Effectiveness
RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
1. What is the clinical effectiveness of corneal cross linking with riboflavin for keratoconus?
2. What is the cost-effectiveness of corneal cross linking with riboflavin for keratoconus?
METHODS:
A limited literature search was conducted on key health technology assessment resources,
including PubMed, the Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2010), University of York Centre for Reviews
and Dissemination (CRD) databases, ECRI (Health Devices Gold), EuroScan, international
health technology agencies, and a focused Internet search. The search was limited to English
language articles published between 2005 and April 12, 2010. No filters were applied to limit the
retrieval by study type. Internet links were provided, where available.
The summary of findings was prepared from the abstracts of the relevant information. Please
note that data contained in abstracts may not always be an accurate reflection of the data
contained within the full article.
RESULTS:
HTIS reports are organized so that the higher quality evidence is presented first. Therefore,
randomized controlled trials are presented first. These are followed by controlled clinical trials,
observational studies, and evidence-based guidelines.
One randomized controlled trial, one controlled clinical trial, six observational studies, and one
evidence-based guideline related to the clinical effectiveness of corneal cross linking with
riboflavin for keratoconus were identified. No studies of the cost-effectiveness of corneal cross
Disclaimer: The Health Technology Inquiry Service (HTIS) is an information service for those involved in planning and providing
health care in Canada. HTIS responses are based on a limited literature search and are not comprehensive, systematic reviews.
The intent is to provide a list of sources of the best evidence on the topic that CADTH could identify using all reasonable efforts
within the time allowed. HTIS responses should be considered along with other types of information and health care considerations.
The information included in this response is not intended to replace professional medical advice, nor should it be construed as a
recommendation for or against the use of a particular health technology. Readers are also cautioned that a lack of good quality
evidence does not necessarily mean a lack of effectiveness particularly in the case of new and emerging health technologies, for
which little information can be found, but which may in future prove to be effective. While CADTH has taken care in the preparation
of the report to ensure that its contents are accurate, complete and up to date, CADTH does not make any guarantee to that effect.
CADTH is not liable for any loss or damages resulting from use of the information in the report.
Copyright: This report contains CADTH copyright material and may contain material in which a third party owns copyright. This
report may be used for the purposes of research or private study only. It may not be copied, posted on a web site,
redistributed by email or stored on an electronic system without the prior written permission of CADTH or applicable copyright
owner.
Links: This report may contain links to other information available on the websites of third parties on the Internet. CADTH does not
have control over the content of such sites. Use of third party sites is governed by the owners’ own terms and conditions.
linking with riboflavin for keratococnus were identified, nor were any relevant health technology
assessments, systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Studies that combined corneal cross linking
with riboflavin and an additional procedure were placed in the appendix. Additional articles of
potential interest can also be found in the appendix.
Eight studies1-8 that assessed the clinical effectiveness of corneal cross linking with riboflavin for
the treatment of keratoconus were indentified. Study characteristics and conclusions can be
found in Table 1. All eight included studies1-8 concluded corneal cross linking with riboflavin was
an effective treatment for keratoconus. A National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
guideline for the use of corneal cross linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A recommended that
the procedure only be performed in special circumstances, as there was insufficient higher
quality evidence to recommend the procedure for all patients with keratoconus.9
2. Coskunseven E, Jankov MR, Hafezi F. Contralateral eye study of corneal collagen cross-
linking with riboflavin and UVA irradiation in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg.
2009 Apr;25(4):371-6. PubMed: PM19431928
Observational studies
3. Agrawal VB. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet - a light for
keratoconus: results in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;57(2):111-4. Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684426 PubMed: PM19237783
4. Arbelaez MC, Sekito MB, Vidal C, Choudhury SR. Collagen cross-linking with riboflavin
and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: one-year results. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
[Internet] 2009 [cited 2010 Apr 12]; 2(1):33-38. Available from:
http://www.muscateye.com/publication/files/04%20OmanJOphthalmol2133-
3660906_101009.pdf
5. Grewal DS, Brar GS, Jain R, Sood V, Singla M, Grewal SP. Corneal collagen crosslinking
using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light for keratoconus: one-year analysis using
Scheimpflug imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):425-32. PubMed:
PM19251133
7. Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and
ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008
May;34(5):796-801. PubMed: PM18471635
Economic evaluations
No literature identified
PREPARED BY:
Health Technology Inquiry Service
Email: htis@cadth.ca
Tel: 1-866-898-8439
10. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Intrastromal corneal ring implants for corneal thinning
disorders: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment series
[Internet]. 2009 Apr [cited 2010 Dec 4];9(1):1-90. Available from:
http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/rev_intacs_2
0090401.pdf
Note: see Collagen Cross-Linking, page 45 and Use of Adjunct therapies With INTACS,
page 52
11. Coskunseven E, Jankov MR, Hafezi F, Atun S, Arslan E, Kymionis GD. Effect of treatment
sequence in combined intrastromal corneal rings and corneal collagen crosslinking for
keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2084-91. PubMed: PM19969212
Observational studies
12. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Morad Y, Hartstein M, Avni I, Zadok D. Can we measure corneal
biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot
study. Cornea. 2009 Jun;28(5):498-502. PubMed: PM19421050
14. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Kounis GA, Portaliou DM, Karavitaki AE, Magarakis M, et
al. Simultaneous topography-guided PRK followed by corneal collagen cross-linking for
keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;25(9):S807-S811. PubMed: PM19772256
16. Tu KL, Aslanides IM. Orbscan II anterior elevation changes following corneal collagen
cross-linking treatment for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009 Aug;25(8):715-22. PubMed:
PM19714796
17. Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi O, Bovone C, Sparano MC, et al. Corneal
healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser
scanning microscopy in vivo: early and late modifications. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008
Oct;146(4):527-33. PubMed: PM18672225
18. Mencucci R, Mazzotta C, Rossi F, Ponchietti C, Pini R, Baiocchi S, et al. Riboflavin and
ultraviolet A collagen crosslinking: in vivo thermographic analysis of the corneal surface. J
Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):1005-8. PubMed: PM17531694
Review articles
20. Karmel M. Clinical update: tools and techniques. Eyenet [Internet]. 2009 Apr [cited 2010
Apr 12];29-31. Collagen crosslinking: research offers promise and poses questions.
Available from: http://www.aao.org/publications/eyenet/200904/upload/CU-Cornea.pdf