahimpour *
a Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz
71345, Iran
bDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA
95616, United States

article info abstract

Article history: The significance of the catalytic naphtha reforming process in the petroleum refining and petrochemical
Received 17 December 2012 industry generates continuous evolution of the technology. These im-provements would be observed in
Received in revised form 9 April presenting more efficient reactor setups in order to improve production yield and operating conditions, as well
2013 as elucidating better kinetic and deactivation models with higher predicting ability. Both of these items have
Accepted 12 April 2013 Available been considered in this work. An optimized radial-flow moving bed membrane reactor has been proposed as a
online 22 May 2013 novel configuration for naphtha reforming process. Optimization has been carried out by differential
evolution (DE) method considering 40 decision variables. A detailed kinetic model has also been presented.
Keywords: The proposed kinetic model consists of 32 lumped pseudo-components and 84 reactions. Deactivation rate of
Naphtha reforming catalyst has also been taken into account by considering coke deposition on both acidic and metallic sites.
Continuous catalyst regeneration Plant data have been used to validate the modeling results. In order to assess the performance of the proposed
Membrane reactor configuration, the obtained modeling results have been compared with those of conventional configuration,
Kinetic model which shows the superiority of the presented one.
Deactivation model
Differential evolution
Copyright ª 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction existing gasoline production processes. In this regard, exten-sive


investigations have been accomplished to improve the performance of
Worldwide growing environmental concerns on one hand and increasing catalytic naphtha reforming process as one of the most important
demand to gasoline on the other hand have moti-vated researchers to find processes in refining industries. This process has a main role in petroleum
new approaches for increasing oc-tane number of gasoline as well as refining to obtain high octane number gasoline and in the petrochemical
improving the yield of industry to

* Corresponding author. Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz
71345, Iran. Tel.: þ98 711 2303071; fax: þ98 711 6287294.
E-mail addresses: mrahimpour@ucdavis.edu, rahimpor@shirazu.ac.ir (M.R. Rahimpour).
0360-3199/$ e see front matter Copyright ª 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.059
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8385

produce aromatics (mostly benzene, toluene, and xylenes). Hydrogen, as a been made by Smith in 1959 [5]. His model consists of three basic
valuable component, and liquefied petroleum gas are also produced in components including paraffins, naphthenes, and aro-matics (PNA),
both cases. which undergo four reactions. Krane et al. [6] investigated the presence of
various hydrocarbons in the whole naphtha and presented a reaction
1.1. Continuous catalyst regeneration reformer (CCR) network of twenty different components, containing hydrocarbons from
C6 to C10. Padmavathi et al. [7] considered 26 lumps of hydrocarbons
Catalytic naphtha reforming units could be categorized ac-cording to the undergoing 48 reactions. Evolution in the considered number of lumped
catalyst regeneration procedure into three main classes, including semi- components and reactions in catalytic naphtha reforming kinetic is
regenerative catalytic reformer (SRR), cyclic catalytic reformer, and presented in Table 1.
continuous catalyst regenera-tion reformer (CCR).

SRR is the most commonly used type of the catalytic reforming units 1.3. Membrane reactor
[1]. In this process, reactors operate continu-ously and catalyst activity
decreases mainly due to the coke deposition. At the end of the cycle, Membrane reactors are widely used either as “extractor” in which certain
which occurs approxi-mately once each 6e24 months, all of the catalysts products remove from reaction zone or as “distributer” in which a certain
are re-generated in situ during routine catalyst regeneration shutdowns. To reactant distributes into the reactor [18]. This effective configuration has
maximize the length of time (cycle) between regenerations, SRR units are various advan-tages such as increasing reaction rate, reducing by product
operated at high pressures, about 1.380e2.070 MPa. formation, requiring lower energy, and operating under rela-tively safe
conditions. Several researchers have investigated the application of
membrane technology in chemical reaction processes. Dittmeyer et al.
In the cyclic catalytic reformer unit, an extra spare or swing reactor [19] studied pd-membrane reactors and discussed two different membrane
exists and each reactor can be removed from the process flow, reactor concepts which both rely on supported palladium, on the one hand
regenerated, and then put back into service without shutting down the unit as a permselective membrane material, and on the other hand as base
and losing production. It should be mentioned that application of the component of a membrane-type hydrogenation catalyst. Pereira et al. [20]
cyclic catalytic reformer unit for naphtha reforming process is not very studied ethyl lactate synthesis in a perva-poration membrane reactor.
common. The operational pressure of cyclic reforming re-actors is Parvasi et al. [21] analyzed PdeAg membrane methanol loop reactors and
approximately 1.5 MPa. applied differential evolution (DE) method as a powerful method for
optimization of the process.
The most modern type of the catalytic reformers is CCR, which
represents a step change in reforming technology compared to semi-
regenerative and cyclic processes. In this unit, the catalyst regenerates
continuously in a special regen-erator and then is sent to the operating
reactors. Due to the continuous regeneration of the catalyst, this process is 1.4. Objective
suited for higher severity operations relative to semi-regenerative fixed-
bed reformers [2,3]. The CCR process has enabled ultra-low pressure In this work the benefits of the membrane reactor and the continuous
operations at about 0.345 MPa. The advantages of CCR process against catalyst regeneration mode of operation has been combined to improve
traditional methods are [3,4]: the performance of the catalytic naphtha reforming unit. The flow pattern
in the reactor is considered to be radial-flow due to its advantageous over

Production of higher octane reformate even working with a low feed


quality
Long time working of the process for hydrogen demand
Table 1 e Evolution in the considered number of lumped
Using catalyst with less stability but higher selectivity and yield
components and number of reactions in catalytic

Lower required recycle ratio and the lower operational pressure with naphtha reforming kinetic.
high yield of hydrogen Number of Number of Year Investigator Reference
lumped reactions
component
3 4 1959 Smith [5]
1.2. Kinetic model
31 78 1980 Jenkins et al. [8]
28 81 1987 Froment [9]
It is revealed that naphtha is a complex mixture of more than 300 35 36 1997 Taskar et al. [10]
components, mainly hydrocarbons. Considering all of these components 26 48 1997 Padmavathi et al. [7]
and their corresponding reactions in a ki-netic model is a complex 24 71 2000 Ancheyta- [11]
problem. In order to take into ac-count the main components and Juarez et al.
reactions, as well as avoiding the complexity of considering large number 17 17 2004 Hu et al. [12]
21 51 2004 Hu et al. [13]
of components and reactions, “lumped” models have been presented. In
20 31 2006 Weifeng et al. [14]
this kind of model, the large numbers of chemical components are
18 17 2006 Weifeng et al. [15]
classified to smaller set of kinetic lumps. The first significant attempt to 27 52 2010 Hongjun et al. [16]
model a reforming system by this approach has 38 86 2012 Wang et al. [17]
8386 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

axial-flow pattern such as lower pressure drop. A reaction network coated by a PdeAg membrane layer. Hydrogen permeates from reaction
containing 32 pseudo-component and 84 reactions has also been area to the gap through membrane, and is car-ried by the sweeping gas
presented. Then for modeling the conventional and membrane reactor, which flows radially. Catalyst moves axially and the feedstock flows
mass and energy balances, thermo-dynamic and kinetic equations, radially inward the reaction media. The operating conditions and specific
deactivation model, and auxiliary relations have been applied. The properties of the catalyst and reactor of this configuration are presented in
obtained conven-tional reactor model has been validated by comparing Table 3.
with industrial data. DE method has been used to optimize the membrane
reactor characteristics and operating conditions via optimization of 40
decision variables. Finally, the perfor-mance of the optimized membrane
reactor (OMR) has been compared with that of conventional reactor (CR) 3. Reaction model
to assess OMR superiority.
3.1. Kinetic model

