Anda di halaman 1dari 10

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Corporate Governance - I includes select references on a particular


theme

K Manjunatha

Adler, Paul S (2002). Corporate Scandals: It’s Time for ciency in a More Competitive Public Sector Environ-
Reflection in Business Schools, Academy of Management ment, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(3),
Executive , 16(3), August, pp 148–150. September, pp 58-72.
Ahmadjian, Christina L (2000). Changing Japanese Barton, Dominic; Felton, Robert F and Song, Ryan (2000).
Corporate Governance, Japanese Economy , 28(6), Building Asian Boards, McKinsey Quarterly, (4), Special
November/December, pp 59-81. Edition, pp 64-74.
Ali, Abbas J and Camp, Robert C (2002). Flexible Ethics Beasley, Mark; Petroni, D and Kathy R (2001). Board Inde-
and Corporate Scandals, Competitiveness Review, 12(2), pendence and Audit-Firm Type Auditing, 20(1), March,
pp 1-4. pp 97-115.
Amable, Bruno and Hancke, Bob (2001). Innovation and Beasley, Mark et al. (2000). Fraudulent Financial Repor-
Industrial Renewal in France in Comparative Pers- ting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate
pective, Industry and Innovation, 8(2), August, pp 113- Governance Mechanisms, Accounting Horizons, 14(4),
133. December, pp 441-455.
Anderson, Christopher W; Jandik, Tomas and Makhija, Bendixen, Mike and Thomas, Adele (2000). Perceived
Anil K (2001). Determinants of Foreign Ownership in Qualities of a ‘Good’ Chairman: A Challenge for Cor-
Newly Privatized Companies in Transition Economies, porate Governance in South America, South African
Financial Review, 36(2), May, pp 161-175. Journal of Business Management , 31(2), June, pp 65-76.
Arikan, Asli M (2002). Does It Pay-off to Capture Intan- Bertrand, Marianne and Mullainathan, Sendhil (2001).
gible Assets Through Mergers and Acquisitions? Aca- Are CEOs Rewarded for Luck? The Ones Without Prin-
demy of Management Proceedings, pp R1-R6. ciples are, Quarterly Journal of Economics , 116(3),
Asher, Mukul G (2001). Pension Reform, Capital Markets August, pp 901-932.
and Corporate Governance in Malaysia, Journal of Bhattacharya, Utpal and Daouk, Hazem (2002). The World
Financial Regulation and Compliance, 9(1), February, pp Price of Insider Trading, Journal of Finance , 57(1),
30-38. February, pp 75-109.
Augustine, Norm et al. (2001). Should the CEO be Fired Bird, Frederick (2001). Good Governance: Philosophical
for One Year of Poor Performance? Harvard Business Discussion of the Responsibilities and Practices of
Review , 79(9), October, pp 42-46. Organizational Governors, Canadian Journal of Admini-
Ayogu, Melvin D (2001). Corporate Governance in Africa: strative Sciences, 18(4), December, pp 298-314.
The Record and Policies for Good Corporate Gover- Black, Bernard (2001). Corporate Governance in Korea at
nance, African Development Review, 13(2), December, the Millennium: Enhancing International Compe-
pp 308-331. titiveness, Journal of Corporation Law, 26(3), Spring, pp
Bagley, Constance E (2003). The Ethical Leader ’s Decision 537-609.
Tree, Harvard Business Review, 81(2), February, pp 18– Black, Bernard (2001). Does Corporate Governance
19. Matter? A Crude Test Using Russian Data, University
Barrett, Pat (2000). Balancing Accountability and Effi- of Pennsylvania Law Review , 149(6), June, pp 2131- 2150.

