IN BRIEF
●
●
●
●
●
This series of articles is designed to aid in the orthodontic evaluation of patients
Not every malocclusion needs orthodontic treatment
Not every patient is suitable for treatment
Understanding the treatment benefit for the patient is important
GDPs have an important role to play in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment 1
VERIFIABLE
CPD PAPER
There are various reasons for offering patients orthodontic treatment. Some of these include
improved aesthetics, occlusal function and the long-term dental health.
Orthodontics comes from the Greek words With these different definitions of what con-
ORTHODONTICS ‘orthos’ meaning normal, correct, or straight stitutes malocclusion, there is, not surprisingly a
1. Who needs and ‘dontos’ meaning teeth. Orthodontics is degree of confusion as to what should be treated
orthodontics? concerned with correcting or improving the and what should not. Although some tooth posi-
2. Patient assessment and position of teeth and correcting any malocclu- tions can produce tooth and soft tissue trauma, it
examination I sion. What then do we mean by occlusion and is important to remember that malocclusion is
3. Patient assessment and
malocclusion? Surprisingly the answer is not not a disease but simply a variation in the nor-
examination II straightforward. There have been various mal position of teeth. Essentially, there are three
attempts to describe occlusion using terms such principal reasons for carrying out orthodontic
4. Treatment planning
as ideal, anatomic (based on tooth morpholo- treatment:
5. Appliance choices gy), average, aesthetic, adequate, normally
6. Risks in orthodontic functioning and occlusion unlikely to impair 1. To improve dento facial appearance
treatment dental health. 2. To correct the occlusal function of the teeth
7. Fact and fantasy in
orthodontics
8. Extractions in
orthodontics
9. Anchorage control and
distal movement
10. Impacted teeth
11. Orthodontic tooth
movement
12. Combined orthodontic
treatment
*Correspondence to: D. Roberts-Harry Fig. 1a A child with a Class II Fig. 1b The same child as
E-mail: robertsharry@btinternet.com division 1 malocclusion and in Fig. 1a
very poor aesthetic appearance
Refereed Paper
doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4810592
© British Dental Journal 2003; 195:
433–437
➠
Fig. 2a Same child as in Fig. 2b Occlusion of the same
Fig. 1 after orthodontic patient as in Fig. 2a, there has
treatment been a significant
improvement in the buccal
segment relation and overjet
compared with the initial
presentation in Fig. 1b
hygiene seems to be the overriding factor in pre- Table 2 Relation between size of overjet and
venting gingivitis and periodontitis. That said, prevalence of traumatised anterior teeth
few of the studies that have investigated the link Overjet (mm) Incidence %
between crowding and periodontal disease have
been longitudinal, over a long term and included 5 22
older adults. It would appear that aligned teeth 9 24
confer no benefit to those who clean their teeth >9 44
well because they can keep their teeth clean
regardless of any irregularity. Similarly, align-
ment will not help bad brushers. If there is poor Certain other occlusal relationships are also
tooth brushing, periodontal diseases will devel- liable to cause long-term problems. Figure 5a
op no matter how straight the teeth are. Howev- and b show a case where there is an anterior
er, having straight teeth may help moderate cross-bite with an associated mandibular dis-
brushers, although there is no firm evidence to placement in a 60-year-old man. The constant
support or refute this statement. This is an area attrition of the lower incisors against the upper
that requires further study. when the patient bites together, have produced
Some malocclusions may damage both the some substantial wear. If allowed to continue
teeth and soft tissues if they are left untreated. It is then the long-term prognosis for these teeth is
well known that the more prominent the upper extremely poor. In order to preserve the teeth,
incisors are the more prone they are to trauma2,3 the patient accepted fixed appliance treatment
(Table 2). that eliminated the cross bite and helped prevent
When the overjet is 9 mm or more the risk of further wear Figure 5c and d.
damaging the upper incisors increases to over Another example of problems caused by an
40%. Reducing a large overjet is not only bene- anterior cross bite is shown in Figure 6. A trau-
ficial from an aesthetic point of view but min- matic anterior occlusion produced a displacing
imises the risk of trauma and long-term com- force on the lower incisors with apical migration
plications to the dentition. Fig. 4 shows a child of the gingival attachment as a consequence. Pro-
with a large overjet and it is not difficult to vided this situation is remedied early (Fig. 7) the
imagine the likely dental trauma that would soft tissue damage stops and as the rest of the
result if he or she fell over. gingivae matures the situation often resolves
Fig. 5a Anterior crossbite in a 60-year-old man occluding Fig. 5b Shows the retruded contact position of the patient.
in the intercuspal position To reach full intercuspation the mandible displaces forward
and this movement is probably associated with the wear on
the incisors
Fig. 5c The patient in fixed appliances in order to Fig. 5d After correction and space reorganisation the patient
correct the displacement and the position of his upper is wearing a prosthesis to replace the missing lateral incisors
anterior teeth
Fig. 8a This malocclusion has an extremely deep bite which Fig. 8b The same patient as in Fig. 8a, but not in
can be associated with potential periodontal problems occlusion. The deep bite has resulted in labial stripping
of the periodontium on the lower right central incisor