Naphtha feedstock is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons, mainly


naphthenes, paraffins, and aromatics, which undergo various reactions. In
2. Process description petroleum, naphthenes (cycloalkanes) mostly consist of a hydrocarbon
ring of either five or six carbon atoms. The most important reaction of
2.1. Conventional naphtha reforming process in CCR naphthenes is dehydrogenation in which naphthenes are transformed into
mode of operation aromatics. Other possible reactions of naphthene hydrocar-bons are
dehydrocyclization, ring isomerization, and cracking to produce paraffins.
Paraffins (alkanes) are the main components of virgin naphtha. Straight-
As depicted in Fig. 1(a), the conventional CCR unit consists of four
chain paraffins are transformed into branched paraffins by isomerization.
radial-flow moving bed reactors with intermediate heaters as well as a
Paraffins also undergo dehydrocyclization to form naph-thenes and
catalyst regenerator. The naphtha feed-stock is combined with a recycle
aromatics. Other important reaction is hydro-cracking which result in low
stream to adjust the H2/HC in the reactors to reduce the possibility of coke molecular weight paraffins. Aromatics which contain one or more
formation in the reactor, and then is sent to the first reactor. In the polyunsaturated rings (conjugated double bonds) have high octane
presented reactor configuration, as depicted in Fig. 1(b), the flow enters
numbers. The reactivity of the unsaturated bonds makes the C 6, C7, and
the reactor and moves downward along the wall of reactor, and then
passes radially from the reaction side, where catalysts present, to take part C8 aromatics important building blocks for the petrochemical industries.
in the reactions. After leaving the reaction part, the product is collected
via a collector in which products flow axially in a downward direction.
Before entering the next reactor, this stream should be heated by a furnace
because the endothermicity of naphtha reforming reaction contributes to
decrease in temperature along the catalyst bed. The catalysts moves These components and their relative reactions are taken into account
slowly downwards under the gravity force and are sent to the next reactor in different kinetic models. In this study, a new kinetic model is proposed
via lift gas method. After passing through four reactors, the catalysts are for catalytic naphtha reforming reaction. This model, which is an
sent to the regenerator and the regenerated catalysts are entered to the first extension of Padmavathi’s model [7], contains 32 lumps of components
reactor again. undergoing 84 reactions. In the presented model, the naphtha feed has
been characterized by naphthenes (alkylcyclohexanes: ACH, alkyl-
cyclopentanes: ACP), paraffins (normal paraffins: NP, iso-paraffins: IP),
The obtained stream from the last reactor is cooled and sent to the and aromatics (A) lumps. The considered hydrocarbon groups range from
separator, in which hydrogen rich gas separates from hydrocarbons. A 5 to 9þ carbon atoms for naphthenes, 1 to 9þ carbon atoms for paraffins,
specified fraction of the hydrogen rich gas is passed to a compressor and and 6 to 9þ carbon atoms for aromatics. The main difference between the
then combined with the naphtha charge. The other fraction of the Padmavati’s model and our model is that in their model C 8 aromatics were
hydrogen rich gas is collected as a main by product to be used in the other not subdivided in details, while in this study C8 aromatics, as main
hydrogen consumer units. The obtained liquid from separator mostly products of process, are subdivided to four pseudo-components
comprises of desired reformate product but light gases also exist. (Ethylbenzene, Para-xylene, Meta-xylene and Ortho-xylene). In addition,
Therefore, this liquid is sent to a stabilizer and the obtained reformate reactions such as dehydrocyclization of paraffins to aromatics,
from the bottom of the stabilizer is sent to storage for gasoline blending. isomerization of aromatics, and transalkylation, which were not
The operating conditions as well as specific properties of the catalyst and considered in Padmavati’s model, are taken into account in this new
reactor of the in-dustrial plant are presented in Table 2. model. The network kinetic of the proposed reaction model is pre-sented
in Fig. 3. Except for cracking of naphthenes and par-affins and the
hydrodealkylation reactions, other reactions are reversible. Hydrogen
production and consumption as well as thermodynamic and kinetic
2.2. Radial-flow moving bed membrane reactor comparison of the main reforming reactions are presented in Table 4.
configuration

In this novel configuration, as demonstrated in Fig. 2, the cross section


area is divided into some subsections, in which two different areas are
provided as areas for reacting of the re-actants and flowing of sweeping Detailed information about the reactions and their corre-sponding rate
gas. The walls of the gaps are equations are presented in Appendix A.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8387

Fig. 1 e (a) A simple process flow diagram for conventional catalytic naphtha reforming CCR unit, (b) A schematic diagram of conventional radial-flow
moving bed reactor.
8388 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

During operation, the catalyst undergoes physiochemical changes,


Table 2 e Specifications of reactors, feed, product and catalyst of which contribute to reduction in the activity for ar-omatic production. In
plant for fresh catalyst.
the catalytic naphtha reforming pro-cess, coke formation is the most
Parameter Numerical value Unit
important cause of the catalyst deactivation [25]. Prediction of coke
Naphtha feedstock 233,637.01 Kg/hr
formation is a very complex task because this phenomenon depends on
Reformate 216,488.63 Kg/hr
various parameters such as operating conditions, oil feed composition, and
H2/HC mole ratio 2.193 e
catalyst properties. Many researchers studied the effect of these factors on
Mole percent of 0.83 e
hydrogen in recycle catalyst activity, and reported relations to consider this effect on the
reaction rate.
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
reactor reactor reactor reactor
In this work, a catalyst deactivation model is presented based on the
Inlet temperature (K) 798 798 798 798
accomplished studies [26e28]. This model is presented in Appendix B.
Inlet pressure (kPa) 595 550 505 460
Inner and outer 1.25, 1.25, 1.30, 1.3,
diameter (m) 2.19 2.35 2.53 2.89
Length (m) 8.50 10.35 12.1 15.39
Catalyst 12 18 25 45 4. Mathematical model
distribution (wt %)
In this section, attempts are made to develop an accurate mathematical
Distillation fraction of naphtha feed
model for radial-flow moving bed membrane reactor for catalytic naphtha
ASTM D86 Naphtha feed ( C) reforming reaction. Radial- and axial-flow are considered for sweep gas
IBP 81 and catalyst in the reactors, respectively. The following assumptions are
5% 91.2 made during the modeling step:
10% 93.2
20% 96.9
30% 101.1
The reactors operate in steady-state condition.
40% 105.7
50% 111.4 Cross flow pattern (catalyst moves axially downward and gas stream
60% 117.6 moves radially) is considered in the reactors.
70% 124.5 Mass and heat diffusion is neglected in both radial and axial directions
80% 132.7 of reactor.
90% 143.1 Homogeneous catalyst moving bed is considered. Ideal gas
95% 150.5 law is applied (Due to high temperature).
FBP 159
Heat loss is considered to be negligible (insulated outlet wall).
Typical properties of catalyst
Peripheral gradient (gradient along the perimeter) is ignored.
dp 1.8 mm
Pt 0.3 wt%
Sn 0.3 wt% Intra-pellet heat and mass diffusion in catalyst pellet are ignored.
s
a
220 m2/g
rB 680 Kg/m
3 Effects of membrane support are neglected.
ε 0.36 e Membrane is just permeable for hydrogen. The
Sievert’s law is applicable.