VIKALPA • VOLUME 28 • NO 2 • APRIL - JUNE 2003 147

147
Blair, William and Png, Cheong Ann (2001). International Carpenter, Mason A and Westphal, James D (2001). The
Standards in the Governance of Financial Markets, Strategic Context of External Network Ties: Examining
Journal of Financial Crime, 8(3), February, pp 248-254. the Impact of Director Appointments on Board Invol-
Bobillo, Alfredo Martinez et al. (2002). Internal Funds, vement in Strategic Decision-making, Academy of
Corporate Investment and Corporate Governance: Management Journal, 44(4), August, pp 639- 661.
International Evidence, Multinational Business Review, Carver, John (2001). A Theory of Governing the Public’s
10(2), Fall, pp 151-162. Business: Redesigning the Jobs of Boards, Councils,
Bongjin, Kim (2002). Adaptation of Governance Mechan- and Commissions, Public Management Review , 3(1),
isms to Deregulation: A Longitudinal Study of the U March, pp 53-73.
S Banking Industry, Academy of Management Pro- Casciaro, Tiziana (2001). Determinants of Governance
ceedings , pp D1-D6. Structure in Alliances: The Role of Task, Strategic, and
Bornstein, Morris (2001). Post-privatisation Enterprise Partner Uncertainties, Academy of Management Pro-
Restructuring, Post-communist Economies, 13(2), June, ceedings, pp C1 -C6.
pp 190-205 Callison, J William (2000). Venture Capital and Corporate
Brailsford, Timothy J; Oliver, Barry R and Pua, Sandra L Governance: Evolving the Limited Liability Company
H (2002). On the Relation between Ownership Struc- to Finance the Entrepreneurial Business, Journal of
ture and Capital Structure, Accounting and Finance , Corporation Law, 26(1), Fall, pp 97- 135.
42(1), March, pp 26-30. Chang, S J and Ha, Daesung (2001). Corporate Governance
Brouwer, Maria T(2002). Weber, Schumpeter and Knight in the Twenty-first Century: New Managerial Concepts
on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, for Supranational, American Business Review , 19(2),
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12 (1/2), pp 83-106. June, pp 32-45.
Bruce, Robert and Townley, Gemma (2002). Take It from Cheffins, Brian R (2001). History and the Global Corporate
the Top, Financial Management (CIMA), February, pp Governance Revolution: The UK Perspective, Business
16-19. History , 43(4), October, pp 87-119.
Buck, Trevor et al. (2000). Different Paths to Economic Cheffins, Brian R (2000). Corporate Governance Reform:
Reform in Russia and China: Causes and Conse- Britain as an Exporter, Hume Papers on Public Policy ,
quences, Journal of World Business, 35(4), Winter, pp 8(1), pp 10-29.
379-400. Child, John (2002). The International Crisis of Confidence
Buck, Trevor and Tull, Malcolm (2000). Anglo-American in Corporations, Academy of Management Executive,
Contributions to Japanese and German Corporate 16(3), August, pp 145–148.
Governance after World War Two, Business History, Choi, Dosoung; Jen, Frank C and Shin, H Han (2000).
42(2), April, pp 119-141. Causes and Consequences of the Korean Financial
Burke, Kerry Shannon (2002). Regulating Corporate Crisis, Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and
Governance through the Market: Comparing the Policies, 3(1), March, pp 1-26.
Approaches of the United States, Canada, and the Christensen, Patrick T (2002). Corporate Reform... or
United Kingdom, Journal of Corporation Law, 27(3), Business as Usual? Journal of Financial Planning, 15(11),
Spring, pp 341-380. November, pp 21-22.
Butler, M D (2003). IMA Responds to the SEC, Strategic Cohen, Jeffrey and Hanno, Dennis (2001). Corporate
Finance, 84(8), February, pp 35-38. Governance and Management Control Philosophy,
Carcello, Joseph V and Neal, Terry L (2003). Audit Com- Journal of Accountancy, 191(5), May, p 91.
mittee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals Follo- Cohen, Jeffrey R and Hanno, Dennis M (2000). Auditors’
wing ‘New’ Going-concern Reports, Accounting Consideration of Corporate Governance and Manage-
Review , 78(1), January, pp 95-118. ment Control Philosophy in Preplanning and Planning
Carcello, Joseph V et al. (2002). Disclosures in Audit Judgments, Auditing , 19(2), Fall, pp 133-147.
Committee Charters and Reports, Accounting Horizons, Colesa, Jerilyn W; McWilliams, Victoria B and Senc,
16(4), December, pp 291-305. Nilanjan (2001). An Examination of the Relationship
Carter, D A; Simkins, B J and Simpson, W G (2003). Cor- of Governance Mechanisms to Performance, Journal of
porate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value, Management, 27(1), pp 23-51.
Financial Review, 38(1), February, pp 33-53. Coombes, Paul and Watson, Mark (2000). Three Surveys

148 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE I

148
on Corporate Governance, McKinsey Quarterly , (4), reporting and Audit Knowledge on Audit Committee
Special Edition, pp 75-79. Members’ Judgments, Auditing , 20(2), September, pp
Corhay, Albert and Rad, Alireza Tourani (2000). Inter- 2-22.
national Acquisitions and Shareholder Wealth Evi- Donoher, William J (2000). To File or Not to File? Systemic
dence from the Netherlands, International Review of Incentives, Corporate Control, and the Timing of the
Financial-Analysis, 9(2), pp 163-175. Bankruptcy Decision, Academy of Management Pro-
Cox, George et al. (2002). A Prescription for Company ceedings, pp P1-P6.
Health, CPA Journal, 72(7), July, pp 62-63. Dugger, William M (2001). Contests for Corporate Control
Cross, Rob; Borgatti, Stephen P and Parker, Andrew (2002). (Book Review), Journal of Economic Issues , 35(3),
Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network September, pp 760-762.
Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration, California Edrich, Carole (2002). Mindsets and Consequences in
Management Review, 44(2), Winter, pp 25-47. Corporate Governance and Control: Part 2, Journal of
Cutting, Bruce and Kouzmin, Alexander (2000). The Financial Regulation and Compliance, 10(4), pp 355-361.
Emerging Patterns of Power in Corporate Governance: Edwards, Jeremy and Nibler, Marcus (2000). Corporate
Back to the Future in Improving Corporate Decision Governance in Germany: The Role of Banks and
making, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(5/6), pp Ownership Concentration, Economic Policy , 15(31),
477-508. October, pp 237-268.
D’Aunno, Thomas; Succi, Melissa and Alexander, Jeffrey Ellerman, David (2001). Lessons from Eastern Europe’s
A (2000). The Role of Institutional and Market Forces Voucher Privatization, Challenge , 44(4), July/August,
in Divergent Organizational Change, Administrative pp 14-38.
Science Quarterly , 45(4), December, pp 679-703. Ellstrand, Alan E et al. (2002). Board Structure and Inter-
Dahya, Jay and Travlos, Nickolaos G (2000). Does the national Political Risk, Academy of Management Journal,
One Man Show Pay? Theory and Evidence on the Dual 45(4), August, pp 769-778.
CEO Revisited, European Financial Management, 6(1), Elson, Charles (2003). What’s Wrong with Executive
March, pp 85-99. Compensation? Harvard Business Review , 81(1),
Daily, Catherine M and Dalton, Dan R (2001). Corporate January, pp 68-77.
Governance Digest, Business Horizons, 44(2), March/ Farrell, Brian and Cobbin, Deirdre (2000). A Content
April, pp 3-5. Analysis of Codes of Ethics from Fifty-seven National
Daily, Catherine M and Dalton, Dan R (2000). Corporate Accounting Organisations, Business Ethics : A European
Governance Digest, Business Horizons, 43(2), March/ Review , 9(3), July, pp 180-191.
April, pp 4-6. Felton, Robert F and Watson, Mark (2002). Change Across
Day, Christian C (2000). Corporate Governance, Conrail, the Board, McKinsey Quarterly, (4), pp 31-46.
and the Market: Getting on the Right Track! Journal of Ferri, Giovanni and Masciandaro, Donato (2002). E-
Corporation Law , 26(1), Fall, pp 1-40. banking, Governance, and Local Banks: The Italian
Deeg, Richard and Perez, Sofia (2000). International Case, Journal of International Banking Regulation, 4(1),
Capital Mobility and Domestic Institutions: Corporate August, pp 72-84.
Finance and Governance, Governance: An International Fields, M A and Keys, P Y (2003). The Emergence of
Journal of Policy and Administration , 13(2), April, pp Corporate Governance from Wall St. to Main St.:
119-154. Outside Directors, Board Diversity, Earnings Mana-
Denis, Diane K (2001). Twenty-five Years of Corporate gement, and Managerial Incentives to Bear Risk,
Governance Research and Counting, Review of Finan- Financial Review, 38(1), February, pp 1-24.
cial Economics, 10(3), Winter, pp 191-113. Filatotchev, Igor et al. (2001). Effects of Post-privatization
Dewenter, Kathryn and Novaes, Walter (2001). Visibility Governance and Strategies on Export Intensity in the
versus Complexity in Business Groups: Evidence from Former Soviet Union, Journal of International Business
Japanese Keiretsu, Journal of Business, 74(1), January, Studies , 32(4), 4th Quarter, pp 853-872.
pp 79-101. Filatotchev, Igor; Buck, Trevor and Zhukov, Vladimir
DeZoort, Todd F and Salterio, Steven E (2001). The Effects (2000). Downsizing in Privatized Firms in Russia,
of Corporate Governance Experience and Financial- Ukraine, and Belarus, Academy of Management Journal,