3.2. Catalyst deactivation model The basic structure of the model consists of heat and mass balance
equations, which are considered in two dimensions. These equations
Naphtha reforming catalyst is a bifunctional catalyst consists of a metal should be coupled with auxiliary relations such as the deactivation model,
function, mainly platinum, and an acid function, usually chloride alumina. thermodynamic and kinetic re-lations, and auxiliary correlations to be able
The metal function mainly cata-lyzes the hydrodealkylation and to predict physical properties as well as operating conditions and molar
dehydrogenation reactions and the acid function mostly promotes the flow rate of pseudo-components. In order to derive the equations, heat and
isomerization re-actions [22]. In addition, some of the reactions such as material balance equations are written upon a small element of the reactor.
hy-drocracking or dehydrocyclization occur on either or both of these The flow pattern of the feedstock in the membrane reactor is assumed to
functions. be radial, while catalysts move axially. The corresponding mass and
energy balance equations, the pres-sure drop correlation, hydrogen
The yield of catalytic naphtha reforming process depends strongly on permeation rate, and velocity distribution are presented in Table 5.
the catalyst properties. In order to improve the catalyst activity, stability,
and selectivity various metals such as Re, Ir, Rh, Ge, In, and Sn have been
added to the metal function. Among these secondary metals, tin prevents
coke deposition on the Pt metal particles and support, also enhances the
selectivity to aromatics and the stability of Pt/Al 2O3 [23]. PteSn catalysts 5. Optimization
are regenerated easily, thus they are used in the systems in which the
catalyst is regenerated continuously [24]. DE optimization technique has been widely used as an efficient and
simple method. In this research, DE algorithm is used to
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8389

Fig. 2 e A schematic diagram of radial-flow moving bed membrane reactor.

optimize the characteristics as well as operating conditions of the The ratio of hydrogen/hydrocarbon affects the coke deac-tivation.
membrane reactor in CCR mode of operation in order to achieve higher Low H2/HC ratio causes catalyst deactivation due to the coke formation.
production of aromatics and hydrogen and saving in operation and Hydrogen is produced during naphtha reforming reaction and removed
fabrication costs. Employing DE, very little input is required from the from reaction media by the mean of membrane. The value of this
user. The main input variables chosen by the user are NP, number of parameter in the input of the reactor is equal to 2.193. If the value of
populations, F, scaling factor (step size) and CR, crossover constant, H2/HC ratio be-comes less than this amount, coke deposition increases
which their value depend on the conditions of the issue. In this work, the considerably. Thus, the amount of the passed hydrogen through membrane
value of NP is set to be equal to 360. DE step size, which generally should should be controlled in a way that in each reactor this ratio remains higher
be in the range of 0.5e1.0 [29], is chosen to be 0.8. The value of CR is than 2.193. Therefore, the following constrain is applied to control H 2/HC
chosen to be equal to 0.8. ratio:

The following objective function is considered to maximize the yield ðH2 =HCÞ 2:193 (2)
In situ
and production of aromatics and hydrogen:

DFAr DFH
OF ¼ YAr þ YH2 þ þ 2
(1) Due to the presence of membrane, H2/HC ratio in OMR is less than CR.
2500 2000
Decrease in the value of H2/HC contributes to an increase in the amount
where Y and DF denote yield and production, respectively. In order to give
equal weights to each term during the optimi-zation procedure, the above
terms are divided by appropriate numbers (2500 for aromatics production
and 2000 for hydrogen production) in a way to have the same order of
magnitude. This avoids maximizing one term while the other terms are not
at their optimum values. In fact, both yield and production can be
maximized simultaneously in this way.
of coke deposition. In order to avoid higher amount
of coke deposition in OMR respect to CR, the
amount of the deposited coke over catalyst in OMR
is adjusted to be less than conventional reactor,
which is 5%. In contin-uous catalyst regeneration
mode of operation, the amount of deposited coke
could be controlled by adjusting the rate of catalyst
circulation. The corresponding constrain is written
as:
8390 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

(17)

(15)

(11)
(6)
(13)
(4)

(14) (18)
CC %5
(12) Sum of the mass distribution of catalyst in the reactors, must be
equal to 1. The relative constrain in OMR is defined by:

(10)(16)
X

Wi ¼
(1)
(2) where i represents the number of the reactors, and Wi is the
mass distribution of the catalysts in each reactor.
(3) In order to avoid high pressure drop, the following constrain is
applied to keep the pressure drop in each reactor less than 25 kPa.

(5) DPi <


25 kPa
Parameter Numerical value Unit
H2/HC mole ratio 2.193 e
Mole percent of 0.767 e
Table 3 e Specifications of reactors, feed and catalyst of membrane hydrogen in recycle
reactor for fresh catalyst.
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
reactor reactor reactor reactor
Inlet temperature (K) 798 798 798 798
(6)
Inlet reaction side 594.137 548.216 504.810 458.840
YOMR > YCR
pressure (kPa) j j
Inlet sweep side 120 120 120 120 DFOMR > DFCR (7)
pressure (kPa)
Inner and outer 1.33, 1.49, 1.42, 1.18, j j
diameter (m) 2.80 2.51 2.54 2.62
where j represents the aromatic components (i.e. benzene, toluene, m-
Length (m) 8.65 13.31 14.95 15.69
Catalyst 21.4 21.6 25.4 31.6 xylene, p-xylene, o-xylene, ethylbenzene) and hydrogen.
distribution (wt %)
In order to consider all of the constraints in the optimiza-tion process,
Distillation fraction of naphtha feed the penalty function method has been used. In this method, a penalty
ASTM D86 Naphtha feed ( C) parameter is defined in a way to eliminate the unacceptable results
8
IBP 81 automatically. In this research the penalty parameter is 10 . The result to
5% 91.2 be mini-mized is:
10% 93.2
20% 96.9
7
30% 101.1 X

40% 105.7 Result ¼ OF þ 108 G k2 (8)


k¼1
50% 111.4
60% 117.6 where:
70% 124.5 H2
80% 132.7
90% 143.1 G1 ¼ max 0; 2:193 HC (9)
95% 150.5
FBP 159 G2 ¼ maxf0; ðC% 5%Þg (10)

Typical properties of catalyst G3 ¼ max 0; 1:00001 ðW1 þ W2 þ W3 þ WÞ4 (11)

dp 1.8 mm
Pt 0.3 wt%
Sn 0.3 wt%
s 220 2 G4 ¼ maxf0; ððW1 þ W2 þ W3 þ W4Þ 0:99999Þg (12)
a m /g
r 680 3
B Kg/m 4
ε 0.36 e
X

G5 ¼ maxf0; ðDPi 25Þg (13)


i¼1
8

G6 ¼ max 0; YiCR YiOMR (14)


i¼1
8
max 0; DFiCR DFiOMR (15)
G7 ¼

X
i¼1

In order to optimize the characteristics as well as operating conditions


of the OMR, 40 decision variables have been selected. These variables
with their optimized values are presented in Table 6.