VIKALPA • VOLUME 28 • NO 2 • APRIL - JUNE 2003 149

149
43 (3), June, pp 286 - 307. Incentive Pay for Directors? Financial Management ,
Financial Economic Roundtable (2002). Statement on the 30(4), Winter, pp 45-62.
Crisis in Accounting, Auditing, and Corporate Gover- Goldstein, Andrea E (2000). Corporate Governance and
nance, Journal of Applied Finance, 12(2), Fall/Winter, Regulation in Privatized Utilities: Telecommunica-
pp 61-66. tions in Four European Countries, Business and Politics,
Fischel, William A (2001). Home Voters, Municipal Cor- 2(2), August,
porate Governance, and the Benefit View of the Pro- Goldstein, Don (2000). Hostile Takeovers as Corporate
perty Tax, National Tax Journal, 54(1), March, pp 157- Governance? Evidence from the 1980s, Review of Poli-
168. tical Economy, 12(4), October, pp 381- 403.
Fliaster, Alexander and Marr, Rainer (2001). Change of Goold, Michael and Campbell, Andrew (2002). Do You
the Insider-oriented Corporate Governance in Japan Have a Well-designed Organization? Harvard Business
and Germany: Between Americanisation and Tra- Review , 80(3), March, pp 117-125.
dition, Journal of Change Management, 1(3) February, Goyer, Michel (2001). Corporate Governance and the Inno-
pp 242-257. vation System in France 1985-2000, Industry and Inno-
Foss, Nicolai J (2002). New Organizational Forms - Critical vation, 8(2), August, pp 135-159.
Perspectives, International Journal of the Economics of Grace, Jr and Stephen, H (2002). Corporate Boards and
Business, 9(1), February, pp 1-8. Business Oversight, CPA Journal, 72(9), September, pp
Freeland, Robert F (2002). When Organizational 80.
Messiness Works, Harvard Business Review, 80(5), May, Graves, Samuel B; Rehbein, Kathleen and Waddock,
pp 24-25. Sandra (2001). Fad and Fashion in Shareholder
Fredriksen, Oystein and Klofsten, Magnus (2001). Venture Activism: The Landscape of Shareholder Resolutions,
Capitalists’ Governance of their Portfolio Companies, 1988-1998, Business and Society Review , 106(4), Winter,
Journal of Enterprising Culture, 9 (2), June, pp 201-220. pp 293-315.
Fung, Hung-Gay and Leung, Wai Kin (2001). Chinese Greenwood, Justin (2002). EU Public Affairs and the White
Financial Liberalization, Chinese Economy , 34 (1), Paper on Governance, Journal of Public Affairs (Henry
January/February, pp 5-15. Stewart), 1/1(4/1), January, pp 423-435.
Galunic, Charles D and Eisenhardt, Kathleen M (2001). Greer, Alan and Hoggett, Paul (2000). Contemporary
Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Governance and Local Pubic Spending Bodies, Public
Forms, Academy of Management Journal , 44(6), Administration, 78(3) pp 513-530.
December, pp 1229-1250. Gregg, Samuel (2001). Stakeholder Theory, Policy , 17(2),
Galvin, Tiffani L (2002). Examining Institutional Change: Winter, pp 33-38.
Evidence from the Founding Dynamics of U S Health Griffith, John M et al. (2002). CEO Ownership, Corporate
Care Interest Associations, Academy of Management Control, and Bank Performance, Journal of Economics
Journal, 45(4), August, pp 673-697. and Finance, 26(2), Summer, pp 170-184.
Garvey, Gerald T and Milbourn, Todd T (2000). EVA versus Groenewegen, John (2000). European Integration and
Earnings: Does it Matter Which is More Highly Corre- Changing Corporate Governance Structures: The Case
lated with Stock Returns? Journal of Accounting of France, Journal of Economic Issues, 34(2), June, pp
Research, 38(3), Supplement, pp 209-246. 471-480.
Georgantzas, Nicholas C (2001). Virtual Enterprise Gunn, Bob (2003). Never Shout ‘Fire’ in a Crowded
Networks: The Fifth Element of Corporate Gover- Theater, Strategic Finance, 84(8), February, pp 14–15.
nance, Human Systems Management, 20(3) pp 171-189. Gupta, Rajat K (2002). Gloom at the Top, McKinsey
Gedajlovic, Eric and Shapiro, Daniel M (2002). Ownership Quarterly, (4), pp 4-5.
Structure and Firm Profitability in Japan, Academy of Gürsory, Güner and Aydogan, Kürsat (2002). Equity
Management Journal , 45(3), June, pp 565-566. Ownership Structure, Risk Taking, and Performance,
George, William W (2002). Imbalance of Power, Harvard Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 38 (6), November,
Business Review , 80(7). July, pp 22-23. pp 6-26.
Gerety, Mason; Chun-Keung, Hoi and Robin, Ashok Hambrick, Donald C and Jackson, Eric M (2000). Outside
(2001). Do Shareholders Benefit from the Adoption of Directors with a Stake: The Linchpin in Improving

150 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE I

150
Governance, California Management Review , 42(4), Review , 7(4), Summer, pp 44-70.
Summer, pp 108-138. James, Oliver (2001). Business Models and the Transfer of
Harjoto, M and Garen, J (2003). Why Do IPO Firms Businesslike Central Government Agencies, Gover-
Conduct Primary Seasoned Equity Offerings? Finan- nance: An International Journal of Policy and Admi-
cial Review , 38 (1), February, pp 103-125. nistration, 14(2), pp 233-252.
Handy, Charles (2002). What’s a Business for? Harvard Jameson, Mel; Sullivan, Michael J and Constand, Richard
Business Review , 80(12), December, pp 49-56. L (2000). Ownership Structure and Performance of
Handy, Charles (2002). Directions for Directors, Harvard Japanese Firms: Horizontal Keiretsu, Vertical Keiretsu,
Business Review , 80(12), December, p 136. and Independents, Review of Pacific Basin Financial
Hann, Daniel P (2001). Emerging Issues in US Corporate Markets and Policies, 3(4), December, pp 535-557.
Governance: Are the Recent Reforms Working? Defense Jarrar, Yasar F (2001). Measuring Organizational Effecti-
Counsel Journal , 68(2), April, pp 191-210. veness in the NHS: Management Style and Structure
Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier (2001). The Best Practices, Total Quality Management , 12(7),
End of History for Corporate Law, Georgetown Law December, pp 882-890.
Journal , 89(2), January, pp 439-469. Johnstone, Karla M; Sutton, Michael H and Warfield, Terry
Harvey, K D and Shrieves, Ronald E (2001). Executive D (2001). Antecedents and Consequences on Indepen
Compensation Structure and Corporate Governance dence Risk: Framework for Analysis, Accounting
Choices, Journal of Financial Research, 24(4), Winter, pp Horizons, 15(1), March, pp 1-18
495 - 513. Kahan, Marcel (2001). The Limited Significance of Norms
Hashi, Iraj (2000). The Polish National Investment Fund for Corporate Governance, University of Pennsylvania
Programme: Mass Privatisation with a Difference? Law Review , 149(6), June, pp 1669–1700.
Comparative Economic Studies , 41(1), Spring, pp 87-134. Kakabadse, Andrew and Korac-Kakabadse, Nara (2002).
Helmsing, Bert (2001). Externalities, Learning and Gover- Corporate Governance in South Africa: Evaluation of
nance: New Perspectives on Local Economic Develop- the King II Report, Journal of Change Management, 2(4),
ment, Development and Change, 32(2), March, pp 277- June, pp 305-322.
309. Kang, David L (2000). The Impact of Activist Institutional
Hemraj, M B (2002). Preventing Corporate Failure: The Investors on Performance in Public Corporations: A
Cadbury Committee’s Corporate Governance Report, Study of the U S Fortune 500, 1982-1994, Academy of
Journal of Financial Crime, 10(2), October, pp 141-146. Management Proceedings, pp P1 -P6.
Herrmann, Pol and Datta, Deepak K (2002). CEO Succe- Kanungo, Rabindra N and Mendonca, Manuel (2001).
ssor Characteristics and the Choice of Foreign Market Ethical Leadership and Governance in Organizations:
Entry Mode: An Empirical Study, Journal of International A Preamble, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,
Business Studies , 33 (3), 3rd Quarter, pp 551-570. 18(4), December, pp 241-244.
Ho, Simon S M and Wong, Kar Shun (2001). A Study of the Kapur, Devesh (2000). Expansive Agendas and Weak
Relationship between Corporate Governance Struc- Instruments: Governance and Related Conditionalities
tures and the Extent of Voluntary Disclosure, Journal of International Financial Institutions, Journal of Policy
of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), Reform, 4(3), pp 207-242.
pp 139-157. Keasey, Kevin and Hudson, Robert (2002). Non-executive
Hoskisson, Robert E et al. (2002). Conflicting Voices: The Directors and the Higgs Consultation Paper, ‘Review
Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive
Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Stra- Directors,’ Journal of Financial Regulation and
tegies, Academy of Management Journal, 45 (4), August, Compliance, 10(4), pp 361-372.
pp 697-717. Kiggundu, Moses N (2002). Entrepreneurs and Entre-
Hoschka, T C et al (2002). Better Boards in Thailand, preneurship in Africa: What is Known and What Needs
McKinsey Quarterly, (3), pp 23-28. to be Done, Journal of Developmental Entre- preneurship,
Ingyu, Oh and Hun-Joon, Park (2001). Shooting at a 7(3), October, pp 239-259.
Moving Target: Four Theoretical Problems in Explai- Kirk, Donald J (2000). Experiences with the Public Over-
ning the Dynamics of the Chaebol, Asia Pacific Business sight Board and Corporate Audit Committees, Accoun-