6.Numerical solution
(4) The obtained governing equations and auxiliary relations of the system
are partial differential equations (PDEs) which should be solved by
appropriate method. To solve this set of equations, forward finite
difference approximation is applied here. In this method, the reactor is
divided into a series of nodes and for each node; derivatives in differential
equations become difference equations that are functions of the
surrounding cells. Then, boundary conditions of the
(5)
In addition, the following constrains are applied to ensure that the yield
and production of aromatics and hydrogen in OMR remain higher than
CR.
process are used for initial nodes of the reactor and the
result of each node is used as boundary conditions for the
following nodes and this procedure is repeated for all
nodes in the reactor.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8391

r
69
r ACH9+
n-P9+
29 r A
r r39
19
9+
r
49
r99
i-P9+
r ACP9+
79
59

r r
18-4
118
r r r
68-1 68-2 18-2

2
r MX
n-P8 r ACH8 r r

X
O
18-1
28 102 OX 169-1
r r38 r106 r104

103
48
r 98

r r

r
r r

10
68-4
i-P8 58 ACP8 78-4
EB 105 PX
r
r r r 68-3
r
78-1 18-3 78-3 117
r
78-2

2T
r
67 r r
r
2
r 168-1 169-2
17
7
n-P7 ACH7 T
r r37
47
r 97

r
87

5
i-P7 7
ACP7 r
66
r
77

r B r
16
168-2 r
r 167
26
n-P6 ACH6
r r36 r
157
46
96

r
r

r
86

i-P6 56
ACP6
r
76

CP
r r r r r r r
55
i-P5 146 147 158 148 159 149
r95
45

r r r r r r
r

r 127 137 126 136 156


129 139 r128 r138 n-P5 r r r r r r r r r
94
i-P4 135
146 157 147 158 148 159 149
r r r r r r r r
r129 r139 r128 138 127 137 126 136 155 125 156
n-P4 r r r r r r r
r 146 157 147 158 148 159 149
r r 135
129 139 r128 r138
r r r r r r r P r
3
r r r r r r r r r
146 157 147 158 148 159 149 168-2
r129
r
139 r128 r138
127 137 126 136 155 12 124 134 156
r
5
r r r r r r r 169-2
146 157 147 158 148 159 149
r r r r
r r r r r r r r r r
r 123

r129 139 128 r138 176 168-1 r169-1


127 137 126 136 155 12 124 134 135 156
P 2

r r r r r r r r r r
r 122

127 137 126 136 155 12 124 134 135 156

5
P
1

Fig. 3 e The kinetic network of the proposed reaction model.

could be concluded that the mathematical model is able to predict the


7. Model validation results appropriately.

The obtained data from conventional model is compared with commercial


data from The Nouri Petrochemical Company in order to check the
validity of the mentioned model. Table 7 presents the experimental and 8. Results and discussion
the predicted data from the model for the CR. Obviously, the predicted
results do not deviate from the experimental results significantly. Thus, it In this section, obtained results of the reactor modeling, by considering
the offered kinetic and deactivation model in CCR

Table 4 e Thermodynamic and kinetic comparison of the main reforming reactions [30].
Reaction Reaction Thermal effect Reach thermodynamic H
2
rate equilibrium
Cyclohexane Dehydrogenation Very rapid Very endothermic Yes Produces
Naphthene Isomerization Rapid Exothermic Yes None
Paraffin Isomerization Rapid Slightly exothermic Yes None
Paraffin Dehydrocyclization Slow Very endothermic Yes Produces
Hydrocracking Very slow Exothermic No Consumes
Hydrodealkylation Very slow Exothermic No Consumes
8392 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

Table 5 e Mass and energy balances and auxiliary relations for OMR in CCR system.
Mass balance (Reaction side)
ai nr
ij i
8
JH2 j ¼ H2 ; P H2PH ¼
i 1; 2; .; m
s 2
C m
NOS 0 jsH2 j 1; 2; .; n
vCj j Cj vur rb <
JH2 j H2; PH2
s (16)
vr ¼ r u r vr þ
ur i¼1 pr Rq ur > PH2 ¼
X

Mass balance (Sweep gas side) : ¼

s r s 8 ;P P ¼
JH2 j ¼ H2 sH2 H2
vCjs Cjs Cj vu s
NOS s
< 0 jsH2 s
j 1; 2; .; n (17)
vr ¼ r ur vr þ
pr ð1 Rq ur JH2 j ¼ H2; PH2 > PH2
Energy balance (Reaction side) :

vT rb X
m NOS s

¼ ðDHi ai rÞ þ U ðT TÞ
vr urCTCP i¼1 i pr Rq ur CT CP
(18)
NOS JH2 HH2 HH2 PH2 PHs2
s
þ ( HH2 H
s
pr Rq ur CT CP J H2 þ H2 PH2 > PH2
Energy balance (Sweep gas side)

vTs NOS U ðT TsÞ

vr ¼ pr ð1 RqÞ urs CTs CP PH2 PHs2 (19)


NOS JH2HH2 HH2
s s ( HH2 H
s
P
s
> PH2
pr ð1 RqÞ ur CT CP JH2 þ H2 H2
Hydrogen permeation rate
H
J
2 Q 0exp RT2
P
H 2
PHSweep
EH
d pffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
¼ H2 ðj ffiffi
ffi2jÞ
1

5 1 1
Q0 ¼ 1:65 10 mol$m $s $kPa 2

EH2 ¼ 15:7 kJ$mol 1 (20)


Velocity distribution (Reaction side)
n m
vur ur ur vCT r NOS JH
b CT P Ps
H2
vr ¼
r CT vr þ
CT j 1 i 1
ai nijri
XX
pr Rq J2 H2 H2
(21)
¼ ¼

velocity distribution (Sweep gas side)


vurs urs urs vCTs NOS JH2 PsH2 PHs2

(22)
¼ þ
vr r CTs vr pr ð1 RqÞ CTs JH2 PH2 > PH2
Collector (Reaction side)
vFj 2pRi Rq j ¼ 1; 2; .; n
vz ¼NOS ureCje

vT 1 2pR T 2pR T vC
(2
i i P

ureRqCTe
vz ¼ FTCP NOS CTeureRqCpe ðTe TÞ FT NOS CP vz
Collector (Sweep gas side) 3)
s 2pR
vFj i s s RqÞ j ¼ 1; 2; .;
n
vz ¼ NOS ureCje ð1
vTs CTesures 2pRi ð1 RqÞ Cpe s s
2pRi
s s
Ts vCP
Ts
(24)
vz ¼ FTsCP NOS Te T F Ts NOS ure ð1 RqÞ CTe CP vz
Ergun equation (Pressure drop)
dP rþ 1:75r ð1 εÞ
150m ð1 εÞ2 u
u2r (25)
dr ¼ fs2dp2 ε3
f
sdp ε3
Additional relations

q1
Rq ¼
q1 þ q2 (2
6)
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8393

Table 6 e The optimized parameters for moving bed membrane reactor in CCR naphtha reforming process.
No. Decision variable Plant value Min. Max. Optimized value
1 Inlet temperature of the first reactor (K) 798 600 798 798
2 Inlet temperature of the second reactor (K) 798 600 798 798
3 Inlet temperature of the third reactor (K) 798 600 798 798
4 Inlet temperature of the fourth reactor (K) 798 600 798 798
5 Pressure of inlet feed to the 1st reactor (kPa) 595 300 595 594.137
6 Pressure of inlet feed to the 2nd reactor (kPa) 550 300 550 548.216
7 Pressure of inlet feed to the 3rd reactor (kPa) 505 300 505 504.810
8 Pressure of inlet feed to the 4th reactor (kPa) 460 300 460 458.840
9 Number of subsections (NOS) for the 1st reactor e 4 100 51.362
10 Number of subsections (NOS) for the 2nd reactor e 4 100 34.753
11 Number of subsections (NOS) for the 3rd reactor e 4 100 22.057
12 Number of subsections (NOS) for the 4th reactor e 4 100 13.993
13 Total fresh naphtha feed to the plant (kmol/h) 2196.37 2000 3000 2705.428
14 Hydrogen mole fraction in the recycle gas 0.8293 0.50 0.99 0.767
15 Catalyst circulation velocity (m/s) 7.660 10 5 7 10 5 50 10 5 20.25 10 5
16 Catalyst distribution for the 1st reactor (weight fraction) 0.1207 0.01 0.99 0.214
17 Catalyst distribution for the 2nd reactor (weight fraction) 0.1798 0.01 0.99 0.216
18 Catalyst distribution for the 3rd reactor (weight fraction) 0.2498 0.01 0.99 0.254
19 Catalyst distribution for the 4th reactor (weight fraction) 0.4497 0.01 0.99 0.316
20 Inner radius of collector for the 1st reactor (m) 0.625 0.20 1.00 0.663
21 Inner radius of collector for the 2nd reactor (m) 0.625 0.20 1.00 0.744
22 Inner radius of collector for the 3rd reactor (m) 0.650 0.20 1.00 0.712
23 Inner radius of collector for the 4th reactor (m) 0.650 0.20 1.00 0.588
24 LOD of first reactor 3.883 2 7 3.092
25 LODof second reactor 4.404 2 7 5.298
26 LOD of third reactor 4.778 2 7 5.898
27 LOD of fourth reactor 5.324 2 7 5.979
28 Membrane thickness of 1st reactor (mm) e 1 10 10
29 Membrane thickness of 2nd reactor (mm) e 1 10 10
30 Membrane thickness of 3rd reactor (mm) e 1 10 8
31 Membrane thickness of 4th reactor (mm) e 1 10 9
32 Hydrogen mole fraction in the sweep gas e 0.01 1.00 0.972
33 Sweep gas molar flow rate of 1st reactor (kmol/h) e 10.00 100.00 32.226
34 Sweep gas molar flow rate of 2nd reactor (kmol/h) e 10.00 100.00 56.402
35 Sweep gas molar flow rate of 3rd reactor (kmol/h) e 10.00 100.00 82.230
36 Sweep gas molar flow rate of 4th reactor (kmol/h) e 10.00 100.00 57.143
37 The ratio of Rq; for the 1st reactor e 0.70 0.99 0.928
38 The ratio of Rq; for the 2nd reactor e 0.70 0.99 0.903
39 The ratio of Rq for the 3rd reactor e 0.70 0.99 0.880
40 The ratio of Rq for the 4th reactor e 0.70 0.99 0.834

system, are presented. The modeling results of OMR are compared with considered reactions may occur in each of the reactors, the possibility of
those of CR in three different subsections. At first, variation of occurrence of fast reactions in the initial reactors is more than the terminal
temperature, as one of the most important parameters, is presented. Then ones. Dehydrogenation of naph-thenes, which is a highly endothermic
catalyst deactivation which is an important parameter in the rate of reaction, is the fastest of all the reforming reactions, and mainly occurs in
reactions is compared in CR and OMR. Finally, production and the first reactor. This reaction continues in the second reactor along with
consumption of pseudo-components of both configurations are presented the isomerization which is an exothermic and moder-ately fast reaction.
as an acceptable evidence for superiority of OMR configuration over CR Dehydrocyclization is an endothermic and comparatively slow reaction,
one. and mostly takes place in the third reactor. Dehydrogenation reaction will
occur after dehydrocyclization and produced naphthens will be con-verted
In the aforementioned figures, some of the parameters are elucidated to aromatics. Hydrocracking, which is an exothermic and slow reaction,
in 3-D figures in which the change of parameter is demonstrated in radial occurs in the third and fourth reactor. Hydrodealkylation is also
and axial direction, while the change of others is demonstrated in 2-D considered as the slowest reaction. This exothermic reaction mostly
figures, along axial or radial di-rection. In the latter case, the average occurs in the last reactor. Although hydrocracking and hydrodealkylation
value of the investigated parameter is taken into account for the absent occur in the third and fourth reactors, they are not the predominant re-
dimension. actions in these reactors.

8.1. Temperature profile

Naphtha feedstock consists of many different hydrocarbons which While these reactions include both exothermic and endo-thermic ones,
undergo various reactions. Although each of the catalytic naphtha reforming is considered as an
8394 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

Table 7 e Comparison between model prediction and plant data.


Pseudo-components Molecular Plant input Plant output Model output Deviation
weight (mole fraction) (kmole/hr) (kmole/hr) (kmole/hr)
n-P6 (C6H14) 86.178 0.0229 71.84 70.98 0.86
n-P7 (C7H16) 100.205 0.0292 46.65 46 0.65
n-P8 (C8H18) 114.232 0.0239 8.1 7.63 0.47
n-P9 (C9H20) 128.259 0.0156 1.15 1.25 0.1
i-P6 (C6H14) 86.178 0.0232 216.06 216.06 0
i-P7 (C7H16) 100.25 0.0314 110.18 109.69 0.49
i-P8 (C8H18) 114.232 0.0338 22.75 22.67 0.08
i-P9 (C9H20) 128.259 0.0244 1.79 1.95 0.16
ACH6 (C6H12) 84.162 0.0077 0.51 0.92 0.41
ACH7 (C7H14) 98.189 0.0084 0.92 1.43 0.51
ACH8 (C8H16) 112.216 0.0115 2.33 2.34 0.01
ACH9 (C9H18) 126.243 0.0018 0.04 0.05 0.01
ACP5 (C5H10) 70.135 0.0001 2.14 2.11 0.03
ACP6 (C6H12) 84.162 0.003 26 26.02 0.02
ACP7 (C7H14) 98.189 0.0065 2.33 3.12 0.79
ACP8 (C8H16) 112.216 0.0084 0.6 0.6 0
ACP9 (C9H18) 126.243 0.0012 0.01 0.02 0.01
A6 (C6H6) 78.114 0.0086 205.84 206.39 0.55
A7 (C7H8) 92.141 0.0109 453.93 454.33 0.4
A8 (C8H10) 106.168 0.0021 163.02 163.47 0.45
A9 (C9H12) 120.195 0.0026 323.66 324.46 0.8
A8 (C8H10) 106.168 0.0015 113.62 113.4 0.22
A8 (C8H10) 106.168 0.0016 120.84 121.55 0.71
A8 (C8H10) 106.168 0.0036 276.56 276.8 0.24
H 2.016 0.6226 10071.31 10090.82 19.51
2