VIKALPA • VOLUME 28 • NO 2 • APRIL - JUNE 2003 151

151
ting Horizons, 14(1), March, pp 103-112. and Eastern Europe, Journal of Management Studies , 39
Klein, April (2002). Economic Determinants of Audit (6), September, pp 823-840.
Committee Independence, Accounting Review, 77 (2), Mar, Pamela and Young, M N (2001). Corporate Gover-
April, pp 435-453. nance in Transition Economies: A Case Study of Two
Knill, Christoph (2001). Private Governance Across Chinese Airlines, Journal of World Business, 36(3), Fall,
Multiple Arenas: European Interest Associations as pp 280-302.
Interface Actors, Journal of European Public Policy, 8(2), Markman, Gideon D; Balkin, David B and Schjoedt, Leon
April, pp 227-247. (2001). Governing the Innovation Process in Entre-
Kochan, Thomas A (2002). Addressing the Crisis in preneurial Firms, Journal of High Technology Mana-
Confidence in Corporations: Root Causes, Victims, gement Research , 12(2), Autumn, pp 273-294.
and Strategies for Reform, Academy of Management Marnburg, Einar (2000). The Behavioural Effects of Cor-
Executive, 16(3), August, pp 139-142. porate Ethical Codes: Empirical Findings and Dis-
Kumar, B.V (2001). Abuse Versus Speculation: The Role cussion, Business Ethics: A European Review, (3), July,
of the Regulatory Authority, Journal of Financial Crime, pp 200-211.
9(1), September, pp 30-40. Matsumoto, Dawn A (2002). Management’s Incentives to
Kwak, Mary (2003). The Advantages of Family Owner- Avoid Negative Earnings Surprises, Accounting Review,
ship, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2), Winter, p 77(3), July, pp 483-515.
12 Mayer, Colin (2000). Corporate Governance in the UK,
Lawler III, Edward E et al. (2002). Adding Value in the Hume Papers on Public Policy, 8(1), pp 1-9.
Boardroom, MIT Sloan Management Review , 43(2), McGregor, Lynn (2002). Improving the Quality and Speed
Winter, pp 96-96. of Decision Making, Journal of Change Management ,
Langevoort, Donald C (2001). The Human Nature of 2(4), June, pp 344-356.
Corporate Boards: Law, Norms, and the Unintended McGregor, Lynn (2001). Making Communication a Stra-
Consequences of Independence and Accountability, tegic Resource in the Boardroom, Strategic Communi-
Georgetown Law Journal, 89(4), April, pp 797-835. cation Management, 5 (6), October/November, pp 6 - 7.
Lavelle, Kathryn C (2000). The International Finance Meyer, Klaus E (2000). International Production Networks
Corporation and the Emerging Market Funds Industry, and Enterprise Transformation in Central Europe,
Third World Quarterly, 21(2), pp 193 -214. Comparative Economic Studies, 41(1), Spring, pp 135 -
Lee, Kyungmook and Pennings, Johannes M (2002). 150.
Mimicry and the Market: Adoption of a New Organi- Michie, Jonathan and Sheehan-Quinn, Maura (2001).
zational Form, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), Labour Market Flexibility, Human Resource Mana-
February, pp 144-163. gement and Corporate Performance, British Journal of
Li, Stan X; Rowley and Timothy, J (2000). Is it Better to be Management, 12(4), December, pp 287-306.
Talented, Popular or Nice? The Roles of Experiential Milhaupt, Curtis J (2001). Creative Norm Destruction:
and Non-experiential Information in Inter-organiza- The Evolution of Non-legal Rules in Japanese Cor-
tional Partner Selection, Academy of Management porate Governance, University of Pennsylvania Law
Proceedings, pp P1 - P6. Review , 149(6), June, pp 2083-2130.
Lynn, Laurence E; Heinrich, Carolyn J and Hill, Carolyn Miller, Danny and Lee, Jangwoo (2001). The People make
J (2000). Studying Governance and Public Manage- the Process: Commitment to Employees, Decision-
ment: Challenges and Prospects, Journal of Public making, and Performance, Journal of Management ,
Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), April, pp 233- 27(2), pp 163-190.
262. Miller, Geoffrey P (2000). Takeovers: English and
Marens, Richard (2002). Inventing Corporate Governance: American, European Financial Management, 6 (4), Dec.
The Emergence of Shareholder Activism in the Miller, Jeffrey B (2000). The First Wave of Mass Privati-
Nineteen-forties, Academy of Management Proceedings, zation in Bulgaria and Its Immediate Aftermath [1],
pp D1-D6. Economics of Transition, 8(1), pp 225-251.
Martin, Roderick (2002). Politicized Managerial Capi- Mishra, Chandra S; Randoy, Trond and Jenssen, Janinge
talism: Enterprise Structures in Post-socialist Central (2001). The Effect of Founding Family Influence on