P1 (CH4) 16.043 0.0211 398.53 396.64 1.89


P2 (C2H6) 30.07 0.0231 399.16 397.72 1.44
P3 (C3H8) 44.097 0.0202 352.36 351.69 0.67
P4 (C4H10) 58.124 0.0106 189.21 189.93 0.72
P5 (C5H12) 72.151 0.0035 71.06 71.69 0.63
i-P4 58.124 0.0073 140.75 139.38 1.37
i-P5 72.151 0.0076 149.21 149.49 0.28

endothermic reaction. The endothermicity of this reaction is concluded variations along the radius of CR and OMR is depicted in Fig. 4(b).
from the positive value of total heat of reaction. Thus, temperature According to the considered reactions, endothermic re-actions, such as
reduction is expected as reaction proceeds. Temperature distribution along dehydrogenation and dehydrocyclization, mainly produce hydrogen and
CR as a function of dimen-sionless length and radius is depicted in Fig. exothermic reactions, such as hydrocracking and hydrodealkylation,
4(a). Temperature is reduced along the radius of all of the reactors which mainly consume hydrogen. As a result of hydrogen removal from reaction
in-dicates the predominance of the endothermic reactions. This decreasing medium, endothermic reactions shift to produce more hydrogen and more
trend reduces considerably from the first reactor to the forth one. This is heat consumes, while exothermic ones tend to consume less hydrogen and
mainly due to the degree of endo-thermiciy and exothermicity of the less heat generates. These effects contribute to more temperature
reactions that occur in these reactors. For instance, hydrocracking and reduction in OMR respect to CR.
hydro-dealkylation reactions, which are exothermic reactions, mostly
occur in the terminal reactors, thus the temperature reduction of these
reactors is less than the initial ones. It should be mentioned that the
temperature of the input stream of the three last reactors is increased to 8.2. Catalyst deactivation
that of the first one by the mean of intermediate heaters in order to
compensate the appeared temperature reduction. The observed increase in The yield of catalytic naphtha reforming process depends strongly on the
temperature through length of the reactors is due to the decrease in the catalyst properties. During operation, the catalyst undergoes
catalyst activity. Deposition of coke on the catalyst pellet contributes to physiochemical changes, which contribute to reduction in the activity for
reduction in the rate of reactions, therefore less heat consumes and aromatic production. In the catalytic naphtha reforming process, coke
temperature drop decreases along length of the reactor. formation is the most important cause of the catalyst deactivation. In this
section, the amount of deposited coke over catalyst and the catalyst
activity along radius and length of the reactors are discussed.

In order to assess the effect of hydrogen removal on the temperature Coke weight fraction along the length and radius of the CR is
profile of the reactors, the temperature demonstrated in Fig. 5(a). In this figure the generated
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8395

Fig. 4 e (a) Temperature distribution in CR as a function of dimensionless length and radius, (b) Temperature drop along radius of the OMR compared
with CR.

coke on metal and acid sites as well as total amount of generated coke are parameters, the membrane reactor is optimized in such a manner that the
depicted separately. Since metal and acid sites catalyze different reactions, weight percent of deposited coke becomes lower than that of conventional
different amount of coke deposits on these sites. ACP has been considered reactor (this issue is consid-ered as one of the optimization constrains).
as the most important hydrocarbon component involved in cata-lyst This aim is accompanied by adjusting H 2/HC ratio as well as catalyst
deactivation [26e28]. It could be concluded from equa-tions (31) and (32) movement velocity.
in Table B2 that reduction in ACP concentration contributes to reduction
in the rate of coke formation. Along the radius of the reactors, coke
formation decreases due to reduction in ACP concentration. In addi-tion, 8.3. Production and consumption of pseudo-components
temperature reduction contributes to decrease in the formation of coke.
The naphtha feedstock consists of a mixture of a several types of
paraffinic, naphthenic, and aromatic compounds under-going various
reactions. The goal of this section is the inves-tigation of the effect of
The amount of deposited coke over catalyst increases through length hydrogen removal from reaction medium along with optimization on
of the reactors due to the continuous coke deposition on the catalyst pellet pseudo-components molar flow rate. In order to reach this end, the
during its axial movement. It should be taken into consideration that production and consumption of different components through radius of
catalyst pellets move with a lift gas through one reactor to the other. In CR and OMR are compared.
this movement, catalyst pellets would be mixed, thus in the input of the
each reactor, the amount of the coke weight fraction is equal to an average Production of hydrogen, as a valuable by product of the naphtha
value of the coke weight fraction through radius in the outlet length of the reforming unit, has become increasingly desirable, since it is used in
previous reactor. hydro-processing units for removal of sulfur as well as for hydrocracking
reactions. As mentioned, although hydrogen is mainly produced in
With the aim of comparing the catalyst coke deposition and activity in naphtha reforming reaction, it consumes in a number of reactions. This
OMR and CR, total amount of the deposited coke in these reactors is produc-tion and consumption for main reforming reactions could be
shown in Fig. 5(b). Lower H2/HC ratio of OMR respect to CR contributes observed in Table 4. Hydrogen production through the radius of the CR
to higher coke deposition, while lower temperature and ACP and OMR is depicted in Fig. 6. During the process, hydrogen production
concentration result in lower coke formation in OMR respect to CR. rate increases along radius as hydrogen
Considering these
8396 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

180
a

Alkylcyclopentane consumption (kmol/h)


160 CR

OMR
140
120

100

80

60

40

20

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1


Radius of reactor (Dimensionless)
350
b
CR

300

(kmol/h)
250 OMR

consumption
200

Alkylcyclohexane
50

150
100

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1


Radius of reactor (Dimensionless)

Fig. 5 e (a) coke weight fraction along the length and the radius of CR Fig. 7 e (a) ACP and (b) ACH consumption in OMR and CR along
(b) total amount of the deposited coke along dimensionless length of dimensionless radius.
OMR and CR configurations.

by the mean of membrane affects both of the reactions in which hydrogen


producer reactions, such as dehydrogenation and dehy-drocyclization, produce or consume. Hydrogen producer reactions are mainly equilibrium
take place and its production rate decreases because in addition to the reactions and according to Le Chatelier’s principle, reduction in hydrogen
aforementioned reactions, hydrogen consumer reactions, such as concentration in reaction media shifts the reactions toward hydrogen pro-
hydrocracking and hydrodealkylation, occur. Thus, hydrogen production duction. Thus, total amount of produced hydrogen in OMR increase 1234
in the initial reactors is considerably more than the terminal ones. In OMR kmol/h respect to CR. In addition to these ef-fects, the membrane reactors
configuration, removal of hydrogen from reaction media are optimized in such a way that the most possible hydrogen be produced.

6000
The most abundant naphthenes in petroleum have a ring of either five
CR or six carbon atoms. In the presented model, naph-thene components are
5000
OMR considered as alkylcyclopentanes (ACP) and alkyl-cyclohexenes (ACH)
which undergo different re-actions. Consumption of these components in
Hydrogennproductio (kmol/h)

4000

CR and OMR along the dimensionless radius is depicted in Fig. 7. ACP is


3000 converted to ACH via isomerization reaction and ACH consume in
dehydrogenation reaction, therefore consumption of these components is
2000 observed during the process. In OMR configura-tion, hydrogen removal
from reaction medium contributes to shift in dehydrogenation reaction
1000 toward ACH consumption. On the other hand, decrease in ACH
concentration favors the for-ward reaction of isomerization of ACP to
0 ACH. Thus, ACP and ACH consumption increase in OMR respect to CR
configuration.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Radius of reactor (Dimensionless)
Straight-chain paraffins have very low octane numbers (RON, 0 for n-
Fig. 6 e Hydrogen production through the radius of CR and OMR. octane and n-nonane),but the octane number in-creases
markedly with the degree of branching (RON, 100 for
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8397

a 40
CR
900
35
800 CR OMR

yield
OMR 30
I-paraffin consumption (kmol/h)

700
600

ofLight ends
25
500 20

400

ePercentag
10

15
300 5
200

100

0 0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Radius of reactor (Dimensionless) Radius of reactor (Dimensionless)

b 900
Fig. 10 e Percentage of light end yield across radius of the OMR and
800 CR
CR.
OMR
(kmol/h)

700

600
paraffin is lower than N-paraffin, because I-paraffin is produced in the
isomerization of N-paraffin.
N-paraffin consumption

500

400 The octane number of aromatics, which are the main products of
naphtha reforming process, is always above 100 (except for benzene). As
300 depicted in Fig. 9, aromatics are produced continuously through
200 dehydrogenation reaction. In the OMR configuration, removing hydrogen
100
form reaction media shifts the dehydrogenation reactions toward more ar-
omatics production. Thus, the production rate of aromatics in the OMR is
0
356 kmol/h more than CR. In addition to this issue, in this study the OMR
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 is optimized in order to maximize the aromatic production.
Radius of reactor (Dimensionless)

Fig. 8 e (a) I-paraffin (b) N-paraffin consumption in OMR and CR


along dimensionless radius. The light end gases, overhead off gas product from the stabilizer,
contain the light by products which are mainly produced by the
hydrocracking reactions during naphtha reforming process. Although
2,2,3-trimethylbutane). Straight-chain paraffins transformed into branched these gases are used as a feed-stock for LPG production in refineries, their
paraffins by isomerization. Paraffins undergo dehydrocyclization reaction production is not desirable from naphtha reforming reaction point of view.
to form naphthene and aromatics, also consume in hydrocracking The percentage of light end yield across radius of the OMR and CR is
reactions. Thus, as depicted in Fig. 8 consumption of parrafins along depicted in Fig. 10. Reduction in the partial pressure of hydrogen
radius increase continu-ously. In the OMR configuration, hydrogen partial contributes to reduction in the amount of reactant of hydrocracking
pressure is lower than CR and the reactions shift toward parrafins con- reaction and less light end gases is produced. In addition, the membrane
sumption. Therefore, more paraffin is consumed in OMR respect to CR. It reactor is optimized in such a way that maximum amount of aromatics be
also should be mentioned that consumption of I- produced, which result in less light end gases production. Thus, the
percentage of light end yield in OMR is lower than CR which shows the
better performance of this new configuration.
1800
1600 CR
Aromatic production (kmol/hr)

OMR
1400
1200

1000 9. Conclusion
800
Due to the importance of catalytic naphtha reforming process in
400
petrochemical and refinery industries, attempts are focused on revamping
600
200 this process. In this work, an optimized radial-flow membrane reactor
with continuous catalyst regeneration system has been proposed as a
novel configu-ration for catalytic naphtha reforming process. Optimum
0
values of 40 decision variables, such as inlet temperature, pressure,
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
number of subsections, hydrogen mole fraction, catalyst circulation
Radius of reactor (Dimensionless)
velocity, catalyst distribution, etc., have been obtained by applying DE
Fig. 9 e Aromatics production through the radius of CR and OMR. method. In addition, the
8398 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9

n acidic function activity power number


reaction network based on 32 pseudo-components and 84 reactions has CA
been suggested. The insertion of membrane in moving bed reactor along nM metallic function activity power number
with optimizing the reactors im-proves the performance of CCR naphtha nCM metallic function activity power number
2 1
reforming process. The production of aromatics, which are the main Nj molar flux of component j, kmol m h
products of this process, is increased 356 kmol/h respect to the conven- P total pressure, kpa
tional configuration. In addition, an increase of 1234 kmol/h is achieved Pj partial pressure of component j, kpa
for hydrogen production, which is used in hydrogen consuming units. r radius, m
1 1
Reduction of light end products is also considered as a superiority of ri rate of ith reaction, kmol kgcat h
r th 1 1
OMR respect to CR. in rate of in reaction, kmol kgcat h
rC rate of coke formation on fresh catalyst, kg
1 1
kgcat h
r rate of coke formation on acidic function of catalyst,
Nomenclature CA
1 1
kg kgcat h
rCM rate of coke formation on metallic function of
1 1
catalyst, kg kgcat h
R 1 1
Parameter gas constant, J mol K
ai catalyst activity Ri inner diameter, m
aA acidic function activity R outer diameter, m
o

aCA acidic function activity for coke formation 2 1


Sa specific surface, m g
aCM metallic function activity for coke formation T temperature, K
aM metallic function activity U overall heat transfer coefficient, W m 2 K 1
2
Ar cross section area of reactor in radial direction, m Uj internal energy of component j, j mol
1
2
Ap surface area of membrane, m ur radial velocity, m s
1

C concentration, kmol m 3
yi mole fraction of component (j)
C 3
ACP alkylcyclopentane concentration, kmol m Y yield
CCA coke weight fraction on acidic function of catalyst, W catalyst mass fraction
1
kg kgcat
CCM coke weight fraction on metallic function of catalyst, Greek letters
1
kg kgcat ε void fraction of catalyst bed
C 3
j0 inlet concentration of component j, kmol m m viscosity, kg m 1 s 1
specific heat capacity at constant pressure, v stoichiometric coefficient of component j in
Cp ij
1 1 reaction i
kJ kmol K
3
Cv specific heat capacity at constant volume, rb reactor bulk density, kg m
1 1 4 sphericity
kJ kmol K s
3 reaction side angle
CT total concentration, kmol m q1
dp particle diameter, m q2 sweep side angle
2 1 d membrane thickness, m
De effective diffusivity, m s H2
1 DH 1
Ec coke formation activation energy, J mol heat of reaction, kj mol
F molar flow rate, kmol h 1 Dz control volume length, m
1 3 1
Fj molar flow rate of component j, kmol h aA constant of deactivation, m kmol
1 a 3 1
FT total flow rate to the reactor, kmol h CA constant of deactivation, m kmol
J 2 1 a 3 1
H2 hydrogen permeation rate, kmol m h CM constant of deactivation, m kmol
H enthalpy, J mol 1 p pi number, 3.14156
1 3 1
Hj enthalpy of component j, J mol aM constant of deactivation, m kmol
k 1 1
thermal conductivity, W m K
kCA constant of deactivation equation for acidic Superscript
1 n 1.5 1.5 s sweep side
function, kg kg kPa 1 m kmol
kCM constant of deactivation equation for metallic
1 n 1.5 1.5 Subscript
function, kg kg kPa 1 m kmol
k 1 1 e exit condition
eff effective thermal conductivity, W m k
k i numerator for reactions
in reaction rate constant for reaction (in)
K j numerator for components
in
equilibrium constant for reaction (in)
t tube side
L length of reactor, m
mnumber of reactions Abbreviations
1
Mj molecular weight of component j, kg kmol A aromatic
1
M mean molecular weight in the flow, kg kmol ACH alkylcyclohexane
nnumber of components ACP alkyl- cyclopentane
n1 constant of deactivation equation CCR continuous catalyst regeneration reformer
n2 constant of deactivation equation CR conventional reactor
n acidic function activity power number DE differential evolution
A
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 3 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 3 8 4 e8 3 9 9 8399