152 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE I

152
Firm Value and Corporate Governance, Journal of Oz, Effy and Sosik, John J (2000). Why Information
International Financial Management and Accounting , Systems Projects are Abandoned: A Leadership and
12(3), Autumn, pp 235-260. Communication Theory and Exploratory Study, Jour-
Morck, Randall and Nakamura, Masao (2000). Banks, nal of Computer Information Systems , 41(1), Fall, pp 66
Ownership Structure, and Firm Value in Japan, Journal -79.
of Business , 73(4), October, pp 539-568. Pan, Yigang (2002). Equity Ownership in International
Nam, Joo-Ha et al. (2000). Bankruptcy Prediction: Joint Ventures: The Impact of Source Country Factors,
Evidence from Korean Listed Companies During the Journal of International Business Studies , 33(2), 2 nd
IMF Crisis, Journal of International Financial Management Quarter, pp 375-384.
and Accounting , 11(3), October, pp 178-198. Parkinson, John (2000). Corporate Governance: The Com-
Naumann, Klaus-Peter (2001). Financial Reporting pany Law Review and Questions of ‘Scope,’ Hume
Enforcement Mechanisms as an Element of Corporate Papers on Public Policy , 8(1), pp 29-54.
Governance in Germany and Reflections on their Pearson, Gordon (2000). Making Profits and Sweet Music,
Further Development, European Accounting Review, Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(3), July, pp 191-
9(4), December, pp 655-673. 200.
Newell, Roberto and Wilson, Gregory (2002). A Premium Peng, Yusheng (2001). Chinese Villages and Townships
for Good Governance, McKinsey Quarterly, (3) pp 20- as Industrial Corporations: Ownerships, Governance,
23. and Market Discipline, American Journal of Sociology,
Ng, Wilson and de Cock, Christian (2002). Battle in the 106 (5), March, pp 1338-1371.
Boardroom: A Discursive Perspective, Journal of Mana- Pinnington, Ashly and Morris, Timothy (2002). Trans-
gement Studies, 39(1), January, pp 23-50. forming the Architect: Ownership Form and Archetype
Nickerson, Jack A (2002). Towards Reconciling Transaction Change, Organization Studies , 23(2), pp 189-210.
Cost Economics and the Knowledge-based View of Piot, Charles (2001). Agency Costs and Audit Quality:
the Firm: The Context of Inter-firm Collaborations, Evidence from France, European Accounting Review ,
International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9 (1), 10(3), September, pp 461-700.
February, pp 97-116. Pollock, Timothy G et al. (2002). The Role of Power and
Norburn, David and Boyd, Brian K (2000). International Politics in the Repricing of Executive Options, Academy
Corporate Governance Reform, European Business of Management Journal, 45(6), December, pp 172-183.
Journal , 12(3), 3rd Quarter, pp 116-134. Prickett, R (2002). Costing the Earth, Financial Management
Oederberg, Susanne (2002). On the Contradictions of the (CIMA), February, pp 20-21.
New International Financial Architecture: Another Pye, Annie (2002). The Changing Power of Explanations:
Procrustean Bed for Emerging Markets? Third World Directors, Academics and their Sense-making from
Quarterly, 23(4), August, pp 607-621. 1989 to 2000, Journal of Management Studies, 39(7), pp
Olivier, Henri (2001). Challenges Facing the Accountancy 907-926.
Profession, European Accounting Review , 9(4), Pye, Annie (2001). A Study in Studying Corporate Boards
December, pp 603-625. Over Time: Looking Backwards to Move Forwards,
O’Sullivan, Noel (2000). Managers as Monitors: An British Journal of Management, 12 (1), March, pp 33 - 46.
Analysis of the Non-executive Role of Senior Execu- Qian, Sun and Tong, Wilson H S (2002). Malaysia Priva-
tives in UK companies, British Journal of Management, tization: A Comprehensive Study, Financial Manage-
11(1), March, pp 17-30. ment , 31 (4), Winter, pp 79-106.
O’Toole, Laurence J (2000). Research on Policy Imple- Radygin, Alexander and Arkhipov, Sergey (2001). Owner-
mentation: Assessment and Prospects. Journal of Public ship Structure and Financial Position of Firms in
Administration Research and Theory, 10 (2), April, pp Russia; Empirical Analysis, Russian Economic Trends,
263-289. 10(2), June, pp 18-27.
Owen, David L; Swift, Tracey and Hunt, Karen (2001). Rebérioux, Antoine (2002). European Style of Corporate
Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Governance at the Crossroads, Journal of Common
Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Repor- Market Studies, 40(1), March, pp 111-134.
ting, Accounting Forum, 25(3), September, pp 264-283. Rebeiz, Karim S (2001). Corporate Governance and Role

VIKALPA • VOLUME 28 • NO 2 • APRIL - JUNE 2003 153

153
of CEO in Engineering Companies, Journal of Manage- Seth, Anju (2001). The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism: How
ment in Engineering, 17 (1), January/February, pp 14- Institutional Investors can Make Corporate American
24. More Democratic, Academy of Management Review ,
Rezaee, Z (2003). The Six-legged Stool, Strategic Finance, 26(4), October, pp 668-671.
84(8), February, pp 26-30. Short, Helen; Keasey, Keven and Wright, Mike (2000).
Rhoades, Dawna L and Rechner, Paula L (2001). The Role Corporate Governance: Accountability versus Enter-
of Ownership and Corporate Governance Factors in prise, Hume Papers on Public Policy, 8(1), pp 70-92.
International Entry Mode Selection, International Siggelkow, Nicolaj (2002). Evolution Toward Fit, Admi-
Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(4), pp 309-327. nistrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), March, pp 125 -154.
Rock, Edward B and Wachter, Michael L (2001). Islands of Sison, Alejo Jose (2000). Integrated Risk Management and
Conscious Power: Law, Norms, and the Self-governing Global Business Ethics, Business Ethics : A European
Corporation, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Review , 9(4), October, pp 288-295.
149(6), June, pp 1619-1700. Smyth, Russell; Wang, Jianguo and Kiang, Quek Lee
Roper, Juliet (2002). Government, Corporate or Social (2001). Efficiency, Performance and Changing Cor-
Power? The Internet as a Tool in the Struggle for Domi- porate Governance in China’s Township-Village Enter-
nance in Public Policy, Journal of Public Affairs (Henry prises since the 1990s, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature,
Stewart), 2(3), August, pp 113-125. 15(1), May, pp 30-42.
Ryan, Christine and Ng, Chew (2000). Public Sector Cor- Sonnenfeld, Jeffrey A (2002). What Makes Great Boards
porate Governance Disclosures: An Examination of Great, Harvard Business Review, 80(9), September, pp
Annual Reporting Practices in Queensland, Australian 106-114.
Journal of Public Administration , 59(2), June, pp 11-23. Spencer, Tom (2002). Truth and Public Affairs, Journal of
Sadler, Graham J (2002). The Disclosure of Directors’ Share Public Affairs (Henry Stewart), 2(3), August, pp 186-
Option Information in UK Companies, Applied Finan- 190.
cial Economics, 12(2), February, pp 95-103. Starovic, Danka (2003). All Above Board, Financial Mana-
Saracho, Ana I (2002). Patent Licensing under Strategic gement (CIMA), February, pp 18.
Delegation, Journal of Economics and Management Stiles, Philip (2001). The Impact of the Board on Strategy:
Strategy, 11(2), Summer, pp 225-252. An Empirical Examination, Journal of Management
Sargent, John (2001). Getting to Know the Neighbours: Studies , 38(5), July, pp 627-651.
Grupos in Mexico, Business Horizons, 44 (6), Novem- Stoney, Christopher (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or
ber/December, pp 16-25. Utopia? Mapping the Conceptual Terrain, Journal of
Sarkar, Jayati and Sarkar, Subrata (2000). Large Share- Management Studies , 38(5), July, pp 603-637.
holder Activism in Corporate Governance in Deve- Sternberg, Elaine (2000). How the Strategic Framework
loping Countries: Evidence from India, International for UK Company Law Reform Undermines Corporate
Review of Finance, 1(3), September, pp 161 -195. Governance, Hume Papers on Public Policy, 8(1), pp 54-
Sarre, Rick; Doig, Meredith and Fiedler, Brenton (2001). 70.
Reducing the Risk of Corporate Irresponsibility: The Stolzenberg, Edward A (2000). Governance Change for
Trend to Corporate Social Responsibility, Accounting Public Hospitals, Journal of Healthcare Management ,
Forum , 25(3), September, pp 300 - 318. 45(5), September/October, pp 347-351.
Schweitz, David T and Bell, Robert E (2003). Value and Stoesser, Joel W and Hess, Robert C (2000). Styles of Higher
Opportunities for Members, Strategic Finance, 84(8), Return Strategies, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio
February, pp 7-8. Management, 6(4), October/December, pp 417-423.
Sebenius, James K (2002). The Hidden Challenge of Cross- Sundaramurthy, Chamu (2000). Antitakeover Provisions
border Negotiations, Harvard Business Review, 80(3), and Shareholder Value Implications: A Review and a
March, pp 76-85. Contingency Framework, Journal of Management, 26
Seidel, Marc-David L and Westphal, J D (2002). Research (5), pp 1005-1036.
Impact: Social Network Research, Framing, and Sutton, Michael H (2002). Financial Reporting at Cross-
Change in Board Network Ties, Academy of Management roads, Accounting Horizons, 16(4), December, pp 319-
Proceeding, pp L1-L6. 329.

154 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE I

154
Sweeney, Paul and Vallario, Cynthia Waller (2002). NYSE Review , 149(6), June, pp 2179-2191.
Sets Audit Committees on New Road, Journal of Verschoor, Curtis C (2002). New Governance Initiatives
Accountancy , 194 (5), November, pp 51-58. have Ethics Component, Strategic Finance , 84(5),
Swift, Tracey A and Humphrey, Christopher (2000). Great November, pp 22-23.
Expectations: The Dubious Financial Legacy of Quality Vinten, Gerald (2002). Public Sector Corporate Gover-
Audits, British Journal of Management, 11(1), March, nance — The Turnbull Report, Credit Control, 23(1),
pp 31-46. pp 27-31.
Tan, Justin (2002). Impact of Ownership Type on Envi- Vinten, Gerald (2000). Corporate Governance: The Need
ronment-strategy Linkage and Performance: Evidence to Know, Industrial and Commercial Training, 32 (5), pp
from a Transitional Economy, Journal of Management 173-179.
Studies , 39(3), May, pp 333-255. Vinten, G (2000). The Stakeholder Manager, Management
Taylor, Bernard (2001). From Corporate Governance to Decision, 38 (5/6), pp 377-386.
Corporate Entrepreneurship, Journal of Change Mana- Waddock, Sandra (2000). The Multiple Bottom Lines of
gement, 2(2), December, pp 128-148. Corporate Citizenship: Social Investing, Reputation,
Tetlock, Philip E (2000). Cognitive Biases and Organi- and Responsibility Audits, Business and Society Review,
zational Correctives: Do Both Disease and Cure De- 105(3), Fall, pp 323-356.
pend on the Politics of the Beholder? Administrative Warren, Richard C (2002). The Responsible Shareholder:
Science Quarterly, 45 (2), June, pp 293 - 327. A Case Study, Business Ethics: A European Review, 11
Thomas, William C (2002). The Rise and Fall of Enron, (1), January, pp 14-25.
Journal of Accountancy , 193 (4), April, pp 41-48. Watkins, Michael D (2003). Government Games, MIT Sloan
Thompson, Robert B and Smith, Gordon D (2001). Toward Management Review, 44(2),Winter, pp 91-96.
a New Theory of the Shareholder Role: ‘Sacred Space’ Weller, Christian E (2002). Contests for Corporate Control:
in Corporate Takeovers, Texas Law Review , 80(2), Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in
December, pp 261-326. the United States and Germany (Book), Industrial and
Vale, Philip A and Addison, Michael (2002). Promoting Labor Relations Review, 55(2), January, pp 349-350.
Entrepreneurship and Innovation in a Large Company: Westphal, James D and Zajac, Edward J (2001). Decoupling
Creating a Virtual Portfolio, Journal of Change Manage- Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase
ment , 2(4), June, pp 334-343. Programs, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), June,
VanderWalt, Nicholas T et al. (2002). Corporate Gover- pp 202-229.
nance: Implications of Ownership, Performance Req- Wilson, Ian (2000). The New Rules, Strategy & Leadership,
uirements and Strategy, Journal of Change Mana- gement, 28(3), pp 12-17.
2(4), June, pp 319-334. Witherell, William (2002). International Approaches to
VanderWalt, Nicholas and Ingley, Coral (2001). Evaluating Combating Financial Abuse and Promoting Stable
Board Effectiveness: The Changing Context of Strategic Financial Markets, Journal of Money Laundering Control,
Governance, Journal of Change Management, 1(4), pp 5(4), Spring, pp 257-362.
313 - 332. Yeh, Yin-hua; Lee, Tsun-siou and Woidtke, Tracie (2001).
Van Ees, Hans et al. (2003). Board Characteristics and Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence
Corporate Performance in the Netherlands, Eastern from Taiwan, International Review of Finance, 2 (1/2),
Economic Journal , 29(1), Winter, pp 41-59. March/June, pp 21-28.
Varey, Richard J (2001). The Human Face of Corporate Young, Michael N and Buchholtz, Amn K (2002). Firm
Governance, Corporate Reputation Review , 4(2), Performance and CEO Pay: Relational Demography
Summer, pp 186-187. as a Moderator, Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(3), Fall,
Varma, R (2003). An Empirical Examination of Sponsor pp 296-314.
Influence over the Board of Directors, Financial Review, Young, Michael N et al. (2002). Governing the Corporation
38(1), pp 55-77. in Emerging Economies: A Principal-principal Pers-
Veasey, Norman E (2001). Should Corporation Law Inform pective, Academy of Management Proceedings, pp E1-
Aspirations for Good Corporate Governance Prac- E6
tices—or vice versa? University of Pennsylvania Law Zahra, Shaker A; Neubaum, Donald O and Huse, Morten

VIKALPA • VOLUME 28 • NO 2 • APRIL - JUNE 2003 155

155
(2000). Entrepreneurship in Medium-size Companies: Note • This bibliography pertains to articles published between
Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance 2000 and 2003. The second part to be published in the next issue
of Vikalpa would include articles prior to 2000.
Systems, Journal of Management , 26 (5), 947-977.
Zenger, Todd R (2002). Crafting Internal Hybrids:
Complementarities, Common Change Initiatives, and
the Team-based Organization, International Journal of
K Manjunatha is Librarian at T A Pai Management Institute,
the Economics of Business, 9 (1), February, pp 79-95.
Manipal. A Ph.D. from Mangalore University, he has organized
Ziv, Amir (2000). Information Technology and Optimal workshops for librarians and published many articles in Library
Firm Structure, Journal of Accounting Research, 38(2), Science journals.
Autumn, pp 297-329. e-mail: manjunath@tapmi.org

Children are principally the creatures of example—whatever


surrounding adults do, they will do. If we strike them, they will
strike each other. If they see us attempting to govern each other,
they will imitate the same barbarism. If we habitually admit the
fight of sovereignty in each other and in them, they will become
equally respectful of our rights and of each other’s. All these
propositions are probably self evident, yet not one of them is
practicable under the present mixture of the interests and
responsibilities between adults and between parents and children.
To solve the problem of education, children must be surrounded
with equity and must be equitably treated, and each and every
one, parent or child, must be understood to be an individual,
and must have his or her individual rights equitably respected.

Josiah Warren

156 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE I

156

Anda mungkin juga menyukai