FBP final boiling point, C [13] Hu S, Zhu XX. Molecular modeling and optimization for catalytic
IBP initial boiling point, C reforming. Chem Eng Commun 2004;191:500e12.
IP isoparaffin [14] Weifeng H, Hongye S, Yongyou H, Jian C. Lumped kinetics model and
its on-line application to commercial catalytic naphtha reforming
LOD length to diameter
process. Hua Gong Xuebao/J Chem Ind Eng China 2006;57:1605e11.
NOS number of subsections
NP number of populations [15] Weifeng H, Hongye S, Yongyou U, Jian C. Modeling, simulation and
NP normal paraffin optimization of a whole industrial catalytic naphtha reforming process
OF objective function on Aspen Plus Platform. Chin J Chem Eng 2006;14:584e91.
OMR optimized membrane reactor
[16] Hongjun Z, Mingliang S, Huixin W, Zeji L, Hongbo J. Modeling and
PdeAg palladiumesilver
Simulation of moving bed reactor for catalytic naphtha reforming. Pet Sci
Pt platinum Technol 2010;28:667e76.
Sn tin [17] Wang L, Zhang Q, Liang CA. 38-lumped kinetic model for reforming
reaction and its application in continuous catalytic reforming
Huagong Xuebao. CIESC J 2012;63:1076e82.

Appendix A. Supplementary data [18] Seidel-Morgenstern A. Membrane reactors: distributing reactants to


improve selectivity and yield. Wiley-VCH; 2010.
Supplementary data related to this article can be found online at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.059. [19] Dittmeyer R, Ho¨llein V, Daub K. Membrane reactors for
hydrogenation and dehydrogenation processes based on supported
palladium. J Mol Catal A: Chem 2001;173:135e84.

references [20] Pereira CSM, Silva VMTM, Pinho SP, Rodrigues AE. Batch and
continuous studies for ethyl lactate synthesis in a pervaporation
membrane reactor. Membr Sci 2010;361:43e55.
[1] Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Bahmanpour AM. A
comparative study on a novel combination of spherical and membrane [21] Parvasi P, Khosravanipour A, Rahimpour MR. Dynamic modeling and
tubular reactors of the catalytic naphtha reforming process. Int J optimization of a novel methanol synthesis loop with hydrogen-
Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:505e51. permselective membrane reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy
[2] Weiszmann JA. Catalytic re-reforming. In: Meyers RA, editor. Handbook 2009;34:3717e33.
of petroleum refining processes. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1986. p. 3. [22] Benitez VM, Pieck CL. Influence of indium content on the properties of
PteRe/Al2O3naphtha reforming catalysts. Catal Lett 2010;136:45e51.
[3] Prins R. Modern processes for the catalytic reforming of hydrocarbons.
In: Pins R, Schuit G, editors. Chemistry and chemical engineering of [23] Vo¨lter J, Ku¨rschner U. Deactivation of supported pt and Pt-Sn catalysts
catalytic processes. The Netherlands: Sitjhoff and Noordhoff; 1980. p. in the conversion of methylcyclopentane. Appl Catal 1983;8:167e76.
389. Alp hen aan den Rijn.
[4] Lee JW, Ko YC, Jung YK, Lee KS, Yoon ES. A modeling and simulation [24] Gonza´lez-Marcos MP, Inarra B, Guil JM, Gutierrez-Ortiz MA.
study on a naphtha reforming unit with a catalyst circulation and Development of an industrial characterisation method for naphtha
regeneration system. Comput Chem Eng 1997;21:1105e10. reforming bimetallic Pt-Sn/Al2O3 catalysts through n-heptane reforming
test reactions. Catal Today 2005;107e108:685e92.
[5] Smith R. Kinetic analysis of naphtha reforming with platinum
catalyst. Chem Eng Prog 1959;55:76e80. [25] Ren XH, Bertmer M, Stapf S, Demco DE, Blu¨mich B, Kern C, et al.
[6] Krane H, Groh A, Schulman B, Sinfelt J. Reactions in catalytic reforming Deactivation and regeneration of a naphtha reforming catalyst. Appl Catal
of naphthas. Section III. In: Proceedings of the Fifth World Petroleum A 2002;228:39e52.
Congress 1959. [26] Liu K, Fung SC, Ho TC, Rumschitzki DS. Heptane reforming over
[7] Padmavathi G, Chaudhuri KK. Modeling and simulation of PteRe/Al2O3: reaction network, kinetics, and apparent selective
commercial catalytic naphtha reformers. Can J Chem Eng catalyst deactivation. J Catal 2002;206:188e201.
1997;75:930.
[8] Jenkins JH, Stephens TW. Kinetics of cat reforming. [27] Liu K, Fung SC, Ho TC, Rumschitzki DS. Kinetics of catalyst coking in
Hydrocarb Proc 1980;1:163. heptane reforming over Pt-Re/Al2O3. Ind Eng Chem Res
[9] Froment G. The kinetic of complex catalytic reactions. Chem Eng Sci 1997;36:3264e74.
1987;42:1073. [28] Tailleur RG, Davila Y. Optimal hydrogen production through revamping
[10] Taskar U, Riggs JB. Modeling and optimization of a a naphtha-reforming unit: catalyst deactivation. Energy Fuel
semiregenerative catalytic naphtha reformer. AIChE J 2008;22:2892e901.
1997;43:740. [29] Khademi MH, Setoodeh P, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri A.
[11] Ancheyta-Juarez J, Villafuerte-Macias E. Kinetic modeling of naphtha Optimization of methanol synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation
catalytic reforming reactions. Energy Fuel 2000;14:1032e7. in a thermally coupled reactor using differential evolution (DE)
method. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:6930e44.
[12] Hu Y, Xu W, Su H, Chu J. A dynamic model for naphtha catalytic
reformers. International conference on control applications. Taipei, [30] Antos GJ, Aitani AM, Parera JM. Catalytic naphtha reforming. New
Taiwan 2004. York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1995.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai